Printable View
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
This is actually indicative of the incompetence of the Trump campaign this time around.Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatine
I was very disappointed in it. Very poorly run. Trump did himself no favors with his usual erratic behavior at a time when nobody is in the mood to see such a thing.
punch line the fbi is now denying a hack happened and smart money play is leaning towards someone embezzled it.
You can take this a step further, most of those shootings were still justified. The idea that cops are going around killing unarmed black men for fun/sport because cops are racist is.........retarded. The odds of getting shot for no reason by a cop are around the same as dying from being struck by lightning.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
blake, there won't be a collapse of the party.
Maybe a retooling.
If Biden wins, and if Democrats have all three houses, you can count on a lot of things happening which piss people off, resulting in a shellacking in the midterms.
That's pretty much exactly what happened in 1994.
While Clinton was a good enough politician to change course and save himself for 1996 (a bad Republican candidate in Dole helped, too), that 1994 win set the stage for Republicans to reshape the map and come back into prominence.
Once the noise of Trump is gone, and the Democrats have full control, there's no way they're going to pull off a lot of their extreme ideas without making a lot of centrists feel really uncomfortable.
You know when a tremendous backlash will come against Democrats? When they finally get socialized medicine into law (which will happen eventually), and people start to realize the reality of what is really is. Right now, many Americans have a rosy view of what to expect -- free healthcare for all! Never another medical bill! Everything treated and taken care of!
When they see the ugly reality of 6-month waits for specialists, denied tests, and 6-month waits for other tests, there will be panic. There will be even more panic when people come down with cancer symptoms and can't get into the doctor for 3 months. Republicans should win in a landslide in the following election. Sadly, we have to destroy our healthcare to get there, so I'm not looking forward to that, especially as my parents advance further in age, and even I start getting into further into the age where shit can go wrong.
Anyway, that's the future.
The present is that Trump will probably lose, Dems will get the Senate, and I will have to endure 2 years of watching a lot of really awful changes. But perhaps the party really does need kind of a reset in order to prevent losing states like Texas, so long term that may not be all that bad.
Quote:
Originally Posted by blakethe irony, of course, is that because trump is so intentionally divisive (and clinically retarded) that he is pushing people further left.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
You just don’t get it man. Can’t you see how extreme Clinton and Biden are? Trump is the real moderate who brings people together...
Republicans have no one to blame but themselves for electing someone so unhinge who actively made fun and taunted his own citizens on twitter. Seriously had any other republican won they would be cruising to reelection here. You put a lunatic in the whitehouse and then complain when he doesn’t get re-elected.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
He’s the first guy on the Right to go on the offensive against the left and a lot of people don’t have the stomach for it. It’s maybe the biggest reason why he won the Presidency because there was an enormous appetite for someone on the Right to fight back.Quote:
Originally Posted by blakei didn't like obama too much in his 2nd term. i actually voted against him.Quote:
Originally Posted by BiffCo99The left’s insane march to the fringes has been churning for the last two decades or more as liberals have marched through and taken control of all of our country’s major institutions.Quote:
Originally Posted by blake
The Ferguson lie and other incidents occurred under Obama and he pushed the narrative further off the cliff. This was always coming. If you want to claim that Trump has been an accelerant largely because of media hysteria and dishonesty and that’s emboldened the left to reveal themselves quicker, sure, but to blame Trump for the state of the Left is LOL
but what trump is doing is waaaaay different. he's being intentionally divisive. he says things with the actual intent to rally against half of america. we haven't seen a president that has not even given lip service to being a president for everybody before.
The left has has had the GOP on its heels and playing defense for the past 30 years on social conservatism. People on the right had enough and that’s why Trump won.
The old GOP is dead in terms of being a political force. Free market and limited government arguments won’t win any more elections. The only way forward for the right to wield any kind of institutional power is MAGA. Trump is the only weapon the Right has in the culture war and he’s shown the way forward.
If MAGA dies the libs will grab power and never let go. The elites know this which is why they’re so desperate to defeat Trump.
