So coronavirus is definitely going to kill a few of us.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by duped_samaritan

You're a climate change denier, covid conspiracy theory spreader, Trump apologist that has no problem rejecting the findings of experts and just pretending it doesn't exist or replacing it with your own idea that you just came up with in your head. So yeah. And if we could go back to 2015 and describe your future self to your 2015 self - I think you'd agree that you ignore facts and studies - at least on the pandemic stuff.

---

I'm not a climate change denier. Not sure where you're getting that one. I don't spread COVID conspiracy theories. I stated that I believe it came from a lab -- something impossible to prove or disprove, but everyone sane admits is a realistic possibility. Note that "came from a lab" doesn't mean "developed in a lab", but simply that the culprit for COVID spreading was a lab.

Which COVID studies have I ignored? The left has been incredibly anti-science with many COVID policies and beliefs, which is why Nate Silver (a Democrat) finally spoke out. In the cases where the right has been anti-science regarding COVID, I have also called it out, on both the forum and radio show.

You claim I "ignore facts and studies", but that sounds like projection to me. For example, you just posted a chart of black COVID vaccination rates as "proof" black people are somehow given a lesser opportunity for vaccination. Yet you didn't even take a moment to ask yourself WHY the black vaccination rates are lower. Did you not realize that perhaps they're simply choosing not to get it?

Seems like all you want to do is post some skewed statistics to prove your woke worldview, pat yourself on the back, and walk away believing you pwned the right.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by duped_samaritan

You bend over backwards a hell of a lot more to stop scammers. How guilty do you feel when someone else gets scammed?

What would you say to someone that accused you of virtue signaling or doing it only out of guilt?

I honestly believe it takes quite a bit of ignorance to think that systemic racism in America is a myth. I don't think it means you hate minorities are are bad person. I just think whatever echo chamber you're stuck in has blinded you from the reality that is American history - slavery just isn't far enough behind us yet and it won't be in our life time. Think about the fact that when you were born there were still living Americans who were born slaves with hundreds of years of slavery before them. When do you think systemic racism disappeared?

---

Systemic racism is different than racism.

Of course instances of racism still exist in the US. Systemic racism is different -- it's the belief that the entire system has racism implanted into it, and that blacks simply cannot get ahead unless we tear everything down and redo it.

The problem is that taking the "everything's racist" line as a white person is intellectually and morally lazy. Sure, it's easy to cast your own race as privileged and auto-accept every theory that negative outcomes for black people are the result of racism. It's a lot tougher to look at these theories critically and separate the truth from the trash. The former allows you to look sensitive and empathetic, the latter risks being cast as a racist or an insensitive jerk.

All claims need to hold up to scrutiny. You can't just believe claims because they're about a purported victim class.

For example, why are black men incarcerated at so much of a higher rate than white people? Is it because they're committing more violent crimes? Is the justice system racist? Is the vast increase of black fatherless homes somewhat to blame? Where does poverty figure into this, and whose fault is the poverty?

These are complex questions, which require honest and complex answers. Simply answering the above with, "Because society is systemically racist" doesn't solve anything, nor is it honest.

But that answer is very woke, and it allows you to pat yourself really hard on the back for being sensitive to the plight of the victim classes. I honestly believe you swallow all of this nonsense because you feel some guilt for your status in life, and want to see those struggling get help. However, knee-jerk acceptance of 2020s woke extremism isn't going to change anything, except for the worse.

I know you get razzed about Jussie a lot here, but it's a microcosm of your entire problem. When Jussie came forward with his outlandish claims, most of us looked at it with extreme skepticism, because the story had huge holes. You looked at it with trust and empathy. You felt too much and thought too little. You need to get away from that.

