i love how the diamond heart of this conspiracy is the amount of money hunter got paid, and it was so effective because team retard had no idea people on boards get paid that much money.
Printable View
Druff: Also, how 'bout that Twitter trying to suppress the story?
Also Druff: I just deleted 14 low quality posts here.
in part, but it really centers around the fact that it was a nobody, with no experience or knowledge of anything to do with the Ukraine or energy who was earning that money on the board. that and his trying to get 30 million for doing nothing more than introducing Chinese businessmen to his father. they impeached trump for essentially this.
It's not fair to call this a conspiracy. Elaborate interpretations of the emails and text messages maybe, but at the very least there is much more to the story.
The bigger issue that they are hinting around at is that Biden might be the "the big guy" and "chairman" referenced in term of payments etc., this is why Giuliani went on television with a print out of a Hunter text saying that Joe takes half of their salaries. Apparently this was just the tip of the leaks.
Also, are we going to pretend like Twitter shouldn't burn for trying to censor this story?
Ok but to be clear, the story from this leaked email is that joe met with his son’s coworker, ostensibly to show the guy how much influence hunter has. We don’t even know the purpose of the meeting
While it’s not good for people to use public positions like this, even assuming this meeting was inappropriate, this is what politicians do every single day, all day long...
actually forget just politicians — this is what all of us who are decision-makers at work do every single day
anyone think trump got into Penn based on merit?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G-iA9LOtK5s
So are these black people fake or real?
they're real fuckin stupid, that much seems evident.
Ya the blacks at BLM rallies are much more thoughtful and unemotional...........
Rupert Murdoch Predicts a Landslide Win for Biden
https://www.thedailybeast.com/fox-ne...biden?ref=home
Biden will probably get at least 10 million more votes than Trump.Quote:
President Trump’s influential supporter Rupert Murdoch is telling close associates he believes Joe Biden will win the election in a landslide.
But just because you get more votes doesn't make you a winner. Just ask Al Gore and Hillary Clinton.
There are still plenty of ways Trump can cheat.
Florida is only going to count enough votes to declare Donald Trump the winner.
It doesn't really matter what happens on November 3rd.
It matters what happens on December 14th when the electors who actually vote for President are asked to disregard Biden’s win and vote for Trump instead.
https://int.nyt.com/applications/ele...2016-10-18.png
New York Times poll prediction
suburban women hopping aboard the :train
Most men will vote for Biden.
Most women will vote for Biden.
If this was a fair election Trump would have no chance but by getting the least amount of votes, Trump thinks he can win again.
https://bloximages.chicago2.vip.town...ize=1200%2C917
Twitter is a fucking trainwreck. They do stupid shit, and then they bend themselves into a pretzel trying to explain their actions, which just makes everything worse. This happens over and over with them, and they always get destroyed in the replies when they try it.
So here was yesterday:
https://twitter.com/TwitterSafety/st...25303930458115
https://twitter.com/TwitterSafety/st...25305796980737
https://twitter.com/TwitterSafety/st...25307441147907
https://twitter.com/TwitterSafety/st...25309412306945
So this explanation was obviously bullshit. For example, they had no problem with people sharing the NY Times article about Donald Trump's illegally obtained tax returns, but here they found the Hunter Biden story objectionable, even though there was no evidence any "hacking" was involved. (I will admit that it's possible that hacking was really the source of this, but the NY Post article didn't make a single mention of hacking!)
Well, they got absolutely ripped apart in the comments, and almost nobody believed the excuses given above. So today we got this:
https://twitter.com/vijaya/status/1316923549236551680
https://twitter.com/vijaya/status/1316923552549998594
https://twitter.com/vijaya/status/1316923555616116741
https://twitter.com/vijaya/status/1316923558606622720
https://twitter.com/vijaya/status/1316923561957875712
Pathetic.
They should have just said it was an overzealous employee who made an error in judgment, that they disciplined that employee, and that they will not censor news stories ever again.