Maybe you can take it further but the rest of us will require proof of what you say. Justified? Where's the data?Quote:
Originally Posted by nightmarefishYou can take this a step further, most of those shootings were still justified. The idea that cops are going around killing unarmed black men for fun/sport because cops are racist is.........retarded. The odds of getting shot for no reason by a cop are around the same as dying from being struck by lightning.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
Last sentence is not the issue
i'm not sure about this.Quote:
Originally Posted by BiffCo99He’s the first guy on the Right to go on the offensive against the left and a lot of people don’t have the stomach for it. It’s maybe the biggest reason why he won the Presidency because there was an enormous appetite for someone on the Right to fight back.Quote:
Originally Posted by blakei didn't like obama too much in his 2nd term. i actually voted against him.Quote:
Originally Posted by BiffCo99
but what trump is doing is waaaaay different. he's being intentionally divisive. he says things with the actual intent to rally against half of america. we haven't seen a president that has not even given lip service to being a president for everybody before.
The left has has had the GOP on its heels and playing defense for the past 30 years on social conservatism. People on the right had enough and that’s why Trump won.
The old GOP is dead in terms of being a political force. Free market and limited government arguments won’t win any more elections. The only way forward for the right to wield any kind of institutional power is MAGA. Trump is the only weapon the Right has in the culture war and he’s shown the way forward.
If MAGA dies the libs will grab power and never let go. The elites know this which is why they’re so desperate to defeat Trump.
trump's policy proposals are clearly popular with a lot of people.
if you had a "normal" candidate who pushed for a border wall and other social issues that a lot of mainstream republicans and democrats believe in, without the dumb statements, that candidate could win.
trump may have given republicans a blueprint for how to win elections.
push economic populism, bring back manufacturing jobs (or try, anyway), appeal to blue collar workers...
if that candidate just acted normal, he could win easily
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
i agree pretty much with the retooling thing. but i totally disagree at the idea that there will be "awful changes".
lol at thinking anything meaningful ever gets done in washington.
even as much as i hate trump, i'm not sure what big changes he actually made that had any effect on me whatsoever.
When you look at the trajectory of states and see early voting in Texas and Florida and Georgia, see the trends in the west, you come away unconvinced we will win those states this time, and I’m still nervous about the general, but I look and think the GOP better have a Hispanic candidate ready to roll going forward if they don’t want to lose by 200 every election come 2028 or so. It feels those places will be almost solidly blue by then.Quote:
Originally Posted by blake
If I was a republican, I don’t know if I care if I lose that much. 4 more years of Trump and you could see an AOC emerge policy wise. If Biden mucks around for 4 years, you may push back the inevitable by 10-15 years. That would be my solace as if I was a republican and I lose. We got 3 SC justices and this guy might have eventually turned Texas and Georgia and NC blue forever next election rather than in 10-15 years.
.
I agree and I would be all for a more polished version of Trump but the tenacity and fight needs to remain. MAGA policies are the key as you’re right, they are broadly popular.Quote:
Originally Posted by blakei'm not sure about this.Quote:
Originally Posted by BiffCo99He’s the first guy on the Right to go on the offensive against the left and a lot of people don’t have the stomach for it. It’s maybe the biggest reason why he won the Presidency because there was an enormous appetite for someone on the Right to fight back.Quote:
Originally Posted by blake
The left has has had the GOP on its heels and playing defense for the past 30 years on social conservatism. People on the right had enough and that’s why Trump won.
The old GOP is dead in terms of being a political force. Free market and limited government arguments won’t win any more elections. The only way forward for the right to wield any kind of institutional power is MAGA. Trump is the only weapon the Right has in the culture war and he’s shown the way forward.
