It will cost me 56 cents

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by WillieMcFML

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sonatine

what gave it away?


that she posted her hairy tit or that she posted her clitoris?

---

tbf plop prolly thought the hairy tit was yours

---

Wait, she showed clit and a hairy tit? How did I miss this? Link please.

that would be up to split.


ill say this much tho, that bitches clit game is top top.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sonatine

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Lord of the Fraud

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AhoosierA

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by adamantium

are you fuckin serious?
How the fuck was she frauding the site?
Are all people in Indiana just as bright as you?

---

Wow. You were in love with this girl weren't you? I'm sorry.

---

I had virtually no forum interaction with KT and won't lose a wink of sleep because she's gone. But how/why she was run off this board is a joke.

She didn't do anything wrong at all.

At the very most Druff should've just made sure that she didn't handle any freeroll $$.

We don't have nice things because we don't deserve them.

---

I'm not arguing your point, which is exactly why I sandboxed my findings/concerns to Druff and Drexel, but her conduct directly contributed to the climate that made this whole affair possible.

Real talk my e-wife was hinkey as fuck and should have taken a hard pass on being a shit-talking forum gladiator.

---

lol no doubt the attention and level of popularity went to her head a little.

Randomly going after users who have been around these parts for a decade or more didn't sit well with anybody I think. Even those who may have disliked her targets curled their lips to that shit.

A complete misjudgement on Trouts part

But that behaviour didn't deserve the fatal blows which were dealt out. Though I admit that she did leave herself wide open to the backlash.


This whole sorry episode has left me wondering just how great split is at giving head.

She obv went for the weak fish.

Bitch knew not to go after legends like myself or PLOL, unless she wanted to get a buck fifty across her grill.

Believe dat.

I think people are debating the wrong thing here.

Most of us agree that her personal information should not have been posted.

Most of us also agree that, given her relative newness to the community and status as someone who was highly liked and admired by many here, it was important to warn the community about her multiple recent arrests for fraud-related crimes.

So it's more a matter of HOW this should have been done, rather than whether something had to be done at all.

FYI, she already "left" PFA (according to an e-mail I received) before she was outed here, because splitthis made enough cryptic references to having knowledge (as did a few others like AHoosierA) to where she knew the jig was up. (She didn't acknowledge that anything was found, but asked in one e-mail as to what splitthis was referring.)

However, that still did not alleviate the potential rolling danger, as she clearly made a number of friendships with people here which could have continued off the forum after she left.

I felt the responsible thing to do was to make sure everyone knew what they were dealing with, and then if they were still cool with it, it was their choice to proceed.

I agree that links to mugshots containing her real name (or instructions how to find her real name elsewhere online) was too much, given that she hadn't harmed anyone here. That is why I chose to remove that information posted here, and told everyone that posting such things could not continue.

However, I find it absurd to suggest any kind of banning or restricting of those who DID post the links, as they did so out of concern for the community, even if they were a bit careless and exposed too much given the circumstances.

This was not gratuitous info-posting, nor was any of it done out of revenge.

Each of these situations is different.

In general, people here should have a right to anonymity.

However, a new, high-profile poster with a recent record of multiple fraud-related arrests is enough of a danger the community (financially) to where a warning to everyone is warranted. That's not to say that personal info should also be exposed, but any information found which greatly impacts the trustworthiness of that user is relevant, especially if that user does not have a long enough history in the community to be deemed safe.

Had Kilgore been around for 10 years and quietly gotten arrested multiple times for bad checks and fraud, all without ever doing a single bad thing to anyone here, then there could be the argument that she had proven herself over time, despite her off-the-forum troubles.

However, while I still believe that Kilgore was NOT here as a long con (but rather simply liked the attention and admiration), she had only been here for 10 months (a relative noob), and it was important for everyone to know the truth before they developed very close friendships with her.

As much as I hate to say it, the fact that she's female and in the age range of most of the (male) posters here was also a factor which made it far easier for people here to like, notice, and trust her. That part isn't her fault, but it plays into why people needed to know that she wasn't quite what she appeared to be.

I do not support doxxing here, and I think I handled this one as fairly as it could have been handled.

If you disagree, I would like to know what you feel I did wrong.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

I think people are debating the wrong thing here.

Most of us agree that her personal information should not have been posted.

