Time to get on the TRUMP train

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mintjewlips

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 4Dragons

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C4U-VJinoWI

---

Imagine voting for someone who has successfully negotiated multiple bankruptcies to get us out of our debt problems....what a CRAZY idea.

---

Imagine voting for somebody that used her position of power to enrich herself off the backs of taxpayers, real cool bruh.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 4Dragons

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mintjewlips

Imagine voting for someone who has successfully negotiated multiple bankruptcies to get us out of our debt problems....what a CRAZY idea.

---

Imagine voting for somebody that used her position of power to enrich herself off the backs of taxpayers, real cool bruh.

---

Listen, I think both candidates are shit... however I'd rather someone get elected who won't try and fuck with our fiscal policy, regardless of how shady they are.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 4Dragons

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ToasterOven

Amusing tidbit for those that actually follow politics...

Trump has hired Mclaughlin and Associates to poll New York State. LOL.

---

??


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d3aVrlQyw7M

---

This Mclaughlin is a semi disgraced polling firm that fell out of favor after blowing the Cantor primary. Cantor had hired them and they had him winning easily.

http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/...ntors-pollster

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DRK Star

LOL at the fucking prosecutors in the Freddie Gray Baltimore case.


Can't wait to see the fallout from tonight's news.


http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/mar...608-story.html


Judge Williams to hold hearing on witness disclosure as Officer Goodson's trial opens





For Gallo,

this Prosecutor (who is of African American Descent....."and thats fine") was caught endorsing tweets that called Police THUGS. She later claimed her twitter account was hacked. (uh huh...)

But, Im sure she will do a fine job and not have any bias against the police.



whoops, she withheld evidence and has been on a massive witchhunt, and has been so overly aggressive against the police that she has fucked up everything, trying to prosecute them.


https://www.powerlineblog.com/archiv...osbys-bias.php



so glad that her "impartiality" didnt affect anything


LOL!!

---

So segregation then? Only let white people try white people and Mexicans try Mexicans... If you ever showed ANY support of your heritage in your personal life you are disqualified. You have gone full crazy person and you need help

Furthermore..... SHES NOT A FUCKING JUDGE!!!!

It's insane to me that when it comes to Trump if there is ANY wiggle room you will find it. But anything that helps your narrative is a "fact."

Trump says someone being Mexican makes them unfit to rule over his case, you find a way to say that's not racist, even though it is the definition.

But, a judge went to the same school as the defendant and boooommmmm, 100% proof he is biased bro!!! He totally gave him a lighter sentence because they went to the same college. "See I only use facts"

You say it with such certainty. I can be like you and say.... Well Derek, you don't know that he gave him a lighter sentence because they both went to Stanford. The judge has said that did not play a role. You have to take him at his word because there is no proof he gave a light sentence SOLELY on the fact that he is also from Stanford. So you can't claim he was biased.

With Trump we have to take him at his word that he did not say terrible shit. (Even though he has, many, many times) But when something fits your narrative it is a FACT bithes.

Again. You are slowly or rapidly going mad, we all see it.

Confirmation Bias - the tendency to interpret new evidence as confirmation of one's existing beliefs or theories.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by El Gallo

It's insane to me that when it comes to Trump if there is ANY wiggle room you will find it. But anything that helps your narrative is a "fact."

Trump says someone being Mexican makes them unfit to rule over his case, you find a way to say that's not racist, even though it is the definition.

But, a judge went to the same school as the defendant and boooommmmm, 100% proof he is biased bro!!! He totally gave him a lighter sentence because they went to the same college. "See I only use facts"

You say it with such certainty. I can be like you and say.... Well Derek, you don't know that he gave him a lighter sentence because they both went to Stanford. The judge has said that did not play a role. You have to take him at his word because there is no proof he gave a light sentence SOLELY on the fact that he is also from Stanford. So you can't claim he was biased.

With Trump we have to take him at his word that he did not say terrible shit. (Even though he has, many, many times) But when something fits your narrative it is a FACT bithes.

Again. You are slowly or rapidly going mad, we all see it.

Confirmation Bias - the tendency to interpret new evidence as confirmation of one's existing beliefs or theories.

---

So you're telling me you expect a judge that was connected to the klan, gave scholarships to only white people, and attended klan meetings, you're telling me you expect that judge to rule fairly in cases involving minorities?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mintjewlips

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by El Gallo

It's insane to me that when it comes to Trump if there is ANY wiggle room you will find it. But anything that helps your narrative is a "fact."