If MAGA dies the libs will grab power and never let go. The elites know this which is why they’re so desperate to defeat Trump.
trump's policy proposals are clearly popular with a lot of people.
if you had a "normal" candidate who pushed for a border wall and other social issues that a lot of mainstream republicans and democrats believe in, without the dumb statements, that candidate could win.
trump may have given republicans a blueprint for how to win elections.
push economic populism, bring back manufacturing jobs (or try, anyway), appeal to blue collar workers...
if that candidate just acted normal, he could win easily
The thing that worries me is that many influential people on the right want to return to the Mitt Romney types who will always cuck to the left when push comes to shove.
I mean, if anyone thinks a Haley/Crenshaw 2024 ticket is a good idea they just don’t get it. That ticket doesn’t have what it takes to win a general election and energize a base and they will always let the left control the narrative.
If Trump wins it’a a validation of MAGA and stops the Dems from transforming the country but if he loses the conservative movement could be essentially finished and the Republican Party will be opposition in name only.
The problem is the parties aren't stagnate even though we like to think they are.Quote:
Originally Posted by BCRWhen you look at the trajectory of states and see early voting in Texas and Florida and Georgia, see the trends in the west, you come away unconvinced we will win those states this time, and I’m still nervous about the general, but I look and think the GOP better have a Hispanic candidate ready to roll going forward if they don’t want to lose by 200 every election come 2028 or so. It feels those places will be almost solidly blue by then.Quote:
Originally Posted by blake
If I was a republican, I don’t know if I care if I lose that much. 4 more years of Trump and you could see an AOC emerge policy wise. If Biden mucks around for 4 years, you may push back the inevitable by 10-15 years. That would be my solace as if I was a republican and I lose. We got 3 SC justices and this guy might have eventually turned Texas and Georgia and NC blue forever next election rather than in 10-15 years.
.
Heck, just 3.5 years ago Democrats were pro tariffs and Republicans believed in free trade. Then Trump comes along and Democrats all of sudden become free traders.
Point being that the issues and the parties will continue to move around and continue to figure out ways to divide people.
Genocide 7x worse then Hitler?... absurd.Quote:
Originally Posted by abrown83If you are a white collar white guy living in a town of 15,000 people making $18 per hour slaughtering chickens you don’t feel that privilege in any way.Quote:
Originally Posted by duped_samaritanImagine having a general grasp of US History and thinking White Men are not privileged.
Imagine repeatedly condemning looting and violence, on the record only to have the President lie about it and millions of people believe him...all for defending the right to peacefully protest.
Imagine fighting to take away the power to decide when an abortion is appropriate from the Woman and her Doctor, and giving it to the Federal Government.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
If you turn on the tv when you get home and watch the news media call them mostly peaceful protests while a building is on fire directly behind you, it makes people believe that the media and by extension Democrats are lying to them.
What’s worse, 220,000 COVID deaths or 220,000 Black abortions since the beginning of the pandemic? Which one is more racist COVID or abortion? Literally your side has supported a genocide 7x worse than Hitler on Black people the last 40 years. Your policies have made them become the second largest minority group in the US. It’s hilarious though that your party has supported the deaths of 40 million Black babies even though it would have secured your party’s control for the next 50 years.
Republicans seem to care more for an unborn fetus then those already living.
Oakland County, MI, 2016, Targetsmart:
D +4.2
Currently:
D +2.5 (and dropping)
If Biden is slipping in Oakland County, MI he is not going to win the state.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Salty_Aus
thats the mentality. they have become addicted to this issue. the christian fundamentalists have effectively performed a hostile takeover of the entire conservative movement, hollowed it out, and converted it into a vehicle for fundamentalism. and the virus they used to deliver that payload is the 'pro life' movement.
