Very true.Quote:
Originally Posted by big dick
Canada just does things betterQuote:
Originally Posted by MumblesBadly
Printable View
Very true.Quote:
Originally Posted by big dickCanada just does things betterQuote:
Originally Posted by MumblesBadly
Lol at all the Saudis that funded the "resist Trump" movement being locked up in a hotel and their assets frozen....
:lol4
COINCIDENCE?
:lol2
WHERE ARE THE THOUSANDS OF RESISTERS THAT WERE GOING TO TAKE THE COUNTRY BACK
:lol4
OH THATS RIGHT NO ONE THERE TO PAY THEM
You just cant make this shit up....
Quote:
Originally Posted by hongkongerVery true.Quote:
Originally Posted by big dick
Perhaps so. Or perhaps not.
New Tars Sands Impact on Air Pollution Found
Scientists discover yet more aerosols emanating from oil sands production
https://www.scientificamerican.com/a...llution-found/
Speaking as someone who worked in the oil & gas industry for years, this isn't supposed to happen.Quote:
Originally Posted by hongkongerVery true.Quote:
Originally Posted by big dick
Canada has more stringent environmental laws but this spill happened in the USA so it will be cleaned up according to their laws not ours so being a Canadian company has no bearing whatsoever on it.
Straight oil spills, which this is, are actually pretty easy to clean up.
Emulsion spills, raw production straight out of the ground with a mix of oil & produced water, or straight produced water, salt water that is produced with the oil & then separated & then re-injected, is another story. They are basically impossible to clean up completely. This spill is at least 99.5%, but is definitely much closer to 100%, oil for it to be in a pipeline designated for delivery.
I'm waiting to find out the cause because that will tell a lot.
Why is it a preferable form of transport?Quote:
Originally Posted by hongkongerI supported the pipeline and still do. This was one of the things I disagreed with Obama about. The owner of the pipeline is a Canadian company so they'll clean it up. Pipelines are still preferable to transportation of crude by rail.Quote:
Originally Posted by GambleBotsSatire
Wow, the live longer study did not need to be part of that story. I guess they threw it in to support the awful headlineQuote:
Originally Posted by thesidedish
Less risk of spill compared to rail, less environmental impact of running a pipeline compared to railroad (diesel fuel, etc).Quote:
Originally Posted by limitlesWhy is it a preferable form of transport?Quote:
Originally Posted by hongkonger
It's true we are happy to oblige the world's addiction to oil, and that has environmental consequences. On the other hand over a quarter of Canada's electricity comes from hydro and Canada is phasing out coal entirely within 3 years.Quote:
Originally Posted by MumblesBadlyQuote:
Originally Posted by hongkonger
Perhaps so. Or perhaps not.
New Tars Sands Impact on Air Pollution Found
Scientists discover yet more aerosols emanating from oil sands production
https://www.scientificamerican.com/a...llution-found/
bump
Quote:
Originally Posted by BetCheckBet
I thought that was an unwritten rule? I know I wouldn't spend a dime on anything trump
speaking of which trump is now unable to spend his political slush fund on his russia legal fees. its all supposedly his own money from now on.
:popcorn
Lefty Gutierrez literally tried to enter a mother jones article into a Senate hearing record........like im not making it up.....its on video
https://youtu.be/kdgAo3i0-yQ
At the 4:00 minute mark
:lol4
I like lefty, he's got balls I'll say..
Jeff Sessions with the ether...
Mother Jones is far more factual and trustworthy than Fox News, Drudge or any of the other right wing fake news bubble propagandists.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mintjewlips
I'm not impressed with the journalism at Mother Jones, they seem basically like a news aggregation portal where they just do hack left wing rimshot takes on other journalists work.
The best journalism 2k17 is devidee just posting super anti jew memes and honestly they get funnier
that is not sarcasm for the record the senate testifying one was incredible
Every. Single. Time.Quote:
Originally Posted by lol wow
https://www.forbes.com/sites/alexmor.../#322e3a7675e0
ty todge
Morally questionable stance re the world's addiction to oil, wouldn't you say? With that perspective, one can't really fault Mexico for providing most of the heroin consumed in its North American neighbors, now could one.Quote:
Originally Posted by hongkongerIt's true we are happy to oblige the world's addiction to oil, and that has environmental consequences. On the other hand over a quarter of Canada's electricity comes from hydro and Canada is phasing out coal entirely within 3 years.Quote:
Originally Posted by MumblesBadly
Perhaps so. Or perhaps not.
New Tars Sands Impact on Air Pollution Found
Scientists discover yet more aerosols emanating from oil sands production
https://www.scientificamerican.com/a...llution-found/
Also, I don't think it is 2027 yet. Or is it and nobody told my iPhone's Calendar app about that?
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/wo...-a7430471.html