So a lady in her mid 70’s who is at my gym 5 days a week faithfully went Friday for her covid vaccine. She hasn’t been back to the gym since. I think there are many unreported issues with the vaccine because it doesn’t fit the media agenda.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Es04NS5W...g&name=900x900

So many people I know who are young/healthy are getting hooked up with shots from local clinics, because of all the extra shots that are going to expire and get thrown out anyways. My wife got both her shots already legitly, as she is a healthcare worker. I am still doing Instacart, so I am not sure if I am eligible or not. If I am not yet, I probably should be soon. But there is no fucking way I am spending hours online trying to get appointments or standing in line, so probably won't happen anytime soon. And my wife has no interest in trying to pull any strings and get me the shots. She says her work is weirdly strict about that and they would rather throw away shots than let employees hook up family/friend.

If you catch COVID and fear death, try remembering that a 116-year-old got it in January and survived:

https://apnews.com/article/europe-co...16760297f9f6c0

It's unlikely that anyone will beat her record, because there's only one person on earth who is older than she is.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kalam

So many people I know who are young/healthy are getting hooked up with shots from local clinics, because of all the extra shots that are going to expire and get thrown out anyways. My wife got both her shots already legitly, as she is a healthcare worker. I am still doing Instacart, so I am not sure if I am eligible or not. If I am not yet, I probably should be soon. But there is no fucking way I am spending hours online trying to get appointments or standing in line, so probably won't happen anytime soon. And my wife has no interest in trying to pull any strings and get me the shots. She says her work is weirdly strict about that and they would rather throw away shots than let employees hook up family/friend.

---

How much life insurance does she have on you? Just kidding. I think it's wrong that they would rather throw away doses of vaccine instead of giving them to willing Guinea pigs, Er I mean people. It's bad policy. And it actual delays herd immunity. But, seriously, how much life insurance does he have on you?

I'm afraid to do the "extra vaccine chasing" thing because I don't know if I will get a second one. I want to do it right, or not at all.

If I knew I'd qualify for a second one once securing the first, I would put in some effort to chase the first -- though I wouldn't stand on hourslong lines or any bullshit like that.

GIVE THE MAN AN EMMY

https://twitter.com/JimmyVielkind/st...05854906515457

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

I'm afraid to do the "extra vaccine chasing" thing because I don't know if I will get a second one. I want to do it right, or not at all.

If I knew I'd qualify for a second one once securing the first, I would put in some effort to chase the first -- though I wouldn't stand on hourslong lines or any bullshit like that.

---

Wait a minute. For nearly a year you have been bunkered in your house and won't even order a pizza for fears of being infected, which is absurd. But now there is a vaccine you are questioning the second shot like an anti-vaxer or refusing to wait in a line.

Let's face it, you like the lockdowns in CA. You won't be voting for a Newsome recall for sure.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tgull

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

I'm afraid to do the "extra vaccine chasing" thing because I don't know if I will get a second one. I want to do it right, or not at all.

If I knew I'd qualify for a second one once securing the first, I would put in some effort to chase the first -- though I wouldn't stand on hourslong lines or any bullshit like that.

---

Wait a minute. For nearly a year you have been bunkered in your house and won't even order a pizza for fears of being infected, which is absurd. But now there is a vaccine you are questioning the second shot like an anti-vaxer or refusing to wait in a line.

Let's face it, you like the lockdowns in CA. You won't be voting for a Newsome recall for sure.

---

I interpreted his post as meaning he is concerned he won’t be able to get a 2nd shot and will be stuck on 1 indefinitely, not he is questioning the shot.

Democrats in the Bay Area sciencing so well!!!!

https://twitter.com/zeynep/status/1359497097767227397

https://www.cnn.com/2021/02/10/healt...ess/index.html

Curious if anyone here does/plans to double mask and/or “knot”.

I’m very careful with COVID, haven’t had it, and stay locked down still most of the time. I’m more likely to double mask than knot, but probably won’t do either to be honest.

Half the people don’t even wear their mask right with one. Their nose is hanging out. The equivalent of putting on a pair of pants but having your dick hang over the top. If people would all wear their one mask right, it would be a win.

