Time to get on the TRUMP train

Printable View

10-10-2016, 09:47 AM
blake

Quote:

Originally Posted by sonatine

Quote:

Originally Posted by Charham

I feel like he won the battle last night but lost the war. Try explaining all of this crap to your kids. BTW Mitt Romney never looked so good. Ill take a boring middle of the road Republican anyday at this point.

Hillary is a pro-choice moderate Republican, Romney has no magic bullet for that. The fact is, Romney is a born political punching bag; he's the hopes and dreams of the biggest loser joke religion in America and all the magic underwear in the world isnt going to get him past the 'courtesy vote' threshold against anyone to the right of Willie Horton.

counterpoint: trump is the political equivalent of clown shoes and he is still within 4-5 points of beating hillary with 30 days left till the election. any other candidate including mitt would be beating her.
10-10-2016, 09:56 AM
sonatine

Quote:

Originally Posted by blake

Quote:

Originally Posted by sonatine

Hillary is a pro-choice moderate Republican, Romney has no magic bullet for that. The fact is, Romney is a born political punching bag; he's the hopes and dreams of the biggest loser joke religion in America and all the magic underwear in the world isnt going to get him past the 'courtesy vote' threshold against anyone to the right of Willie Horton.

counterpoint: trump is the political equivalent of clown shoes and he is still within 4-5 points of beating hillary with 30 days left till the election. any other candidate including mitt would be beating her.

if that was true, you might have a great point.

but its not true, you dont have a great point, and your attempts to animate the corpse of american conservatism is getting a bit morbid around the edges.
10-10-2016, 10:16 AM
sonatine

just to be clear; the issues you think would prevent clinton from gutting romney's core support would not exist if romney was running, because romney would never reduce an election to a ratchet gutter brawl of attrition.

he would challenge her on positions and lose. he would challenge her on experience and lose. then he would fall back on the conservative christian talking points that would keep him on the paid lecture circuit starting november 9th.

i think the mistake youre making is thinking that the clinton we see on stage against today is the same one that we would see on stage vs romney or anyone else. i dont believe it would be. shes basically locked in a cage with a fucking crazy person right now. there are no right moves for her to make beyond letting trump set himself on fire every time he opens her mouth. she cant debate policy with him; he has no policies. she cant debate experience with him; he has none.

and the scariest part of this entire situation is that its the republican party itself thats allowed its non-fringe candidates to be excluded from the party dialog, guaranteeing that our generation might never see a viable conservative candidate ever again.

so when you say 'oh anyone even mitt could beat clinton' i think you have your head in the sand; no one on stage with trump during the primaries was going to have significant advantage over a pro wall street and pro choice secretary of state, and the people capable of representing the republican party as a sane, measured, financially responsible option never got near the stage because Bible/Tea Party/Birtherism/Duck Dynasty is the current republican mission statement.
10-10-2016, 10:32 AM
BetCheckBet

jesus

http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/firs...digits-n663691
10-10-2016, 10:34 AM
4Dragons

Quote:

Originally Posted by Suicide King

Quote:

Originally Posted by 4Dragons

I posted a tweet from someone that felt maligned by a presidential candidate. I did not offer commentary on her words or anything else.

I just want it to sit there and needle the people that are the most butthurt about all things women's issues - except when it's against literally anyone who's been raped by Bill Clinton or come against Hillary.

My thoughts on wtf a lawyer does are not any part of the reasoning behind what she said, nor does it matter. What matters is that she put it out there, and for some reason, her pain becomes me not understanding what a lawyer does? You cannot deny her pain, so you try to project a false narrative on me?

You can attempt to shoot the messenger I guess, but it doesn't change that she feels the way she does and I literally dare you to bring it up to her.

You have to take responsibility for what you're posting. She was appointed by a judge to that case and did her sworn duty as an officer of the court. You posting that is just dumb, and pointless.

It obviously effected you on some level, so it's not pointless. That stuff she said really rubbed you the wrong way, and I don't believe that it was the part that she doesn't understand how defense attorneys work. What she said should be gutting to anyone who has children, and speaks to the character of a soulless, Machiavellian, Maoist like Hillary; that literally laughed out loud that she got that guy off with time served.

