Quote:
Originally Posted by lol wow
says the guy who enjoys his beef n' cheddar with rose wine.
Printable View
Quote:
Originally Posted by lol wow
says the guy who enjoys his beef n' cheddar with rose wine.
Quote:
Originally Posted by lol wow
im on a gin rummy bender fr
literally buying a carrom set
fiiiiiiiiine carrom app
i bet charlie kirk would have loved a good game of carrom.
apparently a 20" x 20" board is like $400 so christ only knows how much an actual grownup one could cost, i cant even find one for sale
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatine
Says the Marxist fuckstick with a double digit IQ.
Hurricane Katrina? Jews fault. Ask Orko. He knows.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
Indian Ocean tsunami's. Fucking Jews again. Ask Orko. He knows.
Nah, i'mn disappointed how many peoplie lose objectivity.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmHurricane Katrina? Jews fault. Ask Orko. He knows.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
Indian Ocean tsunami's. Fucking Jews again. Ask Orko. He knows.
The latest theory is the camera behind Kirk did the shooting.
Ok why is there a dude sprinting on the rooftop who will probably plead guilty in court?
They just ignore that. Also the theory he didn't have a rifle has been debunked.
He did it, i know googley eye Patel doesn't inspire confidenmce but the evidence is overwhelming.
As far as Israel goes, pay for your own war and stop buying our politicians, it;s humiliating and wrong.
Then you can tell me to mind my own business and I would agree..
I'm at least proud of you that you're not blaming Israel for this one, nor agreeing with any other conspiracy theory.Quote:
Originally Posted by OrkoNah, i'mn disappointed how many peoplie lose objectivity.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
The latest theory is the camera behind Kirk did the shooting.
Ok why is there a dude sprinting on the rooftop who will probably plead guilty in court?
They just ignore that. Also the theory he didn't have a rifle has been debunked.
He did it, i know googley eye Patel doesn't inspire confidenmce but the evidence is overwhelming.
As far as Israel goes, pay for your own war and stop buying our politicians, it;s humiliating and wrong.
Then you can tell me to mind my own business and I would agree..
You're growing.
Animal fucker.
https://x.com/nypost/status/1968697247282909315?s=46
Fuentes has stated it is his mission to make sure JD Vance isn't the next president, apparently because he committed race treason by marrying an Indian.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sanlmar
Seems to be a right wing Civil War brewing between the technocratic right (Yarvin/Thiel/Musk), racist Groypers (Fuentes/Bannon), and low IQ antisemitic conspiritard MAGA (Tucker/Owens/MTQ); with Trump's cult of personality the only thing keeping the ship upright right now. It isn't obvious what is going to happen in a post Trump world. Probably Democrats just take control again, which honestly is probably preferable to either the Groypers or low IQ MAGA taking over.
I moved the Kimmel discussion over to a separate thread, as that's a separate (but related) issue which warrants its own discussion: https://pokerfraudalert.com/forum/sh...g-FCC-pressure
Here's a mess of an article being shared everywhere on social media:
'No evidence' found yet of ties between Charlie Kirk's shooting and left-wing groups, officials say
Lefties are screen shotting the headline and posting it as "proof" that Kirk wasn't left-wing.
Of course, this is absurd, because you don't need to be a member of a left-wing group in order to be left wing. For example, I am not part of any right-wing groups, but I think everyone here would agree I could accurately be classified as right-wing.
It turns out that the "group affiliation" thing is just a side investigation to see if a larger network supported the murder of Kirk, but there has never been any credible evidence that such a thing is true. It was worth investigating, of course, but not worthy of the big misleading headline.
The article also shared a second thing which I keep seeing on Facebook and X:
Quote:
Right-wing ideologies have fueled more than 70% of all extremist attacks and domestic terror plots since 2002 in the U.S., according to the Anti-Defamation League.
Right wing (white supremacist) 385
Right wing (anti-government) 148
Islamist 135
Right wing (other) 64
Left wing 51
Other 5
Unknown 1
The problem?
This list is put together by the ADL and other left-wing groups, who clearly want to see an outcome presenting the right as a bigger threat.
The major flaw is that this list omits riots and street attacks by groups like BLM and Antifa, and instead just focuses upon planned violent plots, whether successfully carried out or not.
This does not accurately depict the left wing violence problem, as their attacks tend to be more of the variety of riots, spontaneous street attacks, and attacks/intimidation of opportunity of right wingers in public spaces. None of this stuff is included in the above list.