Most of us also agree that, given her relative newness to the community and status as someone who was highly liked and admired by many here, it was important to warn the community about her multiple recent arrests for fraud-related crimes.

So it's more a matter of HOW this should have been done, rather than whether something had to be done at all.

FYI, she already "left" PFA (according to an e-mail I received) before she was outed here, because splitthis made enough cryptic references to having knowledge (as did a few others like AHoosierA) to where she knew the jig was up. (She didn't acknowledge that anything was found, but asked in one e-mail as to what splitthis was referring.)

However, that still did not alleviate the potential rolling danger, as she clearly made a number of friendships with people here which could have continued off the forum after she left.

I felt the responsible thing to do was to make sure everyone knew what they were dealing with, and then if they were still cool with it, it was their choice to proceed.

I agree that links to mugshots containing her real name (or instructions how to find her real name elsewhere online) was too much, given that she hadn't harmed anyone here. That is why I chose to remove that information posted here, and told everyone that posting such things could not continue.

However, I find it absurd to suggest any kind of banning or restricting of those who DID post the links, as they did so out of concern for the community, even if they were a bit careless and exposed too much given the circumstances.

This was not gratuitous info-posting, nor was any of it done out of revenge.

Each of these situations is different.

In general, people here should have a right to anonymity.

However, a new, high-profile poster with a recent record of multiple fraud-related arrests is enough of a danger the community (financially) to where a warning to everyone is warranted. That's not to say that personal info should also be exposed, but any information found which greatly impacts the trustworthiness of that user is relevant, especially if that user does not have a long enough history in the community to be deemed safe.

Had Kilgore been around for 10 years and quietly gotten arrested multiple times for bad checks and fraud, all without ever doing a single bad thing to anyone here, then there could be the argument that she had proven herself over time, despite her off-the-forum troubles.

However, while I still believe that Kilgore was NOT here as a long con (but rather simply liked the attention and admiration), she had only been here for 10 months (a relative noob), and it was important for everyone to know the truth before they developed very close friendships with her.

As much as I hate to say it, the fact that she's female and in the age range of most of the (male) posters here was also a factor which made it far easier for people here to like, notice, and trust her. That part isn't her fault, but it plays into why people needed to know that she wasn't quite what she appeared to be.

I do not support doxxing here, and I think I handled this one as fairly as it could have been handled.

If you disagree, I would like to know what you feel I did wrong.

---

If you’re deleting things, that’s pretty clear you feel like the poster did something wrong is it not?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

Most of us also agree that, given her relative newness to the community and status as someone who was highly liked and admired by many here, it was important to warn the community about her multiple recent arrests for fraud-related crimes.

This was not gratuitous info-posting, nor was any of it done out of revenge.

---

I’d be surprised if most people here agree with either of these statements.

I think it was nuts to preemptively out her arrest record without any reason.

And surely you know that the people posting her info were not doing so for any other reason than trolling. To suggest otherwise is laughable

The next time I doxx someone it will not be out of revenge, it will be because I can (whats best for the comunity)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by blake

And surely you know that the people posting her info were not doing so for any other reason than trolling. To suggest otherwise is laughable

---

It's hardly laughable. I saw a person who had all the hallmarks of a forum scammer, very public and forthcoming with personal info and stories who lied about a lot/almost all of the small stuff (and ignored the most important big stuff), ingratiated herself with the radio show and other users very quickly, already was handling radio money, made friends with drexel, acted like she was here from the start with encyclopedic knowledge of forum history, and had almost exactly the same criminal past as jasep did, except longer. It was also clear (in the last day or 2) that Druff and others had disturbing info on her and they weren't telling just yet. That sorta rubbed me the wrong way too.

I don't think she came here to scam, just as I don't think jasep first came to dd or pfa to scam. I also think it was an inevitability that she was gonna leave in a blaze of glory, likely with user money in tow, one way or the other. I can't understand how someone would be around these forums for so long and not get the same read. I got that read strong as fuck, well before I knew she was lying to druff about trips to AC and other stupid things like that.

Maybe I was wrong. I don't think so. We've seen that movie over and over and over. It always ends the same way.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

I think people are debating the wrong thing here.

Most of us agree that her personal information should not have been posted.

Most of us also agree that, given her relative newness to the community and status as someone who was highly liked and admired by many here, it was important to warn the community about her multiple recent arrests for fraud-related crimes.