The point of all of it is to say that if the left can paint anyone that votes for Trump as people that are ok with grabbing pussies, then everyone on the left that votes for Hillary is totally ok with protecting rapists like her husband and what she did as a defense attorney.
10-10-2016, 10:34 AM
BetCheckBet

Quote:

Originally Posted by sonatine

just to be clear; the issues you think would prevent clinton from gutting romney's core support would not exist if romney was running, because romney would never reduce an election to a ratchet gutter brawl of attrition.

he would challenge her on positions and lose. he would challenge her on experience and lose. then he would fall back on the conservative christian talking points that would keep him on the paid lecture circuit starting november 9th.

i think the mistake youre making is thinking that the clinton we see on stage against today is the same one that we would see on stage vs romney or anyone else. i dont believe it would be. shes basically locked in a cage with a fucking crazy person right now. there are no right moves for her to make beyond letting trump set himself on fire every time he opens her mouth. she cant debate policy with him; he has no policies. she cant debate experience with him; he has none.

and the scariest part of this entire situation is that its the republican party itself thats allowed its non-fringe candidates to be excluded from the party dialog, guaranteeing that our generation might never see a viable conservative candidate ever again.

so when you say 'oh anyone even mitt could beat clinton' i think you have your head in the sand; no one on stage with trump during the primaries was going to have significant advantage over a pro wall street and pro choice secretary of state, and the people capable of representing the republican party as a sane, measured, financially responsible option never got near the stage because Bible/Tea Party/Birtherism/Duck Dynasty is the current republican mission statement.

Aside from Cruz, head to head polling tended to favour every major republican candidate in the spring against Clinton. Its hard to imagine things are any different now since Clinton took even more of a nosedive since then with the email controversy.
10-10-2016, 10:42 AM
BetCheckBet

Quote:

Originally Posted by DirtyB

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/flash...ry?id=42686582

Days after President Clinton admitted to having an inappropriate relationship with former White House intern Monica Lewinsky, Trump said Clinton was a “victim” and critiqued the physical appearances of various women with whom Clinton had been accused of having extramarital relations at different times.

“It’s like it's from hell, it's a terrible group of people,” Trump said in an interview with FOX News' Neil Cavuto on Aug. 19, 1998.

Asked by Cavuto if Clinton’s image as a “quasi-sex symbol” stood to somehow benefit from the alleged extramarital relations, Trump took issue with the characterization.

“I don't necessarily agree with his victims, his victims are terrible,” Trump said. “He is really a victim himself. But he put himself in that position.”

“The whole group, Paula Jones, Lewinsky, it's just a really unattractive group. I'm not just talking about physical," he said.

“Would it be any different if it were a supermodel crowd?” Cavuto then asked.

“I think at least it would be more pleasant to watch,” Trump replied.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Uqk27P63eY
10-10-2016, 10:44 AM
sonatine

Quote:

Originally Posted by BetCheckBet

Quote:

Originally Posted by sonatine

just to be clear; the issues you think would prevent clinton from gutting romney's core support would not exist if romney was running, because romney would never reduce an election to a ratchet gutter brawl of attrition.

he would challenge her on positions and lose. he would challenge her on experience and lose. then he would fall back on the conservative christian talking points that would keep him on the paid lecture circuit starting november 9th.

i think the mistake youre making is thinking that the clinton we see on stage against today is the same one that we would see on stage vs romney or anyone else. i dont believe it would be. shes basically locked in a cage with a fucking crazy person right now. there are no right moves for her to make beyond letting trump set himself on fire every time he opens her mouth. she cant debate policy with him; he has no policies. she cant debate experience with him; he has none.

and the scariest part of this entire situation is that its the republican party itself thats allowed its non-fringe candidates to be excluded from the party dialog, guaranteeing that our generation might never see a viable conservative candidate ever again.

so when you say 'oh anyone even mitt could beat clinton' i think you have your head in the sand; no one on stage with trump during the primaries was going to have significant advantage over a pro wall street and pro choice secretary of state, and the people capable of representing the republican party as a sane, measured, financially responsible option never got near the stage because Bible/Tea Party/Birtherism/Duck Dynasty is the current republican mission statement.