RFK Jr banned from Instagram for being an anti-vaxxer.

https://www.cnn.com/2021/02/10/tech/...ban/index.html

I am not an anti-vaxxer sympathizer. I think they're morons -- and not just about the COVID vaccine.

However, I do not support suppressing their speech. That sets a terrible precedent, as it will prevent people from speaking out against vaccines which actually could be harmful in the future (as some have been in the past). The way to counter false information is to present true information in response. You don't suppress the false information, or otherwise you make it look like you're covering up something.

The whole recent movement of "we're only going to suppress misinformation" is incredibly dangerous to a free society.

BTW, I believe my shingles in 2010 was caused by a bad reaction to the TDaP booster vaccine. Ironically my need for the TDaP booster was anti-vaxxers refusing to vaccinate their kids, which brought back a dead disease (pertussis). However, I found some convincing albeit anecdotal evidence that the TDaP vaccine did carry a shingles risk with it -- something even the anti-vaxxers didn't claim.

Still, I am pro-vaccination, as should anyone with common sense.

I do think there's a reasonable case to be made against the COVID vaccines for the following groups:

- People under 25 may not want to take it at all
- People under 35 may want to wait longer before taking it, until more is known about its long term effects
- People wanting to have children (who will mostly be young anyway) may not want to take it right now, as its effects on fertility is unknown

However, for people like me (near 50 with no concern about fertility), it should be obvious to take the vaccine.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MrWallace

https://www.cnn.com/2021/02/10/healt...ess/index.html

Curious if anyone here does/plans to double mask and/or “knot”.

I’m very careful with COVID, haven’t had it, and stay locked down still most of the time. I’m more likely to double mask than knot, but probably won’t do either to be honest.

Half the people don’t even wear their mask right with one. Their nose is hanging out. The equivalent of putting on a pair of pants but having your dick hang over the top. If people would all wear their one mask right, it would be a win.

---

Zero point zero chance I'm doing this shit.

I have just about no exposure, so I'm really only masking to put people's minds at ease. I know I'm not transmitting.

But one mask is where I draw the line.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by duped_samaritan

You're a climate change denier, covid conspiracy theory spreader, Trump apologist that has no problem rejecting the findings of experts and just pretending it doesn't exist or replacing it with your own idea that you just came up with in your head. So yeah. And if we could go back to 2015 and describe your future self to your 2015 self - I think you'd agree that you ignore facts and studies - at least on the pandemic stuff.

---

I'm not a climate change denier. Not sure where you're getting that one. I don't spread COVID conspiracy theories. I stated that I believe it came from a lab -- something impossible to prove or disprove, but everyone sane admits is a realistic possibility. Note that "came from a lab" doesn't mean "developed in a lab", but simply that the culprit for COVID spreading was a lab.

Which COVID studies have I ignored? The left has been incredibly anti-science with many COVID policies and beliefs, which is why Nate Silver (a Democrat) finally spoke out. In the cases where the right has been anti-science regarding COVID, I have also called it out, on both the forum and radio show.

You claim I "ignore facts and studies", but that sounds like projection to me. For example, you just posted a chart of black COVID vaccination rates as "proof" black people are somehow given a lesser opportunity for vaccination. Yet you didn't even take a moment to ask yourself WHY the black vaccination rates are lower. Did you not realize that perhaps they're simply choosing not to get it?

Seems like all you want to do is post some skewed statistics to prove your woke worldview, pat yourself on the back, and walk away believing you pwned the right.

---

Embedded Tweet

Is Biden really trying to get bill from preventing traffic in and out of Florida? Just a rumor?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FRANKRIZZO

Is Biden really trying to get bill from preventing traffic in and out of Florida? Just a rumor?

