Time to get on the TRUMP train

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hongkonger

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mintjewlips

Lefty Gutierrez literally tried to enter a mother jones article into a Senate hearing record........like im not making it up.....its on video

https://youtu.be/kdgAo3i0-yQ

At the 4:00 minute mark

:lol4

I like lefty, he's got balls I'll say..

Jeff Sessions with the ether...

---

Mother Jones is far more factual and trustworthy than Fox News, Drudge or any of the other right wing fake news bubble propagandists.

---

Nothing wrong with Drudge. I actually really liked the setup with headlines and hyperlinks. Much easier to navigate than CNN, which is just a bunch of videos I am not going to watch.

Sometimes the hyperlinks link CNN, sometimes they link USA Today, sometimes they link Infowars. its pretty easy to guage how partisan the source of any particular article is. All else being equal Drudge is one of the easiest sites to navigate and I actually don't think it is as extreme right wing partisan as its reputation. I think it is certainly center of Fox News.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MumblesBadly

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hongkonger

It's true we are happy to oblige the world's addiction to oil, and that has environmental consequences. On the other hand over a quarter of Canada's electricity comes from hydro and Canada is phasing out coal entirely within 3 years.

---

Morally questionable stance re the world's addiction to oil, wouldn't you say? With that perspective, one can't really fault Mexico for providing most of the heroin consumed in its North American neighbors, now could one.

Also, I don't think it is 2027 yet. Or is it and nobody told my iPhone's Calendar app about that?
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/wo...-a7430471.html

---

Oil and heroin aren't comparable, but I don't blame Mexico for providing it.

Yes you're right re 10 years.

Trump voters - You guys good with the tax bill ? I want to hear what you guys think of it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by big dick

Trump voters - You guys good with the tax bill ? I want to hear what you guys think of it.

---

They know fuckall about it, but they're going to take it in the ass along with the rest of the country.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hongkonger

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MumblesBadly

Morally questionable stance re the world's addiction to oil, wouldn't you say? With that perspective, one can't really fault Mexico for providing most of the heroin consumed in its North American neighbors, now could one.

Also, I don't think it is 2027 yet. Or is it and nobody told my iPhone's Calendar app about that?
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/wo...-a7430471.html

---

Oil and heroin aren't comparable, but I don't blame Mexico for providing it.

Yes you're right re 10 years.

---

You're right, but the oil/cheap fossil fuel addiction is worse over the long run. Heroin addiction won't cause the need for massive migration of people and industry away from rising sea levels. It also won't cause dangerous acidification of the oceans, with the worst case scenario being massive anoxia events that make vast swaths of the ocean uninhabitable for sealife.

Embedded Tweet

he then went on to retweet people praising him for reversing his big game hunting decision

https://i.imgur.com/12DgLEC.jpg



what a weird fucking guy

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by big dick

Trump voters - You guys good with the tax bill ? I want to hear what you guys think of it.

---

No, candidly, it is too generous for the ultra-rich and too stingy with the rest of us. Huge tax cuts were promised for everyone. They did not deliver on this. The special interests still get theirs, the only thing that has changed is which special interests. More of the same. But at least it is not a tax increase like some of us felt with the last administration, so there is that.

Meh. I personally think big game trophy hunting is abhorrent, but I also think making it economically viable to have preserves is the only way all the big game doesn't go extinct, so I have no problem with it on those grounds.

If some rich retard like Donald Trump Jr. paying $10k to murder an elephant and take its head home is the only economically viable way to keep the preserves going, than I am ok with it as an economic necessity.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tellafriend

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by big dick

Trump voters - You guys good with the tax bill ? I want to hear what you guys think of it.

---

No, candidly, it is too generous for the ultra-rich and too stingy with the rest of us. Huge tax cuts were promised for everyone. They did not deliver on this. The special interests still get theirs, the only thing that has changed is which special interests. More of the same. But at least it is not a tax increase like some of us felt with the last administration, so there is that.

---

The second I saw both houses of Congress and the executive were Republican I could have told you the next tax bill would be too generous of the ultra-rich and too stingy for the rest of us. This should come as a surprise to absolutely no-one, and is independent of Trump. This is what the Republican Party has been doing whenever they get a chance since the 1980s.

I hate to break it to anyone, but the rich guys are always going to win no matter who's in office, i am not shocked by this, if you're waiting for politicians to change your life then you might aswell kill yourself now........

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by verminaard

Meh. I personally think big game trophy hunting is abhorrent, but I also think making it economically viable to have preserves is the only way all the big game doesn't go extinct, so I have no problem with it on those grounds.

If some rich retard like Donald Trump Jr. paying $10k to murder an elephant and take its head home is the only economically viable way to keep the preserves going, than I am ok with it as an economic necessity.

---

Naw people have dedicated a lot of resources to solving issues like this and ultimately the best plan is to have well defended, well funded preserves combined with pan-national suppression of smuggling routes, hiring locals, leasing farm lands, and billing families for the bullet that gets delivered to the base of poachers skulls.

There is an argument for allowing private 'zoos' where exotic animals are raised for slaughter but honestly until we get China to stop thinking anything rare makes a great dick pill, those sorts of proposals wont really address the issues.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sonatine

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by verminaard

Meh. I personally think big game trophy hunting is abhorrent, but I also think making it economically viable to have preserves is the only way all the big game doesn't go extinct, so I have no problem with it on those grounds.

If some rich retard like Donald Trump Jr. paying $10k to murder an elephant and take its head home is the only economically viable way to keep the preserves going, than I am ok with it as an economic necessity.

---

Naw people have dedicated a lot of resources to solving issues like this and ultimately the best plan is to have well defended, well funded preserves combined with pan-national suppression of smuggling routes, hiring locals, leasing farm lands, and billing families for the bullet that gets delivered to the base of poachers skulls.

There is an argument for allowing private 'zoos' where exotic animals are raised for slaughter but honestly until we get China to stop thinking anything rare makes a great dick pill, those sorts of proposals wont really address the issues.

---

Surely you didn't miss his part about how to have well funded preserves. So I don't get your post.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tellafriend

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by sonatine

Naw people have dedicated a lot of resources to solving issues like this and ultimately the best plan is to have well defended, well funded preserves combined with pan-national suppression of smuggling routes, hiring locals, leasing farm lands, and billing families for the bullet that gets delivered to the base of poachers skulls.

There is an argument for allowing private 'zoos' where exotic animals are raised for slaughter but honestly until we get China to stop thinking anything rare makes a great dick pill, those sorts of proposals wont really address the issues.

---

Surely you didn't miss his part about how to have well funded preserves. So I don't get your post.

---

The distinction is that preserves by definition should be hunting-exclusion zones.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MumblesBadly

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hongkonger

Oil and heroin aren't comparable, but I don't blame Mexico for providing it.

Yes you're right re 10 years.

---

You're right, but the oil/cheap fossil fuel addiction is worse over the long run. Heroin addiction won't cause the need for massive migration of people and industry away from rising sea levels. It also won't cause dangerous acidification of the oceans, with the worst case scenario being massive anoxia events that make vast swaths of the ocean uninhabitable for sealife.

---

Kinda cool 20 year timelapse of the Earth & the effects of "global warming":


Surprised it wasn't too big a file for this 7th tier site. Druff must be spending some money since this place is blowing up YUGE the last couple days.

Taken from: https://www.msn.com/en-ca/weather/to...id=mailsignout

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by thesidedish

Embedded Tweet

---

I love how both Donald Trump and you are too stupid to see the massive irony in that. Since the election, Trump has tweeted about Hillary 54 times- more than once a week. He's also spoken about her pretty much constantly.

Here's Trump leading a crowd of Retards in a "lock her up" chant two months ago, before failing to influence Alabama Republicans into voting for his chosen candidate.

http://www.msnbc.com/brian-williams/...-1053209155852

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DirtyB

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by thesidedish

Embedded Tweet

---

I love how both Donald Trump and you are too stupid to see the massive irony in that. Since the election, Trump has tweeted about Hillary 54 times- more than once a week. He's also spoken about her pretty much constantly.

Here's Trump leading a crowd of Retards in a "lock her up" chant two months ago, before failing to influence Alabama Republicans into voting for his chosen candidate.

http://www.msnbc.com/brian-williams/...-1053209155852

---

You realize if the economy stays strong, Trump will win going away in 2020? You understand this correct?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Scandinavian Bob

Forum is RED ANTS. I am not posting any longer until this nonsense gets under control. Nobody like targeted trolling more than me. But the relentless shotgun posting is overwhelming.

I have too much money to put up with this bullshit. You really don't see people with means posting here do you?

Until this forum is cleaned up from dribble I will just sideline this forum in my rotation. I'll check back time to time.

So long old friends for now.

---

Welcome back!

FPS_RUSSIA IS THIS TRUE?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by big dick

Trump voters - You guys good with the tax bill ? I want to hear what you guys think of it.

---

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fjOiTxJPL2k