Quote:
Originally Posted by abrown83
My dick is gonna be so raw.
Printable View
Quote:
Originally Posted by abrown83
My dick is gonna be so raw.
The screencaps I've seen so far show her sucking a 3-inch penis, getting a facial, and fingering her ass.Quote:
Originally Posted by RichardBrodiesCombover.Quote:
Originally Posted by abrown83
My dick is gonna be so raw.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SrslySiriusThe screencaps I've seen so far show her sucking a 3-inch penis, getting a facial, and fingering her ass.Quote:
Originally Posted by RichardBrodiesCombover.
http://i.imgur.com/CCq6IQC.gif
Sonatine, admit I'm right.
It's hilarious that you clowns are jumping for joy over seeing this bitch naked. Can you not see the writing on the wall? How can't you? How dumb are you?
Millions of women are going to be in an uproar over this. Not in an uproar over unrestricted government access to everything in their life... but an uproar over the thought of guys, similar to the guys thrilled about this travesty in this thread, seeing their pussies and their personal information being put out there.
With this one move we have every fan girl of Jennifer Lawrence's faux-rebellious antics plus almost any other 18-40 year old female falling right in line and supporting the restrictions to come. This is such a genius move by the government that I have to give them props. They really couldn't have picked a better actress either. If I was even 1 percent as smart and organized as these guys I'd have a billion dollar bank account and probably own land the size of Rhode Island and have thousands of people working for me.
So now they have half the population almost with this move. Almost every woman possible.
So whose left? The guys.
My prediction is that in the next month or two many men who aren't computer geniuses will be taken hard and the media will play it up huge. There will be stories about millionaires and smaller business type men who have their databases compromised or worse. Like their entire life's work will be taken overnight by hackers and the men will beg for more invasion of privacy the same way that women are about to when this sinks in for them.
Like even people that deny the involvement of the elite in 9/11 to this day who couldn't possibly fathom them sacrificing life for a more important agenda should be able to see this for what it is.
Also this pretty much seals the deal for a democrat being the next pres. Not like that matters to me because its all the same but now it's next to certain.
The National Security Agency deals primarily with data concerning foreign intelligence and counterintelligence.
Oftentimes companies or individuals act incompetently, even at the highest levels. Grab your tongue with your fingers and say Apple.
We're all just people looking for something to do. There is no script.
You place your own chains.
rofl. Simmer down, fag.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Henry
Someone gets it! We will be begging them to shift their concerns!
NSA: "If you faggots hadn't gotten your panties in a twist over the thought of us being all up in your shit then we could have prevented it."
Population: "We're sorry. Please protect me."
Time for another hit........Quote:
Originally Posted by Brittney Griner's Clit
I believe this is Kate Upton's back and the reason why is if you look at the bed sheets closely in that picture and then look at the bed sheets in the photo of her on the bed with the tie between her tits the sheets are identical with the stripes in them.Quote:
Originally Posted by JimmyG_415Is there any proof that picture was her?Quote:
Originally Posted by BeerAndPoker
The other ones, yes, but IMO she would have to come out and verify that one herself.
That was the largest cum "puddle" in history, too.
I think a lot of those just added a nude picture.
Like the one of Audrey plaza, you have 4 pic's where it is obv her, then just a brunette's beaver shot.
If you can't see the face, you can't say it is them. I don't care if the other 4 of 5 pictures in collage are.
I am just going off that information which for me is enough proof but it might not be enough to confirm that for others who might want to look more in depth to draw a conclusion.
Many celebs will continue on saying these are fake photos and not them. It becomes a he say/she say type of thing where we base our opinions off the information we have available in determining what we feel is real and what isn't especially for bad/blurry images.
If a hacker shows enough pictures that can be confirmed then people will lean towards believing most that get leaked from that source even just back shots are real if they have other confirmed photos to go along with those.
Many pictures have information in the "properties" of the picture file that can help assist people in drawing to a conclusion as well if they have enough details. If one or two photos could be proven with very similar details if the had them then you might be able to determine the others to be real as well. Some of that stuff can be edited though.
You misunderstood me.Quote:
Originally Posted by Brittney Griner's ClitQuote:
Originally Posted by Henry
Someone gets it! We will be begging them to shift their concerns!
NSA: "If you faggots hadn't gotten your panties in a twist over the thought of us being all up in your shit then we could have prevented it."
Population: "We're sorry. Please protect me."
Quote:
Originally Posted by HenryYou misunderstood me.Quote:
Originally Posted by Brittney Griner's Clit
No I didn't.
I don't get this though.Quote:
Originally Posted by limitlesTime for another hit........Quote:
Originally Posted by Brittney Griner's Clit
I was surprised at how many pics they all had. Are women in their 20's all pretty much taking 3 selfie nudes (or so) a week?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brittney Griner's Clit
its a collection of basement dweller hackers who have been trading these in various private forums dedicated to these types of shenans for weeks.
and the only interest the NSA has in this is adding the attack vector to their ANT division toolboxes before it gets patched, then building on it to get around the patch.
Sorry, typing out loud, I need another hit...........yeah that's right.
Quote:
Originally Posted by limitles
If you are real please don't do drugs because of an idiot like me.
That makes no sense. If anything happens as a result of this, it will be calls for increased security and privacy on corporate "cloud" systems. That works against the NSA.Quote:
Originally Posted by Brittney Griner's Clit
Not everything has to be a big conspiracy.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DirtyBThat makes no sense. If anything happens as a result of this, it will be calls for increased security and privacy on corporate "cloud" systems. That works against the NSA.Quote:
Originally Posted by Brittney Griner's Clit
Not everything has to be a big conspiracy.