So it's more a matter of HOW this should have been done, rather than whether something had to be done at all.

FYI, she already "left" PFA (according to an e-mail I received) before she was outed here, because splitthis made enough cryptic references to having knowledge (as did a few others like AHoosierA) to where she knew the jig was up. (She didn't acknowledge that anything was found, but asked in one e-mail as to what splitthis was referring.)

However, that still did not alleviate the potential rolling danger, as she clearly made a number of friendships with people here which could have continued off the forum after she left.

I felt the responsible thing to do was to make sure everyone knew what they were dealing with, and then if they were still cool with it, it was their choice to proceed.

I agree that links to mugshots containing her real name (or instructions how to find her real name elsewhere online) was too much, given that she hadn't harmed anyone here. That is why I chose to remove that information posted here, and told everyone that posting such things could not continue.

However, I find it absurd to suggest any kind of banning or restricting of those who DID post the links, as they did so out of concern for the community, even if they were a bit careless and exposed too much given the circumstances.

This was not gratuitous info-posting, nor was any of it done out of revenge.

Each of these situations is different.

In general, people here should have a right to anonymity.

However, a new, high-profile poster with a recent record of multiple fraud-related arrests is enough of a danger the community (financially) to where a warning to everyone is warranted. That's not to say that personal info should also be exposed, but any information found which greatly impacts the trustworthiness of that user is relevant, especially if that user does not have a long enough history in the community to be deemed safe.

Had Kilgore been around for 10 years and quietly gotten arrested multiple times for bad checks and fraud, all without ever doing a single bad thing to anyone here, then there could be the argument that she had proven herself over time, despite her off-the-forum troubles.

However, while I still believe that Kilgore was NOT here as a long con (but rather simply liked the attention and admiration), she had only been here for 10 months (a relative noob), and it was important for everyone to know the truth before they developed very close friendships with her.

As much as I hate to say it, the fact that she's female and in the age range of most of the (male) posters here was also a factor which made it far easier for people here to like, notice, and trust her. That part isn't her fault, but it plays into why people needed to know that she wasn't quite what she appeared to be.

I do not support doxxing here, and I think I handled this one as fairly as it could have been handled.

If you disagree, I would like to know what you feel I did wrong.

---

I’d like to say, that no matter how much a dislike a member of this community I would not post their private info without first going through Druff.

I think it’s pretty obvious I don’t like KT. I never thought that my subtle cryptic message would be enough to get her to leave the site (I’m not claiming to be the main reason).

I did post that cryptic message as a “Just so you know that I know”

I do think she’s an attention whore

I do think she wants to be glamoured as someone that she is not. (She got you wrapped around that little finger Adam)

I do not think what she has done warrants her private life to be affected in anyway from this, including her full name/address being posted (some of the sources I found list her address and several relatives)

I do think that the community deserved to be made aware.

I think that what makes her arrest record interesting and worth discussion is that it was a financial crime. If it were something drug related or petty theft or something it wouldn’t even be worth mentioning.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by LarryLaffer

I have a smile on my face bigger than the Willis Tower right now.

Which is why I'm back for a short appearance.


hate to say I told you so? Because I fucking did.

That cunt sent me a fake picture months ago. Then tried to get me on the radio last week.


Y'all have been gotten. I have goosebumps reading her police reports. LOL BAD CHECK CASHING


what a fucking waste of space.

BYE MICHELLE

---

https://youtu.be/YVkUvmDQ3HY

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AhoosierA

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

I think people are debating the wrong thing here.

Most of us agree that her personal information should not have been posted.

Most of us also agree that, given her relative newness to the community and status as someone who was highly liked and admired by many here, it was important to warn the community about her multiple recent arrests for fraud-related crimes.

So it's more a matter of HOW this should have been done, rather than whether something had to be done at all.

FYI, she already "left" PFA (according to an e-mail I received) before she was outed here, because splitthis made enough cryptic references to having knowledge (as did a few others like AHoosierA) to where she knew the jig was up. (She didn't acknowledge that anything was found, but asked in one e-mail as to what splitthis was referring.)

However, that still did not alleviate the potential rolling danger, as she clearly made a number of friendships with people here which could have continued off the forum after she left.

I felt the responsible thing to do was to make sure everyone knew what they were dealing with, and then if they were still cool with it, it was their choice to proceed.

