IT'S ALL ABOUT THAT STRATEGIC PATIENCE
#MAGA
Printable View
IT'S ALL ABOUT THAT STRATEGIC PATIENCE
#MAGA
LOL. I am not sure there is a single historical incident pertaining to the early 20th century that is accurate in this post. And it isn't even a matter of differing perspective, it is just made up nonsense. I would hazard to guess the Bible is more historically accurate than the accounts of this post.
It's also the 100 yr anniversary of the beginning of the Bolshevik revolution.
RIP Russians
Actually this brings up a really weird double standard that I totally don't get.
Whether you agree Israel should exist in the first place is one question.
However, given that it does exist, and it is perpetually at war with certain groups actively trying to destroy it (PLO, HAMAS, Hezbollah, etc.) I find the constant criticism of it very strange.
Basically critics are telling Israel not to fight back in a war where they are the stronger party. Where is the precedent for this? Where in the history of humanity has a nation ever gotten into a war (whether they should be in the war or not is a separate question), been winning, and then decided just to shut it down and let itself be attacked/destroyed unilaterally? There is certainly no precedent for such behavior in the US or the Muslim world. So I find I hard to take the criticism of Israel's tactics very seriously.
For their part I don't think the Muslim countries really think Israel is doing anything immoral or wrong. It is certainly not doing anything more than any of them would do in similar circumstances. In fact I think it is pretty clear that EVERY Muslim nation would be much more aggressive towards fighting enemies toward such nation. However, the Muslim countries realize that the SJWs of the Western world has a hard-on for swooping to the rescue to fight injustice and victims. So they are just playing along as the victimized parties, so that the Western world will put pressure on Israel to unilaterally not fight to secure its own ends, while they go ahead and proceed towards doing their best to defeat Israel politically, militarily, demographically, etc.
OPERATION COLUMBIAN NECKTIE!! GOGOGOGOGO!!!
Guys... Rick Santorum himself just said the GOP imploded in Virginia because Trump has delivered fuckall.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F6-jaG9yPws
Not an opposite pick.
Verminaard - if you could quit quoting posters that you yourself say post drivel and that half the forum has on ignore, thatd be great k thx
yeah especially if you are going to defend the jews!
What went wrong w Sonatine's crew? Despite my political disagreements w these gentlemen, one thing's clear they're not secretly anti American.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CSmedeK4N70
The truth about white people.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rz608skKbIc
hey fps can you go back to posting jimmy dore videos and not typing anything, thanks pal
Again. What country wouldn't do this in similar circumstances. Where is the historical precedent that suggests Israel is doing anything atypical? This is a serious question. If you can actually provide an example that would be great.
In the modern world today you could go down a list and name 30 countries that have worse human rights abuses than Israel. And none of us give a shit about any of them. Why is that? Why such a hard on for Israel? At least FPS has a stated reason, the Jews are an evil force that is secretly running the world that must be stopped at all costs (I am paraphrasing but I am sure you get the gist of it).
Most of the Jews in Israel are 2nd-4th generation refugees from Europe, Russia and the Middle East. Why in the world do we hold them to higher standards than we would anyone else in the history of the world.
Did we decide that 3rd generation descendants of Jewish refugees are the pinnacle of mankind and as such should be held to higher standards than any other group of humans that has ever lived? If that is your argument, than that is fine. But if you are trying to argue that Israel is doing anything especially heinous or unusual given their circumstances than you don't have a very good perspective of how the world and human societies operate, both historically and today.
I doubt I am going to block him cause that isn't my style, but I will stop engaging him. Everytime I try to engage him, he pretty much just ignores me or gives a very unsatisfactory reply. I don't think he actually has devoted any self-generated critical thought on this matter, or even has the ability to do so. I think he just copy and pastes stuff other people write, and may not actually even read it. No point engaging someone who doesn't even seem to have a very good grasp of their own argument/position and is just parroting the words of others.
I will say the whole notion of "white pride" is pretty silly. Of course no more silly than Black pride, or Latino pride, or womyn pride, but silly nonetheless.
People indigenously from Europe with low amounts of melanin in their skin (which is an environmental adaptation to living in areas with low levels of sunlight) and not much else in common have been not getting along and fighting each other for the last 40,000 years or so. Now in the last 200 years we are no longer isolated from other groups of people like we historically have, so we decided all of a sudden we are a "race" and should have "pride" in our non existent shared heritage. Pretty ridiculous.
Hey Retards, you know all those articles on InfoWars that you love? Guess where they came from?
They also stole articles from CNN, the BBC, NY Times, and Washington Post.
https://www.buzzfeed.com/janelytvyne...oaZ#.uczx54aJ8