http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JQ7lYRnF1F8
Hillary is to big to fail.
A lot of powerful people are steaking her and will do whatever it takes to see her win.
I don't believe in miracles, i might if Donald Trump wins.
Printable View
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JQ7lYRnF1F8
Hillary is to big to fail.
A lot of powerful people are steaking her and will do whatever it takes to see her win.
I don't believe in miracles, i might if Donald Trump wins.
I'm sure it is just a coincidence that Hillary Clinton changed her positions on issues because her husband and Clinton Foundation received a bunch of cash.
http://stateofthenation2012.com/wp-c...1430324646.jpg
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com...fed5849da1.jpg
all i know is that I went to read the news this morning and this was the first image I saw
This is pretty fucking el oh el
https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...f04_story.html
and not reading this one but the headline is pretty el oh el as well
https://www.cardschat.com/news/is-ws...of-poker-34730
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/1...arizona-230724
"Soros spends $2 million to defeat Arpaio
The spending is part of the billionaire’s nationwide push on criminal justice and immigration reform.
George Soros’ spending against Joe Arpaio, a high-profile liberal bogeyman, is his single biggest investment in a local race this year"
Not long ago I used to LOL at Glenn Beck and his Soros chalk board conspiracy theories and think David Brock's Media Matter's was the most honest political site. TBF it actually was but now he's behind some massive internet disinfo campaign.
I've never been on skatz.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mintjewlips
Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatine
I heard it on skatz so it must be true.
Why are you accusing me of being a pedo? The same conservative strategy of if you repeat a lie often enough it becomes the truth? But I'm not running for office.
You going to man up and explain yourself?
That kid is proven not to be Clinton's.Quote:
Originally Posted by TheXFactor
hills back up to -300 based on newsweek breaking down the trump/russia connections in such simple, child like terms that even trump votes understand them.
By whom? The liberal media?Quote:
Originally Posted by hongkonger
Nothing's been proven.
An old tabloid report stating that a DNA test had ruled out Bill Clinton as his father was false.
Bill Clinton never submitted his DNA for a test to determine if he is Clinton’s son.
If he is Bill Clinton's son, then maybe he can run for President next time.
People who write opinion pieces for The Washington Post or The New York Times are NOT real "journalists".
Clinton’s Black “Son” Meets the Press
http://www.aim.org/aim-column/clinto...ets-the-press/
Quote:
“My name is Danney Williams. As you can see, I’m the black son of the former President Bill Clinton and the stepson of Hillary Clinton.”
With these words, at the prestigious National Press Club in Washington, D.C., 30-year-old Danney Williams released a letter asking Clinton’s former mistress and White House intern, Monica Lewinsky, to release the infamous semen-stained dress so that a DNA test and match with Williams can be made. That dress proved Clinton and Lewinsky had had a sexual affair, despite Clinton’s strenuous denials.
Hillary Clinton has said she has spent her lifetime helping children, Williams noted. “If black lives truly matter to her, why not mine? Why don’t you care about me?”
Alluding to a book Mrs. Clinton wrote, It Takes a Village, Williams said, “I just want her to accept me in her village today.”
“I am his only son in this world,” the young man said of the former president, who could get back into the White House if his wife is elected president. “He is my only dad.”
Bill Clinton’s sexual affairs are a matter of public record and beyond dispute, and they reportedly led to Clinton financing an abortion when he impregnated Gennifer Flowers. Clinton was accused of sexual harassment, for which he paid a fine, and was also accused of rape.
Williams, whose mother was an Arkansas prostitute, tells the story of his upbringing in the video, “Banished,” which was seen by millions on YouTube before being taken down by the video-sharing website and then reinstated after protests.
Williams was supported at the National Press Club news conference by black ministers and other supporters, who drew comparisons between the plight of his mother and her son to white male plantation owners who impregnated their slaves.
Williams said an old tabloid report stating that a DNA test had ruled out Bill Clinton as his father was false.
But since Clinton won’t submit his DNA for a new test to determine if he is Clinton’s son, Lewinsky’s dress is his only option. He called for “a true, verified DNA test.”
Williams said Clinton had indirectly acknowledged him while growing up in Arkansas, when State Troopers working on Clinton’s behalf when he was Arkansas governor would deliver gifts and cash to the Williams household. But all of that changed, he said, when Clinton became president. All contact was then cut off.
“Let me borrow your blue dress,” Williams said to Lewinsky. “I have to know who am I and maybe my father and stepmother Hillary will accept me one day. I have to get a DNA test to prove I am their son, once and for all. Ms. Lewinsky, please help me.”
Of course, if you haven’t heard anything about this news conference, it’s because it doesn’t fit into the media narrative that Donald J. Trump is the controversial character in the race for president, and the only sex charges that matter are those directed at him.
