No.Quote:
Originally Posted by buzzy
Says the guy who is livin in S.E Asia...Quote:
Originally Posted by hongkonger
Come back home, until then kindly STFU please.
Printable View
No.Quote:
Originally Posted by buzzySays the guy who is livin in S.E Asia...Quote:
Originally Posted by hongkonger
Come back home, until then kindly STFU please.
Attention Libtards: FYI
Ronald Reagan was trailing Jimmy Carter by 8 points going into the final week of that election back in 1980.
Reagan fucking destroyed him in a landslide of epic proportions....it wasn't even close.
The lame-stream media tried doing exactly the same thing to Reagan back then as they are doing to Trump now.
The establishment hacks and all the so called 'expert' political pundits were also frantic to stop Reagan simply because he was an actor, and not part of the good ol' boys club in D.C.
Whether you want to admit it or not, we are seeing history repeating itself.
There are so many people that never voted or even registered that are now voting for the first time for Trump.
The pollsters aren't reaching them because these voters were never even registered before this election.
#dealwithit
http://media.gq.com/photos/57faf588b...fRUMAAfSRt.jpg
Quote:
HILLARY: I told you he'd fuck the chair
TRUMP: *while fucking the chair* I never fucked the chair
except that isn't really true. most polls actually had reagan ahead with one week to go. also they only did one presidential debate back then, which was one week before the election. that debate, which he nailed, gave reagan a chance to appear qualified and not a joke actor. trump has the same sort of criticisms against him, but he lost ground after each debate and did nothing to dismiss the not-qualifed label (at least to independents).Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyde
Quote:
Originally Posted by blakeexcept that isn't really true. most polls actually had reagan ahead with one week to go. also they only did one presidential debate back then, which was one week before the election. that debate, which he nailed, gave reagan a chance to appear qualified and not a joke actor. trump has the same sort of criticisms against him, but he lost ground after each debate and did nothing to dismiss the not-qualifed label (at least to independents).Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyde
also its worth nothing that what happened in 1980 was an actual presidential election, not the catastrophic end game of a dying empire's final descent into viral marketing as a surrogate for the pursuit of wisdom and truth.
Why does no one care that the current administration is threatening Russia with an attack all in the name of making sure Clinton wins the White House? And with no real proof Russia did anything?
Fucking sick shit.
Stop confusing him with the facts.Quote:
Originally Posted by blakeexcept that isn't really true. most polls actually had reagan ahead with one week to go. also they only did one presidential debate back then, which was one week before the election. that debate, which he nailed, gave reagan a chance to appear qualified and not a joke actor. trump has the same sort of criticisms against him, but he lost ground after each debate and did nothing to dismiss the not-qualifed label (at least to independents).Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyde
Yes I'm sure if a a Republican were president and claimed to have evidence of a Russian cyberattack you'd be preaching the same restraint. If a Democrat said hey wait a minute, you'd be calling for his head.Quote:
Originally Posted by BiffCo99
There was no real proof that Iraq did anything either (and still isn't), but W destroyed the whole country and created ISIS at the cost of thousands of American and countless Iraqi lives.
This is actually a lie perpetuated by trump. Reagan was consistently ahead as of June.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyde
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-me...reagan-race-a/
they're talking about an embarrassing wikileaks style cyberattack on putin, not a physical attack.Quote:
Originally Posted by BiffCo99
also, how would this possibly help clinton win? is the public is going to say, wow the CIA is doxing putin, i guess that means he really was helping trump? there's around 3 weeks before the election and hillary's up 7 points nationally according to fox news. newsflash -- there's nothing they need to do to ensure hillary wins. in fact, rocking the boat would be the last thing they'd want to do right now.
last point, how on earth would you know what proof they have or didn't have?
