Almost the entire mainstream media, Hollywood, Twitter, Facebook, and so on were biased for and/or helping her, but Trump had the Russians.Quote:
Originally Posted by devidee
Printable View
Almost the entire mainstream media, Hollywood, Twitter, Facebook, and so on were biased for and/or helping her, but Trump had the Russians.Quote:
Originally Posted by devidee
https://www.washingtonpost.com/graph...=.82b3fb44336dQuote:
Originally Posted by VaughnP
Looks like Russian ads were gas lighting both sides.
Скажите, пожалуйста, где музей?Quote:
Originally Posted by VaughnP
Quote:
Originally Posted by devidee
Can we make this a thing
Like vegas and several others have pointed out, fuck hillary too. No one in this thread is saying anything positive about her, not from the very beginning. This is obv in contrast to our right wing geniuses that stand by their guys when they are clearly unfit to do their jobs (running the country if you arent paying attention).Quote:
Originally Posted by VaughnPAlmost the entire mainstream media, Hollywood, Twitter, Facebook, and so on were biased for and/or helping her, but Trump had the Russians.Quote:
Originally Posted by devidee
Hillary lost, whatever happened up until she lost can be dealt with on the backburner. Its not entertaining. Trumps admin going down in flames and having no clue how to deal with it...
:popcorn
Hillary did more to get Trump nominated as the GOP candidate than the Russians did.
Like, it was literally her strategy to help him.
I love it when republicans describe intelligent, functional adults working towards a sane and obvious choice a conspiracy.
"oooooo they refused to assist a foreign government elect a bloated amphetamine addict reality tv star, where are their morals?"
this has been the greatest period of intellectual cowardice in this countries entirely embarrassing history.
LiterallyQuote:
Originally Posted by devidee
If i had to give a number to votes Russia moved in favor of Trump over Hillary, i'd have to go with over a million. If you remove the Russian influence, you remove the DNC/Podesta hacks and everything that filled the news cycles for months out of those. It's endearing to see the same people parroting the Russia didn't influence anything line while giving a list of horrible things that Hilldog did that we only know because of Russian influence (not that there's anything wrong having it both ways).
Ok, so remove all the tagents, Hillary still loses.
She's still hated in all those counties that voted for President Trump, and all the "experts" predicted a Hillary landslide which curbed the amount of votes she would have gotten had the narrative been "she will lose if you don't vote for her".
So you can spin all your delusions into cogent thoughts all you want, but when you try to comment on why she lost, atleast be objective and not a smug pretentious faggot.
LOVE THE HAIR!
I'm not saying Bernie (the Mossad agent) would have won but we know for a fact that Hillary lost.Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatine
In hindsight, maybe rigging the primary was a bad idea.
Wow. Brave...
Fuck Hillary, I'm one of her victims, Bernie kicked her ass and that's that.
So Reddit was going crazy over Preet's podcast, I checked it out and figured I'd be turned off within a minute. Instead I listened to most of it, he's a good talker, HQ audio and knowledgeable. I listened to the most recent one, he has a female ex fed prosecutor and they just shoot the shit on flipping witnesses and other insider shit. They speculate who may of did what in the Russia case. Start at 8 min to get past his terrorism condolences.
http://www.wnyc.org/shows/preetbharara
Maybe stepping foot in the state of Wisconsin during the election would have helped.Quote:
Originally Posted by gimmick
I don't know. Maybe.
Sure there are tons of reasons why she lost. None of them mean that the others don't exist though. It's just not how it works. Russia/Trump don't get off the hook because she's part reptilian.Quote:
Originally Posted by devideeMaybe stepping foot in the state of Wisconsin during the election would have helped.Quote:
Originally Posted by gimmick
I don't know. Maybe.
Arrogance and questionable choices with more than half the dems more worried about their positions in Hillary administration instead of making sure there is a democrat administration. I can see why they would rig shit for Hillary since they would gain quite a bit from that bet, but it's not exactly nice for the party or the country. And once again only reason we know any of this is because of Russian influence. I doubt the RNC hack would have presented a much rosier picture of that party, but none of it was ever published (it might come out once Russians are done playing with the current fool).
hillary would always have beaten bernie cause he was just so unpopular with older black people that he couldn't have won any southern states.Quote:
Originally Posted by devideeI'm not saying Bernie (the Mossad agent) would have won but we know for a fact that Hillary lost.Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatine
In hindsight, maybe rigging the primary was a bad idea.
but the fact that her camp felt like she had to rig this anyway shows just how vulnerable they knew she was. bernie's wall street attacks on her were damning in the general election
Black people didn't vote for Hillary (at least not in the numbers needed).Quote:
Originally Posted by blakehillary would always have beaten bernie cause he was just so unpopular with older black people that he couldn't have won any southern states.Quote:
Originally Posted by devidee
but the fact that her camp felt like she had to rig this anyway shows just how vulnerable they knew she was. bernie's wall street attacks on her were damning in the general election
Because, you know, MUH RUSSIANS!
No, forensic data shows the dnc emails were downloaded too fast to not be a direct download from inside. Ask urself why don't u know this??Quote:
Originally Posted by gimmick
You believe everything that fits your narrative no matter how dumb it is. Are you jumping on the Hitler is alive in the USA story next?Quote:
Originally Posted by thesidedishNo, forensic data shows the dnc emails were downloaded too fast to not be a direct download from inside. Ask urself why don't u know this??Quote:
Originally Posted by gimmick