---

Did you ever hear of a trial balloon? Wait for CNN to start pushing the idea over the next few weeks or months. They are just waiting for the #'s to go up post Super Bowl and Spring Break. It's not a good look for NY and California if Florida's economy is thriving and the #'s are similar of better than California and NY. But, they will have many problems with it. 1) is it Constitutional? 2) How can you have open borders for illegals to come in and yet restrict travel to and from a state?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TheXFactor

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

I'm not a climate change denier. Not sure where you're getting that one. I don't spread COVID conspiracy theories. I stated that I believe it came from a lab -- something impossible to prove or disprove, but everyone sane admits is a realistic possibility. Note that "came from a lab" doesn't mean "developed in a lab", but simply that the culprit for COVID spreading was a lab.

Which COVID studies have I ignored? The left has been incredibly anti-science with many COVID policies and beliefs, which is why Nate Silver (a Democrat) finally spoke out. In the cases where the right has been anti-science regarding COVID, I have also called it out, on both the forum and radio show.

You claim I "ignore facts and studies", but that sounds like projection to me. For example, you just posted a chart of black COVID vaccination rates as "proof" black people are somehow given a lesser opportunity for vaccination. Yet you didn't even take a moment to ask yourself WHY the black vaccination rates are lower. Did you not realize that perhaps they're simply choosing not to get it?

Seems like all you want to do is post some skewed statistics to prove your woke worldview, pat yourself on the back, and walk away believing you pwned the right.

---

Embedded Tweet

---

Glad to know the WHO is on the case, a very reputable organization, which runs completely independently of the CCP. Also, Taiwan doesn't exist.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by v12cl

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TheXFactor

Embedded Tweet

---

Glad to know the WHO is on the case, a very reputable organization, which runs completely independently of the CCP. Also, Taiwan doesn't exist.

---

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Et-H8FFV...g&name=900x900

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dwai

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by v12cl

Glad to know the WHO is on the case, a very reputable organization, which runs completely independently of the CCP. Also, Taiwan doesn't exist.

---

---

:shock

PSA- I don’t know how it will work State by State. If you are in New York you can now get the Vaccine if you are 65+ or you have a pre-existing condition. The list of conditions is long af and includes hypertension, diabetes, etc. Forget about the website. Only the phone operators have the capability of reserving a slot that just opened up b/c of a cancellation. Online you have no shot.

So I called 18336974829 and asked for a call back. When you get the call back hopefully you will get someone who will wait as cancellations come up and try and grab them. I was able to make an appointment for this Friday at a place very close to where I am staying. Prior to this online I was only able to reserve a slot two months from now with a 6 hour drive upstate. As dates get close people cancel. This is the way to get it done. Hope this helps.

FOLLOW THE SCIENCE YALL

In a press conference today Dr. Fauci said "Cancelling the Keystone Pipeline was essential in setting the stage for reopening the schools. Now if we can pass the $15 minimum wage it will definitely lead to the schools reopening."

And in other news my group 1B is now eligible to take the vaccine. I should be getting an appointment by tomorrow for anywhere between Feb 22 and Mar 6.

Facui appeared in some segment on my local cable channel where they buy some fail LA Times broadcast.

The interviewer asked him why it's safe for kids to return to school, even though they're not getting vaccinated.

Instead of saying, "Almost no kids under 15 are dying of this. And the very few kids dying are ones with known major medical conditions", he spouted a bunch of nonsense about how classrooms are cleaning, making kids use hand sanitizer, and making kids mask.

lol wut

The "COVID doesn't spread much or at all on surfaces" conclusion is now about 10 months old, and masking doesn't help much if you're spending a ton of time indoors in a crowded room.

The reason it's safe to return kids is because kids aren't at danger from COVID!

Fauci didn't make one mention of how kids almost never get more than mildly sick from it.

Why is this 80-year-old fart still the face of the coronavirus response? Embarrassing.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

Facui appeared in some segment on my local cable channel where they buy some fail LA Times broadcast.