Trump says someone being Mexican makes them unfit to rule over his case, you find a way to say that's not racist, even though it is the definition.

But, a judge went to the same school as the defendant and boooommmmm, 100% proof he is biased bro!!! He totally gave him a lighter sentence because they went to the same college. "See I only use facts"

You say it with such certainty. I can be like you and say.... Well Derek, you don't know that he gave him a lighter sentence because they both went to Stanford. The judge has said that did not play a role. You have to take him at his word because there is no proof he gave a light sentence SOLELY on the fact that he is also from Stanford. So you can't claim he was biased.

With Trump we have to take him at his word that he did not say terrible shit. (Even though he has, many, many times) But when something fits your narrative it is a FACT bithes.

Again. You are slowly or rapidly going mad, we all see it.

Confirmation Bias - the tendency to interpret new evidence as confirmation of one's existing beliefs or theories.

---

So you're telling me you expect a judge that was connected to the klan, gave scholarships to only white people, and attended klan meetings, you're telling me you expect that judge to rule fairly in cases involving minorities?

---

If he was a member of the KKK he wouldn't be a judge and that alone would get him fired. However, if you are trying to say that a group of lawyers who help Mexican immigrants is = to the KKK, then we have nothing to discuss. If in your mind a separate group of lawyers who are NOT La Raza (La Raza is a whole other topic that is being distorted by the media) is comparable to burning crosses, murdering people for being different to what they see as the norm, then let's just not reply to one another. There is no point if you are that far gone

Until I see a news report from a legitimate news source saying la raza runs around lynching people, burning down non-hispanic homes/businesses/churches and burning crucifixes in peoples front yards yall need to stop saying stupid shit like la raza=the klan.

you guys are being too hard on sah24 and mintjewlips. i think the la raza lawyers association and the kkk are basically one and the same. i suppose that makes alberto gonzalez, an officer of la raza -- WHO ALSO SERVED AS US ATTORNEY GENERAL UNDER GEORGE FUCKING BUSH -- basically the grand wizard

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by El Gallo

If he was a member of the KKK he wouldn't be a judge and that alone would get him fired.

---

So, you are 100% sure that there are NO lawyers that are in the KKK

ROFL....trump's lead attorney in the Trump U case donated to the Clinton campaign AFTER he became trump's attorney. Trump better fire him quick because there's no way he can represent trump what with having a pro-clinton bias and all.


http://www.politico.com/story/2016/0...onation-224047

DRK you are confusing the National Council of La Raza and La Raza Lawyers Association... I mean fuck!!! They are separate organizations. It's this sort of shit that is just crazy.

"La Raza" is a VERY common term amongst Mexican Americans. I use the term at least once a week. We use it the context of a group of friends regardless of ethnicity or gender. Much like we say "the guys" here in the United States."

My mom will ask me if me and la Raza are going out to a movie tonight. She essentially means, are you and your friends. It's normally used for your close friends or your clique.

When going to a wedding you say. "Toda la raza va a ir" or the entire group of friends and/or family will be there.

I have never heard facts distorted so badly. They probably have, it has just never hit so close to home

Drk, you do realize whatever point you're trying is kinda being undercut by the fact that Gallo said judges are you're saying attorneys. Hopefully you do know that the two are different things. Also as per usual you're babbling about irrelevant nonsense. But keeping posting hawking pics as they frame your posts nicely.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by El Gallo

It's insane to me that when it comes to Trump if there is ANY wiggle room you will find it. But anything that helps your narrative is a "fact."

Trump says someone being Mexican makes them unfit to rule over his case, you find a way to say that's not racist, even though it is the definition.



Trump is APPARENTLY, BASED ON HOW THE PRESS IS RUNNING WITH THIS, Against Mexicans (even though people completely ignore all of his comments, every fucking week, stating that he loves Mexicans, has friends that are mexicans, celebrates Mexican holidays, etc) because he wants to build a wall. Something THIS MEXICAN JUDGE, has been publicly against, based on his legal/personal actions. The Mexican public, especially when you see them protesting (with violence in many cases) at every Trump rally, apparently hates Trump. The media, frankly, caused most of this shit. For a Mexican person, (and not just a regular Mexican person, but a Mexican person, with ties to a group who publicly came out against him) to preside over this case, seems very questionable. AND, to have a law firm chosen to fight Trump, where that law firm donated 500K to the Clintons, seems odd as well, but whatever. Just tossing this in there because that is more strange info about this case. There is absolutely, the possibility, for there to be bias. That is NOT saying there is any RACIST remarks about the judge's heritage, which Trump has stated. Being Mexican is perfectly fine. No issues with the race itself. He LOVES Mexicans. But that race apparently may have some issues with Trump, based on public reaction.