The media’s strategy to elect Hillary Clinton is to exaggerate any accusation against Trump, and censor or mock evidence of immoral, unethical or illegal conduct by the Clintons. Hence, Danney William’s painful plea on Tuesday at the National Press Club for his “father” to acknowledge and take him into the Clinton family was mostly ignored by the press.
One exception was Dana Milbank of The Washington Post, a liberal activist whose job is to contain the damage from charges reflecting badly on the “progressive” movement. He was at the news conference and quickly filed a column ridiculing Danney Williams.
In a column with strong racist overtones, Milbank depicted Williams as a puppet for conservative filmmaker Joel Gilbert, who is white, and who introduced Williams and the other speakers. Milbank insisted that Williams had been “hauled” to the event by Gilbert and was given a speech to read. He was “looking to Gilbert for instruction” on what to say, Milbank wrote.
While he read a prepared statement about getting the Lewinsky dress, he spoke from the heart and in deep emotional terms throughout the news conference about how he has sought for many years to get Clinton to acknowledge paternity. Williams said he was prepared to file a paternity suit against Clinton if he does not get the DNA from the dress.
Milbank’s column attacked me personally for pointing out during the National Press Club event what his mission was in being there. I noted that Milbank shows up at conservative events only for the purpose of making fun of the participants and trying to discourage other members of the press from covering conservative news.
Milbank, who scampered out of the press conference as awareness grew about his real agenda, insisted in his column that he had not made fun of Williams. But his column was full of statements and suggestions that the young man from Arkansas was unable to articulate his own case and had to rely on a white man to guide him.
One of Milbank’s more obnoxious lies was the claim that Gilbert had once done a film about a “labor activist” by the name of Frank Marshall Davis, who was Obama’s mentor in Hawaii during his growing-up years. Davis was a veteran member of the Communist Party—with a 600-page FBI file—who dabbled in pornography and pedophilia.
Demonstrating a pattern of dishonesty, the Post has consistently failed to note Davis’s Communist affiliations, since the days when Post associate editor David Maraniss deliberately ignored them before the 2008 election. It turns out Maraniss was a red-diaper baby whose parents were themselves members of the Communist Party.
Predictably, Milbank’s columns find a “conspiracy” when conservatives are trying to expose left-wing cover-ups and urge accountability from left-wing lawmakers. He has consistently done damage control for the Democratic Party in matters involving Frank Marshall Davis and Benghazi. More recently, sporting a beard, he was on CNN accusing Trump supporters of being racists. This led to comparisons to an episode of the old Andy Griffith show in which Goober Pyle grew a beard to look smart but came across as a buffoon.
Part of Milbank’s modus operandi is to use the word “conspiracy” over and over again when referring to what conservatives say and do.
The only sinister pattern of behavior is that of Milbank, who is paid by Amazon billionaire Jeff Bezos, the owner of the Post, to cover what the paper calls “political theater” in the nation’s capital.
If this is theater, Milbank is the comedic sidekick who expects to be taken seriously while the audience laughs at him. But his routine is getting tiresome and old, and is degenerating into the racism he claims to find among conservatives.
http://www.aim.org/wp-content/upload...04-868x651.jpg
Trump being Trump again.
BOMBSHELL: Trump Business Goes Bankrupt Again In Scheme With Russian Billionaire (VIDEO)
http://newcenturytimes.com/2016/11/0...ionaire-video/
:lol2
Let's see Arpaio raises 10 million with about 3/4 from out of state sources versus a candidate he overspent in the last election more than 10-1 and is doing his best to make spending even more disproportionate this time. Apparently in his mind that's perfectly fair and balanced and no one is buying the election in anyway in that scenario. But when big bad Soros comes around to make the race even remotely balanced the first thing he does is cry about buying the election. Yea that seems reasonable. Notice that there's still more money spent on Arpaio's side than on his opponents. Now it's about 2-1 instead of 10-1.Quote:
Originally Posted by FPS_Russia
Quote:
Originally Posted by BiffCo99
:lol2
I'm offended that a feeble minded ninny like you is telling me to "man up". Your poor kids have to deal with you molesting them with your ridiculous ideology.Quote:
Originally Posted by hongkongerI've never been on skatz.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mintjewlips
Why are you accusing me of being a pedo? The same conservative strategy of if you repeat a lie often enough it becomes the truth? But I'm not running for office.
You going to man up and explain yourself?