:blackcockQuote:
Originally Posted by limitlesSo I looked it up. Took a couple of minutesQuote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
Deaths Due to Use of Lethal Force by Law Enforcement
Findings From the National Violent Death Reporting System, 17 U.S. States, 2009–2012
Several high-profile cases in the U.S. have drawn public attention to the use of lethal force by law enforcement (LE), yet research on such fatalities is limited
Victims were majority white (52%) but disproportionately black (32%) with a fatality rate 2.8 times higher among blacks than whites. Most victims were reported to be armed (83%); however, black victims were more likely to be unarmed (14.8%) than white (9.4%) or Hispanic (5.8%) victims.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6080222/
Government officials, academic researchers and media outlets launched data-collection projects around that time to better understand the frequency of police violence and the risk factors that contribute to it. From these growing data sets come some disturbing findings. About 1,000 civilians are killed each year by law-enforcement officers in the United States. By one estimate, Black men are 2.5 times more likely than white men to be killed by police during their lifetime1. And in another study, Black people who were fatally shot by police seemed to be twice as likely as white people to be unarmed2.
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-01846-z
Unreal. Big Tech is out of control.
https://twitter.com/ByronYork/status...32652874330113
So your argument against White privilege is 'there are poor uneducated white people also, I saw them myself'Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
Drawing a conclusion about a society of 350 million people based on what you see is like arguing that you should fold KK because an Ace always flops. You have to do the math and forget about the hands you 'remember'.
When do you think white privilege stopped being a thing, or do you think it was never a thing?
Because there's always been poor, uneducated white people in America, including during the times of slavery.
Why are you doing this? Repeating the same lies over and over. It's like since you disagree with what the protesters are protesting, and the democrats support the protesters, you don't think there's anything wrong with straight up lying.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
Here, I'll give you another chance to ignore the truth:
Biden:
May 29:
they have a right to be, in fact, angry and frustrated. And more violence, hurting more people, isn’t going to answer the question.
May 31:
Protesting such brutality is right and necessary. It’s an utterly American response. But burning down communities and needless destruction is not. Violence that endangers lives is not. Violence that guts and shutters businesses that serve the community is not.
The act of protesting should never be allowed to overshadow the reason we protest. It should not drive people away from the just cause that protest is meant to advance.
June 2:
there is no place for violence, no place for looting or destroying property or burning churches, or destroying businesses,
James Clyburn, June 3:
We have to make sure we do not allow ourselves to play the other person’s game,” Clyburn said. “Peaceful protest is our game. Violence is their game. Purposeful protest is our game. This looting and rioting, that's their game. We cannot allow ourselves to play their game.
Breaking out a window will not contribute to that. Setting a fire, throwing stones at police officers, that’s destructive behavior, which will not contribute to anything that will make this a better country and make a better future for our children and our grandchildren
There's plenty more.
Over 95% of the 8,000+ summer protests were peaceful. People who disagree with what the protesters were protesting are spreading misinformation to make them all look like violent criminals. You're one of those people.Quote:
What kind of "peaceful protest" needs to be defended? The kind we saw in Philly yesterday, where people were wheeling out TVs on dollys?
Point proven.
The above is how far gone Druff is. Seems like only yesterday he was able to think critically with the best of them.
https://www.dailywire.com/news/walsh...blm-are-hidingQuote:
Originally Posted by limitlesMaybe you can take it further but the rest of us will require proof of what you say. Justified? Where's the data?Quote:
Originally Posted by nightmarefish
Last sentence is not the issue
I have already made the case that systemic racism in law enforcement is a myth. The claim that racist police are prowling the street searching for black men to murder is absurd on its face, and even absurder when you look at the facts. It is by now well publicized — at least in some corners — that, despite all of the panicking and rioting over race-based police brutality, only a very small number of unarmed black men are killed by police each year. But an even closer look at the data, and a study of each “unarmed” killing, reveals that the real number of unjustified police shootings of actual unarmed people — black, white, or any other race — is much smaller still.
First, to put the statistics into perspective, it’s helpful to begin with the overall number of arrests. According to the DOJ, police make about 10 million arrests each year. As a rough average, 7 million of the arrested suspects are white and 3 million are black. Out of that number, last year, 25 unarmed white people were killed by police, compared to 14 unarmed black people, according to the Washington Post database of police shootings. That means about .0004 percent of all blacks arrested were killed while unarmed. The percentage for whites is comparable. In total, 1,000 people were shot and killed by police in 2019, the vast majority of whom were armed. Still, that’s a mere .01 percent of all arrests.