For example, the left wing activists hurling bricks and rocks at law enforcement vehicles driving to ICE raids are not considered a "left wing attack", because it's not a pre-planned plot! Stupid!
Additionally, some non-right-wing attacks are considered right wing. For example, any political attack related to a person believing they're a sovereign citizen is considered a "right wing attack", even if that person's ideology is obviously left. Also, attacks done by "incels" are considered right wing, even though being an incel has nothing to do with ideology, and incels span across the political spectrum.
The left loves to play with numbers until they get the results they want, and then these are published as "studies", which are then waived in the face of right wingers in order to gaslight them. Dirty.
Megyn Kelly and Rudy Giuliani have exposed that the Murdochs banned Kirk from appearing on FNC.
https://youtu.be/JOtWYMSnyRQ?si=Uyga9gAXjgMH96IK
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
You should be happy the left is trying to just blame the right or say he’s not political.
The right is blaming the Jews. It’s all I am not saying the Jews did it, but let me dedicate 55 out of a 57 minute podcast to tell how you how petrified Charlie was of the Jews and how the Jews would have did it, not that we are saying they did it, but look at this and it certainly seems to tie to Israel and did we tell you Charlie was petrified of the Jews, let’s bring on another guest to tell us how scared Charlie was of the Jews.
After the memorial and a few weeks they are just going to say it directly that the Jews did it.
I’ve just described every far right podcast.
"Far right" is the operative term here, though.Quote:
Originally Posted by BCRQuote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
You should be happy the left is trying to just blame the right or say he’s not political.
The right is blaming the Jews. It’s all I am not saying the Jews did it, but let me dedicate 55 out of a 57 minute podcast to tell how you how petrified Charlie was of the Jews and how the Jews would have did it, not that we are saying they did it, but look at this and it certainly seems to tie to Israel and did we tell you Charlie was petrified of the Jews, let’s bring on another guest to tell us how scared Charlie was of the Jews.
After the memorial and a few weeks they are just going to say it directly that the Jews did it.
I’ve just described every far right podcast.
It's been clear for a long time, but especially the last 2 years, that the far right hates Jews. Of course, so does the far left, except they like to disguise their Jew hatred as "concern for human rights" and "anti-genocide".
The mainstream right is not blaming Jews, but is instead trying to push back at the nonsense coming from the left about this kid being either right or apolitical.
The mainstream left is not accepting that the kid was left, hence the poll where 8% of Democrats believe the kid was left wing.
I've had debates with normally sane Democrats who insist that it's "unclear" what his ideology was, and that they "heard he was a groyper". When I point out the strong evidence that he had gone left -- the political arguments with his MAGA parents, the co-worker who verified he hated Trump and Kirk, the text messages calling Kirk "hateful" (a modern left wing term never used by people on the right), the fact that he's gay and was dating a trans furry, and the fact that he murdered a prominent right wing figure.... I get excuses.
I even ask them WHY he would have killed Kirk if he were right wing, and WHY he would have also disliked Trump.
They'll usually say, "He was probably in agreement with the left on the trans topic but right wing on everything else", but of course that falls apart regarding disliking Trump, as he has never made trans matters a big part of his governing or speeches.
At best I get, "Well it's still not clear either way, let's see what else comes out", as if we need any more information than the kid's own fucking mother saying it, on top of everything else.
There's a big reason the left won't admit he was one of them. They don't want to tone down their rhetoric. They need to keep inciting panic about Trump, Vance, and MAGA being an existential threat to our democracy. But if the person committing the most consequential US assassination in several decades is shown to be a kid who got radicalized by online leftist rhetoric, they're going to face mounting pressure to tone it down. However, if it was a MAGA-on-MAGA killing, then they can just give their token, "Political violence is wrong, mmmkay" speech, and then use the Trump administration's reaction to this as "proof" that this is being used to bring us into fascist rule. They can say, "One of MAGA's own killed Charlie, and the right is trying to lie about his political affiliation so they can persecute the opposition and silence critics!" In fact, they're already saying that.
It's not nearly as powerful to say, "Yeah, one of our own followers murdered a beloved conservative figure, but that doesn't excuse Trump exploiting this to bring on authoritarian rule!"
