Youtube Slot Community and SlotLady

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by PositiveVariance

It is obvious that they are monitoring the comments on YT. There are many comments about how people are, "So sorry this happened to you", to "How awful". I wonder how these same people are going to feel when they figure out the entire thing was a set up?

The entire thing was setup because they wanted the bread $$$$$ but not the slutty stigma that goes with selling yourself for money.

Also, obviously the story about them contacting the FBI was made up. They can NOT contact the FBI if they sent the pictures to EZ, the trail will lead right back to them. These 2 will never admit to this - just as they never admitted to Victor being her BF/Husband, whatever the hell he is to her.

---

Slight disagree: It wouldnt be an offense if they sent the pix to EZ AND told him to do whatever he wanted with them./encouraged a release so they can pivot to OF.

The FBI threat is probably more to "chum" the waters for the simps so they know there is hot porn out there and they'll want to join OF.

Sadly Victor should have shouted "VICTOR LUCK" as he jizzed on sarah's face to really seal the deal.

Who knows, that might be an upcoming clip as it were.

Also, agree with Ms.Fussy, ACA Exposed should definitely contact PFA to arrange script writing and related services to enhance the viewer experience and potential profits from this nonsense.

Finally, updated my signature for this glorious day.

I wonder if the "Open Relationship" is true, or they made It up because they know they will eventually need more "characters" to perform on film with Sarah to keep the money coming in?

Also, they are in Canada, why are the calling the FBI in the States, unless they know where the offender is?



But how funny is it that they hid Victor, had him behind the scenes from the Slot Lady channel for 3 years to encourage simp behavior, and now these SAME simps are going to pay $50 per month to watch Victor SMASH "their" girl?!?

I won't be purchasing a sub but I do recommend they spend a little time/money on lighting and makeup. They looked like a couple of shiny junkies in the announcement video.

What an interesting series of developments. I see a few possibilities:

1.) I do like the theory about the pictures being a 'Leak' rather than an actual leak. It transitions right into the OnlyFans thing perfectly and then you get to play the angle of taking your power back, or whatever the vernacular was. If the pictures were sent to EZ by a third party, and hopefully EZ will comment on this, it would be a stroke of brilliance if they had deliberately played him (harmless enough and his video pays, so he also gains) knowing that he couldn't resist that kind of drama and then they transition it right into this OnlyFans thing. That's some 3D chess right there! This seems like such a perfect segue into creating an OF, as has already been mentioned, and they can do the, 'Taking their power back,' rather than cold introducing an OF seemingly out of nowhere.

2.) On the other hand, perhaps the pictures weren't a leak at all. If this possibility is true, then I'd actually owe EZ an apology for suggesting it possible that he was trying to takedown ACA for his own benefit. What if EZ was in on it the entire time? They could kick him back a little something-something by way of commission on the first flood of OF money AND there's also whatever he makes by way of his video on this. If that's the case, then ACA and EZ played everyone, which is pretty smart, but falls a little short of brilliant considering that simps played themselves when it was SlotLady just by virtue of the fact that Sarah is moderately attractive and also has a vagina.

3.) The third possibility, which I consider a bit less likely...but have to accept in order to be fair...is that these pictures were genuinely some sort of leak. I don't know about this FBI thing; it would shock me if ACA has the FBI on speed dial. Maybe they submitted an online report to the FBI, which I'm sure is easy enough to do, and that's what they mean. Naturally, that doesn't actually mean the FBI will actually investigate it.

I think we have to be fair and accept the pictures were leaked as, at least, an outside possibility. I think there is a little bit in the way of corroborating statements that make this possible:

A.) Sarah continues to deny having ever been an escort.

-The first thing that we note is that Sarah continues to deny having ever been an escort. For the time being, the only thing that has been made public are the Reddit post claiming she was an escort as well as the very pictures that ACA does not dispute the existence of. In an attempt to takedown the ACA channel, if the pictures were leaked, it stands to reason that the pictures could be used as corroborating evidence as to her being an escort...even though nude pictures aren't sufficient to make a person an escort.

-Another aspect that makes her DENIAL of being an escort strange is that they are now creating an OnlyFans anyway. Think about this for a second: Do you guys think the OnlyFans would do better or worse if Sarah were to create the impression that guys could simply pay to fuck her? I would think, if nothing else, Sarah should WANT people to believe that she used to be an escort, unless it's patently untrue and she's offended by the very suggestion.

B.) Again, what would Sarah being an escort actually harm? Sarah and Victor are now, evidently, going to become OnlyFans cam whores, so having been an escort isn't exactly a huge step down from that if it's even a step down at all.

---

In any case, I didn't look at those other pictures because I had no way of knowing whether or not they were volunteered or were, in fact, leaks. Even if they had been volunteered, why would I want to look at them anyway? Don't get me wrong, I guess Sarah's moderately attractive, but I have no particular interest in seeing her nude and I have less than zero interest in seeing sexual acts committed upon her by men. The thought of watching Victor facebang Sarah kind of makes me want to puke a little bit, not going to lie. No offense meant to either of them and I hope they absolutely clean the fuck up with OF---dudes just aren't my thing.

This has all been very weird and I'm glad it's all but over.

I certainly hope all of the simps enjoy paying their $50 and masturbating to Victor pounding Sarah whilst they use their own tears as lubricant given that, since they are actually paying $50 to watch this, they lack all social skills, and consequently, almost certainly haven't been with a woman in any number of years. Not to mention that I somehow know, while they must not know, that's there's better porn available for free.

Seriously. Victor seems like a nice enough dude when he's not in full degen mode, perhaps a bit of a whiner, but nice enough. If Victor can pull that ass, then maybe the guys paying $50 to watch them on OF should get out of the house. If I were single and left the house with $50 in my pocket, I can say that I would be 50/50, AT WORST, to pull some ass that night. It's all about confidence and either having, or being able to fake, a personality.

I do hope that EZ Life will offer some clarification on his opinion of whether or not the initial pictures were a 'leak' or an actual leak. I doubt if he will say he was in on it, but does he think he got played like a fiddle? Meh. The video pays either way, so who cares? Also, does EZ believe and/or have evidence of that Sarah was ever an escort?

Sarah being an escort I still doubt because, in light of recent events, it really doesn't make a ton of sense that she'd deny it, imo.

As long as Brian Christopher doesn’t start an OF page, I’m fine with this.

But it is the natural next step for Sarah and Vic as their degenerate behavior grows.

