Watching once great fighters have to fight past their prime because they need the money has to be one of the saddest things in sports.
Printable View
Watching once great fighters have to fight past their prime because they need the money has to be one of the saddest things in sports.
Paulo Costa does not give one F about making weight.Quote:
The Brazilian’s middleweight clash against Marvin Vettori was originally set for 185 pounds. Then it was 195 pounds. Finally, Costa and Vettori’s main event at UFC Vegas 41 on Saturday afternoon is official for 205 pounds.
That's pretty crazy I'm surprised they didn't axe him on the spot.
What’s his deal?Quote:
Originally Posted by simpdog
It’s sad to see, he was a very exciting fighter and had massive potential
He seems majorly defeated since being disgraced by the Last Style Bender
Excuses, bitching, moaning
Now not even attempting to make weight?
Not sure how he can win tomorrow, I hope he shows up to fight, I was excited for this match up between two guys I thought had a lot of big time potential
Site is so overrun with political and other faggotry I had to dig hard to bump this thread.
Big upset for Pena.
Almost looked like Nunes wasn't really into it. Was she injured? Tired of having the belt and training?
Decent card lots of finishes.
if you could go back in time a decade and tell yourself 'look in 10 years, rogans going to call a womens mma fight the biggest upset in the history of the sport', would you keep paying attention to ufc?
Sure I would, but I’m not an anti Rogan drone.
This is a fairly retarded take honestlyQuote:
Originally Posted by sonatine
Weight cut got her is my guess. This was the first time she’d had to make 135 in 2yrs.Quote:
Originally Posted by simpdog
I'm headed to Houston, TX to see UFC 271! Super-pumped!
https://www.ufc.com/event/ufc-271
Anyone else attending?
I’ll be Houston but nothing says Happy Valentines Day to my wife than people beating each other to a pulp.
Oh yeah, I'm sure there will be other people there.Quote:
Originally Posted by khalwat
V-day is Monday -- you can do both!Quote:
Originally Posted by Texter
Regardless of your political affiliation, you gotta like Izzy coming to Rogan’s defense
https://twitter.com/MMAjunkie/status...chlOmPAxpS2jGQ
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsearles22
humans: joe rogan claims hes just a meathead who loves hearing people riff about their wild takes but somehow all the wild takes are from self proclaimed experts who want to share the stage with actual science.
right wing media: i dont know... joe rogan doesnt _seem_ like a racist....
humans: w..what?
joe rogan: ok yeah i toss around a few n bombs, and i feel terrible about it.
right wing media: see? he feels terrible about it.
total random black dude: JOE ROGAN IS NOT REPEAT NOT A RACIST.
right wing media: ok glad we got to the bottom of it, clearly the left wing media is not to be taken seriously.
hard to tell if tine is doing a bit or not these days
i mean if you are still talking about "actual science" 2 years into this shit show given how its consistently got things wrong time after time idk what to say
you absolutely nailed it with the lab leak in your op right at the start when "the science" took a good 12-18 month to admit actually yeah thats what happened
like him or not its obv this is an attempted political takedown of rogan cos he has a massive audience and doesnt "follow the science" which lets be honest only a complete and utter moron would trust unquestionably at this point
yeah ill always trust the opinion of someone who quad post tilts about how they cant trust science.
I always find it interesting when someone says "you can't trust the science" as if there is some legitimate alternative in medicine.Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatine
The other obvious red flag is nobody who actually studies this stuff ever uses the term "science". It's just a dumbed down word used for the public. What they are really talking about is empirical evidence, literature reviews, or even effect sizes.
The knowledge base is always expanding as anyone who's taken a research methods intro course should understand. Anyone who states "well we thought this last year and don't think this now" clearly doesn't understand that this is the exact point of "science". The knowledge body is not static.
I'm not even gonna get into the fact that vaccine skepticism is rooted in second wave feminism.
anyways
https://twitter.com/Matysek88/status...r-match-2022-2
https://twitter.com/Matysek88/status...r-match-2022-2
ATINE IS ONLY MEGA LOYAL TO MAINSTREAM SCIENCE SINCE HE GOT RIPPED OFF ON BLACK MARKET DICK PILLS BACK IN THE DAY.
Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatine
YOU EXPECTED SERIOUS RESPONSES TO THAT OBVIOIS TROLL POST? I MEAN I GET IT, YOUVE LONG DECIDED TO KEEP THE SERIOUS POSTING OVER ON REDACTED, AND JUST TROLL HERE THESE DAYS. BUT SOME OF THESE GUYS DONT SEE IT YET.
ATINE IS IN LINE FOR A FAT BONUS FROM CTR/SOROS AFTER SUCCESSFULLY TURNING A 300+ PAGE UFC THREAD INTO AN ANTI ROGAN THREAD IN A SINGLE POST. BRAVO.
GET HIM DISCO CHAPS
UFC 271 must be sponsored by some cupping company.
Yeah I thought this was fantastic for Izzy to literally redirect the question to him, and own it.Quote:
Originally Posted by jsearles22
So much this.Quote:
Originally Posted by BetCheckBetI always find it interesting when someone says "you can't trust the science" as if there is some legitimate alternative in medicine.Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatine
The other obvious red flag is nobody who actually studies this stuff ever uses the term "science". It's just a dumbed down word used for the public. What they are really talking about is empirical evidence, literature reviews, or even effect sizes.
The knowledge base is always expanding as anyone who's taken a research methods intro course should understand. Anyone who states "well we thought this last year and don't think this now" clearly doesn't understand that this is the exact point of "science". The knowledge body is not static.
Science arrives at conclusions by empirical evidence, testing, and peer review. So as the evidence, so can the consensus.
This is how it's supposed to work.
Scientists are benevolent wizards who are disgusted by money.
Regardless of where anyone stands on COVID, it's insane to think that Joe Rogan's show should be censored, because he has guests who present an alternate point of view regarding the current COVID narrative.
Much like the issue of Gofundme trying to steal $8 million aimed at supporting the Ottawa truckers, this shouldn't be a debate, no matter what side you're on. Censorship of alternate points of view is always wrong, just as scamming/stealing is always wrong. Politics shouldn't matter.
I don't agree with some of the COVID takes by Rogan's guests, but I would never want them denied the ability to speak if Joe wants them on his show.
Haha….anyone who paid for this phony shit should be pissed….punch grazes his head and flops to the canvas
https://twitter.com/SpinninBackfist/...023814485.html
The Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario is requiring all registered casino, lottery and igaming operators to stop offering and accepting wagers on Ultimate Fighting Championship events.
That comes after the commission says it learned of recent alleged incidents involving possible betting by UFC insiders, as well as reports of suspicious betting patterns in other jurisdictions.
Is this big news? Have I missed something?