Had to quote me twice eh? Clearly you know something is up by your desperate defense of a ridiculous action by the Obama administration. I'm sure you think Yemen is just a coincidence too? Obama should be held accountable for tampering with this election, end of story.Quote:
Originally Posted by blakethey're talking about an embarrassing wikileaks style cyberattack on putin, not a physical attack.Quote:
Originally Posted by BiffCo99
also, how would this possibly help clinton win? is the public is going to say, wow the CIA is doxing putin, i guess that means he really was helping trump? there's around 3 weeks before the election and hillary's up 7 points nationally according to fox news. newsflash -- there's nothing they need to do to ensure hillary wins. in fact, rocking the boat would be the last thing they'd want to do right now.
last point, how on earth would you know what proof they have or didn't have?
But with the media in his back pocket and all in on Hillary, there's no chance of that happening. Scary times for Americans.
i really don't know what you mean about quoting you twice, cause i don't think i did.Quote:
Originally Posted by BiffCo99Had to quote me twice eh? Clearly you know something is up by your desperate defense of a ridiculous action by the Obama administration. I'm sure you think Yemen is just a coincidence too? Obama should be held accountable for tampering with this election, end of story.Quote:
Originally Posted by blake
But with the media in his back pocket and all in on Hillary, there's no chance of that happening. Scary times for Americans.
anyway, you use words like "desperate" and "ridiculous" but pretty much just admitted that you have no idea if the US has any proof that russia did anything or not.
i asked you to explain how cyberattacking russia would be a viable means of "rigging the election," but you just ignored it and said "obama should be held accountable for tampering with this election, end of story."
great. this is the way trump supporters think in a nutshell
I thought hongcucker's response was yours too, my bad.Quote:
Originally Posted by blakei really don't know what you mean about quoting you twice, cause i don't think i did.Quote:
Originally Posted by BiffCo99
anyway, you use words like "desperate" and "ridiculous" but pretty much just admitted that you have no idea if the US has any proof that russia did anything or not.
i asked you to explain how cyberattacking russia would be a viable means of "rigging the election," but you just ignored it and said "obama should be held accountable for tampering with this election, end of story."
great. this is the way trump supporters think in a nutshell
If you can't see that this is a ploy to discredit Wikileaks then I don't what to tell you. It's plain as day to me and it's disgusting.
How can I prove there's no proof it's the Russians? How can you prove there is proof? Obama has lied time and time again to the American people and there's no fucking way I believe him this time. If you choose to be naive that's on you.
List of Debunked Groper Allegations by Corrupt Media Against Donald Trump
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016...-donald-trump/
Bwahahahaaaaa
Idiots are still trying that "armrest" bullshit. Allow me to debunk your debunked shit lol......Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyde
http://www.tmz.com/2016/10/15/donald...lane-armrests/
Quote:
Donald Trump's camp claims the center armrest separating him from a fellow passenger is the smoking gun proving she's a liar ... but we did some digging and she's on solid ground.
Jessica Leeds claims she was sitting next to Trump on a flight from Dallas to NYC in 1979, when he got all handsy with her. She says all of a sudden the center console disappeared, and that's when the under-the-skirt groping began.
Trump's camp claims her story doesn't hold water, because the center armrest in first class was fixed -- not removable.
Leeds claims she was on a Braniff Airways Boeing 707, but we contacted Ben Cass, the founder of the Braniff Airways Foundation, and he says 707s were not in service from Dallas to NYC in '79.
Cass says the plane was actually a Boeing 727, and the armrest was indeed removable by simply pulling it vertically.
L O fucking L
In b4 the info sec guy that would vote for the literal worst human in history in regards to server security tells you that that smart people who know better confirm that these are fake and therefore shouldn't be read.
Yes, part of the false mythology of Reagan.Quote:
Originally Posted by BetCheckBetQuote:
Originally Posted by Tyde
This is actually a lie perpetuated by trump. Reagan was consistently ahead as of June.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-me...reagan-race-a/
BOOM ROASTEDQuote:
Originally Posted by Muck Ficon
Wikileaks Emails Confirm Media in Clinton’s Pocket
http://observer.com/2016/10/rigged-d...intons-pocket/
Im not saying its not true, mind you, but I dont trust wikileaks at this point. The veracity of their product is at best suspect.
what the average % of the population voting at president elections?
:facepalmQuote:
Originally Posted by sonatine
this post you have a problem with, really?Quote:
Originally Posted by BiffCo99:facepalmQuote:
Originally Posted by sonatine
Absolutely. It's a bullshit narrative being sold by the left and the Clinton Camp. Wikileaks has a great track record. I think he's still just mad he got trolled in to staying up for Assange's infomercial, which I kind of get.Quote:
Originally Posted by adamantiumthis post you have a problem with, really?Quote:
Originally Posted by BiffCo99
Quote:
Originally Posted by hongkongerThere's also that. Him and all the other Trumpets. And everyone on Fox News.Quote:
Originally Posted by DirtyB
Karl Rove's meltdown last election night was pretty hilarious - when he was in such denial that Obama was going to win again.
Clinton Allies ‘Believe The Obama Forces’ Committed Voter Fraud In ’08
Two attorneys with close ties to the Clinton family believe then-Sen. Barack Obama’s 2008 campaign “flooded” the caucuses with “ineligible voters,” according to leaked emails.
Emails hacked from Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton’s campaign manager John Podesta cites two attorneys and “old friends of the Clintons,” James Lyons and Michael Driver, tasked with “caucus protection, election protection and to raise hard $” for the 2016 Colorado caucus.
Apparently, Lyons and Driver didn’t want a repeat of 2008 when, they believe, the Obama campaign “flooded the caucuses with ineligible voters,” according to the email chain released by WikiLeaks. It’s unclear if they are only talking about the Colorado caucus or those in other states.
“High importance,” Podesta wrote to campaign staffers in a May 2015 email.
________________
http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/15/em...r-fraud-in-08/
Quote:
Originally Posted by BiffCo99Absolutely. It's a bullshit narrative being sold by the left and the Clinton Camp. Wikileaks has a great track record. I think he's still just mad he got trolled in to staying up for Assange's infomercial, which I kind of get.Quote:
Originally Posted by adamantium
No one doing gov work has a folder called "Pay to Play" on their hard drive.
Assange wants to be part of the convo about 'what destroyed America' in a hundred years so hes no longer vetting material properly. Assange just hope that the village rubes are so angry about no longer being relevant to America's future because they refuse to be as smart as the people who are, that they swallow anything that allows them to escape responsibility for it.
Case in point, You.
Wow, where to begin.Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatineQuote:
Originally Posted by BiffCo99
No one doing gov work has a folder called "Pay to Play" on their hard drive.
Assange wants to be part of the convo about 'what destroyed America' in a hundred years so hes no longer vetting material properly. Assange just hope that the village rubes are so angry about no longer being relevant to America's future because they refuse to be as smart as the people who are, that they swallow anything that allows them to escape responsibility for it.
Case in point, You.
From the Observer on the Guccifer 2.0 Wikileaks files:
"A folder titled “pay-to-play” was also included, consisting of opposition research on Republicans in Congress, citing bills they supported while receiving campaign donations from entities who benefit from their stance."
Dude, Wikileaks has over a decade's worth of material all of which has been proven to be 100% accurate. They also released a lot of shit on Bush, which I'm sure you ate up. What's different this time around? Not too hard to figure out…...
HUH? SO THE WOMAN MAKES A CLAIM, THAT INCLUDES FALSE INFO, AND TRUMP GOT ROASTED? MAYBE THE WOMAN IS LYING? WHEN YOU TRY TO ADD DETAILS TO YOUR CLAIM, AND THEY ARE FALSE, WELL....... GOOD LUCK IN COURT.Quote:
Originally Posted by hongkongerBOOM ROASTEDQuote:
Originally Posted by Muck Ficon
sorry I meant to green rep you for that post Chaps....
I think I just red repped instinctively because I'm amazed how fucking retarded hongmonger is, and was overwhelmed by his downs syndrome and blind liberalism being shipped here straight from fucking southeast Asia
Wait when did Wikileaks lose their 100% accuracy rep??
LMFAO SHEEPATINE IS A GOOD LITTLE SLAVE
Quote:
Originally Posted by thesidedish
I was actually thinking the same thing, or pretty damn close to it...
when exactly did Wikileaks suddenly lose their credibility when they have historically had a pristine record for accuracy ?
i guess right about the same time the Hillary and Podesta leaks started flooding out like a river.
The response now from the libtards is 'oh, well Assange obviously has an agenda and the information being leaked is fabricated'
LOL give me a fucking break
The bad news is that apparently much of the info being leaked now is being 'blacked out' by mainstream media
But I don't think it matters that much at this stage in the game...I'd say 95% of voters already have their mind up who they are voting for
Quote:
Originally Posted by BiffCo99Wow, where to begin.Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatine
From the Observer on the Guccifer 2.0 Wikileaks files:
"A folder titled “pay-to-play” was also included, consisting of opposition research on Republicans in Congress, citing bills they supported while receiving campaign donations from entities who benefit from their stance."
Dude, Wikileaks has over a decade's worth of material all of which has been proven to be 100% accurate. They also released a lot of shit on Bush, which I'm sure you ate up. What's different this time around? Not too hard to figure out…...
http://www.dailydot.com/layer8/gucci...ion-hack-leak/
But yeah given that infowars hasnt published a sympathetic opinion, I understand that I'm wasting my keystrokes.
You're gonna call me an infowars loon and then post something from the Daily Dot?Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatineQuote:
Originally Posted by BiffCo99
http://www.dailydot.com/layer8/gucci...ion-hack-leak/
But yeah given that infowars hasnt published a sympathetic opinion, I understand that I'm wasting my keystrokes.
:lol2
That's it, I'm done for the night. I'll let sidedish take over now.
Trump calls for Drug Test ahead of Next Debate, says Clinton was 'pumped up'
Donald Trump suggested Saturday that his Democratic rival, Hillary Clinton, has been "getting pumped up" with performance-enhancing drugs and challenged Clinton to take a drug test before the final debate next week.
Trump argued that Clinton was more energetic during the beginning of their debate last Sunday, but lost her steam by the end of the debate. He offered no evidence to back up his wild claim.
"I think we should take a drug test prior to the debate," Trump said during a rally here. "Because I don't know what's going on with her, but at the beginning of her last debate, she was all pumped up at the beginning, and at the end it was like, huff, take me down. She could barely reach her car."
Trump appeared to be conflating the debate with last month's 9/11 ceremony where Clinton struggled to get inside her van on her own due to a bout with pneumonia.
Reached for comment, the Clinton campaign said Trump is trying to depress voter turnout by his "shameful attempts to undermine an election weeks before it happens."
Trump has repeatedly questioned Clinton's "strength and stamina," raising concerns about her physical and mental fitness to be president -- all without providing any evidence for his claims.
But Trump's suggestion that Clinton has been taking drugs in order to perform well at the presidential debates is a new step for him.
"A lot of things are going on, folks. A lot of things. I think she's actually getting pumped, you want to know the truth? She's getting pumped up," Trump said Saturday. "She's getting pumped up for Wednesday."
Trump added that presidential candidates are "like athletes" and should undergo drug screenings before the next debate.
"Athletes, they make them take a drug test. I think we should take a drug test prior to the debate,"
Trump said. "I'm willing to do it."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3mE7YkeasOA
http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/15/politi...f=rss_politics
LMAO @ 'comments disabled for this video'
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyde
rofl yeah cause it was hillary who was sniffing like a cokehead the entire way through the first two debates