https://x.com/SSMcDAN/status/1981130297266884923
Printable View
I literally said that in a post several weeks ago. Maybe more. Treat the dollar like a hot potato if you find yourself holding any.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tellafriend
Wait til they fire up the printer to get the stable coin bullshit up and running. Speaking of dystopian movies.
The ballroom is privately funded.
If you want to look at an expensive White House renovation paid with your tax dollars, look up Obama's lol basketball court.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
wudabout Obama painting lines and adding baskets to a tennis court is your response to knocking down the east wing of the Whitehouse?
Does anyone really believe the ballroom will only cost 200 mill and not cost the taxpayers a penny?
Does anyone really believe Pablo knows what he is talking about.Quote:
Originally Posted by PabloQuote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
wudabout Obama painting lines and adding baskets to a tennis court is your response to knocking down the east wing of the Whitehouse?
Does anyone really believe the ballroom will only cost 200 mill and not cost the taxpayers a penny?
more bribes.
wonder what Binance money will do next for the cause.
Chat GPT
Below is the most complete donor list available in public reporting and the amounts where reporters or officials have said a figure. Where the White House or media have only named donors and not an amount, I mark it “amount not disclosed (public).” I included source links next to each entry so you can check the original reporting.
Quick context: the White House has said the ballroom is being privately funded and has provided a donor list; cost estimates published range from about $200M–$300M.
The Washington Post
+1
Donors reported (names + amounts when published)
Alphabet / YouTube — $22,000,000 (reported as part of a legal settlement directed toward the project).
Business Insider
Lockheed Martin — $10,000,000 (reported pledge).
FactCheck.org
Google (separate reports) — at least $5,000,000 (reported); note some outlets treat Google/Alphabet together — see above for the $22M settlement reporting. There is a discrepancy in reporting about whether Google/Alphabet’s contribution is $5M or part of the $22M settlement.
FactCheck.org
+1
Apple — amount not disclosed (public).
WTOP News
Amazon — amount not disclosed (public).
WTOP News
Microsoft — amount not disclosed (public).
WTOP News
Meta — amount not disclosed (public).
WTOP News
Comcast — amount not disclosed (public).
WTOP News
Coinbase — amount not disclosed (public).
WTOP News
Palantir Technologies — amount not disclosed (public).
The Guardian
T-Mobile — amount not disclosed (public).
The Guardian
Blackstone / Stephen A. Schwarzman — amount not disclosed (public) (named as a donor/pledger).
TIME
+1
Miriam Adelson / Adelson family — amount not disclosed (public).
The Guardian
Harold Hamm — amount not disclosed (public).
TIME
Tyler & Cameron Winklevoss — amount not disclosed (public).
The Guardian
+1
Laura & Isaac Perlmutter Foundation (and related donors listed by Time) — amount not disclosed (public).
TIME
Betty Wold Johnson Foundation — amount not disclosed (public).
TIME
Charles and Marissa Cascarilla — amount not disclosed (public).
TIME
Edward and Shari Glazer — amount not disclosed (public).
TIME
Benjamin Leon Jr. — amount not disclosed (public).
TIME
The Lutnick family / Howard Lutnick — amount not disclosed (public).
TIME
Kelly Loeffler and Jeff Sprecher — amount not disclosed (public).
TIME
Konstantin Sokolov — amount not disclosed (public).
TIME
Paolo Tiramani — amount not disclosed (public).
TIME
Important notes & caveats
White House release vs. reporting differences: multiple outlets say the White House provided a donor list; many outlets (CNN/WTOP/AP/others) published the names. However, the majority of individual donation amounts have not been publicly disclosed in the White House release — only a few numbers have appeared in press reports (see Lockheed, Google/Alphabet/YouTube settlement reporting).
WTOP News
+1
Conflicting or evolving figures: reporting on Google/Alphabet vs. YouTube/Alphabet contributions contains conflicting descriptions (some outlets report a $22M settlement related to YouTube/Alphabet; others report a separate “at least $5M” from Google). I flagged both sources above.
Business Insider
+1
Why amounts may be missing: donations are being routed through a nonprofit (reported as the Trust for the National Mall and similar entities), which can delay public disclosure of dollar amounts until the nonprofit’s filings (or the donors themselves) make them public. Some contributions may be pledged but not yet paid or structured as multi-year commitments.
CBS News
Comparing a basketball court to a 200+ million renovation that wasnt needed. Fucking toddlerQuote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
It's time to impeach Trump and Rubio for killing all those fisherman.
