Printable View
NOT GUILTY LOSERS! NOT HIS JOB TO TRACK DOWN MURDERERS, HE SAID THAT CUZ HE KNEW JUSTICE WOULD BE SERVED (HIS ACQUITTAL), AND WAS VERY HAPPY AT THAT TIME. WHO HAS TIME TO PULL A DOUBLE MURDER SO CLOSE TO THEIR FLIGHT OUT OF TOWN? WHY WERE NO PEOPLE FROM HIS FLIGHT CALLED TO TESTIFY ABOUT HIS DEMEANOR THAT NIGHT (LEADS TO STATE OF MIND)......I GUESS THAT IS EVIDENCE THAT YA CANT TARNISH.
DONT GET ME STARTED ON THAT TINY ASS GLOVE.
This is just not true. Shapiro was shocked when it came back not guilty. Plus theres a difference of not having proof beyond a reasonable doubt, and thinking he didnt do it. Just because some Lawyers thought he should be found not guilty doesnt mean they think he didnt do it. The guy was going to commit suicide just use your head and put yourself in that situation. I'd be doing everything I can to help find out who killed the mother of my children not attempting suicide in front of the entire world.Quote:
Originally Posted by SetofKs
They (Defense) admitted they had the glove in their posession the day before it was introduced at trial. To me the funniest part of the whole case was how black people packed churches and cheered his aquital. If it was a white man killing a black chick they would have been 100% opposite side of it. They would have rioted if the white man got off with so much evidence against him. The best part is that although OJ is black he lived the life of a white person everything he did on a daily basis was all with white people. The guy never did anything for blacks in his life until he murdered 2 innocent white people.Quote:
Originally Posted by DJ_Chaps
i thought setofk's was a good card player. if he refuses to see this as bs, i feel good about crushing him in poker.
Everyone who is dead certain OJ did it (like myself up until about 2 hours ago) should really watch the documentary "My Brother the Serial Killer". Came on Investigation Discovery, probably comes on again at some point. It is not some documentary trying to prove this guy killed them, it mainly deals with his life and the Simpson killings are like 10 minutes out of a 2 hour documentary.
Here are the cliffs....the serial killer Glen Rogers was hired by OJ to rob the place for some 20k earrings he gave her that he wanted back. He specifically told him "you might have to kill the bitch". This was not a wise thing to say to Glen, because while he grew up a thief/robber he was smack in the middle of a cross country killing spree. OJ told him where keys to the house were hidden, he grabbed them and as he was coming around the side of the house Goldman came in the front gate, he killed him. Nicole came outside, killed her.
OJ comes to the house after the fact to see what the hell happened, and that is how the blood gets in the Bronco, and why there were an unidentified set of second shoeprints in the blood at the scene.
You have to watch it all the way through to see how it fits though, there is a lot of background pieces that point towards him in the way they were killed, the timing and some other stuff in his past.
So basically OJ was behind the whole thing, but "didn't want to get his hands dirty" and hired this guy to do it for him. Now what they don't know if OJ was serious when he said you might have to kill her, or if he just said it in jest and really just wanted the jewelry and that wasn't part of the plan. You have to remember he had no idea he hired a serial killer to rob the house, a guy who killed for sport basically so he wouldn't think the guy would just eliminate any obstacle instantly like he allegedly did with Goldman and Simpson.
Because a serial killer's brother says so??
Come on man, 99.999% of the time things are exactly what they appear to be. OJ killed them and no amount of revisionist history, subterfuge or obfuscation will change that.
There's no arch criminal.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t0iVK...feature=fvwrel
No Rogers also said so in many letters to an FBI profiler working his case, isn't his brother claiming this alone. If you actually take the time to watch the show it isn't just "some crazy serial killer making stuff up for publicity" like you probably assume.Quote:
Originally Posted by tony bagadonuts
And this is a serial killer was in the area at the time(he grew up in LA), right in the middle of killing people left and right, knew Nicole Simpson, killed every single one of his victims the same exact way(by "sticking" them as he called it) slicing them to pieces, and even sent a piece of jewelry he took from the house to his mother after the case. (she wore it to his trial, still has it, again have to watch to see the connection but it is there).
Look I know that what you said is going to be the response if you don't actually watch the documentary, but there are many other things that make it very plausible. I was looking for things to poke holes in his story but really couldn't find any. He described exactly how he did it and it matched the scene perfectly, along with a bunch of other things that matched up time wise and other details.
I think the big thing is if he was some nutcase trying to take credit and gain publicity for the crime he would have said he did it alone, but he is still saying OJ was behind it, was there, but it was him who actually did the killings for him. That is a big difference IMO, and it makes a lot of sense with the circumstances surrounding the crime.
I havent seen it but every single fact about the case is public knowledge and it happened years ago, so someone could pick apart all the evidence and insert someone as the killer. For one even if the guys a serial killer hes going to charge more to kill someone theres alot greater chance of being caught, so OJ just saying hey you might have to kill her is laughable to say the least. A hitman would say wait do you want her robbed or killed because killing someone is going to cost you x compared to x for a simple earing robbery.Quote:
Originally Posted by NaturalBornHustler
If you know it fit the scene dont you think his story is going to fit the scene exactly? You act like all the evidence isnt known to the whole free world. This is why the police like to keep things private when their looking for a killer, because if they know something only the killer would know thats alot different since they tried OJ and put all the evidence out on the table. This guys story about his brother being a serial killer would be alot more interesting if he killed a high profile person wouldnt it? If he made it without saying his brother killed OJs wife would we even be in this thread right now talking about it? No, of course not its called marketing.Quote:
Originally Posted by NaturalBornHustlerNo Rogers also said so in many letters to an FBI profiler working his case, isn't his brother claiming this alone. If you actually take the time to watch the show it isn't just "some crazy serial killer making stuff up for publicity" like you probably assume.Quote:
Originally Posted by tony bagadonuts
And this is a serial killer was in the area at the time(he grew up in LA), right in the middle of killing people left and right, knew Nicole Simpson, killed every single one of his victims the same exact way(by "sticking" them as he called it) slicing them to pieces, and even sent a piece of jewelry he took from the house to his mother after the case. (she wore it to his trial, still has it, again have to watch to see the connection but it is there).
Look I know that what you said is going to be the response if you don't actually watch the documentary, but there are many other things that make it very plausible. I was looking for things to poke holes in his story but really couldn't find any. He described exactly how he did it and it matched the scene perfectly, along with a bunch of other things that matched up time wise and other details.
I think the big thing is if he was some nutcase trying to take credit and gain publicity for the crime he would have said he did it alone, but he is still saying OJ was behind it, was there, but it was him who actually did the killings for him. That is a big difference IMO, and it makes a lot of sense with the circumstances surrounding the crime.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Walter Sobchak
Chris Rock even points out OJ had to pay 29k a month to her. That seems like a plausible motive. He killed her got his kids back and saved almost 30k a month the guys a genius.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tony bagadonuts
WOW
http://i1112.photobucket.com/albums/...CCD2912541.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by DJ_Chaps
I used to buy dope off a guy/friend who smoked 24/7
He was convinced that jet trails were chem trails....the government "seeding" the population for various reasons
Chappie sounds like this guy
oh les, you deny chemtrails exist?
Since this kinda formation is obv normal and seen all the time. Can you tell me which pilot won the race in this pic?
Awful lot of forgetful pilots. Guess they had to go back and grab their passport.
If you mean chemtrails = gov't dropping chemicals to control the masses then yeahQuote:
Originally Posted by DJ_Chapsoh les, you deny chemtrails exist?
Since this kinda formation is obv normal and seen all the time. Can you tell me which pilot won the race in this pic?
Awful lot of forgetful pilots. Guess they had to go back and grab their passport.
9/11, OJ and chem-trails? Put the ganja down dude.
There is another member here that believes in chem trails too. I'll give you a hint as to who it is... His screen name starts with a 4.Quote:
Originally Posted by DJ_Chapsoh les, you deny chemtrails exist?
Since this kinda formation is obv normal and seen all the time. Can you tell me which pilot won the race in this pic?
Awful lot of forgetful pilots. Guess they had to go back and grab their passport.
I don't know what chemtrails are all about, but they are quite real. Commercial jets are not flying in these patterns.
Can one of you please explain the pics? Thx.
There is this branch of the military called the air force...