Printable View
Calling Trymp the adult in the room is a bridge I can’t cross. But it does appear he has dragged everyone else down to his level, which is disappointing. I am not particularly disappointed by his behavior, because he is exactly who I thought he was. But it is disappointing how Everyone on both sides of the aisle has responded to him.
looks like aoc is tweeting for the senate now also
Quote:
Originally Posted by verminaard
the dems waited patiently for the right to police trump on any level and it simply never happened.
so this is whats next.
Quote:
Originally Posted by duped_samaritan
GOD I HATE THIS POST SO MUCH. what does AOC have to do with it? ur that trained already to be obsessed with her? and how is "is this a parody account" funny. that's about as lazy as "that's what she said"
Quote:
Originally Posted by blake
lol jesus christ blake, get dish out of your head.
the rnc told pence & mcconnell they their maginot line against impeachment was starting to crack 48 hours before trump tail-tucked. gop senator from california left the fucking party over it and it was only going to get worse from there.
blake they _heeled_ trump.
reagan's most iconic moment was telling gorbachev to 'tear down this wall', the only grownups in the room are the ones recognizing that america's PR problem is going to go supernova if we erect a physical monument to our racism and indifference to human suffering (that we created). o and what a curious thing that its become trumps raison d'etre, btw.
I apologize for triggering you friend.Quote:
Originally Posted by thesidedishQuote:
Originally Posted by duped_samaritan
GOD I HATE THIS POST SO MUCH. what does AOC have to do with it? ur that trained already to be obsessed with her? and how is "is this a parody account" funny. that's about as lazy as "that's what she said"
Fair enough. Just realize most of them have money and resources to relocate if things get too bad. We are stuck here. What is in Nancy Pelosis best interests isn’t necessarily in yours or mine.Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatineQuote:
Originally Posted by verminaard
the dems waited patiently for the right to police trump on any level and it simply never happened.
so this is whats next.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tsRUfh99ncAQuote:
Originally Posted by sonatineQuote:
Originally Posted by verminaard
the dems waited patiently for the right to police trump on any level and it simply never happened.
so this is whats next.
there is a 0.0% chance of trump's impeachment at present (or at least conviction), which trump surely knows. every republican voting in favor of it would be primaried and get thrown out of office.Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatineQuote:
Originally Posted by blake
lol jesus christ blake, get dish out of your head.
the rnc told pence & mcconnell they their maginot line against impeachment was starting to crack 48 hours before trump tail-tucked. gop senator from california left the fucking party over it and it was only going to get worse from there.
blake they _heeled_ trump.
reagan's most iconic moment was telling gorbachev to 'tear down this wall', the only grownups in the room are the ones recognizing that america's PR problem is going to go supernova if we erect a physical monument to our racism and indifference to human suffering (that we created). o and what a curious thing that its become trumps raison d'etre, btw.
the dems don't have to agree to a giant concrete wall and trump probably doesn't even want that. everybody agrees with "border security" -- republicans, democrats and independents. why not allocate more money for that? if that means replacing existing fencing, great. adding new fencing in areas where it's needed, fine. drones, additional manpower, etc.
of course let's be real that the reason trump is totally unable to get dems to agree to anything in this regard is because he's done everything in his power to convince the public that he wants a wall solely because he hates brown people. (mexicans = rapists, white supremacists in charlottesville = good people, etc.)
big surprise the dems won't work with him
Do you make this up as you go along, or are you that in touch with the things white people hate because you're at the white power meetings?
ATTENTION BLAKE
you want blakes attention stop ducking our nba contests you sidecuck
lol at you thinking this is helpful. it's actually just the oppositeQuote:
Originally Posted by thesidedish
the indictment doesn't say stone had direct contact with assange. it says there were intermediaries between them.
wikileaks' statement only emphasizes that the indictment never challenged that there were no direct communications between assange and stone.
how come wikileaks ignored mueller's allegations that third-persons communicated with assange on stone's behalf?
remember that before the indictment came out, wikileaks claimed there were no back channel communications.
if the indictment was wrong, you would have expected wikileaks to deny it, wouldn't you?
blake were a two parent household HOW DARE YOU UNDERMINE ME LIKE THIS
What's the over/under on this being over?
Lol at libtards fawning over ANY percieved win......typical.....
It's almost as if libtards learned nothing from 2016....I'm sure they will be reminded in 2020....
really...Quote:
Originally Posted by Mintjewlips