Has this cloud been confirmed as the leak? Admittedly I don't know much about it... but lets say that is where all this came from... Will the public really trust any corporations ability to protect themselves if a company as big and powerful as Apple is viewed as penetrable?
Barry g winning this thread. All his posts are spot on. Sonatine seems dead on with recent post.
So that's it? The Reddit is down?
I held that last hit too long.......
Anyway, you know how women spend hours in the bathroom getting made up and almost as much time
buying cosmetics or shopping for anything they think will make them look better?
I'll bet deep down a good percentage of these hackees aren't worried about these photos but actually kind of like it.
You know how we've been taught, no means yes?
As far as the politics of the shituation, wouldn't Hilary be perfect for taking up the cause and instigating a wave of
estrogen like no other time in history.
We're fucked.
BTW, I believe governments are most often one step behind rather than the opposite.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1N29vkIT3eo
Search "The Fappening" on ThePirateBay.se or other torrent sites.Quote:
Originally Posted by Daly
Last I heard on Reddit is that some collector has a treasure trove of 4,000 celebrity pictures about 2 GB and was working on uploading it to some torrent sites soon.
:popcorn
Word around the water cooler is that the FBI is starting to focus on insider threats, not iphone hacks, "cloud security", so on.
DELETED FROM NET
Has a pretty comprehensive collection of these pics
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThreeBet
Thanks! I'm always offline when the good shit happens.
WARNING: Don't try to download the pics. It's loaded with malware/trojans/evil shit.
LOL @ Verlander cock pics now popping up. Interesting that it appears the Kate Upton photos are all from Verlander's phone, not hers. Also, who is the other chicks sending him nude photos? Ahhh boy
:facepalm
Not that the pic was anything special but Mila Kunis is ageing like a fine wine, def on my top two list.
that mila kunis picture is basically ancient, be warned. in fact a lot of these are old hat.
Based on the response from Apple this sounds dead on. Likely some people held these for a while possibly trading/trying to sell/etc....and someone let the dog out.Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatine
http://business.financialpost.com/20..._lsa=ba6c-d4a9
So sounds like just shitty passwords/reminders/etc.Quote:
The celebrity accounts were “compromised by a very targeted attack on user names, passwords and security questions, a practice that is all too common on the Internet,” the Cupertino, California-based company said in a statement.
On a related note, the McKayla Maroney and Liz Lee photographs were taken when they were minors; they are child pornography, and anyone who has posted any urls or torrents containing the referenced materials in this thread or any other is quite literally guilty child pornography distribution.
I think this could be a career killer for Jlaw....especially if the videos come out. She's really the only a-lister here. I haven't really heard of half those women. Too bad Vergara wasn't included.
:cosbyQuote:
Originally Posted by Pooh
All it will do is impact her ability to get a big payday for on-screen nudity.
I would like Finklestein's opinion on this one.Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatine
Google likely had 1000's of copies of the images on their image search, Tumblr had it, imgur had them. Are they guilty too?
"Person of Interest" had an episode related to this earlier in the year, where a scammer pretended to be a psychologist, and then would trick his patients into revealing the details of their security questions.
So if the question was, "What was your favorite childhood pet?", the guy would ask his patient to close their eyes and picture spending time with their favorite childhood pet, and then ask them to describe everything, including the pet's name. He would then take that information to get into their accounts and steal their money.
While the fake psychologist angle was a bit of a stretch, the show raised a great point that I had long thought was a huge security hole.
Most "security" questions are a joke. The questions are either incredibly easy to guess by just 10 or so tries ("What color was your first car?"), easy to look up through public database searches ("What street did you grow up on?"), or answers easily found on google ("What was the mascot of your high school?")
Even the tougher questions can be easy to guess or acquire through reading social media posts, with questions such as "What was the name of your first boyfriend or girlfriend?"
Paris Hilton's phone was hacked because she laughably chose a security question regarding the name of her CURRENT dog, which was widely known.
These "security questions" should be eliminated and replaced with something much less vulnerable. Even the best security questions can be compromised through some convincing social engineering, especially on social media.
Also, I am guessing something similar was done regarding security question guessing, to where a really weird Canadian woman was able to "hack" and double-catfish basketball player Chris "Birdman" Andersen.
This story got surprisingly little publicity (especially the resolution), probably because it was too difficult for the general public to understand.
http://pokerfraudalert.com/forum/sho...l=1#post212164
Edit: After reading it again, it was probably phishing rather than password resetting through security questions, but my point still remains that it's far too easy to get into celebrity accounts online.
Quote:
Originally Posted by simpdogI would like Finklestein's opinion on this one.Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatine
Google likely had 1000's of copies of the images on their image search, Tumblr had it, imgur had them. Are they guilty too?
All the above have SLA's with law enforcement with regards to both the removal of illegal content and the archiving of access logs for it.
So no, they are not in violation of their SLA (yet, to my knowledge), and yes, all the people viewing those images are guilty of access child pornography and are, in the eyes of the law, sex offenders.
Additionally people have been arrested/fired/lost security clearance because a *pop up* for a sketchy porn site had an underaged girl in a thumbnail.
100% true.
Will anyone here admit to actually having jerked off to any of these pictures?
so, the standard MO has been using a simple brute force script to compromise iphone/icloud credentials, and using a piece of software designed for law enforcement to back up the entire cloud dataset called eppb to grab the archive.