Time to get on the TRUMP train

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

Seriously though, I'm getting so tired of the "...but Hillary is qualified to be President, right?" lines from willfully delusional Democrats.

Many of these same people couldn't stop talking about how corrupt she was, back when they believed Bernie had a chance.

Why even talk about how "qualified" she is? Her political resume/knowledge were never considered issues with her, so that defense of her is pointless.

Richard Nixon was also quite qualified to be President on the day before he resigned.

He also wasn't fit to be President because of his ethical lapses.

Same with Hillary, except amazingly she's about to be elected, rather than Nixon's situation where he resigned in disgrace.

Bottom line is that having qualifications to be President doesn't mean that you should be, or that you hold the proper ethics for the position.

Enjoy your 4 years of constant scandal, everyone.

Maybe 8 if the Republicans fuck up again in 2020.

---

Qualifications just weren't an issue in the Dem primary. Bernie has a better resume than Obama did in 2008, and Hillary has the same Senate resume plus Secretary of State. There was just no ammunition for either side.

Now Hillary is running against someone utterly unqualified to be President, so it is an issue.

The next 4 years will be full of Republican manufactured "scandals", exactly like Benghazi. They'll scream on Fox News, hold dozens of Congressional hearings, spend millions of dollars, and end up with nothing.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

Seriously though, I'm getting so tired of the "...but Hillary is qualified to be President, right?" lines from willfully delusional Democrats.

Many of these same people couldn't stop talking about how corrupt she was, back when they believed Bernie had a chance.

Why even talk about how "qualified" she is? Her political resume/knowledge were never considered issues with her, so that defense of her is pointless.

Richard Nixon was also quite qualified to be President on the day before he resigned.

He also wasn't fit to be President because of his ethical lapses.

Same with Hillary, except amazingly she's about to be elected, rather than Nixon's situation where he resigned in disgrace.

Bottom line is that having qualifications to be President doesn't mean that you should be, or that you hold the proper ethics for the position.

Enjoy your 4 years of constant scandal, everyone.

Maybe 8 if the Republicans fuck up again in 2020.

---

LOL at Nixon's "ethical lapses", nice way of saying he hated the jews, but in his defense, who didn't hate the jews in 1969, or the coloreds.

A poll is only as good as the people asking the questions. This an anomaly of a political race. According to the 2014 census, there are 197 million non Hispanic white people in America.






As you can see by the map, there are large concentrations of white people in the midwest, south, and eastcoast. More importantly Pennsylvania, Ohio, Florida, and Texas, must win states for Trump.

I believe Trump wins, just to many white people. Even if you divide them in half and hypothetically say half are Republican and half are Democrat, the Republican half overwhelmingly is enthusiastic about Trump, versus the Democratic half that hates Trump but doesn't care for Hillary. I believe the disillusioned Democrats(which is a substantial amount) don't show up for election day, negating any minority vote. And the Republican voters will show up in droves, compelled to vote for Trump, many believing the election will be stolen if they don't vote.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DirtyB

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by rum dick

That and the whole world laughing at him during the post birth certificate release washington correspondents dinner (ie the one where obama killed trump figuratively just after killing bin laden literally).

---

That's the thing that kills both the "Trump is a plant" and "Trump doesn't actually want to win" theories. The birther shit he was spewing in 2011 is indistinguishable from the shit he's been saying all year.

Plus he literally launched his campaign by calling Mexican immigrants rapists, and followed it up a week later by John McCain a loser for getting captured by the North Vietnamese.

---

With the birther argument he was trolling the tea party with one of their dumbest Obama objections. Trump was never a tea party guy.

It's the golden age of trolls. This phenomenon has taken me by surprise too.

There are just the right number of idiots to make this all possible.

I miss Milo that fabulous troll. Trump and Milo were playing the same game.

Trump and Hillary prolly had dinner and laughed over cocktails

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DirtyB

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

Seriously though, I'm getting so tired of the "...but Hillary is qualified to be President, right?" lines from willfully delusional Democrats.

Many of these same people couldn't stop talking about how corrupt she was, back when they believed Bernie had a chance.

Why even talk about how "qualified" she is? Her political resume/knowledge were never considered issues with her, so that defense of her is pointless.

Richard Nixon was also quite qualified to be President on the day before he resigned.

He also wasn't fit to be President because of his ethical lapses.

Same with Hillary, except amazingly she's about to be elected, rather than Nixon's situation where he resigned in disgrace.

Bottom line is that having qualifications to be President doesn't mean that you should be, or that you hold the proper ethics for the position.

Enjoy your 4 years of constant scandal, everyone.

Maybe 8 if the Republicans fuck up again in 2020.

---

Qualifications just weren't an issue in the Dem primary. Bernie has a better resume than Obama did in 2008, and Hillary has the same Senate resume plus Secretary of State. There was just no ammunition for either side.

Now Hillary is running against someone utterly unqualified to be President, so it is an issue.

The next 4 years will be full of Republican manufactured "scandals", exactly like Benghazi. They'll scream on Fox News, hold dozens of Congressional hearings, spend millions of dollars, and end up with nothing.

---

Exactly

Calling Benghazi a "manufactured scandal" is like calling the Holocaust an exaggeration.

Have some respek you delusional libtard.

I wonder what influence or inspiration Trump the reality show entertainer took from Colbert. Colbert was another guy on the cutting edge of trolling large.

Much as the slow kids caught up with Milo we (I of course mean YOU) are gonna feel mighty foolish for treating schticks like the Great Wall of Mexico seriously.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

And yeah I'm pretty convinced if John Kasich was the nominee, he would be leading handily right now in the polls.