Quote:
Originally Posted by VaughnP
also tucker
https://x.com/itsmorganariel/status/1969866785210949914
https://x.com/DeIudedShaniqwa/status...37902786720151
Best theory I've seen so far
Probably the wildest part of the Tucker video is his full on Joanquim Phoenix Joker laugh at the end of it.Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatineQuote:
Originally Posted by VaughnP
also tucker
https://x.com/itsmorganariel/status/1969866785210949914
Good thing Devidee is back.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
Dessertrunner claims he finds his transgender content on X rather than Reddit, and I'm sure he claimed hes merely obsessed rather than addicted.
That could be a cautionary tale for all involved.
Druff will you step in before DR starts banging transgender people (assuming he hasnt already) ?
Three problems with this scenario. Lack of opportunity: he lives in a trailer park in the Mojave Desert. Lack of a willing partner: he's old and decrepit, even trannies have their standards. Lack of funds: he can't afford a prostitute.Quote:
Originally Posted by zealanddonk
Pure Gold
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=49MGHwgICBQ
Interesting a Saudi viewer informed him that Sept 11th 2001 occurred one day before the UN was set to vote on Palestinian statehood.
There are some conspiracies now, related to the 1998 Nicholas Cage movie "Snake Eyes".
Here are the claims:
- An assassination occurred against a political figure (Assistant Secretary of Defense) named Charles Kirkland (a name very similar to Charlie Kirk)
- Charles was shot in the throat while in a public place, among a huge crowd (Kirk was killed in a public place among a huge crowd)
- The shooter was never named, but it was done on behalf of a defense contractor called "Tyler Industries" (the name of the shooter was Tyler Robinson)
- Despite the huge crowd, the shooter got away (same with Kirk's killer)
- The shooting takes place on September 10 (Kirk was killed September 10)
However, here are some unverified elements:
- Nobody can find a credible source that places the movie shooting on September 10. All sources I see claim the date was not specified.
- I can't tell if the shooting was in the neck or throat. I did find one scene where it appears blood is in that area as Charles Kirkland is being wheeled away
I will say it's a weird coincidence, though.
Tyler Robinson was not born yet when Snake Eyes hit theaters.
That is a helluva coincidence. Eisenhower tried to warn us, now God himself is trying to warn us.
Stop before we (mankind) roll snake eyes.
Nick Fuentes explains how the GOP turned Kirk's memorial into a pro GOP rally.
The GOP is trying to rebrand away from America first to the old school Reagan GWB Republican party.
Fuck that!
https://x.com/ImperiumFirst/status/1970697948460965899
Its going to come out that a detective friend of the Robinson family learned the FBI was zeroing in on Tyler Robinson so rushed over to get them to turn Tyler in so there wouldn’t be any bloodshed.
This isn't really about Charlie & Erika. The fact of the matter is women do not get heartbroken like men.
They will move like nothing ever happened and quickly, all of them.
To a dude a break up devastating, it feels like the end of the world. The level of attachment is ten fold what a woman feels.
That's just the way it is, won't be long Charlies kids will be introduced to their step dad.
JDVance can deny whatever but it's hardwirerd in his and his wifes DNA.
Ali descibed Vance and his wife pretty accurately.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HqiWFLsgVi4
There is a chance that this is some misunderstanding, but given that school teachers have the highest rate of ardent libtards of any profession it's a small one.
It looks like they're probably innocent.Quote:
Originally Posted by VaughnP
Students have verified that they wore the shirts last year, and a picture has gone around of a group photo (including the missing math teacher, who is in plain clothes) from that time.
There is no authenticated 2024 picture of them wearing the shirts, but there's enough people stating they wore them last year that this is probably just a coincidence.
It's also hard to believe that all but one teacher would wear something like this. I could see if one or two of them did, but getting the entire department (minus one) to wear shirts mocking the Kirk death is unlikely.
Why are snowflake Republicans still deep in their feelings over Charlie Kirk?Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan DruffIt looks like they're probably innocent.Quote:
Originally Posted by VaughnP
Students have verified that they wore the shirts last year, and a picture has gone around of a group photo (including the missing math teacher, who is in plain clothes) from that time.
There is no authenticated 2024 picture of them wearing the shirts, but there's enough people stating they wore them last year that this is probably just a coincidence.
It's also hard to believe that all but one teacher would wear something like this. I could see if one or two of them did, but getting the entire department (minus one) to wear shirts mocking the Kirk death is unlikely.
Kristol is a fake Republican.
His entire timeline is TDS and bashing of conservative positions.
just putting this out there,
https://x.com/IanCarrollShow/status/...967761703?s=20