The interviewer asked him why it's safe for kids to return to school, even though they're not getting vaccinated.

Instead of saying, "Almost no kids under 15 are dying of this. And the very few kids dying are ones with known major medical conditions", he spouted a bunch of nonsense about how classrooms are cleaning, making kids use hand sanitizer, and making kids mask.

lol wut

The "COVID doesn't spread much or at all on surfaces" conclusion is now about 10 months old, and masking doesn't help much if you're spending a ton of time indoors in a crowded room.

The reason it's safe to return kids is because kids aren't at danger from COVID!

Fauci didn't make one mention of how kids almost never get more than mildly sick from it.

Why is this 80-year-old fart still the face of the coronavirus response? Embarrassing.

---

hate to burst your hypochondriac bubble here Druff, but mostly everybody doesn't get more than "mildly sick" from this, I can't believe how hard you've swallowed this bullshit

https://twitter.com/JaniceDean/statu...74701606776835

European CDC is saying what I've been saying all along about masking:

It can't hurt, and it probably helps a little, but it really doesn't make that much of a difference.

https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/public...9-transmission

Quote:

---

Executive summary

The role of face masks in the control and prevention of COVID-19 remains an issue of debate. Prior to COVID-19, most studies assessing the effectiveness of face masks as a protective measure in the community came from studies on influenza, which provided little evidence to support their use.



Assessment of the evidence

The evidence regarding the effectiveness of medical face masks for the prevention of COVID-19 in the community is compatible with a small to moderate protective effect, but there are still significant uncertainties about the size of this effect. Evidence for the effectiveness of non-medical face masks, face shields/visors and respirators in the community is scarce and of very low certainty.

---

But that doesn't stop Joe Biden from posting condescending bullshit like this:

https://twitter.com/POTUS/status/1361736716948811777



"Mask up" irritates me -- and has for many months, not just because Biden tweeted it yesterday. It reeks of condescension, and furthers the false sense of security which leads people into COVID-dangerous situations, feeling safe because of mask wearing.

Norway, with very little mask use, did fairly well during the pandemic. This is now believed to be the result of people taking social distancing seriously, which is far more important than masking.

The Democrats don't want to be honest about masking's weak effectiveness, because they have been using the mask thing to attack Trump and Republicans.

SCIENCE!!!!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

European CDC is saying what I've been saying all along about masking:

It can't hurt, and it probably helps a little, but it really doesn't make that much of a difference.

https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/public...9-transmission

Quote:

---

Executive summary

The role of face masks in the control and prevention of COVID-19 remains an issue of debate. Prior to COVID-19, most studies assessing the effectiveness of face masks as a protective measure in the community came from studies on influenza, which provided little evidence to support their use.



Assessment of the evidence

The evidence regarding the effectiveness of medical face masks for the prevention of COVID-19 in the community is compatible with a small to moderate protective effect, but there are still significant uncertainties about the size of this effect. Evidence for the effectiveness of non-medical face masks, face shields/visors and respirators in the community is scarce and of very low certainty.

---

But that doesn't stop Joe Biden from posting condescending bullshit like this:

https://twitter.com/POTUS/status/1361736716948811777



"Mask up" irritates me -- and has for many months, not just because Biden tweeted it yesterday. It reeks of condescension, and furthers the false sense of security which leads people into COVID-dangerous situations, feeling safe because of mask wearing.

Norway, with very little mask use, did fairly well during the pandemic. This is now believed to be the result of people taking social distancing seriously, which is far more important than masking.

The Democrats don't want to be honest about masking's weak effectiveness, because they have been using the mask thing to attack Trump and Republicans.

SCIENCE!!!!

---

Our new republican governor Gianforte has relaxed the mask mandate effective last friday but is recommending we keep wearing them. Local jurisdictions have the power to continue the mask mandate.

We've dropped from a 7 day average in Nov of 1100 new cases a day to under 200 cases a day. 99,000 people out of a population of 1,068,000 have had covid. And 120,000 people, a little over 11%, have had at least first time vaccine shots.