But, a judge went to the same school as the defendant and boooommmmm, 100% proof he is biased bro!!! He totally gave him a lighter sentence because they went to the same college. "See I only use facts"

A judge, who allegedly ran on a platform of being tough on rape cases, but just so happened to not only attend the Same University, but to also play a sport, like the rapist did, that is typically played by affluent white men, and happened to dish out a sentence, which almost the entire country can not believe, due to how short it is. Its nationally being looked at as outrageous. There is NO 100% proof!!!! You cant prove he is 100% biased unless the judge comes out and says "Yeah, I gave him a short sentence because he and i both played sports at Stanford. Ya got me", but there are too many piece of evidence where logic would help rational people come to the conclusion, that something there was not right, and bias could easily be claimed, yet not 100% proved. Therefore, since there is such a strong possibility, eliminating other factors, you have to question whether there was bias. Most people you ask, when presented with the facts, would likely agree. Many people I posed that question to on Facebook (which you participated in) agreed as well.


You say it with such certainty. I can be like you and say.... Well Derek, you don't know that he gave him a lighter sentence because they both went to Stanford. The judge has said that did not play a role. You have to take him at his word because there is no proof he gave a light sentence SOLELY on the fact that he is also from Stanford. So you can't claim he was biased.

With Trump we have to take him at his word that he did not say terrible shit. (Even though he has, many, many times) But when something fits your narrative it is a FACT bithes.

Were the "terrible things" Trump said, FACTUALLY TRUE?......



Again. You are slowly or rapidly going mad, we all see it.

Confirmation Bias - the tendency to interpret new evidence as confirmation of one's existing beliefs or theories.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by rum dick

Drk, you do realize whatever point you're trying is kinda being undercut by the fact that Gallo said judges are you're saying attorneys. Hopefully you do know that the two are different things. Also as per usual you're babbling about irrelevant nonsense. But keeping posting hawking pics as they frame your posts nicely.

---

Are you actually fucking asking me if I know the difference between a judge and an attorney?


Really?


The fact that you just typed that is insulting, and you look like a fucking idiot for posting that. Terrible.





Try to stay with me here, Rum Dick.

There are some trials going on lately. In those trials, there are people involved....some are "judges", and some are "attorneys". At those trials, people in those two positions, JUST SO HAPPENED to have something they personally did, that would lead people to believe that they would NOT BE impartial, in their actions, within those trials.

The judge for Trump, was a member of a group, that hated Trump. People of his "race", are also apparently very much against Trump right now. It is MUCH more likely, based on reason, to make the claim that a Mexican, having that judge's background, would hold more negative bias against Trump, than a German judge who joined the National Association of Tennis Players.

The Prosecutor in the Freddy Gray case, has done/said things that put the Baltimore police in a very bad light. Her press conference even had anti-police tones. Her strategies to prosecute this case were deemed laughable and outrageous by legal experts across the Nation. In the end, she very likely used Horrible judgement, in an effort to punish these officers. She was NOT impartial, based on her words/actions. You could easily argue that she had a bias against the police.

https://ethicsalarms.com/2015/06/26/...marilyn-mosby/


I cant state this for you any better than that, so if you have any issues with that, red rep me and move on. There actually is NOTHING you are going to tell me to try to convince me otherwise. You can call that stubborn if you want, but I firmly believe that your own thinking is clouding your judgment and you arent seeing the forest through the trees.

Derek, he mimicked the movements of a disabled woman on stage because he didn't like what she had to say.... That pretty much sums the guy up. I'm sure you have some justification for that though.

Drk, i'll read your rant just as soon as you and the rest of the confused individuals who are babbling about the judge in this thread read this article.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-me...s-group-stron/

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by El Gallo

Derek, he mimicked the movements of a disabled woman on stage because he didn't like what she had to say.... That pretty much sums the guy up. I'm sure you have some justification for that though.

---

and cue the Trump-apologists

The one thing I have to give Trump credit for is being a billionaire, who has married multiple super models, lives in expensive high rises, wears expensive suits, owns his own private jets who has some how convinced people that he is just like them. For that I must tip my hat

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by rum dick

Drk, i'll read your rant just as soon as you and the rest of the confused individuals who are babbling about the judge in this thread read this article.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-me...s-group-stron/

---

Quote:

---

It’s a serious matter to accuse federal judges of bias solely because of their ethnic background, and top-ranking Republicans have rejected Trump’s line.