I would like to thank Mission for another great piece of writing above so I don’t have to be repetitive. Literally agree with everything. Also, wanted to especially acknowledge Zealadonk for honoring this thread with a full break down of the ACA video Chrissy style.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by EZ Life Slot Jackpots

So I am usually very tight lipped on this forum since many of you have said they read this forum but at this point as I said in my video I REALLY want to be done with them unless something groundbreaking happens. The damage they have done, I don't see them coming back from this unless Vic goes and Sarah comes back. (Which I doubt she wants any part in)

If they go with either option 1 or 2 as you mentioned, I can debunk and prove they are lying...so try me.

In my opinion they will say nothing. He went live the same night of my other video in August to talk about it and dubunk everything I said but they have been live from home since my video and have not said a word. Why? If they were smart (Victor and Sarah) if you WERE smart. You would block every word on all your social media platforms regarding this situation and take the Sister Christopher approach and not mention it. But Victor, since you are such a narcissist and think you are smarter than everyone else. I have a feeling you have something planned and I sit here waiting with baited breathe waiting to hit the upload button on my last video, which will be the final nail I have left for your coffin.

---

Hmmm...interesting.

This seems really personal for you. No chance of you elaborating, is there? We have you saying the following:

-They are not smart.

-Victor is a narcissist.

-Nails in coffins.

If I had to guess, you won't talk about it, if there's a personal vendetta. Still, they did seem like a really strange choice for a target and drama for the sake of drama never did make a ton of sense to me because they really haven't harmed anyone as far as I can tell.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JeffDime

I would like to thank Mission for another great piece of writing above so I don’t have to be repetitive. Literally agree with everything. Also, wanted to especially acknowledge Zealadonk for honoring this thread with a full break down of the ACA video Chrissy style.

---

You're welcome. I'm sorry for the needless post, but I ran out of +REP.

Dan Druff, can you please increase my Rep limit? JK. You might consider it though since I only give +REPs.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Phantom Limb

Sarah and Victor remind me of Sharon Stone and James Woods in Casino.

Dopey pimp who just has Svengali powers that make no sense.

---

Given one of the clips is "Submissive Sarah" it could be some D/s relationship gone wrong ala "50 shades of greenbacks going into a slotmachine"

It'd explain his hold on her and her willingness to perform these shenanigans to make him happy.

It'd also explain why they used language around swingers rather than BDSM as well.

If done right they could justify $50/month on OnlyFans but given how Victor seems to only think a day or 2 ahead.......

I find it amazing, 600 people will watch them play this Beavis and Butthead machine Live at $2 per spin.

Does anyone know what site this is that they are playing on?

Quote:

---

Phantom Limb: "Nice slot, Lady!" Nothing to be ashamed of in this day and age, really. Chrissy is a different story because of his denial and, well, he's an asshole.

---

This makes the Slot Lady transition to OF even more brilliant and seamless since she doesn't even have to change her username.

Well I gotta say this is NOT a conversation I expected to see here, even as recently as a month ago.

My first impression of Slot Lady was that she was a fairly intelligent, attractive young woman who used these attributes to establish a decently popular slots channel.

After the first "exposure" video by EZ Life, my opinion changed a bit, as it became fairly clear that she didn't seem to enjoy gambling or running a channel, and was more of a secret frontwoman for her boyfriend/husband's channel. Still, I saw her as a fairly normal young Canadian woman who happened to be thrust into the world of YouTube gambling by her degenerate partner.

At no point did I ever see Sarah as any kind of sex worker or porn star. In fact, she seemed quite the opposite to me. Even with some of those bikini pics leaking out from Instagram or whatever, I still saw her as a fairly reserved girl who was just exploring ways to make money online.

The escort allegations really threw me for a loop. It's hard to picture Sarah escorting, from the personality we've seen in her videos. She seems kind of aloof and unfriendly. She can just barely turn on enough charm to be watchable in some of her gambling videos, but if she hates life being a frontwoman in a gambling video, how bitter would she be when having sex for money with gross men in Vegas? Not everyone is cut out for escorting. You need to be able to feign interest in men you find unappealing, and you need to maintain a certain level of friendliness and sexuality at all times, even when you are disgusted. I couldn't see Sarah doing that. She just doesn't come off as warm or friendly at any point.

I'm not sure if the escorting stuff is true. I doubt Sarah put out that rumor herself, but I guess anything is possible at this point.

But what we do know is that she either sent videos of herself blowing Victor to some stranger who betrayed her (why??), or she distributed these videos herself and feigned outrage.


I do laugh at the "active police investigation" and "FBI" claims. You can't make a criminal complaint about revenge porn and then sell videos of yourself sucking dick at the same time. She would get laughed out of the FBI office for this. Revenge porn is indeed a crime, but it will only be treated as such when the person is attempting to maintain a level of sexual privacy. You can't cry "revenge porn" while selling videos of you sucking dick for $50. Perhaps a revenge porn claim can still exist if someone had recorded THEMSELVES with Sarah and distributed it without her permission, but a person distributing a dick sucking video featuring Victor, when they're also selling videos of her sucking Victor, is a civil matter at worst.

I think you guys might be onto something with the leak being intentional. The turnaround from "OMG my video of sucking Victor's dick has been distributed" to "buy my dick sucking Onlyfans videos" is incredibly fast. Like, they didn't even take some time to process the situation, or to let the supposed FBI investigation take place. Instead, they jump right into producing and selling their own porn, and promoting it on their slots channel. Wow.


I also don't believe this open relationship crap. As already mentioned here, I believe that's a story so the simps will feel like they have a chance with Sarah. We've seen no indication this is actually true, and suddenly it's announced (why?) right when they release the Onlyfans page.

And while this is a bit of a stereotype, I find that people in open relationships tend to be fairly laid back and not possessive, for obvious reasons. Victor seems very controlling and possessive, while Sarah just seems kind of perpetually annoyed and bitter. I can't see either of these two being cool with their partner banging other people. Maybe I'm wrong, but the fact that they needlessly informed us of the open relationship is very suspicious. It's not like someone alleged that, and they're responding. Nobody is claiming that -- unless you believe the escort rumors, which still wouldn't exactly be an open relationship situation (it would be one only for business purposes!)


This whole thing is just sooooooooooooo bizarre. We went from an attractive young woman doing a slot channel, to finding out that her friend "Jenny" moderating chat was actually her male partner Victor running the channel, to her quitting the channel and letting Victor be the one on video, to the whole thing becoming a gateway to selling hardcore porn videos of the two of them.

