You don't have a rebuttal so you point out a typo....i see so you're the intellectual.....
sah_24: More free than you or your british daddys
British daddys > Israeli daddys
idiot
4D, I seriously can't fathom that you're just flat out not trolling right now. As I've said many times before to your "OH THE NEXT MAO OR THE NEXT HITLER" bullshit:
YOU DON'T BRING AN AR15 TO A DRONE FIGHT.
You really think your little government regulated semi automatic rifle or handgun is going to save you from getting bombed or shot down by something you can't even see?
It's the fucking 21st century man, get with it.
Pretty much why according to the 2nd amendment, civilians should have much more access to weapons . Go ahead, deny but its true. Even George Washington stated it quite plainly. The problem is we have minorities orr...gangs in this country along with mentally retarded liberals and sand n-words who fuck it up for the rest of us and should be wiped off the map. Everyone keeps saying the rught wing civilian kills more - prove it.it werent for these people you would have far less killings. This is FACT.
That aside,lets say we only had limited arms. Have you seen how well military can handle urban warfare? ? In case you haven't been paying attention, its quite a cluster fuck - no matter what continent you are on. Look how long we have been trying to handle iraq. Some citizens with small arms and some knowledge of explosives manages to keep the US MILITARY at bay for how many years now?
Oh yeah, almost forgot. People like anonymoose couldn't even fathom the response to a civilian threat (or civil war) from our inactive as well as some of our active miliary. They salivate over this shit and swear to protect from any adversaries foreign and domestic...
It's inevitable. The opening scene is the Canadian airforce Top Gun strike team....hence shitstorm.
Berlin is the obv second target but ya spread yourself to thin and, ya know
http://youtu.be/JTTC_fD598A
In before someone says Cohen can't sing.
Also, PFA class action lawsuit for time wasted on trying to post a video and logging i/o
So glad you asked Bumbletard
I understand every part of it.
I know what part you don't understand - ALL of it.
HINT: it has NOTHING to do with limiting arms
"Well Regulated"....
Would you like me to school you on this too?
I know this guy has a habit of satire. Personally, I don't think this was satire though; maybe it is...maybe it isn't.
but there are actually people out there who think like this - primarily due to the leftist media giving them ridiculously incorrect information
People actually think that weapons like the AR - 15 ...Sig Sauer MCX etc are actually used in the military. The type of weapons like this sold in retail gun stores have NEVER set foot on a battlefield. FACT
Here is another fact while im at it - I could easily buy an AR-15 (and other models) during the "assault weapons ban" of 94 - 2004 (ooh, minus a couple of minor ergonomic differences). Why? because its not a fucking assault weapon - and it still isn't.
So much misinformation out there, it just blows my mind.
You want to enact "laws and regulations"? at least be somewhat informed. Hell, Feinstein actually thinks that if law abiding citizens lay down their legal arms in a shootout, then the felon will lay down his too....these are real live politicians collecting taxpayer dollars. I can think of another one who has tried to spearhead gun control bills who actually thinks that magazines are disposable and if we ban magazines, pretty soon there wont be any more bullets because you "cant reload a magazine"...
Holy fuck, I can't even...
Let the jihad begin then take away our guns. Same in Chicago or the Bronx.
Everybody has a gun except the law abiding. Lol.
Fast and furious was all about a red flag just to provoke exacly what there trying to provoke all this shit with the Muslims.
Create a problem, then come with a fix that allows the government to take away our liberties and 2nd or 1st amendment or the freedom of travel ect ect..
Dude it's not a conspiracy. There open about it. It's just the libtards and Establishment are going along with it.. Scary fools.
If there is no second amendment, there is no first amendment:
- http://www.cbsnews.com/news/uk-man-j...r-free-speech/
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_s...United_Kingdom
- http://www.nationalreview.com/articl...rles-c-w-cooke
- http://www.thedailybeast.com/article...in-the-uk.html
- http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016...ffence-online/
I'll stop there, I could fill the fucking page.
Really?
It has nothing to do with the fact that our neighbors are Mexico and Canada, and that it would take an easily traceable amount of time and effort to ford the Atlantic or Pacific Ocean?
It has nothing to do with the fact that no one gives a fuck and no one starts wars with 1st world countries anymore?