---

for fucks sake. EVEN YOUR OWN PARTY WANTS NOTHING TO DO WITH THIS PIECE OF DOG SHIT

so you're not republicans anymore. you're your own party. The Trump Party.


they'll never let him win.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by rum dick

Drk, i'll read your rant just as soon as you and the rest of the confused individuals who are babbling about the judge in this thread read this article.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-me...s-group-stron/

---

I spent the time to give you information. Since I, in essence, made the first move, you cant just say NO, YOU READ MINE First. Address my comments using logic and reason, to try to argue your viewpoint, which is apparently Against mine.


First, do that.

Now, since Im a nice guy, I read your article. If you would like me to now post OTHER SOURCES, which go against YOUR ARTICLE, I could, because I have seen those as well.

whose source is going to be legit?

http://www.wnd.com/2016/06/trump-u-j...cil-of-laraza/

http://dailycaller.com/2016/06/06/me...eir-community/

https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/...diego_la_raza/

http://www.infowars.com/anti-trump-j...-grand-dragon/ <--- didnt watch this one yet, but it has to be interesting

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by LarryLaffer

Quote:

---

It’s a serious matter to accuse federal judges of bias solely because of their ethnic background, and top-ranking Republicans have rejected Trump’s line.

---

---

Hey Larry,


Please take a few moments and show me where this is ILLEGAL, citing sources. Also, show where Trump doesnt want a Mexican presiding because of some racial, negative reason, which would indicate he is a racist. Thanks!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DRK Star

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by rum dick

Drk, i'll read your rant just as soon as you and the rest of the confused individuals who are babbling about the judge in this thread read this article.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-me...s-group-stron/

---

I spent the time to give you information. Since I, in essence, made the first move, you cant just say NO, YOU READ MINE First. Address my comments using logic and reason, to try to argue your viewpoint, which is apparently Against mine.


First, do that.

Now, since Im a nice guy, I read your article. If you would like me to now post OTHER SOURCES, which go against YOUR ARTICLE, I could, because I have seen those as well.

whose source is going to be legit?

http://www.wnd.com/2016/06/trump-u-j...cil-of-laraza/

http://dailycaller.com/2016/06/06/me...eir-community/

https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/...diego_la_raza/

http://www.infowars.com/anti-trump-j...-grand-dragon/ <--- didnt watch this one yet, but it has to be interesting

---

Info wars is basically the National Enquirer... It doesn't count as a source DRK. This is where Flat Earth people get information

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by El Gallo

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DRK Star

I spent the time to give you information. Since I, in essence, made the first move, you cant just say NO, YOU READ MINE First. Address my comments using logic and reason, to try to argue your viewpoint, which is apparently Against mine.


First, do that.

Now, since Im a nice guy, I read your article. If you would like me to now post OTHER SOURCES, which go against YOUR ARTICLE, I could, because I have seen those as well.

whose source is going to be legit?

http://www.wnd.com/2016/06/trump-u-j...cil-of-laraza/

http://dailycaller.com/2016/06/06/me...eir-community/

https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/...diego_la_raza/

http://www.infowars.com/anti-trump-j...-grand-dragon/ <--- didnt watch this one yet, but it has to be interesting

---

Info wars is basically the National Enquirer... It doesn't count as a source DRK. This is where Flat Earth people get information

---

Lol you probably get your "reputable" news from salon.com, or msnbc, or cnn who has admitted ex cia agents working for them.

Rum Dick,

What do you have to say about my previous comments about the Judge and Prosecutor?

dont look at this spoiler until 12:30 central

 

waiting for someone to do the THERE WERE ONLY 3 articles listed!, statement, from above, while they avoid addressing my comments

El Gallo,

Please post where the Non Flat Earth people should gather all of their knowledge from?

thanks


by the way, I used all kinds of news agencies/newspapers as sources. I just use logic and reason to determine what portion of the information can be legit, and what can be wildly biased and bullshit.

Even Info Wars has great information. You cant view EVERY SINGLE THING they give you as bullshit, however, I will not argue with you about some of their info being absurd. You just ruled out 100% of their info as not being credible.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by El Gallo

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mintjewlips

So you're telling me you expect a judge that was connected to the klan, gave scholarships to only white people, and attended klan meetings, you're telling me you expect that judge to rule fairly in cases involving minorities?