In the meantime, the Democrats and media want you to wear masks for eternity because...

.... um...

science?

https://twitter.com/VPrasadMDMPH/sta...13313881620483

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

In the meantime, the Democrats and media want you to wear masks for eternity because...

.... um...

science?

https://twitter.com/VPrasadMDMPH/sta...13313881620483

---

Now Go ahead and try to get that Thomas Dolby song out of your head.

Kary Banks Mullis (December 28, 1944 – August 7, 2019) was an American biochemist. In recognition of his invention of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique, he shared the 1993 Nobel Prize in Chemistry with Michael Smith[4] and was awarded the Japan Prize in the same year. His invention became a central technique in biochemistry and molecular biology, described by The New York Times as "highly original and significant, virtually dividing biology into the two epochs of before PCR and after PCR.

This guy has stated this wasn't an accurate diagnostic tool despite it's efficacy in other applications, don't remember where I read this but he credited at least partially psilocybin mushrooms in helping him developing this idea.

Here he is slam dunking on Dr Faggot.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BAA_DAStP0

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ok25

Kary Banks Mullis (December 28, 1944 – August 7, 2019) was an American biochemist. In recognition of his invention of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique, he shared the 1993 Nobel Prize in Chemistry with Michael Smith[4] and was awarded the Japan Prize in the same year. His invention became a central technique in biochemistry and molecular biology, described by The New York Times as "highly original and significant, virtually dividing biology into the two epochs of before PCR and after PCR.

This guy has stated this wasn't an accurate diagnostic tool despite it's efficacy in other applications, don't remember where I read this but he credited at least partially psilocybin mushrooms in helping him developing this idea.

Here he is slam dunking on Dr Faggot.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BAA_DAStP0

---

Being extra smart he died before Covid-19. The clip is likely from mid 90s and refers to hiv/aids. He didn't believe there was a connection.

Oh and he is saying it's not effective for hiv/aids. Appears to work just fine for Covid-19.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by gimmick

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ok25

Kary Banks Mullis (December 28, 1944 – August 7, 2019) was an American biochemist. In recognition of his invention of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique, he shared the 1993 Nobel Prize in Chemistry with Michael Smith[4] and was awarded the Japan Prize in the same year. His invention became a central technique in biochemistry and molecular biology, described by The New York Times as "highly original and significant, virtually dividing biology into the two epochs of before PCR and after PCR.

This guy has stated this wasn't an accurate diagnostic tool despite it's efficacy in other applications, don't remember where I read this but he credited at least partially psilocybin mushrooms in helping him developing this idea.

Here he is slam dunking on Dr Faggot.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BAA_DAStP0

---

Being extra smart he died before Covid-19. The clip is likely from mid 90s and refers to hiv/aids. He didn't believe there was a connection.

Oh and he is saying it's not effective for hiv/aids. Appears to work just fine for Covid-19.

---

no it doesn't

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

European CDC is saying what I've been saying all along about masking:

It can't hurt, and it probably helps a little, but it really doesn't make that much of a difference.

https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/public...9-transmission

Quote:

---

Executive summary

The role of face masks in the control and prevention of COVID-19 remains an issue of debate. Prior to COVID-19, most studies assessing the effectiveness of face masks as a protective measure in the community came from studies on influenza, which provided little evidence to support their use.



Assessment of the evidence

The evidence regarding the effectiveness of medical face masks for the prevention of COVID-19 in the community is compatible with a small to moderate protective effect, but there are still significant uncertainties about the size of this effect. Evidence for the effectiveness of non-medical face masks, face shields/visors and respirators in the community is scarce and of very low certainty.

