Quote:
Originally Posted by
GrenadaRoger
Hold on Roscoe, don't be so quick to judge...
Trump lost money as per tax basis of accounting, but lost as per Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) would undoubtedly be difference and probably less severe...and who is to say that the GAAP loss wasn't according to plan agreed to by investors in Trump's activities?
if anything, the Clinton campaign blasting Trump indicates the Clinton's lack of understanding of the Tax Code,its underlying economic principles and incentives built into the system...not a good person to lead any revision/overhaul of taxation.
Really? You think the Clinton campaign doesnt understand tax code?
Please tell me more things you think. Because I'm pretty sure we are scratching the surface of a deep, dark pool of luridly entertaining stupidity if you honestly believe that.
Because you also said
Quote:
and who is to say that the GAAP loss wasn't according to plan agreed to by investors in Trump's activities
and I want to know more about how people who bought in at $37 a share and got out at seventeen fucking cents a share thought this was a solid plan.
What you probably meant to say, is that the Clinton campaign was willfully misrepresenting the situation to cast Trump glibly fucking his contractors, employees, and investors over for his own purposes in a criminal light. And you would be right.
So lets just pretend you said that. That totally works for me if you're onboard.
Also the real party is apparently about to start, because the word on the streets is that the envelope his ex-wife dox'd to the press also contains some tidbits about his campaign finances that are going to be very, very difficult for middle America to reconcile with his altruist working man messiah shtick.