You know that's a parody account, right? I can never tell with you guys. #Poe'sLawQuote:
Originally Posted by BiffCo99
Quote:
Originally Posted by gimmickLet's see Arpaio raises 10 million with about 3/4 from out of state sources versus a candidate he overspent in the last election more than 10-1 and is doing his best to make spending even more disproportionate this time. Apparently in his mind that's perfectly fair and balanced and no one is buying the election in anyway in that scenario. But when big bad Soros comes around to make the race even remotely balanced the first thing he does is cry about buying the election. Yea that seems reasonable. Notice that there's still more money spent on Arpaio's side than on his opponents. Now it's about 2-1 instead of 10-1.Quote:
Originally Posted by FPS_Russia
Blah blah blah post the links where i can see arpaio spending 10-1, where he's "getting out of state" donations, and spare me your opinion please and thanks.
Wishful thinking?.....
http://www.samaa.tv/international/20...ew-days-early/
Quote:
India’s Hindu Army celebrates Trump ‘victory’ a few days early
Quote:
An Indian fringe group on Friday celebrated the “victory” of US presidential contender Donald Trump, hailing his friendship with diaspora Indians and backing his call to ban immigration by Muslims from countries hit by militancy.
With drums banging and speakers blaring, the Hindu Sena, or Hindu Army, gathered at Jantar Mantar – New Delhi’s answer to London’s Speakers’ Corner – to proclaim to a knot of TV crews that Trump had “already won” the Nov. 8 vote.
You can never tell because you have that awful lefty liberal disease of always thinking you're smarter than everyone else.Quote:
Originally Posted by DirtyBYou know that's a parody account, right? I can never tell with you guys. #Poe'sLawQuote:
Originally Posted by BiffCo99
Dirty B used to use this clever lie or half truth when I'd bring up the stolen primary.
Trigger warning: Vid contains a repulsive but typical 'because she's a woman' Hillary supporter.
She reminds me of the workers when i was denied my right to vote, BARF!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Rg2HzQY-Rc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4hmbArq1x6E
You cant make this shit up...
Perhaps the most important video this entire election, that guy's such a phony and Hillary wants to give him your retirement.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y4dG0dpiMV0
Yes Hillary's coming to get your social security and she's going to give it to her criminal friends on Wall Street, George Carlin called it.
Mumbles let me know at what point you pull ur support for Hillary, thx.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DirtyBYou know that's a parody account, right? I can never tell with you guys. #Poe'sLawQuote:
Originally Posted by BiffCo99
Using punctuation in a hashtag. You really are the biggest fucking tool on this site.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DJ_ChapsQuote:
Originally Posted by DirtyB
Using punctuation in a hashtag. You really are the biggest fucking tool on this site.
Guy still believes Hillary's story of when she came under sniper fire getting off an airplane. Leave him be.
This is exactly why I was confused by the parody tweet. You seem to actually think this is real.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mintjewlips
Someone bugged the DNC Washington headquarters:
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/...ve-been-bugged
tl;dr: They swept the office for bugs in September after the Russia hacks and found nothing, but after the O'Keefe lolfest they decided they needed a proper TSCM team, who proceeded to find forensic evidence covert surveillance in the form of a radio beacon, located outside the perimeter of the office, that was likely attached to a device used to mimic cell towers for capturing cellular data (think Stingray).
The FBI (lol) is all the fuck over it supposedly.
BWWWHAHAHAHAHAQuote:
Originally Posted by Mintjewlips
Alex Jones has really outdone himself with line of bullshit LOL I'm Dying here LOLOLOL
That chick's not actually collecting sperm n breast milk right? They're not actually cutting open their finger right, it's just a performance correct? It might be pretty cool for people into horror flicks. Oh well I guess i'll just keep up the fake outrage since religious people are freaking out.
OMG THE ANTICHRIST!
She hangs w Gaga Gaga and gives Ted talks. It's seems like a irl Blair Witch type performance. It figures that people would freak out over some meaningless art weirdo and not notice the TPP or Hills plan for S.S. or that we're being lied into a potential nuclear war by traitors.
Art weirdos and music weirdos, smh.
We'll see if more sinister details emerge, i doubt it. The Alex Jonesians are going to be rambling about this for years.
This thread needs a little bit more comic relief so here ya go
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GEEgplXwNWk
Get your fucking suit on booyyyy
Im not surprised
Imagine an 18 year old college student drinking too much. Hard to believe this ever happens. I am stunned and voting for Hillary now.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lord of the FraudGet your fucking suit on booyyyy
Yes but eventually they turn into 40+ year old drunk losers like you.Quote:
Originally Posted by DraymondImagine an 18 year old college student drinking too much. Hard to believe this ever happens. I am stunned and voting for Hillary now.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lord of the FraudGet your fucking suit on booyyyy
Quote:
Originally Posted by DraymondImagine an 18 year old college student drinking too much. Hard to believe this ever happens. I am stunned and voting for Hillary now.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lord of the FraudGet your fucking suit on booyyyy
Him drinking too much isn't really the story here.