---

He and his terrible haircut would be up by at least ten points in every battleground state right now assuming he didn't do something stupid like select pence or Cruz as his VP

Druff, is mintjewlips a jsearles dupe? I ask because jewlips is the only poster who constantly butchers than vs then and to vs too as much as jsizzle did.

Aw c'mon Rum. Milo was making fun of Trump and the crowd. Yeah, he was in it for the attention but he was original even if you didn't think he was funny.

Gotta confess I loved it. Never saw anyone quite like him.

I tried to dress better anyway.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ToasterOven

Oh my. This might be the dumbest thing I've ever read. Well done. The bar is so incredibly low, but you've done the near impossible.

---

Comments
rum dick: dumbest post youve made yet which is saying something


:lol

GREAT MATERIAL GUYS

:YAWN

EASY WORK

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by rum dick

Druff, is mintjewlips a jsearles dupe? I ask because jewlips is the only poster who constantly butchers than vs then and to vs too as much as jsizzle did.

---

It started posting on 4/14 which is the exact same day searles lost his ability to give out reputation, but also the same day lannister had his account title changed to 'SCAMMER'. I believe its a joint account between the two. Yes it has the posting frequency and habitual retardation of sizzle but it also carries the racist minimum wage worker vibe that animosity brings to the table. And fookame did eventually pay back China $200 after he saved up enough pay checks. So idk, I get the feeling jules is a part of jewlips, but it may very well be all sizz, because his brand of country stupid is all over that account.

DISH is absolutely CRUSHING this thread

Peaceful Hillary supporter

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by blake

i don't think it's a matter of her qualifications versus his. most people would probably welcome an outsider with no political experience at this point.

the temperament argument is the big one. this is the first election in my lifetime where there's a real concern that one of the candidates is a legit psychopath

---

Yes, Hillary is a psychopath. What exactly are you worried about if Trump were to win?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sanlmar

He's not a politician
He's not a Republican

He's a huckster
He's a promoter

He's not funded
He's not serious

He's no fool
He's always had goals and accomplished a lot.

So what was his endgame?
He trolled the Republican Party. It was stealth and it was beautiful. It was necessary too.

He's not crazy. When he fesses up he will be hailed as brilliant and reviled too.

Our fucked up system made all this possible.

---

The GOP have themselves to blame by going full retard on fomenting bigotry and xenophobia while ignoring the economic interests of ordinary Americans since at least when Obama took office.

Mintjewlips is not searles unless searles moved far from Missouri.

It seems clear Mintjewlips had another screen name either here or on NWP/DD, but I don't know who it is.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DirtyB

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

Seriously though, I'm getting so tired of the "...but Hillary is qualified to be President, right?" lines from willfully delusional Democrats.

Many of these same people couldn't stop talking about how corrupt she was, back when they believed Bernie had a chance.

Why even talk about how "qualified" she is? Her political resume/knowledge were never considered issues with her, so that defense of her is pointless.

Richard Nixon was also quite qualified to be President on the day before he resigned.

He also wasn't fit to be President because of his ethical lapses.

Same with Hillary, except amazingly she's about to be elected, rather than Nixon's situation where he resigned in disgrace.

Bottom line is that having qualifications to be President doesn't mean that you should be, or that you hold the proper ethics for the position.

Enjoy your 4 years of constant scandal, everyone.

Maybe 8 if the Republicans fuck up again in 2020.

---

Qualifications just weren't an issue in the Dem primary. Bernie has a better resume than Obama did in 2008, and Hillary has the same Senate resume plus Secretary of State. There was just no ammunition for either side.

Now Hillary is running against someone utterly unqualified to be President, so it is an issue.

The next 4 years will be full of Republican manufactured "scandals", exactly like Benghazi. They'll scream on Fox News, hold dozens of Congressional hearings, spend millions of dollars, and end up with nothing.

---

This is exactly what I'm talking about.

"Manufactured scandals"

No.

Real scandals.

Clintons keep slithering out of them, but most of these scandals existed because of legitimately bad behavior by the Clintons -- and they seem to engage in such behavior FAR more than other major politicians.

The problem is that most Democrats don't want to admit this, for fear of scaring people into voting for Trump.

They're concerned that if they concede, "Yeah, she's self-serving, shady, and downright corrupt, but... umm.... look how bad Trump is!", people will be unconvinced and choose to select Trump on election day.

So they feel their only option is to remain willfully ignorant of Hillary's major ethics flaws, and repeat the ludicrous talking points that her reputed shadiness is simply a result of a right-wing propaganda machine.

There is such a thing as, "Yes, Hillary is awful and shady, but Trump would be an even bigger disaster, so we must support Hllary."

Why do so few Democrats say that -- or even think it?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by rum dick

Druff, is mintjewlips a jsearles dupe? I ask because jewlips is the only poster who constantly butchers than vs then and to vs too as much as jsizzle did.

---

ehh searles is a grade A douche but not nasty.Jewlips is A douche+ NASTY

1 I still think its searles. Its not like he was really killing it in Missouri. If he found a $19 an hour job in some other midwest shithole he might have relocated. I mean if its some random hick who re-emerged from the shadows, first of all, wow is there a never ending supply of these guys and secondly that implies that he went from nwp (his first post was a teamrazor velveeta joke) to not posting for 4 years to hey its 2016 I'll post 150+ times a month. All at the same time as sizz stops posting. Either way I'm going to start posting rollercoaster gifs because he's definitely at the very least some retarded 3rd cousin offshoot of sizzle.

2 What specific scandals are you referring to?

Jewlips has not been a douche to me until recently so this makes me think whoever he was doesn't really hate me.
Let's be honest here ,who gives a fuck anyways, jewlips is a douchebag regarless of who he was in a past forum life