---

If he was a member of the KKK he wouldn't be a judge and that alone would get him fired. However, if you are trying to say that a group of lawyers who help Mexican immigrants is = to the KKK, then we have nothing to discuss. If in your mind a separate group of lawyers who are NOT La Raza (La Raza is a whole other topic that is being distorted by the media) is comparable to burning crosses, murdering people for being different to what they see as the norm, then let's just not reply to one another. There is no point if you are that far gone

---

The organization is called LA RAZA!, lol wtf you must be trolling or you are socially retarded.

You probably think that only white people can be racist too.

La Raza is a racist organization by definition, just like the klan, so if this judge is affiliated with he should be disbarred, just like any other judge with racist connections no matter what his race.

I know zero about 'la raza" but if what mintjewlips is saying is true then I agree with him. Can someone go more into detail about la raza?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by El Gallo

The one thing I have to give Trump credit for is being a billionaire, who has married multiple super models, lives in expensive high rises, wears expensive suits, owns his own private jets who has someone convinced people that he is just like them. For that I must tip my hat

---

I never got the feeling that he was running on a "Im just like you" campaign. If he did, that would be pretty LOL to me. I kind of looked at it as a guy, who made a lot of money, who is well known (whether for good or bad reasons, doesnt matter) who wants to give things a shot at running the country like a business, as he doesnt like how its being currently run (cant blame him here at all). I also personally think the challenge was made to him when Obama tried to clown him at that correspondence dinner a few years ago. I figured Trump started having all of these dreams (since he was challenged, publicly, and doesnt like to lose) of him coming in and making massive changes, and fixing things, so that Obama looked like a total joke of a pres.


I see him as taking on the fight FOR the people, not being ONE OF the people. He probably wants a legacy of fixing this US and showing how politicians suck ass.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by big dick

I know zero about 'la raza" but if what mintjewlips is saying is true then I agree with him. Can someone go more into detail about la raza?

---

I actually talk about the meaning of the phrase one page back

Listen to this liberal psycho, and she is a DNC leader too lol. Can't make this stuff up too funny . . .

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vbshPA3M0Tw

https://theconservativetreehouse.com...p/#more-117276

San Jose Undercover Cops: “Trump Supporters were running for their lives – We were unable to help”…

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by LarryLaffer

Quote:

---

It’s a serious matter to accuse federal judges of bias solely because of their ethnic background, and top-ranking Republicans have rejected Trump’s line.

---

for fucks sake. EVEN YOUR OWN PARTY WANTS NOTHING TO DO WITH THIS PIECE OF DOG SHIT

so you're not republicans anymore. you're your own party. The Trump Party.


they'll never let him win.

---

Have never voted republican before Trump and likely never will after, thats what you morons don't get lol . . .

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by rum dick

Until I see a news report from a legitimate news source saying la raza runs around lynching people, burning down non-hispanic homes/businesses/churches and burning crucifixes in peoples front yards yall need to stop saying stupid shit like la raza=the klan.

---

You must have missed all the La Raza spics assaulting Trump supporters in San Jose eh, how convenient . . .

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sah_24

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by rum dick

Until I see a news report from a legitimate news source saying la raza runs around lynching people, burning down non-hispanic homes/businesses/churches and burning crucifixes in peoples front yards yall need to stop saying stupid shit like la raza=the klan.

---

You must have missed all the La Raza spics assaulting Trump supporters in San Jose eh, how convenient . . .

---

Again, sir.... Different organizations. La Raza is an insanely common term amongst Mexican Americans that I personally use frequently

So DRK, you are cool with him mimicking a disabled woman? That is what he does in PUBLIC. That is who you are supporting: A guy who in front of thousands of people makes fun of a woman's disability. Get it together man. He is a shitty person no matter how hard you try to not make him look like a pice of shit.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by El Gallo

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sah_24

You must have missed all the La Raza spics assaulting Trump supporters in San Jose eh, how convenient . . .

---

Again, sir.... Different organizations. La Raza is an insanely common term amongst Mexican Americans that I personally use frequently

---

Ok well, La Raza members were major organizers for San Jose so you can keep being intentionally stupid if you want I guess lol

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by El Gallo

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DRK Star

Im perfectly comfortable with my stance on this, however, if YOU have issues with my explanation, I dont have anything else to tell you. Its pretty fucking clear and simple.

---

I'm begging you to stop... just look at your supporters the last few pages... just for a second stop and see the people on this thread who think like you and then ask if that is who you want to be.

---

at this point, i think we need to ask the flat earthers and self-identified crackheads like mintjewlips and the sparten if they're embarrassed to share the same views as drk