---

But that doesn't stop Joe Biden from posting condescending bullshit like this:

https://twitter.com/POTUS/status/1361736716948811777



"Mask up" irritates me -- and has for many months, not just because Biden tweeted it yesterday. It reeks of condescension, and furthers the false sense of security which leads people into COVID-dangerous situations, feeling safe because of mask wearing.

Norway, with very little mask use, did fairly well during the pandemic. This is now believed to be the result of people taking social distancing seriously, which is far more important than masking.

The Democrats don't want to be honest about masking's weak effectiveness, because they have been using the mask thing to attack Trump and Republicans.

SCIENCE!!!!

---

Literally nothing has changed. Masks have small to moderate effect alone. Social distancing has small to moderate effect alone. No one has said anything else at any point.

Norway was at 40% mask usage week ago. They did well last year because they only had half a flu season and people followed very simple guidance. There wasn't a good reason to use masks just incase because they don't do anything when barely no one is infected. Now they have a reason to use masks and they do use them.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dwai

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

Facui appeared in some segment on my local cable channel where they buy some fail LA Times broadcast.

The interviewer asked him why it's safe for kids to return to school, even though they're not getting vaccinated.

Instead of saying, "Almost no kids under 15 are dying of this. And the very few kids dying are ones with known major medical conditions", he spouted a bunch of nonsense about how classrooms are cleaning, making kids use hand sanitizer, and making kids mask.

lol wut

The "COVID doesn't spread much or at all on surfaces" conclusion is now about 10 months old, and masking doesn't help much if you're spending a ton of time indoors in a crowded room.

The reason it's safe to return kids is because kids aren't at danger from COVID!

Fauci didn't make one mention of how kids almost never get more than mildly sick from it.

Why is this 80-year-old fart still the face of the coronavirus response? Embarrassing.

---

hate to burst your hypochondriac bubble here Druff, but mostly everybody doesn't get more than "mildly sick" from this, I can't believe how hard you've swallowed this bullshit

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by gimmick

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ok25

Kary Banks Mullis (December 28, 1944 – August 7, 2019) was an American biochemist. In recognition of his invention of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique, he shared the 1993 Nobel Prize in Chemistry with Michael Smith[4] and was awarded the Japan Prize in the same year. His invention became a central technique in biochemistry and molecular biology, described by The New York Times as "highly original and significant, virtually dividing biology into the two epochs of before PCR and after PCR.

This guy has stated this wasn't an accurate diagnostic tool despite it's efficacy in other applications, don't remember where I read this but he credited at least partially psilocybin mushrooms in helping him developing this idea.

Here he is slam dunking on Dr Faggot.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BAA_DAStP0

---

Being extra smart he died before Covid-19. The clip is likely from mid 90s and refers to hiv/aids. He didn't believe there was a connection.

Oh and he is saying it's not effective for hiv/aids. Appears to work just fine for Covid-19.

---

and you are? LOL what a fucking clown.

Regardless gimmick you just ignored how much of a fraud he stated Fauci is even saying he lies to the public and doesn't know anything, a nobel prize winning legend in his field vs your anonymous opinion. Shut the fuck up.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ok25

Regardless gimmick you just ignored how much of a fraud he stated Fauci is even saying he lies to the public and doesn't know anything, a nobel prize winning legend in his field vs your anonymous opinion. Shut the fuck up.

---

Ok. I guess that qualifies as a response.

That was 25 years ago and the context of it was him defending his position that HIV doesn't cause AIDS.

ps. choke on a bag of dicks

Since apparently Wikipedia is a decent source for introducing this rocket scientist, here's the fun part when you scroll down just a bit...

"Mullis claimed climate change and HIV/AIDS theories were promulgated as a form of racketeering by environmentalists, government agencies, and scientists attempting to preserve their careers and earn money, rather than scientific evidence.[18] The medical and scientific consensus considers these hypotheses as pseudoscience[citation needed], HIV having been conclusively proven to be the cause of AIDS[43][44] and global warming strongly shown to be caused by human activities."

...yup that guy clearly knows something.