Printable View
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iamdlloyd77
We'll make a deal..U give me a postive rep+ and I'll do the actual record from this thread and keep updating.....Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockey Guy
Sorry 'tellaguy', this deal is for Hockeyguy to do.........
As I said.....I'm BACK BABY...Quote:
Originally Posted by Iamdlloyd77
Jon Jones def. Daniel Cormier via third-round TKO (3:01).....
I had Jones by KO/TKO at +350. Even when you're right you still suck. +264 was a shit lineQuote:
Originally Posted by Iamdlloyd77As I said.....I'm BACK BABY...Quote:
Originally Posted by Iamdlloyd77
Jon Jones def. Daniel Cormier via third-round TKO (3:01).....
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsearles22I had Jones by KO/TKO at +350. Even when you're right you still suck. +264 was a shit lineQuote:
Originally Posted by Iamdlloyd77
Sure u did........ smh
And for someone to think that +264 is a bad line is emblematic of the imbecile you are
UFC Fight Night 114 Pettis vs Moreno.......Going with Grasso at -160 over Markos.... (For Hockeyguy...I do remember yr request..and I will post it..I'm on page 5 right now..but after tabulating I will post it up)
So I went markos for $500. Thanks!Quote:
Originally Posted by Iamdlloyd77
[Ticket #: 326958760] PARLAY (4 TEAMS)
08/05/2017 @ 09:15 PM MU [24305] Alexa Grasso -180 (Alexa Grasso vrs Randa Markos)
08/05/2017 @ 07:45 PM MU [24318] Sam Alvey -135 (Rashad Evans vrs Sam Alvey)
08/05/2017 @ 07:15 PM MU [24321] Alejandro Perez -140 (Alejandro Perez vrs Andre Soukhamthath)
08/05/2017 @ 04:45 PM MU [24341] Joseph Morales +105 (Joseph Morales vrs Roberto Sanchez)
Quote:
Originally Posted by DJ_Chaps
Joseph Morales def. Roberto Sanchez by Submission (RNC, Round 1, 3:56)
1 DOG DOWN 3 FAVES TO GO
Just need Grasso and we can fire Lloyd.
So sorry for your loss.Quote:
Originally Posted by DJ_Chaps
Ship.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TellafriendSo I went markos for $500. Thanks!Quote:
Originally Posted by Iamdlloyd77
Glad u lost!
Fuck ya. Lloyd and I printing money.
Is what you should never want to happen.Quote:
Originally Posted by DJ_Chaps
He's on the wrong side so often he is the reverse wormhole of mma.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iamdlloyd77
Alexa Grasso def. Randa Markos
Decision (split) (29-28, 28-29, 29-28)
For Hockey Guy..From the beginning of this thread....Record is 31 Wins, 30 Losses and 1 Draw (31-30-1)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iamdlloyd77Quote:
Originally Posted by Iamdlloyd77
Alexa Grasso def. Randa Markos
Decision (split) (29-28, 28-29, 29-28)
For Hockey Guy..From the beginning of this thread....Record is 31 Wins, 30 Losses and 1 Draw (31-30-1)
The thing is that record is awful and people would be stuck several units if they bet every single play of yours because you are picking heavy favorites for most of them.
You can't break even on -160+ favs never all of the time rarely taking dogs that win. You're plays on that record the books love you because long term you will get smashed.
Enjoy your recent winning streak which was bound to happen at some point betting big favorites while it lasts.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iamdlloyd77Quote:
Originally Posted by Iamdlloyd77
Alexa Grasso def. Randa Markos
Decision (split) (29-28, 28-29, 29-28)
For Hockey Guy..From the beginning of this thread....Record is 31 Wins, 30 Losses and 1 Draw (31-30-1)
How many of your 31 wins were on favorites?
Because you should not have a literal coinflip record when the vast majority of your picks are on 3-1 or better favorites.
Which is why we laugh at you to your face.
I kinda doubt his record is even that good but I'm waaaaaaay too lazy to check it because, as B&P & you have pointed out, that record is just awful considering who he's picking.Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatineQuote:
Originally Posted by Iamdlloyd77
How many of your 31 wins were on favorites?
Because you should not have a literal coinflip record when the vast majority of your picks are on 3-1 or better favorites.
Which is why we laugh at you to your face.
It might even be interesting & worth having his own thread if he added some analysis to why he's picking these fights but I'm pretty sure he just picks the heaviest favorite on the card & posts it. At least that would open up a discussion instead of just laughing at how hilariously bad his picks are. & lol at getting snarky when he actually gets one right.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockey GuyI kinda doubt his record is even that good but I'm waaaaaaay too lazy to check it because, as B&P & you have pointed out, that record is just awful considering who he's picking.Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatine
It might even be interesting & worth having his own thread if he added some analysis to why he's picking these fights but I'm pretty sure he just picks the heaviest favorite on the card & posts it. At least that would open up a discussion instead of just laughing at how hilariously bad his picks are. & lol at getting snarky when he actually gets one right.
There's no science here, he's just here for attention. Literally +280 tops that he's a dupe.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockey GuyI kinda doubt his record is even that good but I'm waaaaaaay too lazy to check it because, as B&P & you have pointed out, that record is just awful considering who he's picking.Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatine
It might even be interesting & worth having his own thread if he added some analysis to why he's picking these fights but I'm pretty sure he just picks the heaviest favorite on the card & posts it. At least that would open up a discussion instead of just laughing at how hilariously bad his picks are. & lol at getting snarky when he actually gets one right.
Remember..you asked for the record and you got it...and now when u get it you're still smack talking an over +500 record...There's a term for that..
'soreloser'
So if" I kinda doubt his record is even that good" ....Don't be too lazy to check it
GO CHECK IT!