LOL INTERNETS

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by PositiveVariance

I find it amazing, 600 people will watch them play this Beavis and Butthead machine Live at $2 per spin.

Does anyone know what site this is that they are playing on?

---

PartyCasino.com

If the only cock you see on OnlyFans is Victor's, then most likely they are lying about having an open relationship.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tariq Reed

Quote:

---

Phantom Limb: "Nice slot, Lady!" Nothing to be ashamed of in this day and age, really. Chrissy is a different story because of his denial and, well, he's an asshole.

---

This makes the Slot Lady transition to OF even more brilliant and seamless since she doesn't even have to change her username.

---

The best part is she's an old school coin-dropper slot. I miss those.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

Well I gotta say this is NOT a conversation I expected to see here, even as recently as a month ago.

My first impression of Slot Lady was that she was a fairly intelligent, attractive young woman who used these attributes to establish a decently popular slots channel.

After the first "exposure" video by EZ Life, my opinion changed a bit, as it became fairly clear that she didn't seem to enjoy gambling or running a channel, and was more of a secret frontwoman for her boyfriend/husband's channel. Still, I saw her as a fairly normal young Canadian woman who happened to be thrust into the world of YouTube gambling by her degenerate partner.

At no point did I ever see Sarah as any kind of sex worker or porn star. In fact, she seemed quite the opposite to me. Even with some of those bikini pics leaking out from Instagram or whatever, I still saw her as a fairly reserved girl who was just exploring ways to make money online.

The escort allegations really threw me for a loop. It's hard to picture Sarah escorting, from the personality we've seen in her videos. She seems kind of aloof and unfriendly. She can just barely turn on enough charm to be watchable in some of her gambling videos, but if she hates life being a frontwoman in a gambling video, how bitter would she be when having sex for money with gross men in Vegas? Not everyone is cut out for escorting. You need to be able to feign interest in men you find unappealing, and you need to maintain a certain level of friendliness and sexuality at all times, even when you are disgusted. I couldn't see Sarah doing that. She just doesn't come off as warm or friendly at any point.

I'm not sure if the escorting stuff is true. I doubt Sarah put out that rumor herself, but I guess anything is possible at this point.

But what we do know is that she either sent videos of herself blowing Victor to some stranger who betrayed her (why??), or she distributed these videos herself and feigned outrage.


I do laugh at the "active police investigation" and "FBI" claims. You can't make a criminal complaint about revenge porn and then sell videos of yourself sucking dick at the same time. She would get laughed out of the FBI office for this. Revenge porn is indeed a crime, but it will only be treated as such when the person is attempting to maintain a level of sexual privacy. You can't cry "revenge porn" while selling videos of you sucking dick for $50. Perhaps a revenge porn claim can still exist if someone had recorded THEMSELVES with Sarah and distributed it without her permission, but a person distributing a dick sucking video featuring Victor, when they're also selling videos of her sucking Victor, is a civil matter at worst.

I think you guys might be onto something with the leak being intentional. The turnaround from "OMG my video of sucking Victor's dick has been distributed" to "buy my dick sucking Onlyfans videos" is incredibly fast. Like, they didn't even take some time to process the situation, or to let the supposed FBI investigation take place. Instead, they jump right into producing and selling their own porn, and promoting it on their slots channel. Wow.


I also don't believe this open relationship crap. As already mentioned here, I believe that's a story so the simps will feel like they have a chance with Sarah. We've seen no indication this is actually true, and suddenly it's announced (why?) right when they release the Onlyfans page.

And while this is a bit of a stereotype, I find that people in open relationships tend to be fairly laid back and not possessive, for obvious reasons. Victor seems very controlling and possessive, while Sarah just seems kind of perpetually annoyed and bitter. I can't see either of these two being cool with their partner banging other people. Maybe I'm wrong, but the fact that they needlessly informed us of the open relationship is very suspicious. It's not like someone alleged that, and they're responding. Nobody is claiming that -- unless you believe the escort rumors, which still wouldn't exactly be an open relationship situation (it would be one only for business purposes!)


This whole thing is just sooooooooooooo bizarre. We went from an attractive young woman doing a slot channel, to finding out that her friend "Jenny" moderating chat was actually her male partner Victor running the channel, to her quitting the channel and letting Victor be the one on video, to the whole thing becoming a gateway to selling hardcore porn videos of the two of them.

LOL INTERNETS

---

I think your first impression can still be accurate; she remains at least reasonably intelligent and moderately attractive. I can't imagine that any of the recent events, or doing OF, would have meaningfully changed either of those attributes. It may change whether or not some people will find her attractive, but she still looks...well...not quite the same, but more or less.

As you stated, she was the front woman. The obvious reason for that is initial channel growth and also to appeal to men who are simps. If there's a conversation to be had, then I guess the conversation amounts to whether or not that is a scam or at all immoral. I suppose, if Victor were the supposed female chatter, then that is definitely deception, but is it deception of a serious enough nature as to warrant being called out? I'd be a very tepid, "Sure, if you really feel it necessary," on that, but if guys think throwing Youtube live chat and Patreon money her way is going to result in her bedding them, then I'd also argue that those guys are kind of their own problem.

More than that, those guys are sort of buying into an illusion, right? Really, the only thing she did was to help facilitate that illusion. I'd also suggest that if those guys weren't going to be dropping the online 'donations' on her, then they would be dropping them on someone else anyway.

I don't want to name any specific channels, but if you had other slot channels that are led by a lady who is actually single, then guys donate to that, literally the only difference is that the lady is actually single. She's still most likely not going to sleep with them. Also, I would imagine that most women would be happy to take any donated money (as well as most men), but I think the primary objective for most of them is just to produce good gambling content.

Also, at the end of the day, those guys did the donations of their own accord. They didn't have to. I just see money going into a non-AP slot machine and, regardless of who the person is, I'm not going to feel the need to donate when my money would, in part, be going to the financial betterment of casinos. People can obviously do as they like with their own money, but to me, it's a stupid spend in the first place.

There's also the question of the authenticity of Youtube content creators, and other creators, in general. People would do well not to assume that everyone is what they present. I'm not always as I present, but then, I don't ask for donations and would refuse any that were offered to me...unless they were going to one of my WoV games' prize pools. For one thing, while it takes something fairly massive to push me over the edge, I have a pretty vicious temper if I get there.

Anyway, to your point, I don't think this was always the plan, or anything. For one reason or another, they seem to be exploring every possible revenue source that they can get. In order to be fair, we must accept the outside possibility that these items were a legitimate leak...unless such is conclusively proven otherwise...but I'm with you that I think this was planned; I just don't think it was long-term planned. I tend to get the impression that Sarah wanted less camera time, not that she wanted the camera moved from her face to her labia.

I'm honestly not sure about the open relationship aspect. I obviously have no reason to care and see it as an aside to the main thing anyway. I guess we will see, well, I won't see, but some people will see if others get involved with their provocative OF content.

The last few statements are basically, "Well, there you have it," for me. I hope that their OF page is successful as I have no reason to hope otherwise. By one mechanism or another, this is what they have decided to do, so good luck to them. I'll leave speculating as to the relationship dynamic between Sarah and Victor for others (speculations that haven't been made public) as anything off-camera and out of the public eye is none of my business.

I am sure some of you have the same questions for me that Mission had asked Druff...

I will take the initiative and try to address concerns that some may have. I am going to get Crucified for this, but that is ok - I probably deserve it, but more importantly, I feel it is the right thing to do.

Many probably think, What did Victor do to you? You are very negative towards him. Both of these are very fair assessments. If I had met Victor or Sarah out at a bar, I would likely get along with both of them very well.

As Druff mentioned, early on when Victor and Sarah were not truthful about their relationship, it left a bad taste in my mouth. Is this a valid reason to criticize him on a regular basis? No, it is not.

So What is the reason? My entire life when I have seen a business that I feel is doing something incorrect, I feel the need to immediately "fix it." For some reason, an inefficient business drives me up the Fucking wall. I think many people including myself, looked at their channel (business) and desperately wanted to make corrections. Or, is this just a Positive Variance problem? It is obvious,that this is THEIR business, and they have no obligation to listen to anyone's opinions or advice on how to operate their channel.

I feel a few weeks ago, I gave him what was amazing advice on several ways to change their business for the better, to greatly increase revenue. Just to refresh, one of those ideas was too get a very attractive girl, with a bit of personality and make her a partner - The new face of All Casino Action. Now, of course this was JUST MY OPINION. To them, I am just some dude on a forum that criticizes them, why should they listen to me? I felt I needed to criticize Victor shortly after he became the face of the channel, because that is when I felt the start of them "running their business into the ground" all started. Was this ok for me to do? NOPE, NOT IN THIS WAY.

There have been many times that I felt it was appropriate to give Victor some criticism. I think a lot of my criticism involved his Gambling Degeneracy, and I believed this affected the business and caused it to greatly underperform.

Regardless of how I felt about the way he was operating HIS channel (business), I should have not been so aggressive and critical of him in other areas, and for that I WAS WRONG.

Don't get me wrong, there are some things that I feel needed to be brought up and addressed, but here's the thing: This is a forum... We speculate, we criticize, we analyze, we give our opinions, ect., but we must keep it reasonable and respectful to others. (Unless your initials are C.M.)

I don't regret calling him a DEGEN, degenerate, Degenerate Gambler, ect., because this is true, however I didn't need to repeatedly say it. However, in the future I will do my absolute best to try to not have this as well as his business decisions influence anything that I write towards them that may be critical.

Ultimately, I was a bit hard on him, I still agree with my business advice for them, but in the future, I will try to be a bit more respectful, considerate to them and their business and only be critical of them for the issue at hand, and NOT be influenced by their business decisions.


It is still my opinion that they provided the pictures to a third party, to have that person, intentionally release them to the Public. However, I do not believe this is something they could ever admit to, wayyyy to much on the line.

I do have opinions on Sarah, but they will be for later. They may really surprise some people, I am sure another Crucifixion will be in short order.


Chrissy, there is nothing what so ever like this coming for you! You , are the Scumbag of scumbags!

You don't need a good looking girl to have a successful slot channel. The top 3 channels are run by males. The one with the most subscribers is homosexual. I have had friends give money to Victor in person while he was streaming from the El Cortez. They are not Sarah simps, they enjoy Victor's degeneracy and his bitching and complaining.

I believe the reason why All Casino Action is struggling is because they switched from slots to table games. I think most people prefer watching slots. That is why you rarely see the biggest channels playing table games.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by PositiveVariance

early on when Victor and Sarah were not truthful about their relationship, it left a bad taste in my mouth.

---

Oddly I saw a video just the other day that ended before Sarah ended up with a bad taste in her mouth.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Small_Banana

If the only cock you see on OnlyFans is Victor's, then most likely they are lying about having an open relationship.

---

It potentially hinges on Victor's exact wording: He said he could bang hot chicks, and Sarah had the same priviledge.
Technically that means Sarah can also bang hot chicks.

Not sure that'd be worth $50/month but defo worth something.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Small_Banana

You don't need a good looking girl to have a successful slot channel. The top 3 channels are run by males. The one with the most subscribers is homosexual. I have had friends give money to Victor in person while he was streaming from the El Cortez. They are not Sarah simps, they enjoy Victor's degeneracy and his bitching and complaining.

I believe the reason why All Casino Action is struggling is because they switched from slots to table games. I think most people prefer watching slots. That is why you rarely see the biggest channels playing table games.

---

I think it might actually be a little of both.

Tipping or not tipping, some of Victor's antics are a little much when we're talking about a casino dealer who is just doing his or her job and has to be there. If there was a person, who was not a Youtuber, doing the same...I wouldn't be shocked if a supervisor, or perhaps security, were to politely tell the person that they need to chill the fuck out a little bit. If anything bothers me at all about his whining, it's that the dealer has to listen to it.

He can say whatever the fuck he wants to a slot machine. I might even do a $1 super chat (in the highly unlikely event that I'm watching) if he incorporates, "Whore of Babylon," (a personal favorite of mine) into the rant.

My guess is that this will be closer to an Only Scams than a traditional Only Fans. It looks like what has been released is merely the stuff that was already leaked. It’s early, but do I think these 30 somethings all of a sudden going to start taping and releasing hard core sex scenes on the reg? No, I absolutely do not.

Much like with the slot channel, as long as they can keep enough subscribers they will promise a lot and deliver less. I would say some topless photos and the occasional whip cream or ice on the nips is where this will go. I don’t see them becoming a couple that does full blown porn together.

You wont’t see any other guys on there but Victor. Same as when Sarah was bringing in more Creators in the mix in the slot channel. No fucking way. The open relationship talk goes back to the number 1 commandment. “Though shall not inform Simpee that the Simpor is taken”. Even until this day they can’t just admit that Victor was hidden because it was good for business. I know others have made thst point but I agree 100%.

What’s missing from these two is any kind of real contrition. No real thanks for the paying members to stick through all their nonsense. But remember, they may being selling their souls, but these are cultured people. They spend their off time learning new languages and going to the gym. What a couple of intellectuals. Pure class through & through.

BTW EZ mentioned this just scrapes the surface. So they are probably using whatever other material they know is out there at first. So my prediction is when that runs out. Just wanted to be clear on that.

I got involved in this forum because I think Victor and Sarah are two scammers who need to be exposed for who and what they are. Any positive qualities / attributes that they have (for example, being nice to someone they meet in person for 15 seconds or showing the "real" side of gambling) don't justify what they have done and continue to do.

It's unfortunate that some people on here still don't understand the nature of the beast and seem to be indirectly simping for Sarah.

A few basic things we all know:
- Victor has been involved in the channel from the beginning
- Victor and Sarah are and always have been romantically involved (even if you believe the lie about an "open relationship")
- Victor was Jenny (if you still don't believe this, just watch any old el Cortez stream where Jenny directs Sarah to every game we know Victor likes like Wonder 4, Keno, etc.)
- Victor has no compunction about lying to their viewers and members - anything from saying there will be "additional creators" to "even more gambling" to "DAILY" videos uploaded. Whether it's outright lies or lying by omission or being evasive, it's dishonest and misleading.

If you think Sarah wasn't a part of all of this from the very beginning then I have a bridge to sell you. She is not some bright eyed, bushy tailed innocent lamb who met a modern day Svengali like someone on here said. She is rude to her viewers, attitudinal like a child and nothing about her behavior ever screamed "nice" or "pleasant" to me. And unlike others on this forum whose opinions about prostitutes / escorts seem to come from movies and TV, I can assure you that her real personality as we've seen it (snarky, nasty, aloof with a holier-than-thou attitude) is quite common among women who engage in sex work.

Ask yourself: would any woman you know (wife girlfriend daughter) so readily engage in sex work for money on OF as Sarah is doing now? She isn't selling feet pics or nudes, she's selling "facefucking" and "facials from Victor's huge dick". In tonight's livestream she laughingly said that the pics and videos that were "leaked" didn't "really show what I'm fully capable of". So should we expect anal and gangbags?

I'm glad to see that their OF experiment is an abysmal failure so far with only 30 likes after the initial "HUGE" announcement. Maybe it would have been more successful if Victor didn't tank the channel.

Sarah has been an active and willing and equal participant in this whole charade from day one. She is just as big of a lowlife scumbag as Victor is. Victor's public involvement doesn't change the fact that she knew everything that was going on and joined in to make money. Losers might give those two money out of their own free will, but the decision to do so is not based on truthful information, which is scammy and shady.

well i thought Sarah's titties were bigger than that.... they are ok titties ... but i just thought they were bigger....

Victor's Huge Cock:

https://twitter.com/ClownWorld_/stat...TBB2UNpdw&s=19

It is my belief, that up until very recent, doing an Only Fans was not even a remote possibility. I think most of us would agree it was out of urgency.

I do believe if Sarah had launched an Only Fans prior to Victor being introduced, while the channel was in its prime, it would have been very successful.

There is a girl that goes by the name "Bhad Bhabie". This girl was made "famous" for going on Doctor Phil and saying some stupid ghetto shit phrase that went internet viral. Anyway, she started on Only Fans, and made over $1 Million in the first 6 hours, and has gone onto earn over $52 Million since from OF. However, the AVERAGE Only Fans account earns less than $200 per month.

As has been mentioned above, Sarah's (I guess Vic's as well) Only Fans has so far been a massive failure. As has also been mentioned, you need to be a subscriber to "Like" a picture or video.

All we can do is estimate "Likes" to actual paid subscribers. As an estimate, I would say 3 to 1. So 90 people at $50 each is only $4,500. There is no doubt that they thought their first few days would be much better than this. Even if sign ups are 10 to 1 to "Likes", it is still far less than I would think they expected, even on the lowest estimates.

Also, let's be honest Sarah is not a bombshell, and I think this is needed to get the reoccurring monthly income. I think most signed up because they were "curious". That is why I looked at the Reddit link, there was no sexual attraction for me.

I think for under $10k per month, she is going to have a hard time continuing making content to please everyone. Sarah will probably make her money with the "premium" OF as well as 1 on 1's for more money moving over to zoom or the other platforms the girls use. I see her angle will need to be giving simps attention 1 on 1 for $100 or so for 15 min.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Small_Banana

You don't need a good looking girl to have a successful slot channel. The top 3 channels are run by males. The one with the most subscribers is homosexual.

---

I somewhat disagree...

Being a good looking female absolutely helps a channel. Is it everything? No, but does give the creator a huge edge, everything else being equal.


Yes, 3 of the top channels are run by males, however Brian Christopher was one of the original pioneers of "Slot Channels". As with any niche on YT, if you Garner a massive following before anyone else starts to do it and YT will push your videos. Nothing against BC, I don't care for him - But I know a lot of people do like him. The thing about BC, he is a smart business man, unlike Victor. BC knows the business of a slot channel.

As far as the other 2 of the largest slot channels, they are where they are at for one reason, and that is betting huge amounts per spin. If they were betting $1 per spin, we would have never heard of them.

Look at 2 of the largest Female creators in say 2019. Lady Luck HQ and Slot Lady. Both very attractive females. Neither was betting super large at this time. If either of them were average looking females or male, I have no doubt they would be no where near where they are now. The "Big Jackpot", who would watch at $1 per spin? Not many.

There are literally thousands of these slot channels now. It is one of the very few niches where you NEVER run out of content (A major problem other niches have). As long as you have the money, you can crank out the content and try to fight your way into +EV territory as far as channels go.


In my opinion you have to have 1 of 2 things to have a very successful slot channels:

Be an attractive female
OR
Be a male that places LARGE bets.

Of course there are exceptions to this rule.

Look at the top 10 channels on YT, virtually all of them fall into the above categories.


There is this one really goofy guy that reminds me of Beavis, and is always making these strange grunting/farting sounds, he is probably the exception to the rule. He is moderately successful and plays a reasonably low bet, but then again he's been at it along time. Also is gay. His name is SDguy1234. I will watch him for his antics once every few months.

Did a segment on SlotLady's recent follies on the last PFA Radio.

Go to the 2:45:38 timestamp

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JBFjB10eAto

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bythecshour

I got involved in this forum because I think Victor and Sarah are two scammers who need to be exposed for who and what they are. Any positive qualities / attributes that they have (for example, being nice to someone they meet in person for 15 seconds or showing the "real" side of gambling) don't justify what they have done and continue to do.

It's unfortunate that some people on here still don't understand the nature of the beast and seem to be indirectly simping for Sarah.

A few basic things we all know:
- Victor has been involved in the channel from the beginning
- Victor and Sarah are and always have been romantically involved (even if you believe the lie about an "open relationship")
- Victor was Jenny (if you still don't believe this, just watch any old el Cortez stream where Jenny directs Sarah to every game we know Victor likes like Wonder 4, Keno, etc.)
- Victor has no compunction about lying to their viewers and members - anything from saying there will be "additional creators" to "even more gambling" to "DAILY" videos uploaded. Whether it's outright lies or lying by omission or being evasive, it's dishonest and misleading.

If you think Sarah wasn't a part of all of this from the very beginning then I have a bridge to sell you. She is not some bright eyed, bushy tailed innocent lamb who met a modern day Svengali like someone on here said. She is rude to her viewers, attitudinal like a child and nothing about her behavior ever screamed "nice" or "pleasant" to me. And unlike others on this forum whose opinions about prostitutes / escorts seem to come from movies and TV, I can assure you that her real personality as we've seen it (snarky, nasty, aloof with a holier-than-thou attitude) is quite common among women who engage in sex work.

Ask yourself: would any woman you know (wife girlfriend daughter) so readily engage in sex work for money on OF as Sarah is doing now? She isn't selling feet pics or nudes, she's selling "facefucking" and "facials from Victor's huge dick". In tonight's livestream she laughingly said that the pics and videos that were "leaked" didn't "really show what I'm fully capable of". So should we expect anal and gangbags?

I'm glad to see that their OF experiment is an abysmal failure so far with only 30 likes after the initial "HUGE" announcement. Maybe it would have been more successful if Victor didn't tank the channel.

Sarah has been an active and willing and equal participant in this whole charade from day one. She is just as big of a lowlife scumbag as Victor is. Victor's public involvement doesn't change the fact that she knew everything that was going on and joined in to make money. Losers might give those two money out of their own free will, but the decision to do so is not based on truthful information, which is scammy and shady.

---

Let's start with the things you say we all know:

- Victor has been involved in the channel from the beginning
- Victor and Sarah are and always have been romantically involved (even if you believe the lie about an "open relationship")
- Victor was Jenny (if you still don't believe this, just watch any old el Cortez stream where Jenny directs Sarah to every game we know Victor likes like Wonder 4, Keno, etc.)
- Victor has no compunction about lying to their viewers and members - anything from saying there will be "additional creators" to "even more gambling" to "DAILY" videos uploaded. Whether it's outright lies or lying by omission or being evasive, it's dishonest and misleading.

1.) Longer than advertised, anyway. I'd obviously have no way of knowing from the very beginning. It could well be that the two of them weren't even together yet. She's been going for some years, right? It appears that the oldest videos are 6+ years old, so I don't know that it's a mortal lock that she and Victor were together that entire time. I'm not saying they weren't. I'm saying six years is a long time and I don't know that.

2.) Going back to #1, but I would say that as long as they have known each other, they have been.

3.) I tend to believe that.

4.) Is that lying or is it overpromising? Perhaps they were in discussions with other creators that fell through. I'm of the mindset that there has to be deliberation in order for something to be a lie; in other words, he'd have to say that without that being his actual intent.

I've already stipulated that I don't think Sarah is the reincarnation of Agnes, Patron Saints of Virgins. I really wouldn't expect any gambling content creator to be. If I'm any example, I am certainly no saint and suspect that I sort of fell into this because of various mental imbalances. Actually, when I get good and truly interested in any subject, I just dive into it head first and go crazy until I get to the point that I feel like I either know, or could learn, anything about it.

I will say that I've had brief and private written correspondences with one/both (I don't know which one I was talking to and had no reason to ask) of them and found them polite and intelligent in that context. I'll stipulate that she has said some rude things, at times, but I don't really see the problem with that. If someone says something that you think warrants a rude response, then you give a rude response; sometimes you're in the right, and sometimes, you're in the wrong. If there's anyone who doesn't like what she does, then they can simply avoid the product which, until just recently, Youtube was the entire product and whatever Patreon membership is good for. As far as women who engage in sex work, I don't personally partake of any such services, so I have no reason to care what their attitudes are.

My fiancee and ex-wife wouldn't be inclined to do those things, and when my daughter is legally old enough to do any such---I 99.99999999999999% doubt she would, but it's certainly not for me to try to prevent an adult from doing what she wants to do. People are free to engage in sex work or not engage in sex work; Sarah is also not my significant other, or daughter, so what she does is immaterial to me.

Is your point that you consider her immoral? So what if she's immoral? Who gives a shit? We're posting on a forum about gambling, so I would suggest we're immediately far from being fucking saints. What are we even talking about here? Gray v. Dark Gray v. Black? I don't think Sarah and Victor are in the black.

I don't see the benefit of wishing failure on anyone, but you are certainly free to do so.

Okay, here's a simple solution for your last bit: Don't directly give people money unless they are providing you a tangible product or service for which you feel there is a mutual benefit. If the donators feel that there is a benefit for them, and want to give money, then they should. If they don't want to give money, then they shouldn't.

What do you want that they should do? Give retroactive refunds dating back to the time when people assumed Sarah was single though she wasn't? Money donated, by the way, out of some illogical belief that the donators had that such donations could eventually be parlayed into getting in her pants.

Please. This isn't a pyramid scheme. This isn't faking cancer. If someone is a simp, to the limited extent that a simp can ever be a victim at all, they are largely their own victims.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bythecshour

I got involved in this forum because I think Victor and Sarah are two scammers who need to be exposed for who and what they are. Any positive qualities / attributes that they have (for example, being nice to someone they meet in person for 15 seconds or showing the "real" side of gambling) don't justify what they have done and continue to do.

It's unfortunate that some people on here still don't understand the nature of the beast and seem to be indirectly simping for Sarah.

A few basic things we all know:
- Victor has been involved in the channel from the beginning
- Victor and Sarah are and always have been romantically involved (even if you believe the lie about an "open relationship")
- Victor was Jenny (if you still don't believe this, just watch any old el Cortez stream where Jenny directs Sarah to every game we know Victor likes like Wonder 4, Keno, etc.)
- Victor has no compunction about lying to their viewers and members - anything from saying there will be "additional creators" to "even more gambling" to "DAILY" videos uploaded. Whether it's outright lies or lying by omission or being evasive, it's dishonest and misleading.

If you think Sarah wasn't a part of all of this from the very beginning then I have a bridge to sell you. She is not some bright eyed, bushy tailed innocent lamb who met a modern day Svengali like someone on here said. She is rude to her viewers, attitudinal like a child and nothing about her behavior ever screamed "nice" or "pleasant" to me. And unlike others on this forum whose opinions about prostitutes / escorts seem to come from movies and TV, I can assure you that her real personality as we've seen it (snarky, nasty, aloof with a holier-than-thou attitude) is quite common among women who engage in sex work.

Ask yourself: would any woman you know (wife girlfriend daughter) so readily engage in sex work for money on OF as Sarah is doing now? She isn't selling feet pics or nudes, she's selling "facefucking" and "facials from Victor's huge dick". In tonight's livestream she laughingly said that the pics and videos that were "leaked" didn't "really show what I'm fully capable of". So should we expect anal and gangbags?

I'm glad to see that their OF experiment is an abysmal failure so far with only 30 likes after the initial "HUGE" announcement. Maybe it would have been more successful if Victor didn't tank the channel.

Sarah has been an active and willing and equal participant in this whole charade from day one. She is just as big of a lowlife scumbag as Victor is. Victor's public involvement doesn't change the fact that she knew everything that was going on and joined in to make money. Losers might give those two money out of their own free will, but the decision to do so is not based on truthful information, which is scammy and shady.

---

It is too early to tell if their OnlyFans is gonna be a failure. The simps like to wait for there to be a lot of pictures and videos and then they will subscribe for just a month. Then they can screenshot or record whatever they want.

This came thru my youtube feed tonight. Vegas Victor is playing video poker. First thing I did was check out the paytable. I was surprised he was playing Not So Ugly Deuces, a 99.73% game with optimal strategy. Maybe he ain't as dumb as he looks, I thought.

But thoughts of him not being so dumb quickly faded when I watched him play a few hands. He ain't just bad at video poker. He's reallllllllllllllllly bad.

The bet is 5 units per hand. You want to hold the combination of cards that has the highest expected value.

So in the 2nd hand Victor is dealt:

5h-2d-6d-Td-Jd

The hold with the highest expected value, at 6.5 units, is 2d-Td-Jd. But Victor holds the 2d-6d-Td-Jd, worth about 4.7 units.

In the very next hand he is dealt:

3d-2d-2h-8d-9d

Victor held the pat flush worth 15 units. But the 2d-2h-8d-9d is worth 17 units.

He butchered some more hands before I got tired of watching. Dude turns a 99.7% game into about a 96% game.

The thing is, the NSUD strategy is easily found online. He could easily have it available on another tab to reference when he is playing. Dumb, dumb, dumb.

https://youtu.be/bkqJxFlTeR4

More Laughable Footage from Shithead Victor!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rv1TO04OePE


Dealer literally starts with an Ace on 4 of the "new decks" after Vic cuts the deck, but he still continues to play One hand like a Donkey. He pretty much whines for the last 12 minutes straight and donks off about $200 per hand to the point he Stops playing side bets, his only smart move! Enjoy!!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BedWetterBettor

More Laughable Footage from Shithead Victor!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rv1TO04OePE


Dealer literally starts with an Ace on 4 of the "new decks" after Vic cuts the deck, but he still continues to play One hand like a Donkey. He pretty much whines for the last 12 minutes straight and donks off about $200 per hand to the point he Stops playing side bets, his only smart move! Enjoy!!

---

At 8:55 Victor spills the Beans...

Remember they got paid from YouTube on the 21st.

He says for this trip "A day and a half" and that he is "DOWN 10 GRAND!" Yes, 36 Hours and $10,000 is DUNZO! This is not counting the $1.1k he lost in this video.

This verifies he is in full DEGEN mode off camera, at least for the past 1.5 days.

-$11.1k in 1.5 days

Perhaps I will be able to gather some insight for a WoV Article.

I am scheduled to have an interview with ACA tomorrow; we've discussed things privately and I have informed them that I'll be asking any question that readers may find interesting. Of course, I made a point to say that they have the right to refuse any questions, as well.***

I intend to ask straight questions and am hoping for straight answers. Anyone looking for 'gotcha' moments will have to keep looking, but I do plan to at least ask substantial questions.

With that, it is probably appropriate for me to discontinue participating in this thread until such time that the interview has occurred and article released. If I am perceived as attacking them, then I am being terrifically rude to people who are graciously going to allow me to conduct an interview with them; if I am perceived as defending them, then I can be accused of bias.

I'll be back to link the article when it is published and I will field any questions anyone might have for me. To be clear, I will not answer for them about anything, but I would be willing to entertain questions about how I perceived our interaction, etc.

***That is not special treatment, btw. This is my standard procedure. Anyone I interview is also given the option to read the transcript and delete things, if they choose, or to make minor corrections/clarifications. More flies with honey. Better articles, too.

DISCLOSURE: My post defending them Saturday was after I opened up a dialogue about interviewing them, but I had no idea if they would accept or not. I'd pretty much done the bulk of the talking, at that point.

@Mission146, i am sure you probably have this written down as a question.... but just in case.... could you ask what the thought process was for Sarah

to basically stop being the face of the channel and Victor to take over.... thanks

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 1dollarboxcar

@Mission146, i am sure you probably have this written down as a question.... but just in case.... could you ask what the thought process was for Sarah

to basically stop being the face of the channel and Victor to take over.... thanks

---

Yeah I don't know if Mission has questions established yet, but just in case he doesn't, here's three questions I'd like to see asked:

1) 1dollarboxcar's question above... what led them to Victor becoming the on-camera player instead of Sarah, especially given that an attractive female player will always have an edge in getting viewers?

2) Has the channel made more money than they have lost gambling?

3) What is the reason they have transitioned to Onlyfans porn, given that only a very small percentage of viewers were likely ever to see the "leaked" blowjob video?


Also, I assume Victor and Sarah are reading this thread. I want them to know that I am not against them, and have repeatedly stated on my show that they haven't scammed or harmed anyone. My only issue with them has been their deception of their audience at times, which is their right to do as channel content creators, but I don't think is good practice.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 1dollarboxcar

@Mission146, i am sure you probably have this written down as a question.... but just in case.... could you ask what the thought process was for Sarah

to basically stop being the face of the channel and Victor to take over.... thanks

---

Yeah I don't know if Mission has questions established yet, but just in case he doesn't, here's three questions I'd like to see asked:

1) 1dollarboxcar's question above... what led them to Victor becoming the on-camera player instead of Sarah, especially given that an attractive female player will always have an edge in getting viewers?

2) Has the channel made more money than they have lost gambling?

3) What is the reason they have transitioned to Onlyfans porn, given that only a very small percentage of viewers were likely ever to see the "leaked" blowjob video?


Also, I assume Victor and Sarah are reading this thread. I want them to know that I am not against them, and have repeatedly stated on my show that they haven't scammed or harmed anyone. My only issue with them has been their deception of their audience at times, which is their right to do as channel content creators, but I don't think is good practice.

---

Unfortunately, there will not be an interview. ACA has cancelled the interview with their stated reason being the fact that I post here. That's literally the reason I was given.

I'd normally keep such a thing private, but I'd already announced the interview, so I can't just not produce such an article without stating why.

What does my participation here have to do with anything if I don't work for this site? I have no idea. But, they can do an interview, or not do one, for any reason they want to.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mission146

Unfortunately, there will not be an interview. ACA has cancelled the interview with their stated reason being the fact that I post here. That's literally the reason I was given.

I'd normally keep such a thing private, but I'd already announced the interview, so I can't just not produce such an article without stating why.

What does my participation here have to do with anything if I don't work for this site? I have no idea. But, they can do an interview, or not do one, for any reason they want to.

---

Mission, I am sorry to hear about this and tbh I have had enough of these two. Canceling this interview with you is the last straw for me

My message to all patreons and OnlyFans subscribers. Do not give these two a cent. Here is why…

1. Onlyfans actually takes a little work and is about spending a good amount of time connecting with the subscribers. Actually having real access to the person is what you are paying for. That’s not what they are doing. They are simply trying to profit off the release of the leaked porn/photos.

Sarah wastes the FBI’s time talking about how violated she feels, and at the same time they are setting up a mechanism for profiting on the same violation.

Listen to Druff’s breakdown of their video response to the photos coming out. He did it perfectly. This wasn’t about introspection for either of them. It was about playing the victim, profiting to the max and having their cake & eating it too.

Enough is enough. The photos and videos will all be leaked one way or another. I don’t know if everyone realizes, porn is free nowadays. No need to pay $50 bucks for a month for this.

I’m sure a large percentage of the Onlyfans subscribers are fugazi anyways. Onlyfans does a 80/20 split for the creator. Meaning you could spend a grand getting 20 subs and you will get $800 of it back.

2. Patreon/YouTube members, you are an after thought. You get a stream if Victor feels like it/has money left. Just watch their shit on YouTube for free. They got nothing to offer you for that extra money and just take you for granted. Neither has much of anything of interest to say. Their live chats are essentially the same boring nonsense over and over again.

Stop enabling these two and allowing them to take the world for granted. Mission was going to give them a fair interview but they couldn’t even accept that level of accountability. It’s time these two act like adults. Make them…

At the end of the day there has been a good share of negative comments on this thread. There has also been a good share of posters being more than fair. What Sarah/Victor have shown is they will always take the path of least resistance. They will always find a reason to justify that choice. In this case they went with Mission having posted on this thread.

They had a chance of actually being straight up with he audience. At this point it would have only served them well imho. Wow these people can actually be authentic? What a breath of fresh air that would have been.

But of course they take the easy road. Stay the course. What a surprise. I am just so tired of it. These two have profited greatly in the last 5/6 years and they take it completely for granted. In fact, they feel as if they have deserved all of it. In their eyes they owe no one. In fact, they believe they deserve more.

Unfortunately that is the world for people who make a living doing Yotube/OnlyFans/Patreon. The only rules they must abide are the Terms of Service of each platform. If they follow those, then they must be correct morally, ethically, etc. They get to position the goal posts themselves and move them as they wish.

Like most things it comes down to money at the end of the day. We all understand that. Change is very scary for these creators. Staying the course will always be the default position. I don’t know how Sarah really felt when the leak occurred. But what I do know, is that they had set up a mechanism to profit from it within a day.

I will say, when you zoom out on this whole Slot Community, it is really a cesspool. Not everyone can be Vegas Matt with the personality & bankroll to just put out good content every day. There is scam group pulls, gofundmes, guys making multiple channels/reposting old videos, a plethora of channels playing with funny money (*Not acknowledging it & hoping some naive idiots fall for it) and basically channels leveraging their audiences for money in any way they possibly can.

Channels that main purpose is to get viewers signed up on shady offshore sites or these poker apps where they are either going to get scammed/cheated or probably both. It is absolutely rampant the scumbaggery out there. Look, Victor & Sarah’s sins are on the lower end when you compare them to the other shenanigans that go on. Do they receive a disproportional amount of scrutiny because of their history? Yes, I don’t think anyone can say they don’t.

I am not backtracking from my last post. But as George Carlin said, “This planet is going to be one great big ball of shit one day”. But we only can deal with what’s in front of us at the time. For better or worse that is ACA right now. At the same time, they have certainly benefited from the scrutiny. Polarization sells. Their responses to EZ’s videos have been by far their highest viewed content. They have benefited from the scrutiny.

It really bothered me that they would sight Mission having been on this thread as a way to weasel out of the interview. So I let them have it. But wanted to provide full context. There is an incredible amount of shady shit going on in this “community”.

Unfortunately policing it is an impossibility. The gambling space is too large. We have the table game system sellers, the sports pick sellers and that doesn’t even scratch the surface. There is not enough time in the day to talk about it all. So the spotlight has to be shined on a few. It may not be fair, but that’s just the way it goes.

What someone wants to do with their money is their business. No surprise, I wouldn’t spend mine on ACA. But everyone is free to pony up for the “Pussy Pounding” (note the quotes please) if they so choose. Have at it Hoss!

Been busy with life and decided to log back in to this forum. Yea, I didn't expect the Slot gravy train to end with Victor's degenerate gambling putting them in such a hole that they decided to do adult content as an income source.