Aside from Cruz, head to head polling tended to favour every major republican candidate in the spring against Clinton. Its hard to imagine things are any different now since Clinton took even more of a nosedive since then with the email controversy.

personally, and i get that these are ostensibly 'heads up' polls, but personally i think a lot of that was because bernie's white knight schtick really calved off a significant number of people who would otherwise be loyal to hillary.

or, admittedly, im so shocked that a mental toddler drug addict is on the stage with a career politician that i'm over estimating hillary's appeal. that really may well be the case here.
10-10-2016, 10:46 AM
snake_in_the_ass

Quote:

Originally Posted by DirtyB

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/flash...ry?id=42686582

Days after President Clinton admitted to having an inappropriate relationship with former White House intern Monica Lewinsky, Trump said Clinton was a “victim” and critiqued the physical appearances of various women with whom Clinton had been accused of having extramarital relations at different times.

“It’s like it's from hell, it's a terrible group of people,” Trump said in an interview with FOX News' Neil Cavuto on Aug. 19, 1998.

Asked by Cavuto if Clinton’s image as a “quasi-sex symbol” stood to somehow benefit from the alleged extramarital relations, Trump took issue with the characterization.

“I don't necessarily agree with his victims, his victims are terrible,” Trump said. “He is really a victim himself. But he put himself in that position.”

“The whole group, Paula Jones, Lewinsky, it's just a really unattractive group. I'm not just talking about physical," he said.

“Would it be any different if it were a supermodel crowd?” Cavuto then asked.

“I think at least it would be more pleasant to watch,” Trump replied.

I agree with Trump. Bill should have been fucking models, not some fat bitch intern.
10-10-2016, 10:47 AM
BetCheckBet

Quote:

Originally Posted by ToasterOven

Mr Bone

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=arZdeg_fL-I
10-10-2016, 10:52 AM
TheXFactor

Quote:

Originally Posted by blake

Quote:

Originally Posted by sonatine

Hillary is a pro-choice moderate Republican, Romney has no magic bullet for that. The fact is, Romney is a born political punching bag; he's the hopes and dreams of the biggest loser joke religion in America and all the magic underwear in the world isnt going to get him past the 'courtesy vote' threshold against anyone to the right of Willie Horton.

counterpoint: trump is the political equivalent of clown shoes and he is still within 4-5 points of beating hillary with 30 days left till the election. any other candidate including mitt would be beating her.

Remember Trump and Romney were friends at least back in 2012 when Trump endorsed Romney and contributed to his campaign.
During the primaries, Trump insulted Romney and blamed him for losing back in 2012, then Romney became his worst enemy.

Do newspaper endorsements matter? I doubt it since people no longer read them.

Do endorsements from members of Congress and Senators matter? Nope, people don't give a shit.

Honestly, people are sick of the Clinton's.
They remember the 90's and Bill Clinton getting blow jobs from White House interns.
They know that Bill & Hillary Clinton are corrupt politicians and would do anything to hold onto power.

This is why Donald Trump still has a chance.

Less than one month left.

http://www.gannett-cdn.com/-mm-/efe0...216-389B-9.JPG
10-10-2016, 10:54 AM
4Dragons

1 Attachment(s)

Quote:

Originally Posted by BetCheckBet

Quote:

Originally Posted by ToasterOven

Mr Bone

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=arZdeg_fL-I

Ken Bone, to me, looks like the older fat version of Horatio Sanz
10-10-2016, 10:57 AM
4Dragons

Just wondering out loud if Dan Bilzerian has taken this opportunity to start randomly grabbing pussies?
10-10-2016, 10:58 AM
BetCheckBet

Ken Bone, the undisputed winner of last night’s debate, despite the fact that he can’t decide whether or not he’s voting for Trump, appeared on CNN this morning wearing the same red sweater he wore last night. He made this fashion choice, he explained, because he split his pants on the way to the debate.

“I had a really nice olive suit, and my mother would have been very proud to see me wearing on television, but apparently I have gained about 30 pounds,” Bone told Carol Costello Monday morning. “And when I went to get in my car the morning of the debate I split the seat of my pants all the way open. So the red sweater is plan B. I’m glad it worked out.”
10-10-2016, 11:01 AM
BetCheckBet

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cWJsG00R9GA
10-10-2016, 11:02 AM
4Dragons

1 Attachment(s)

Quote:

Originally Posted by 4Dragons

Just wondering out loud if Dan Bilzerian has taken this opportunity to start randomly grabbing pussies?

