like the idea a dude worth billions isnt playing high stakes hands for a few hours isn't credible is so dumb thats obviously what it was you nerds
Printable View
like the idea a dude worth billions isnt playing high stakes hands for a few hours isn't credible is so dumb thats obviously what it was you nerds
So lets do the old DR break down here again...
Here we are at the old PFA liberal tactic of- falsely quoting someone else hoping to discredit them and resorting to lame insults, always the autism card.Quote:
Originally Posted by go_buccos
No, I havent made a claim here yet, rather I am questioning this totally random major pay out by a non-pro gambler/whale. This democrat governor just "randomly happened" to go there and "just got lucky" before mid-terms and made 1.5 million in a blue city and county with a helpful media behind him- very suspicious.
And YES, if the blue state of Nevada, County of Clark and City of Las Vegas are willing to rig their 2020 presidential election inline with the other states, they have no problem calling a certain casino and telling management- You want to keep your licenses and permits, let the governor walk out with his winnings of 1.4 million. What the Nevada Gaming Commission (NGC) doesnt see, they cant investigate.
Let me tell you how it works at one of the casinos in Nor Cal, Stones Gambling Hall- the home of the greatest poker fraud of all time with Mike Postle, Druff and I met up there in person once for dinner. How the bad guys launder money there- someone walks in with 10k, buys chips, plays 1-3 hands, not happy and then cashes in 9,900 and gets new laundered cash. Maybe JBP did this too- played some BJ sessions, made some money and chased out 1.4m ahead, I doubt it, rather guessing the private games were rigged.
I cant prove any of this, but if Joe Biden was willing to publicly sell his high priced junk artwork to buyers allowing them access to his father POTUS Joe Biden, it doesnt surprise me this is the new public tactic rigged that no one can challenge or prove.
Dan Druff wrote-
Unfortunately, Druff has been playing the empty straw-man card "because I say so card" on me hoping I would just take the bait and pass- Nope.Quote:
desertrunner and some on the right are trying to say that they let Pritzker cash out $1.4m above what he bought in, regardless of his actual blackjack results (or if he played at all).
First, it was not a bribe as that was already made, this was the pay off. The bribe was already accepted and pay-off location agreed on.
Second- How often does he play big whale Black Jack?? I am guess not so much. How often does he walk away with over 1 million, I'm guessing not so much. As he is still in office fighting the Trump admin and eyeing a presidential bid, this just happened to magically randomly happen and the liberal media covers for him- suspicious.
Druff- You've said twice now- "He's a billionaire, so no..." This is the lamest excuse to play were you're just guessing and hoping this mud might stick to the wall. This means nothing as the bribe was made, accepted and then paid off, regardless if he's a billionaire. It looks lame when you say this because its a lame guess. He's in a powerful position, he's not going to spend his own money if he doesnt have to and the bribe payoff worked perfect at the blue county casino where no one questions it AND the liberal media will cover for you. Please stop saying- "Well, he's a billionaire, so..." because its a lame response. No one is going to turn down free money when they dont have to use their own cash to deliver on the political buy. Its just business.
It wasnt the casino, that was only the medium to make the transfer. Someone had to pay off this politician to get him to do what they bribed him to do. And now he is doing the perfect play-dumb-luck media interviews because no one can question him as the liberal media covers for him. "Ha ha, I just got lucky..." No shit Sherlock, all you had to do was show up and collect the money, bribe pay out done, now let the liberal media cover for you, no one will think about it next week. If the pay out was dirty under the table, THEN the GOP would have you, but this way out in the open- nice and clean.Quote:
Indeed, if a casino or casino-adjacent company/individual were to bribe him, that would be a good way to do it.
And no one cares, this means nothing, its just received funds and a deposit. The casino doesnt care, they do what theyre told. So he has presidential aspirations, more reason to accept the pay off.Quote:
This falls apart mainly due to the fact that Pritzker has $4b in net worth, and also has major Presidential aspirations. There's no way he'd risk fucking that up for a tiny percentage increase in his net worth.
Everything Druff said above was a guess, speculation and him playing the "because I say so" card.
Me- I cant prove that it happened, but in a BLUE city and county and this has been the trend lately for pay offs. And then we goes on camera because he knows the liberal media wont touch him and let the news story die today (Saturday) as the next news cycle starts tomorrow.
Hell, lets look at then Joe Biden when he got the special prosecutor fired in Ukraine and bragged about it. Why did the then sitting VP of the US need a special prosecutor fired in Ukraine before the 1 Billion was transferred over?? And this whole video is what got Trump impeached the first time because he questioned this video on the phone asking for an investigation in his first term.
Whistleblower Docs Show Burisma Hired Hunter Biden for His “Political Weight” and Carefully Navigated His Appointment to Protect Joe Biden
When Hunter Biden got his Ukraine energy board of directors position, "he just got lucky" too, right?
Upfront bribe pay off and bragging about it...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u8xOyt3fLZU
obv didn't read but you are nonetheless deserving
:noose
this site has really become the watering hole for the absolute dumbest people on the internet.
these are my people when ive had chardonnay jace be easy
Let me put it this way.
It's credible to believe that someone on PFA might offer me $500 for desertrunner's personal info. However, I'm pretty sure desertrunner knows I would not sell him out for $500. If asked why, he would probably say, "Because Druff is my friend, and $500 isn't much to him anyway, so he wouldn't even be slightly tempted to betray me to get paid that relatively small amout of money."
And he'd be correct. If someone offered me $500 for his info, there wouldn't even be 1% of me that would consider saying yes. It would be a snap NO.
That's basically where JB Pritzker stands, regarding $1.4 million. To everyone on this site, that's a lot of money. To Pritzker, it's not at all. Such a bribe/payoff makes zero impact on his life or finances, and can only end up being a negative (if he gets caught).
It would be the biggest unforced error in human history for a multi-billionaire serious Presidential candidate to accept a bribe of $1.4 million. It just makes no sense.
The more I think about it, the more I believe my theory that he had big losing sessions as well, but simply didn't report them. It makes sense. He didn't want to be seen as a loser or a problem gambler. He didn't want to explain to people that $5m to him is nothing, as that makes him look out of touch with everyday Americans. Thus, the best solution for him was just to declare that big win and pretend the losses didn't happen.
I respect what youre saying, but I just dont trust or believe JBP and think he's shady as fuck.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff