LETS NOT FORGET THAT ABUREY MCBENDIN WAS SO DISTRAUGHT OVER THE 500+ EARTHQUAKES HIS FRACKING HAS CAUSED IN OKLAHOMA LAST YEAR THAT HE HELS'D HIMSELF
Printable View
LETS NOT FORGET THAT ABUREY MCBENDIN WAS SO DISTRAUGHT OVER THE 500+ EARTHQUAKES HIS FRACKING HAS CAUSED IN OKLAHOMA LAST YEAR THAT HE HELS'D HIMSELF
ATTENTION LINTARDS!!!!!
FRAKING DOES NOT CAUSE PROBALEMS.... EARTHQUAKES ARE GOD PUNSIHMENT FOR ALLOWING SHEMALES INTO CHILDRENS BATHROOMS!!!!!!
STACE DASH SAYS DADDY WILL MAKE THE HE SHES CRAP IN THE BUSHES!!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatine
Maybe people just dont like watching senseless asswipes like the BLM and their ILK, destroy shit and act like fools, so they vote against whomever they side with? It doesnt make them racist white separatists. It means they dont like the absurdity on the other side and dont want to see asswipes make their lives harder.
Im all for motivation and hard work, so I dont think I want to side with the ones expecting others to give up all their hard worked earnings to fund some one else's lifestyles. If Bernie didnt have so many fucksticks supporting him, I may have listened more to his message. I think many people would agree with me on that.
Was able to find a photo of Trump naked on the dark web.
(WARNING: NSFW)
So?Quote:
Originally Posted by ToasterOven
Quote:
Originally Posted by TellafriendSo?Quote:
Originally Posted by ToasterOven
The Daily Beast is an American news reporting and opinion website focusing on politics and pop culture with a liberal progressive slant
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRK StarQuote:
Originally Posted by Tellafriend
The Daily Beast is an American news reporting and opinion website focusing on politics and pop culture with a liberal progressive slant
There's a video.
I guess I was blind to how many regular posters on these boards were completely fucking retarded before this election.
Can't wait
Don't be so hard on yourselfQuote:
Originally Posted by ToasterOvenQuote:
Originally Posted by DRK Star
There's a video.
I guess I was blind to how many regular posters on these boards were completely fucking retarded before this election.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRK StarQuote:
Originally Posted by Tellafriend
The Daily Beast is an American news reporting and opinion website focusing on politics and pop culture with a liberal progressive slant
if the illegitimate love child of heinrich himmler and the entire white power structure of 1980's South Africa accidentally shot a white person while aiming for a black person, drk would accuse the bullet of a liberal progressive slant.
amusing
sauce
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rNjNfKgYIM8
You listed a ton of things here and I don't have the time or desire to respond to them all.Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatine
But I have to call out some areas where I strongly disagree.
The "national healthcare initiative" was a flawed disaster which was ramrodded into law without most people (including Obama) fully understanding it.
It fixed one problem (the issue with certain people not being able to qualify for individual insurance) and created another (ruined existing individual health insurance, skyrocketed costs).
The new healthcare laws did nothing to contain the runaway costs of our system (the biggest problem) and the ridiculous, convoluted medical billing system which makes it impossible for the patient to predict cost of care (the second biggest problem).
And then there was the $560 million disaster known as healthcare.gov and Obama's refusal to fire the woman in charge of the whole thing, which pretty much underscored Obama's managerial incompetence.
Obama is a smart guy and seems like mostly a good person (unlike Hillary on the latter), but he is just not a good manager. Reminds me of some people I used to work with -- very smart/competent people who just didn't have the skills to manage.
Regarding "keeping al Qaeda/ISIS off our soil", he can't be credited for that. The structure to keep terrorists off our soil was mostly established post-9/11 by the Bush Administration, including some oft-criticized elements such as the Patriot Act. Obama simply continued some of these policies (much to the chagrin of fellow Dems) and we still stayed mostly safe, aside from some individual terror attacks such as the Boston Marathon and San Bernadino attacks. But this isn't something you can give credit to Obama, much like Jay Leno can't be given credit for The Tonight Show.
However, if you want to discuss ISIS, that was a monumental screwup on the part of Obama. He didn't take them seriously. He referred to them as "the JV (junior varsity) team", and laughed off any real concern about them. Many Republicans at the time were objecting to this and insisting that Obama was making a huge mistake not taking action against early ISIS, but Obama dismissed them as foolish. Now you see where we are today. ISIS could have been smacked off the map before it grew to eclipse al Qaeda. It wasn't. We knew about it, and we sat by as it rapidly expanded. By the time action was taken, it was too late. Obama cannot take credit for anything having to do with ISIS.
And let's face it... the tech sector has a mind of its own. Clinton does not get credit for its late '90s growth, Bush does not deserve criticism for its early 2000s collapse, and Obama does not get credit for any recent return to realism in the industry. That would be like Obama taking credit for good weather on Christmas.
Obama wasn't as bad as some conservatives like to say, but to say that he was a great President is laughable. I have so many other valid criticisms I could level here, and so many other ways to debunk claims of "accomplishments" he made.
One of my big issues with Obama was his refusal to ever get rid of crappy cabinet members. He stood behind Kathleen Sebellius after the healthcare.gov embarrassment. He stood behind Eric Shinsheki after the horrendous VA waiting list scandal. He stood behind Eric Holder despite a horrible performance as Attorney General.
Even fellow Democats were irritated by this. Some derisively called him "No Drama Obama" behind his back, in reference to Obama's obsession with everyone getting along within his Administration, meaning that nobody was allowed to bring up legitimate issues when they noticed someone else failing at their job.
http://www.mediaite.com/online/vox-e...-start-a-riot/
Vox Editor Openly Supports Violence: ‘If Trump Comes to Your Town, Start a Riot’
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan DruffYou listed a ton of things here and I don't have the time or desire to respond to them all.Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatine
But I have to call out some areas where I strongly disagree.
The "national healthcare initiative" was a flawed disaster which was ramrodded into law without most people (including Obama) fully understanding it.
It fixed one problem (the issue with certain people not being able to qualify for individual insurance) and created another (ruined existing individual health insurance, skyrocketed costs).
The new healthcare laws did nothing to contain the runaway costs of our system (the biggest problem) and the ridiculous, convoluted medical billing system which makes it impossible for the patient to predict cost of care (the second biggest problem).
And then there was the $560 million disaster known as healthcare.gov and Obama's refusal to fire the woman in charge of the whole thing, which pretty much underscored Obama's managerial incompetence.
Obama is a smart guy and seems like mostly a good person (unlike Hillary on the latter), but he is just not a good manager. Reminds me of some people I used to work with -- very smart/competent people who just didn't have the skills to manage.
Regarding "keeping al Qaeda/ISIS off our soil", he can't be credited for that. The structure to keep terrorists off our soil was mostly established post-9/11 by the Bush Administration, including some oft-criticized elements such as the Patriot Act. Obama simply continued some of these policies (much to the chagrin of fellow Dems) and we still stayed mostly safe, aside from some individual terror attacks such as the Boston Marathon and San Bernadino attacks. But this isn't something you can give credit to Obama, much like Jay Leno can't be given credit for The Tonight Show.
However, if you want to discuss ISIS, that was a monumental screwup on the part of Obama. He didn't take them seriously. He referred to them as "the JV (junior varsity) team", and laughed off any real concern about them. Many Republicans at the time were objecting to this and insisting that Obama was making a huge mistake not taking action against early ISIS, but Obama dismissed them as foolish. Now you see where we are today. ISIS could have been smacked off the map before it grew to eclipse al Qaeda. It wasn't. We knew about it, and we sat by as it rapidly expanded. By the time action was taken, it was too late. Obama cannot take credit for anything having to do with ISIS.
And let's face it... the tech sector has a mind of its own. Clinton does not get credit for its late '90s growth, Bush does not deserve criticism for its early 2000s collapse, and Obama does not get credit for any recent return to realism in the industry. That would be like Obama taking credit for good weather on Christmas.
Obama wasn't as bad as some conservatives like to say, but to say that he was a great President is laughable. I have so many other valid criticisms I could level here, and so many other ways to debunk claims of "accomplishments" he made.
One of my big issues with Obama was his refusal to ever get rid of crappy cabinet members. He stood behind Kathleen Sebellius after the healthcare.gov embarrassment. He stood behind Eric Shinsheki after the horrendous VA waiting list scandal. He stood behind Eric Holder despite a horrible performance as Attorney General.
Even fellow Democats were irritated by this. Some derisively called him "No Drama Obama" behind his back, in reference to Obama's obsession with everyone getting along within his Administration, meaning that nobody was allowed to bring up legitimate issues when they noticed someone else failing at their job.
DAAAAAAAAAMNED DANIEL
Seriously tho who do you think was a great president, exactly?
Because applying this scale of criticism is nothing but a nuclear option for derailing anyones opinion on anything, ever.
Old news. 'Cause he was appropriately canned. (I'll let you mumble up a source on this yourself.)Quote:
Originally Posted by DRK Star
sonatine is gonna put druffs head on the curb itt
Quote:
Originally Posted by big dick
zero interest in doing this and its not like druff doesnt have a right to his own opinion. i just think that when people levy accusations like druff's against obama, they do so from a place of wounded pride and alienation more than from a place of neutral assessment of an elected official facing unprecedented partisan attacks while governing over a nation composed largely of habitually butthurt idiots with very little to lose by burning the world down.
CMON JACE PUT HIM ON THE CURB IT WILL BE SO SICK HILARY 4LIFE
Vox editor suspended for encouraging riots at Trump ralliesQuote:
Originally Posted by DRK Star
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016...p-rallies.html
Before we give obama a pat on the back for saving the nation from the horrors of frac'ing, we should let the people of West Virginia chime and their thoughts (we'll just have to pretend that they have Internet and that we could even understand what they wrote).
Just to clarify:
the comparison of trump to hitler was lately popularized by louis ck, and he clearly qualifies that he meant hitler not as "der fuhrer" in the throes of WWII, but as he was rising to power in the mid-1930s. which incidentally -- and this was not in the email louis ck sent out -- was BEFORE Time magazine shortsightedly honored Hitler as "Man of the Year" in 1938 (basically, after sending out a massive, first-ever politically-charged email -- see below for link -- lambasting trump not as evil per se but as a sad and spoiled little boy who desperately needs our approval, he qualified what he meant on 60 minutes or one of those interview shows (i'm pretty sure i got the show wrong; just find it on youtube, i'm not your servant). though he also talks about what he means by this comparison in the email, but in less depth). others have made the comparison of trump to hitler, but louis ck seemed to have the most thoughtful one (and in fewer words, not overstating the scope of things, or trying to awkwardly match details of 1930s germany to america in the year 2016) that not only made sense, but also didn't have that sensationalist tenor of some nonlogical emotional "argument" whose hysteria was masked by some thinly-veiled attempt to lend a reason to it's blubbering validity, and 'splain us a thingertwo as to why it's SUCH an accurate comparison.
i say this because i've read several comparisons since that try to take the high road and sound logical (https://youtu.be/TP8RB7UZHKI), and to me it seems the longer they are in content, the more said self-ordained expert-of-knowledges seems to be overcompensating for not really having much of a strong point, and instead thinking whoever is reading will assume length equals thoughtfulness.
but anytime that happens, let's just remember that in 1957, US senator strom thurmond spoke for over 24 hours in OPPOSITION to the Civil Rights Act of 1957 (he felt very stongly that 'white is right' and 'black is whack,' evidently), and in this longest-ever filibuster in US political history, thurmond regaled his rapt audience by reading passages from many things, among them the farewell address of george washington. oooooooh!
other famous filibusters have read things like their favorite recipes, entire novels, and large passages from the phonebook (i'm not sure the exact phonebook, but it's probably an important detail).
but i dye grass.
this sort of lorem ipsum-ing ad nausem may be, uh, riveting and effective in proving a point (as well as pissing literally everyone, supporters and non alike, off; my guess is that had thurmond read dale carnegie's "how to win friends and influence people," someone would have shot him on the spot), but aside from all the engaging rhetoric here, more isn't ALWAYS better, and, at least content-wise, it still is not above being anything more than, yknow, long-winded bullshit.
oh, and in case you have just over a day to kill, here is the full transcript of thurmond's eloquent and, uh, knee-slappingly hilarious, stunt: http://www.senate.gov/.../pdf/Thurmo...uster_1957.pdf
louis ck's email: http://variety.com/2016/tv/news/loui...us-1201723679/
fine, i am your servant. and it was cbs with charlie rose: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sLoQh3MvZc0
Actually I did it way before they did it:Quote:
Originally Posted by LarryLaffer
http://pokerfraudalert.com/forum/sho...l=1#post514492Quote:
Originally Posted by 4Dragons
It's been pretty common lately for 1 political camp & supporters to compare the other candidate to Hitler.
Pretty sad actually.
Thank you commiefornia for showing the country that your state is made up of mostly illegal trash from south of the border, San Jose just helped Trump more and more . . . God liberals are fucking dumb lol
http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presid...-by-jail-time/
EXCLUSIVE: General Jerry Boykin on Hillary Exposing Intelligence Sources: ‘Lives Have Been Endangered…Punishable By Jail Time’
This guy has got to be a mumbles dupe..Quote:
Originally Posted by LarryLaffer
Did he need a couple of more paragraphs to rationalize the progressive spewing hatred mentality..
Complicating the simple is a sign of ignorance.
Simplifying the "complicated" is a sign of intelligence.
APES ARE APES AND PEOPLE ARE PEOPLE WHATS THE CONFUSION DUMBOCRATS
http://www.cnbc.com/2016/06/05/swiss...oney-plan.html
Swiss voters reject 'money for nothing' income plan
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ITnUpVhvTM
This'll be fun:
Tales from the Trump University legal vault
Playbook PDF: http://static.politico.com/25/88/783...y-playbook.pdf
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheXFactor
Found a rip copy online if you want to try it out: http://www.rlslog.net/surgeon-simula...trump-tinyiso/
Quote:
Originally Posted by 4Dragons
This looks bad but the more Hillary talks about trumps minor bullshit the more he brings out her major bullshit. You would think the media would just give up already, the man is going to be president no matter what. The only thing stopping trump from being president is a bullet to the head aka arkanside.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MintjewlipsQuote:
Originally Posted by 4Dragons
This looks bad but the more Hillary talks about trumps minor bullshit the more he brings out her major bullshit. You would think the media would just give up already, the man is going to be president no matter what. The only thing stopping trump from being president is a bullet to the head aka arkanside.
To me it says more about the danger of being a celebrity and endorsing something that you didn't really have anything to do with, didn't create the materials for or anything else, you just signed off on it figuring you'd just collect a royalty check from it every month. I mean I can, right now, go have Kim Kardashian tweet some crazy shit on her twitter feed for a few grand and she'd be on the hook for it, even though she most likely didn't even see the tweet going out to all of her fans.
Nice try. Trump lent his NAME to the project, as well as his reputation, and endorsement. That is a *bit* more than retweeting something. The equivalent would be Druff putting his name on a scam poker site, and using his voice and image, etc, to vouch for its fairness and financial soundness, versus merely having a banner ad on PFA.Quote:
Originally Posted by 4DragonsQuote:
Originally Posted by Mintjewlips
To me it says more about the danger of being a celebrity and endorsing something that you didn't really have anything to do with, didn't create the materials for or anything else, you just signed off on it figuring you'd just collect a royalty check from it every month. I mean I can, right now, go have Kim Kardashian tweet some crazy shit on her twitter feed for a few grand and she'd be on the hook for it, even though she most likely didn't even see the tweet going out to all of her fans.
P.S. Oh, and then defending the integrity of that scam poker site after others called it out for scamming people.
:fail
Still waiting on those $250k worth speech transcripts, i can't wait to read them, i want to learn how to make speeches worth 250kQuote:
Originally Posted by MumblesBadlyNice try. Trump lent his NAME to the project, as well as his reputation, and endorsement. That is a *bit* more than retweeting something. The equivalent would be Druff putting his name on a scam poker site, and using his voice and image, etc, to vouch for its fairness and financial soundness, versus merely having a banner ad on PFA.Quote:
Originally Posted by 4Dragons
And its has begun....
http://pagesix.com/2016/06/05/tell-a...e-white-house/