Wtf that's bullshit.
It's weird how the USA wages economic war on any country that doesn't turn over alll their wealth to the billionaire class.
https://x.com/BenFRubinstein/status/1980416934349795440
It’s gonna be named the “Palantir Stardust Ballroom”Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
Sure, government contractors donating money to entertain Trump’s whims. Nothing to see here.
Tighten up your game Druff. You’re a step slow these days
I love how Mamdani’s wife doesn’t look like a cheap plastic blow-up doll made in Russia.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G47OeXcX...pg&name=medium
https://x.com/Geiger_Capital/status/1986163649858211892
things trump will pivot on for $200, alex
https://x.com/Bannons_WarRoom/status...91016564687136
lol, good luck w that steve. you have mike j and thune as your leaders. we still don't even have the full 1/6 videos we were promised years ago bc, checks notes, reasons.
Reagan was right. Countries will retaliate with their own tariffs. Thats exactly what Trump did. He retaliated for the tariffs the entire world placed on US goods.Quote:
Originally Posted by BetCheckBet
Easiest money ever to be made in the market, even a loser like Sonatine can get this right.
Short every cigarette, weed and alcohol stock. Since over 40+ million can no longer afford to buy these because of the loss of SNAP money they should crater, right?
These “starving” people surely will feed their kids before buying them, right?
incorrect actually EBT (SNAP) can't be used for Alcohol or Cigarettes, its Food and Drinks only (No Alcohol..)Quote:
Originally Posted by The Boz
You missed the point, without EBT they have to use their money on food, right?Quote:
Originally Posted by garrettincorrect actually EBT (SNAP) can't be used for Alcohol or Cigarettes, its Food and Drinks only (No Alcohol..)Quote:
Originally Posted by The Boz
As for being “unable” to use them for cigarettes and alcohol, you obviously have never been a bodega in NY or most any big city. Usually .50 on the dollar but it happens every day.
If I was president, the first thing I'd do is arrest Steven Miller and send him to Guantanamo Bay. Just because I can. Then I'd watch video of him being gang raped by Muslim terrorists. That would be awesome.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tellafriend
It's clear Trump is deteriorating like Biden. He just got absolutely roasted by Laura Ingram, a conservative retard. I wonder how long the GOP will keep up the charade.
hey lets see how king retards foreign policy is working out
https://x.com/upholdreality/status/1988050017282871790
ahhhh cool cool
this is now in the "Clean CR" the republicans said was all they wanted along with other provisions banning most forms of intoxicating hemp, I believe.
Shutdown deal lets senators sue for $500,000 over data seizures like those in Jan. 6 probe
By Stefan Becket
Updated on: November 11, 2025 / 12:16 PM EST / CBS News
Washington — A provision of the legislative package that would end the government shutdown allows senators to bring lawsuits if federal law enforcement seizes or subpoenas their data without notifying them, with potential damages of $500,000 for each violation.
The language appears to allow GOP senators to sue over steps that the Justice Department took during special counsel Jack Smith's investigation into President Trump related to the 2020 election. In October, Senate Republicans revealed an FBI document that showed investigators had obtained phone record data from eight senators and one congressman for calls they made in the days before and after the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol. The records were obtained pursuant to a subpoena in 2023, and the new legislation covers alleged violations dating back to 2022.
The revelation that their call records were obtained infuriated the lawmakers, who accused the Biden administration of weaponizing the Justice Department to target Republicans.
"The FBI's actions were an unconstitutional breach, and Attorney General Bondi and Director Patel need to hold accountable those involved in this serious wrongdoing," said GOP Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa, the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee. He said the Biden administration's actions were "arguably worse than Watergate." A spokesperson for Grassley did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the new legislation.
......
The bill says senators are entitled to $500,000 for each violation of the notification provisions, and it prevents the government from invoking several types of immunity to rebut the claims. Suits can be brought up to five years after a senator is first made aware of a violation, and allows senators to bring suits for any instances that occurred after January 2022. The FBI analyzed the senators' call records in 2023, meaning they could bring lawsuits under the legislation.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/governm...00k-january-6/
LOL that Republicans don't even know how subpoenas work.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tellafriend
Laura Ingraham would crucify you in a debate.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jayjami
Lol. I'm a trial lawyer. I'd wipe the floor with her.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmLaura Ingraham would crucify you in a debate.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jayjami
https://x.com/PressSec/status/1987956156497584570
door dash.
they are using... door dash.
to measure inflation.