Now, the numbers aren’t exactly the same every year, of course. For example, the Post says 22 unarmed black people were killed in 2017, compared with 31 white people. But the percentage doesn’t change very much. Also, we should acknowledge that the numbers vary depending on what source you use. USA Today cites a crowdsourced database that has 25 unarmed black killings in 2019. However a look at the individual cases in that database shows that they count as “police shootings” any shooting involving a police officer, on or off duty. Violence stemming from domestic disputes or off-duty bar fights make it onto their list. This is not how you determine whether there is a systemic problem in law enforcement. We need to look specifically at the cases of uniformed police officers shooting unarmed black people in the line of duty. We know that number is already quite low. But a closer inspection of the actual cases shows that it’s even lower than we think. Indeed, it appears that the whole category of “unarmed” shootings is severely misleading
I looked up all 14 cases included in the Post’s 2019 database. A few are straightforwardly unjustified. Atatiana Jefferson was shot while sitting inside her mother’s home. The officers were responding to a call from a neighbor who was concerned that there’d been a break in at the residence. Officer Aaron Dean peered into a window in the dark, spotted Jefferson, screamed for her to show her hands, and then shot her without identifying himself as a police officer. Dean has been charged with murder. It’s a horrible case, and outrageous behavior by Dean, but it hardly amounts to systemic racism. There’s no reason to think that this is even a case of isolated racism. Dean, it seems, could hardly see who he was shooting, which is what makes it an egregiously unjustified act on his part, but also probably not racism.
Officer Carmen DeCruz in Texas fatally shot a man named Michael Dean. Body cam footage apparently shows that DeCruz accidentally discharged his firearm while trying to confiscate Dean’s car keys during a traffic stop. DeCruz has been charged with manslaughter. Both of these cases are clearly unjustified, and both officers have received criminal charges appropriate for the offense. Most of rest of the cases, however, are either far from clear cut, or clear cut in the other direction.
Christopher Whitfield was shot allegedly during a scuffle with police after trying to steal from a convenience store. The sheriff’s office claimed the shooting was accidental. A grand jury cleared the officer of any criminal wrongdoing.
Josef Richardson of Louisiana was shot by Officer Vance Matranga Jr during a no-knock drug raid at a Budget 7 Motel. Richardson was unarmed and shot in the back of the head. Deputies on the scene said Richardson turned and reached for his waistband. Matranga was not charged with any crime.
Officer Jovany Crespo was indicted for aggravated manslaughter for shooting Gregory C. Griffin during a car chase. Crespo says he thought Griffin pointed a gun at him. Body cam footage shows Crespo jump out of his police cruiser (another officer was driving) and fire multiple shots at the fleeing vehicle.
Officer Sung Kim shot and killed Jimmy Atchison while trying to arrest him for allegedly stealing a cell phone at gun point. Atchison was backed into a broom closet at the time of the shooting.
These six shootings range from outrageous to questionable. But these are still only six out of the approximately 3 million black suspects arrested in 2019. Half of the officers have been charged with crimes, so it’s not as though cops are given legal license to kill on a whim. Only one of these cases is murder. Two might be manslaughter. You could potentially make an argument for manslaughter in the other three cases, though the officers weren’t charged or were cleared. And, at any rate, in none of these cases is there any reason whatsoever to suspect white supremacy as a motivation. The last officer mentioned isn’t even white.
What about the other 8 “unarmed” shootings of 2019? This is where the “unarmed” designation really confuses matters.
Melvin Watkins was shot by a sheriff’s deputy after Watkins’ family called 911 to report that he’d become violent and they feared for their safety. When officers arrived on the scene, Watkins allegedly tried to run them over with his car. Multiple witnesses and video support this version of events.
Knoxville police officer Dylan Williams was cleared of any wrongdoing by the DA after fatally shooting Channara Pheap last summer. Five eye-witnesses, plus video evidence and dash cam footage, confirmed that Pheap assaulted Williams, choked him, grabbed his taser and used it on him.
Ryan Twyman was shot by police attempting to arrest him for possession of illegal firearms in June of 2019. Security camera footage shows Twyman driving away with an officer trapped by his car door. The other officer on the scene opened fire, fearing for his partner’s life.
Kevin Pudlik was killed by police during a car chase. The driver of the car Pudlik was in, Christopher Lee Calvin, nearly pinned an officer between his car and a concrete wall. Cops on the scene finally opened fire when they believed Calvin was intentionally trying to ram into an officer. Calvin was charged with Pudlik’s death.
Isaiah Lewis, a black teenager, was shot by police after pouncing on an officer and knocking him unconscious.
Marcus McVae, a “renowned criminal,” as the local media described him, has a bevy of violent crimes to his name, including assault of a public servant. He was killed by police after assaulting an officer during a foot chase.
Marzeus Scott can be seen on body cam footage attacking a female officer who was trying to arrest him for assaulting a store clerk moments before. The footage clearly shows that the officer was knocked to the ground by Scott, and that she tried to use her taser before resorting to her firearm.
Lastly, Kevin Mason of Baltimore was shot by police responding to a domestic violence call. Mason sent dogs after the officers. When that didn’t scare them off, he called 911 and threatened to “blast” them and “kill every last one of them.” Mason was ultimately shot when he emerged from his home after explicitly announcing his intention to murder the cops on the scene.
No reasonable person could describe any of the 8 cases just listed as cold-blooded murder, much less racist hate crimes. These were violent criminals shot while in the act of physically attacking and threatening officers. Most of them were not truly “unarmed,” either. Some were using cars. One used a dog. Another used a taser. Others used their hands and nearly succeeded in arming themselves with the officer’s weapon. These cases may count as “unarmed” in a strictly legal sense, but any news outlet interested in accurate reporting wouldn’t use the term without careful qualification.
This is what the media and BLM activists mean when they scream about the epidemic of “unarmed” black men killed by police. They mean that a very tiny fraction of black people arrested by police are killed in the process, and that an even tinier fraction are unarmed at the time, and that an even tinier fraction of that fraction of the fraction, actually had no weapon of any kind, and were making no attempt to hurt or kill a police officer. When phrased like that, it doesn’t seem like there’s much of an epidemic here at all.
The Daily Wire is one of America’s fastest-growing conservative media companies and counter-cultural outlets for news, opinion, and entertainment. Get inside access to The Daily Wire by becoming a member.
SCOTUS just served trump an L for PA voting
Quote:
Originally Posted by nightmarefishhttps://www.dailywire.com/news/walsh...blm-are-hidingQuote:
Originally Posted by limitles
I have already made the case that systemic racism in law enforcement is a myth. The claim that racist police are prowling the street searching for black men to murder is absurd on its face, and even absurder when you look at the facts. It is by now well publicized — at least in some corners — that, despite all of the panicking and rioting over race-based police brutality, only a very small number of unarmed black men are killed by police each year. But an even closer look at the data, and a study of each “unarmed” killing, reveals that the real number of unjustified police shootings of actual unarmed people — black, white, or any other race — is much smaller still.
This is what the media and BLM activists mean when they scream about the epidemic of “unarmed” black men killed by police. They mean that a very tiny fraction of black people arrested by police are killed in the process, and that an even tinier fraction are unarmed at the time, and that an even tinier fraction of that fraction of the fraction, actually had no weapon of any kind, and were making no attempt to hurt or kill a police officer. When phrased like that, it doesn’t seem like there’s much of an epidemic here at all.
The Daily Wire is one of America’s fastest-growing conservative media companies and counter-cultural outlets for news, opinion, and entertainment. Get inside access to The Daily Wire by becoming a member.
That's an op ed and it plays it's hand in the first two sentences. Who is claiming cops are prowling murderers? No one. The scientific study on available data relates to
“Deaths Due to Use of Lethal Force by Law Enforcement.”
The numbers show blacks die at 2.8 times the rate than whites.
“Most victims were reported to be armed (83%); however, black victims were more likely to be unarmed (14.8%) than white (9.4%) or Hispanic (5.8%) victims.“
To suggest than hundreds of years of discrimination and segregation, complete with incarceration and violence, has suddenly disappeared is ridiculous
Again, almost three times the rate of death across the board
absurder!
The flaw in your statistics is they include law abiding citizens of all races which don't have police encounters thus have a 0.000000000% of being killed by a cop. So why are these people factored into the overall probabilities? The reason is it tricks retards like you.Quote:
Originally Posted by limitlesQuote:
Originally Posted by nightmarefish
That's an op ed and it plays it's hand in the first two sentences. Who is claiming cops are prowling murderers? No one. The scientific study on available data relates to
“Deaths Due to Use of Lethal Force by Law Enforcement.”
The numbers show blacks die at 2.8 times the rate than whites.
“Most victims were reported to be armed (83%); however, black victims were more likely to be unarmed (14.8%) than white (9.4%) or Hispanic (5.8%) victims.“
To suggest than hundreds of years of discrimination and segregation, complete with incarceration and violence, has suddenly disappeared is ridiculous
Again, almost three times the rate of death across the board
If you look at per police encounter blacks aren't killed more often than whites. I know the media has brainwashed you into thinking only blacks are killed by cops but it's not reality homegirl. Reality is cops get called when people are breaking the law, 10s of millions of calls a years and sometimes the criminal gets killed and sometimes the cop gets killed.
Blacks are killed disproportionately more than other races because they disproportionally commit more violet crime. If you can't understand the concept, if you commit a violent crime that makes you infinitely more likely to be killed by a cop compared to if you had continued being a law abiding citizen, then you are truly retarded.
Bad day for sidedish on PI. Let's keep him in our prayers
Quote:
Originally Posted by PLOL
good day to bet more. trump is going to win in a :SLIDE, easily programmed libtards are scared shitless of covid and will not be voting much election day unlike freedom loving trump supporters
https://twitter.com/realikamusume/st...96544795774989Quote:
Originally Posted by PLOL
Idiot. The stats are for people shot and killed by cops. You can extrapolate that this group are not jay walkers.Quote:
Originally Posted by nightmarefishThe flaw in your statistics is they include law abiding citizens of all races which don't have police encounters thus have a 0.000000000% of being killed by a cop. So why are these people factored into the overall probabilities? The reason is it tricks retards like you.Quote:
Originally Posted by limitles
If you look at per police encounter blacks aren't killed more often than whites. I know the media has brainwashed you into thinking only blacks are killed by cops but it's not reality homegirl. Reality is cops get called when people are breaking the law, 10s of millions of calls a years and sometimes the criminal gets killed and sometimes the cop gets killed.
Blacks are killed disproportionately more than other races because they disproportionally commit more violet crime. If you can't understand the concept, if you commit a violent crime that makes you infinitely more likely to be killed by a cop compared to if you had continued being a law abiding citizen, then you are truly retarded.
Ok? Of that group of non jay walkers blacks die nearly three times as much as whites all things considered.
There is nothing to your opinion that blacks commit disproportionately more violent crime.
You dig a bigger hole every time you post
Biden voters already voted. Trump is banking on all his supporters showing up on election day. Not the best strategyQuote:
Originally Posted by thesidedishQuote:
Originally Posted by PLOL
good day to bet more. trump is going to win in a :SLIDE, easily programmed libtards are scared shitless of covid and will not be voting much election day unlike freedom loving trump supporters
Quote:
Originally Posted by PLOLBiden voters already voted. Trump is banking on all his supporters showing up on election day. Not the best strategyQuote:
Originally Posted by thesidedish
did they tho?? there's plenty left that will be too scared. im looking at some Trump to win Maine action today
Your "3x as often" statistic factors in law abiding citizens. Those people no matter what the race don't have police encounters thus aren't killed by cops. Jesus you're a mong, this isn't a hard concept. If you exam "police encounters" which makes sense if we're trying to determine if cops kill blacks more often than other races they encounter, you will find no difference percentage wise.Quote:
Originally Posted by limitlesIdiot. The stats are for people shot and killed by cops. You can extrapolate that this group are not jay walkers.Quote:
Originally Posted by nightmarefish
Ok? Of that group of non jay walkers blacks die nearly three times as much as whites all things considered.
There is nothing to your opinion that blacks commit disproportionately more violent crime.
You dig a bigger hole every time you post
BTW those aren't my statistics and they do not include law abiding citizens. The study covers those killed (non jay walkers) by law enforcement. You either can't read or understand, which is it?Quote:
Originally Posted by limitlesIdiot. The stats are for people shot and killed by cops. You can extrapolate that this group are not jay walkers.Quote:
Originally Posted by nightmarefish
Ok? Of that group of non jay walkers blacks die nearly three times as much as whites all things considered.
There is nothing to your opinion that blacks commit disproportionately more violent crime.
You dig a bigger hole every time you post
Methods:
All fatalities (N=812) resulting from use of lethal force by on-duty LE from 2009 to 2012 in 17 U.S. states were examined using National Violent Death Reporting System data. Case narratives were coded for additional incident circumstances.
Results:
Victims were majority white (52%) but disproportionately black (32%) with a fatality rate 2.8 times higher among blacks than whites. Most victims were reported to be armed (83%); however, black victims were more likely to be unarmed (14.8%) than white (9.4%) or Hispanic (5.8%) victims. Fatality rates among military veterans/active duty service members were 1.4 times greater than among their civilian counterparts
You're an idiot that doesn't understand the statistic you're posting. Blinded by your own stupidity. The left loves idiots like you, easy to manipulate.Quote:
Originally Posted by limitlesBTW those aren't my statistics and they do not include law abiding citizens. The study covers those killed by law enforcement (non jay walkers). You can't read or understand, which is it?Quote:
Originally Posted by limitles
Quote:
Originally Posted by thesidedish
please save your money.
seriously this is not a good bet.
like if youre getting better than +300, ok i guess?...
Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatineQuote:
Originally Posted by thesidedish
please save your money.
seriously this is not a good bet.
like if youre getting better than +300, ok i guess?...
its 11c
all gamblers should be loading up on Trump in the rust belt fr, he will be leading in them all at one point
Except that it's widely known. The opposite will happen in Florida btw. Mail in ballots will get displayed first and will show a large lead for Biden, even if he ends up losing or winning by a small margin.Quote:
Originally Posted by thesidedish
Of course low-info bettors may trade on it regardless. A similar thing happened in 2016 when Miami-dade results came in first and showed a large lead for clinton in FL. Traders took Clinton up to 88 cents in Florida. I'm not expecting them to be that dumb this time around.
Honestly, listening to thesidedish' takes is a refreshing breath of fresh air after listening to OSA's retarded theories
Also, Clinton tried to claim immunity from civil cases and lost, and he should have lost. And that was just a harassment case.Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatine
This is a criminal case, a RAPE case. Trump claiming immunity is LOL. It's even more LOL that he's claiming that denying the allegation is an official function of his office. Really? It's a duty of the presidency to deny rape allegations?
:lol2
dont underestimate the stupidity of people with access to the internet and means to deposit money online into a betting account...Quote:
Originally Posted by PLOLExcept that it's widely known. The opposite will happen in Florida btw. Mail in ballots will get displayed first and will show a large lead for Biden, even if he ends up losing or winning by a small margin.Quote:
Originally Posted by thesidedish
Of course low-info bettors may trade on it regardless. A similar thing happened in 2016 when Miami-dade results came in first and showed a large lead for clinton in FL. Traders took Clinton up to 88 cents in Florida. I'm not expecting them to be that dumb this time around.
god bless al gore and Satoshi Nakamoto...