Never mind, I have my answer.. thanks Dan, I knew you had it in you.
10-10-2016, 11:03 AM
blake

Quote:

Originally Posted by sonatine

Quote:

Originally Posted by BetCheckBet

Aside from Cruz, head to head polling tended to favour every major republican candidate in the spring against Clinton. Its hard to imagine things are any different now since Clinton took even more of a nosedive since then with the email controversy.

personally, and i get that these are ostensibly 'heads up' polls, but personally i think a lot of that was because bernie's white knight schtick really calved off a significant number of people who would otherwise be loyal to hillary.

or, admittedly, im so shocked that a mental toddler drug addict is on the stage with a career politician that i'm over estimating hillary's appeal. that really may well be the case here.

yeah i think that's the case here. if not for trump, hillary clinton would be the most disliked and distrusted presidential candidate in history since polling began. those words aren't hyperbole, they are actual facts measured by data. we have never before seen any person with negatives this high get elected. period.

i'm not sure who you think is inspired by a hillary clinton presidency. even liberals loathe the idea of voting for her. (i'm a registered democrat by the way.)
10-10-2016, 11:07 AM
4Dragons

Quote:

Originally Posted by blake

Quote:

Originally Posted by sonatine

personally, and i get that these are ostensibly 'heads up' polls, but personally i think a lot of that was because bernie's white knight schtick really calved off a significant number of people who would otherwise be loyal to hillary.

or, admittedly, im so shocked that a mental toddler drug addict is on the stage with a career politician that i'm over estimating hillary's appeal. that really may well be the case here.

yeah i think that's the case here. if not for trump, hillary clinton would be the most disliked and distrusted presidential candidate in history since polling began. those words aren't hyperbole, they are actual facts measured by data. we have never before seen any person with negatives this high get elected. period.

i'm not sure who you think is inspired by a hillary clinton presidency. even liberals loathe the idea of voting for her. (i'm a registered democrat by the way.)

I have to think that 'tine likes her because that she is so inept with computer security; he sees her as an easy target for a 7 figure contract to do her next completely illegal server security.
10-10-2016, 11:07 AM
BetCheckBet

Quote:

Originally Posted by 4Dragons

Quote:

Originally Posted by 4Dragons

Just wondering out loud if Dan Bilzerian has taken this opportunity to start randomly grabbing pussies?

Never mind, I have my answer.. thanks Dan, I knew you had it in you.

looks like same girl from my city...

https://thedirty.com/gossip/ottawa/f...sold-her-soul/
10-10-2016, 11:11 AM
sonatine

Quote:

Originally Posted by blake

Quote:

Originally Posted by sonatine

personally, and i get that these are ostensibly 'heads up' polls, but personally i think a lot of that was because bernie's white knight schtick really calved off a significant number of people who would otherwise be loyal to hillary.

or, admittedly, im so shocked that a mental toddler drug addict is on the stage with a career politician that i'm over estimating hillary's appeal. that really may well be the case here.

yeah i think that's the case here. if not for trump, hillary clinton would be the most disliked and distrusted presidential candidate in history since polling began. those words aren't hyperbole, they are actual facts measured by data. we have never before seen any person with negatives this high get elected. period.

i'm not sure who you think is inspired by a hillary clinton presidency. even liberals loathe the idea of voting for her. (i'm a registered democrat by the way.)

totally fair.

its funny because my friends with really significant net worths (8+ digits) are becoming increasingly enthusiastic about hillary for the same reason most democrats are not; shes establishment. shes been operating above the partisan turbulence layers for years and definitely isnt looking to rock the boat at a crucial point in our economic evolution.

also, http://i.imgur.com/C0ukwfM.jpg
10-10-2016, 11:25 AM
Sanlmar

1 Attachment(s)
10-10-2016, 11:28 AM
GambleBotsChafedPenis

Quote:

Originally Posted by BetCheckBet

Ken Bone, the undisputed winner of last night’s debate, despite the fact that he can’t decide whether or not he’s voting for Trump, appeared on CNN this morning wearing the same red sweater he wore last night. He made this fashion choice, he explained, because he split his pants on the way to the debate.