I agree that links to mugshots containing her real name (or instructions how to find her real name elsewhere online) was too much, given that she hadn't harmed anyone here. That is why I chose to remove that information posted here, and told everyone that posting such things could not continue.

However, I find it absurd to suggest any kind of banning or restricting of those who DID post the links, as they did so out of concern for the community, even if they were a bit careless and exposed too much given the circumstances.

This was not gratuitous info-posting, nor was any of it done out of revenge.

Each of these situations is different.

In general, people here should have a right to anonymity.

However, a new, high-profile poster with a recent record of multiple fraud-related arrests is enough of a danger the community (financially) to where a warning to everyone is warranted. That's not to say that personal info should also be exposed, but any information found which greatly impacts the trustworthiness of that user is relevant, especially if that user does not have a long enough history in the community to be deemed safe.

Had Kilgore been around for 10 years and quietly gotten arrested multiple times for bad checks and fraud, all without ever doing a single bad thing to anyone here, then there could be the argument that she had proven herself over time, despite her off-the-forum troubles.

However, while I still believe that Kilgore was NOT here as a long con (but rather simply liked the attention and admiration), she had only been here for 10 months (a relative noob), and it was important for everyone to know the truth before they developed very close friendships with her.

As much as I hate to say it, the fact that she's female and in the age range of most of the (male) posters here was also a factor which made it far easier for people here to like, notice, and trust her. That part isn't her fault, but it plays into why people needed to know that she wasn't quite what she appeared to be.

I do not support doxxing here, and I think I handled this one as fairly as it could have been handled.

If you disagree, I would like to know what you feel I did wrong.

---

I’d like to say, that no matter how much a dislike a member of this community I would not post their private info without first going through Druff.

I think it’s pretty obvious I don’t like KT. I never thought that my subtle cryptic message would be enough to get her to leave the site (I’m not claiming to be the main reason).

I did post that cryptic message as a “Just so you know that I know”

I do think she’s an attention whore

I do think she wants to be glamoured as someone that she is not. (She got you wrapped around that little finger Adam)

I do not think what she has done warrants her private life to be affected in anyway from this, including her full name/address being posted (some of the sources I found list her address and several relatives)

I do think that the community deserved to be made aware.

---

We are not on a first name basis, who the fuck are you again? certainly no one in this community, you will probably not be missed.
Now log off my fuckin website

So all of this and nobody even got to fuck her? Thoroughly disappointing.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by adamantium

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AhoosierA

I’d like to say, that no matter how much a dislike a member of this community I would not post their private info without first going through Druff.

I think it’s pretty obvious I don’t like KT. I never thought that my subtle cryptic message would be enough to get her to leave the site (I’m not claiming to be the main reason).

I did post that cryptic message as a “Just so you know that I know”

I do think she’s an attention whore

I do think she wants to be glamoured as someone that she is not. (She got you wrapped around that little finger Adam)

I do not think what she has done warrants her private life to be affected in anyway from this, including her full name/address being posted (some of the sources I found list her address and several relatives)

I do think that the community deserved to be made aware.

---

We are not on a first name basis, who the fuck are you again? certainly no one in this community, you will probably not be missed.
Now log off my fuckin website

---

LOL. Maybe get a username that doesn’t start with your name. Fucking idiot.

In case you haven’t heard, this is Druff’s site that he runs at a small loss. You claiming this is your site is completely disrespectful and IMO deserves a life time ban.

:noose

Adamantium is a fictional metal alloy appearing in American comic books published by Marvel Comics, and is best known as the substance bonded to the character Wolverine's skeleton and claws.

pretty sure no self respecting norwegian is named adam

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by GambleBotsSatire

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AhoosierA

LOL. Maybe get a username that doesn’t start with your name. Fucking idiot.

---

Adamantium is a fictional metal alloy appearing in American comic books published by Marvel Comics, and is best known as the substance bonded to the character Wolverine's skeleton and claws.

pretty sure no self respecting norwegian is named adam

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BlunderMaker

So all of this and nobody even got to fuck her? Thoroughly disappointing.

---

Pussy got fucked with words

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RegGaymer

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BlunderMaker

So all of this and nobody even got to fuck her? Thoroughly disappointing.

---

Pussy got fucked with words

---

Update your thread. Are you still with that bird who's still sucking her ex's meat on the side?

frankly im shocked Handicapme hasnt sucked Druff's dick in this thread yet