Oh they've been having war parties on that beach since at least 1044. Your rhetoric has little or nothing to do with the subject, but thanks for playing.
Printable View
the fact that at the culmination of their suicide pact, she was able to shoot him but he was unable to shoot her is very interesting, in terms of gender psychology.
Well, she did manage to raise the body count by one (the guy at Walmart) and stave off their own deaths for a short time.
The Walmart guy was carrying a weapon and was going to stop them, but he thought it was a single male shooter, so he took his eyes off of her and she blew him away.
This girl was only 22, by the way. Probably some dumb/impressionable girl with issues who was impressed with this Jerad idiot and all of his ramblings. She was cold enough to straight up murder people and then take both of their lives, though, so I can't just classify her as a brainwashed follower.
did i miss something? according to the narrative on the radio, she shot him then shot herself.
the cops probably aired them both out before approaching however. this is standard when an armed subject refuses to heed requests to disarm, be it due to insolence or death.
You did. Cops said there was initial confusion as to who killed who.
http://www.cnn.com/2014/06/11/justic...html?hpt=hp_t2
word, there has been a lot of interesting work done regarding how women are basically able to tap into a primal place that green lights much higher levels of savage violence. its tied into a place in the human mind related directly to defending their young, is the theory.
eg: there is nothing a woman wont do to protect her offspring, and that sense of moral polarity is ... less accessible to males.
also just for context, i think the impetus/context for that study came from social workers etc trying to understand why attacks in womens institutions, especially for younger women, were such a quantum leap in violence, intensity, and savagery compared to attacks in mens institutions.
also just to lend some more depth to that concept; a woman carries a child for 9 months, a man can basically sire a new child every 30 minutes, 12-16 hours a day.
except for gary since his t-count is so low.
Millions died from many countries, to defend the right of 4D to talk bollocks.
fuck and here I was speaking German this morning like a world war loser
So in this thread I'm supposed to believe that someone like Sonatine truly believes the news. I'm supposed to believe that he believes that the richest most powerful men who control everything including the media and government do not have an agenda and are here to give an accurate portrayal of events to the masses. I'm supposed to believe that he thinks the government is beyond false flags. I'm supposed to believe that after 13 years of dissection of 9/11 that he thinks it was some Arabs that weren't aligned with the elite. I'm supposed to believe that he thinks we are somehow above false flags and manipulation. I've said before that he could be the best disinfo agent ever but if you combine these posts with his body of work it becomes incredibly obvious that he doesn't believe his own words.
And absolutely the most mind boggling of all I'm supposed to believe that he honestly cares about the life of two pigs. The absolute lowest of low members of society... when a murder occurs every minute and tens of thousands of CHILDREN have been killed specifically by drone strikes. My Dad always told me that if my life was bad and I had nothing left I could always become the town Sherriff.
Cops are generally good people and terrorists literally did 9/11.