“I had a really nice olive suit, and my mother would have been very proud to see me wearing on television, but apparently I have gained about 30 pounds,” Bone told Carol Costello Monday morning. “And when I went to get in my car the morning of the debate I split the seat of my pants all the way open. So the red sweater is plan B. I’m glad it worked out.”

not joking, I think this guy could possibly beat both candidates in this election...in the bone we trust...
10-10-2016, 11:28 AM
blake

lol, look at this story that dropped minutes after i finished my post. this is exactly what i am saying

Leaked Email: Clinton Ally Was ‘Petrified’ the GOP Wouldn’t Nominate Trump

http://www.mediaite.com/online/leake...ominate-trump/

liberal columnist to john podesta, courtesy of wikileaks:

Quote:

“Right now I am petrified that Hillary is almost totally dependent on Republicans nominating Trump….she has huge endemic political weaknesses that she would be wise to rectify…..even a clown like Ted Cruz would be an even money bet to beat and this scares the hell of out me.”
10-10-2016, 11:31 AM
GambleBotsChafedPenis

what are the thoughts on voter turnout this year? is it going to be a record low? its gotta be right?
10-10-2016, 11:31 AM
sonatine

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sanlmar

oh... my... god.. guys have you SEEN this?? is this even allowed???!?

"HILLARY FOR PRISON 2016" I DONT BELIEVE MY EYES

DORIS HOLD MY CALLS WE GOTTA GET TO THE BOTTOM OF THIS BECAUSE *EVERYTHING JUST CHANGED*
10-10-2016, 11:34 AM
BetCheckBet

Quote:

Originally Posted by blake

lol, look at this story that dropped minutes after i finished my post. this is exactly what i am saying

Leaked Email: Clinton Ally Was ‘Petrified’ the GOP Wouldn’t Nominate Trump

http://www.mediaite.com/online/leake...ominate-trump/

liberal columnist to john podesta, courtesy of wikileaks:

Quote:

“Right now I am petrified that Hillary is almost totally dependent on Republicans nominating Trump….she has huge endemic political weaknesses that she would be wise to rectify…..even a clown like Ted Cruz would be an even money bet to beat and this scares the hell of out me.”

Also note that cnn was pretty pro trump during primaries and really only started to turn once he was guaranteed to win primary.
10-10-2016, 11:45 AM
JoeD

Quote:

Originally Posted by BetCheckBet

Quote:

Originally Posted by blake

lol, look at this story that dropped minutes after i finished my post. this is exactly what i am saying

Leaked Email: Clinton Ally Was ‘Petrified’ the GOP Wouldn’t Nominate Trump

http://www.mediaite.com/online/leake...ominate-trump/

liberal columnist to john podesta, courtesy of wikileaks:

Also note that cnn was pretty pro trump during primaries and really only started to turn once he was guaranteed to win primary.

Wait, I thought the emails were made up by the Russians?
10-10-2016, 11:46 AM
sonatine

OMAHA, Neb.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Answering a question last night about his $916 million income tax loss carryforward in 1995, Donald Trump stated that “Warren Buffett took a massive deduction.” Mr. Trump says he knows more about taxes than any other human. He has not seen my income tax returns. But I am happy to give him the facts.

My 2015 return shows adjusted gross income of $11,563,931. My deductions totaled $5,477,694, of which allowable charitable contributions were $3,469,179. All but $36,037 of the remainder was for state income taxes.

The total charitable contributions I made during the year were $2,858,057,970, of which more than $2.85 billion were not taken as deductions and never will be. Tax law properly limits charitable deductions.

My federal income tax for the year was $1,845,557. Returns for previous years are of a similar nature in respect to contributions, deductions and tax rates.

I have paid federal income tax every year since 1944, when I was 13. (Though, being a slow starter, I owed only $7 in tax that year.) I have copies of all 72 of my returns and none uses a carryforward.

Finally, I have been audited by the IRS multiple times and am currently being audited. I have no problem in releasing my tax information while under audit. Neither would Mr. Trump – at least he would have no legal problem.

Contacts
Warren E. Buffett, 402-346-1400
Omaha, Nebraska
10-10-2016, 11:48 AM
Suicide King

Quote:

Originally Posted by 4Dragons

Quote:

Originally Posted by Suicide King

You have to take responsibility for what you're posting. She was appointed by a judge to that case and did her sworn duty as an officer of the court. You posting that is just dumb, and pointless.

It obviously effected you on some level, so it's not pointless. That stuff she said really rubbed you the wrong way, and I don't believe that it was the part that she doesn't understand how defense attorneys work. What she said should be gutting to anyone who has children, and speaks to the character of a soulless, Machiavellian, Maoist like Hillary; that literally laughed out loud that she got that guy off with time served.

The point of all of it is to say that if the left can paint anyone that votes for Trump as people that are ok with grabbing pussies, then everyone on the left that votes for Hillary is totally ok with protecting rapists like her husband and what she did as a defense attorney.

I really thought you were better than this. You posting this is pure ignorance to what a defense attorneys civic duty is.
10-10-2016, 11:55 AM
BiffCo99

Quote:

Originally Posted by Suicide King

Quote:

Originally Posted by 4Dragons

It obviously effected you on some level, so it's not pointless. That stuff she said really rubbed you the wrong way, and I don't believe that it was the part that she doesn't understand how defense attorneys work. What she said should be gutting to anyone who has children, and speaks to the character of a soulless, Machiavellian, Maoist like Hillary; that literally laughed out loud that she got that guy off with time served.

The point of all of it is to say that if the left can paint anyone that votes for Trump as people that are ok with grabbing pussies, then everyone on the left that votes for Hillary is totally ok with protecting rapists like her husband and what she did as a defense attorney.

I really thought you were better than this. You posting this is pure ignorance to what a defense attorneys civic duty is.

Was it her job to laugh about it?
10-10-2016, 12:04 PM
sonatine

Quote:

Originally Posted by BiffCo99

Quote:

Originally Posted by Suicide King

I really thought you were better than this. You posting this is pure ignorance to what a defense attorneys civic duty is.

Was it her job to laugh about it?

I think that when you're a young attorney who just won an impossible case.. I wont say laughing is forgivable, but I think its a human response from someone who feels like they just climbed to the top of a mountain. And if I had to guess, Id say she regrets that moment for all the right and obvious reasons.
10-10-2016, 12:24 PM
FPS_Russia

2 Attachment(s)

I'm petrified of Trump dropping out too. If the GOP pulls this shit I'll be pissed and the country will be perma fucked.
The billionaire backers that forced Ted Cruz to support Trump worry me. Smokey back room....

Ted Cruz is Freddy Krueger in the nightmares of Democrats.
10-10-2016, 12:26 PM
sonatine

+450

if trump pulls out, it will be viewed as an angle shoot and likely be adopted as a viable election strat for however long the republic lasts.
10-10-2016, 12:44 PM
4Dragons

Quote:

Originally Posted by Suicide King

Quote:

Originally Posted by 4Dragons

It obviously effected you on some level, so it's not pointless. That stuff she said really rubbed you the wrong way, and I don't believe that it was the part that she doesn't understand how defense attorneys work. What she said should be gutting to anyone who has children, and speaks to the character of a soulless, Machiavellian, Maoist like Hillary; that literally laughed out loud that she got that guy off with time served.

The point of all of it is to say that if the left can paint anyone that votes for Trump as people that are ok with grabbing pussies, then everyone on the left that votes for Hillary is totally ok with protecting rapists like her husband and what she did as a defense attorney.

I really thought you were better than this. You posting this is pure ignorance to what a defense attorneys civic duty is.

So you just tl;dr'd the whole thing?

Ok, let's try it this way:

If Hillary Clinton got your daughters rapist off with time served, would you vote for her?
10-10-2016, 12:52 PM
ToasterOven

Quote:

Originally Posted by 4Dragons

Quote:

Originally Posted by Suicide King

I really thought you were better than this. You posting this is pure ignorance to what a defense attorneys civic duty is.

So you just tl;dr'd the whole thing?

Ok, let's try it this way:

If Hillary Clinton got your daughters rapist off with time served, would you vote for her?

That's some good posting, 408.
10-10-2016, 12:54 PM
handicapme

Quote:

Originally Posted by sonatine

+450

if trump pulls out, it will be viewed as an angle shoot and likely be adopted as a viable election strat for however long the republic lasts.

My local had +500 before the debate... now +430. #SNIFFLES
10-10-2016, 01:00 PM
big dick

Trump is going after the gop. I love it.
10-10-2016, 01:07 PM
tyde

Live in Ambridge, Pennsylvania right now

MASSIVE crowd

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7HBEse6SQ4E
10-10-2016, 01:16 PM
Tellafriend

1 Attachment(s)

.
10-10-2016, 01:17 PM
big dick

Thanks for the money tellafriend.

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:53 AM.