Seriously dude, it's the 21st fucking century? Are you still living in like 1650 or some shit?
Also, again, NO FUCKING FOREIGN GOVERNMENT WOULD HAVE TO LAND A SINGLE PERSON HERE. TECHNOLOGY, DO YOU UNDERSTAND IT?
The 2nd amendment was written at a time where your nearest neighbor was 500 miles away and guns took 5 minutes to reload after a single shot.
Do you also still pee in a bucket, wash your clothes with a washboard in the creek, and wonder how you're going to save up to buy your next negro?
Just remember who it was that tore themselves apart at the seams to do something that had never been done in recorded human history to that point: Ended slavery.
Guess what Einstein, only one way you do that.. with an armed rebellion fought with the help of a well regulated militia.
I don't even know how do you fuck up every part of this without intentionally trolling. If there wasn't anecdotal evidence that you can be just this stupid/ignorant i doubt i would believe it. Before 1865 slavery had been made illegal among others in the entire British Empire. Had you been a part of that empire, slavery in North America would have been illegal 30 years earlier.
Now to return to your efforts in abolishing slavery. It has nothing to do with 1776 or the help of a well regulated militia. If you know very little it might seem logical it would, being that it's the 13th amendment and we all know constitution is a sacred document, was written in 1776, etched in stone, word of god and should never be changed in any shape or form. Doing very little research on this subject it appears that the original constitution was written in 1787, came into force in 1789 and didn't really do anything to abolish slavery. The 13th amendment on the other hand did do something for abolishing slavery but that was added in 1865. Apparently you can just add stuff to the constitution, possibly even remove some retarded shit. Who knew legislation can live with the times.
lol this nerd seems furious
Tbh i was being kinda nice and let a few things slip by. But please do tell who did "something that had never been done in recorded human history to that point: Ended slavery". And please elaborate how the "only one way you do that.. with an armed rebellion fought with the help of a well regulated militia" had anything to do with the first claim or is even remotely true. Otherwise it might seem you were trying to take credit of something you had nothing to do with and trying to make the feat seem more grandiose than it was. That's clearly not something that's often associated with Americans.
1. As shown, we weren't the first ones to get rid of slavery.
2. Thank you for proving my point about the 21st century.
Look, it doesn't matter what you say, we still live in 2016 and every problem you have that you think can be solved with a gun, can now be solved by more efficient means or a gun is just completely useless.
Unless you are looking down the barrel of a gun.
Mao took China in recent history, by force. Castro took Cuba, all in the realm of mechanized warfare. The Visagoths took Rome, and you couldn't ever do that.
I appreciate that you want to be victimized by some government body, but don't force it on everyone else. When they come to round you up, only your neighbors will be able to hide you in their attics.
Uh... Correcting grossly distort historical claims used to support a stupid policy isn't "dotting i's and crossing t's". And if you knew more about the American Civil War, you'd know that it *wasn't* won using firearms owned by ordinary citizens (which Confederacy troops did for much longer and more often than federal ones).
Seriously. Educate yourself on the actual history versus the jingoistic bullshit you hear from your fellow gun nuts, or just dream up on the fly.
And you can even do so by listening to an excellent and detailed podcast series on it.
http://civilwarpodcast.org/
(Been listening to it on and off for about a month. Ridic amount of details. Only up to the first few months of 1862 (episode 108 or so). But a definite keeper for Civil War history fans who like the deep dive.)
I don't like how the Dems are trying to play on peoples emotions with these votes related to gun control. If they got a strong case then bring it up when emotions are not a factor.
When I see someone who sold out to private prison lobbyists like Hillary trying to play on peoples emotions to push new legislation. It sends chills up my spine. We're not going to lock up a bunch of right wing gun enthusiasts that have nothing to do with terrorism because you sold out to the private prisons.
They wouldn't do the same for me but that's the dif. between us n them. We always try to do right thing not only when its in our interest.
Do you guys have any idea how close Hillary is with private prison lobbyists? Cenk Uygur where you at now? Crickets...
"See see she got killed by a gun and they have gun control!!!!" YOU STUPID REDNECK FUCKS.. YOU DONT GET IT AND DONT HAVE THE CAPACITY TO GET "IT"