Was doing a LOT worse myself at 18.
What's your excuseQuote:
Originally Posted by Draymond
Somehow, I missed seeing this spot-on story earlier.
‘Drinking the Orange Kool-Aid’: Cult expert says Trump is like Rev. Jim Jones — but far more dangerous
http://www.rawstory.com/2016/09/drin...ore-dangerous/
All out cyberspace war is getting closer.
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/...ection-n677936
Quote:
U.S. military hackers have penetrated Russia's electric grid, telecommunications networks and the Kremlin's command systems, making them vulnerable to attack by secret American cyber weapons should the U.S. deem it necessary, according to a senior intelligence official and top-secret documents reviewed by NBC News.
American officials have long said publicly that Russia, China and other nations have probed and left hidden malware on parts of U.S critical infrastructure, "preparing the battlefield," in military parlance, for cyber attacks that could turn out the lights or turn off the internet across major cities.
It's been widely assumed that the U.S. has done the same thing to its adversaries. The documents reviewed by NBC News — along with remarks by a senior U.S. intelligence official — confirm that, in the case of Russia.
U.S. officials continue to express concern that Russia will use its cyber capabilities to try to disrupt next week's presidential election. U.S. intelligence officials do not expect Russia to attack critical infrastructure — which many believe would be an act of war — but they do anticipate so-called cyber mischief, including the possible release of fake documents and the proliferation of bogus social media accounts designed to spread misinformation.
On Friday the hacker known as "Guccifer 2.0" — which U.S. officials say is a front for Russian intelligence — tweeted a threat to monitor the U.S. elections "from inside the system."
U.S. military officials often say in general terms that the U.S. possesses the world's most advanced cyber capabilities, but they will not discuss details of highly classified cyber weapons.
James Lewis, a cyber expert at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, says that U.S. hacks into the computer infrastructure of adversary nations such as China, Russia, Iran and North Korea — something he says he presumes has gone on for years — is akin to the kind of military scouting that is as old as human conflict.
"This is just the cyber version of that," he said.
In 2014, National Security Agency chief Adm. Mike Rogers told Congress that U.S. adversaries are performing electronic "reconnaissance" on a regular basis so that they can be in a position to disrupt the industrial control systems that run everything from chemical facilities to water treatment plants.
"All of that leads me to believe it is only a matter of when, not if, we are going to see something dramatic," he said at the time.
Rogers didn't discuss the U.S.'s own penetration of adversary networks. But the hacking undertaken by the NSA, which regularly penetrates foreign networks to gather intelligence, is very similar to the hacking needed to plant precursors for cyber weapons, said Gary Brown, a retired colonel and former legal adviser to U.S. Cyber Command, the military's digital war fighting arm.
"You'd gain access to a network, you'd establish your presence on the network and then you're poised to do what you would like to do with the network," he told NBC News. "Most of the time you might use that to collect information, but that same access could be used for more aggressive activities too."
Brown and others have noted that the Obama administration has been extremely reluctant to take action in cyberspace, even in the face of what it says is a series of Russian hacks and leaks designed to manipulate the U.S. presidential election.
Administration officials did, however, deliver a back channel warning to Russian against any attempt to influence next week's vote, officials told NBC News.
The senior U.S. intelligence official said that, if Russia initiated a significant cyber attack against critical infrastructure, the U.S. could take action to shut down some Russian systems — a sort of active defense.
Retired Adm. James Stavridis, who served as NATO commander of Europe, told NBC News' Cynthia McFadden that the U.S. is well equipped to respond to any cyber attack.
"I think there's three things we should do if we see a significant cyber-attack," he said. "The first obviously is defending against it. The second is reveal: We should be publicizing what has happened so that any of this kind of cyber trickery can be unmasked. And thirdly, we should respond. Our response should be proportional."
The U.S. use of cyber attacks in the military context — or for covert action — is not without precedent.
During the 2003 Iraq invasion, U.S spies penetrated Iraqi networks and sent tailored messages to Iraqi generals, urging them to surrender, and temporarily cut electronic power in Baghdad.
In 2009 and 2010, the U.S., working with Israel, is believed to have helped deploy what became known as Stuxnet, a cyber weapon designed to destroy Iranian nuclear centrifuges.
Today, U.S. Cyber Command is engaged in cyber operations against the Islamic State, including using social media to expose the location of militants and sending spoof orders to sow confusion, current and former officials tell NBC News.
One problem, officials say, is that the doctrine around cyber conflict — what is espionage, what is theft, what is war — is not well developed.
"Cyber war is undefined," Brown said. "There are norms of behavior that we try to encourage, but people violate those."
-320 now that people know shes a Satanist, at least they can assume she believes in God.
Im seeing -400Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatine