Time to get on the TRUMP train

Here's the only issues that matter in no particular order.

1. Require AIPAC and other foreign lobbies to register as foreign lobbies, duh.

2. Require foreign owned media outlets register as foreign. ((They're)) trying to make RT and Sputnik register as foreign media so they can lie us into war without resistance.

3. Stop allowing Israeli citizens to hold office in America until American citizens can hold office in Israel.

4.Stop the Neocons/Jews/Israelis (same thing) from lying us into any more wars.

5. Overturn Citizens United.

6. Remove the Federal Reserve, it's the biggest Jewish swindle in the history of mankind.

Until these happen American voters will remain powerless.

Factoid: Israel has no extradition treaty w the United States, Sonatine isn't that strange?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FPS_Russia

Here's the only issues that matter in no particular order.

1. Require AIPAC and other foreign lobbies to register as foreign lobbies, duh.

2. Require foreign owned media outlets register as foreign. ((They're)) trying to make RT and Sputnik register as foreign media so they can lie us into war without resistance.

3. Stop allowing Israeli citizens to hold office in America until American citizens can hold office in Israel.

4.Stop the Neocons/Jews/Israelis (same thing) from lying us into any more wars.

5. Overturn Citizens United.

6. Remove the Federal Reserve, it's the biggest Jewish swindle in the history of mankind.

Until these happen American voters will remain powerless.

Factoid: Israel has no extradition treaty w the United States, Sonatine isn't that strange?

---

can you explain what you mean about the federal reserve? what is citizens united?

The world really is in mortal danger with him in power, isn't it?

You just fucking know the history books will say that WW3 was triggered because a parody twitter account was taken seriously by the then sitting president.

Embedded Tweet

Embedded Tweet

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by blake

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FPS_Russia

Here's the only issues that matter in no particular order.

1. Require AIPAC and other foreign lobbies to register as foreign lobbies, duh.

2. Require foreign owned media outlets register as foreign. ((They're)) trying to make RT and Sputnik register as foreign media so they can lie us into war without resistance.

3. Stop allowing Israeli citizens to hold office in America until American citizens can hold office in Israel.

4.Stop the Neocons/Jews/Israelis (same thing) from lying us into any more wars.

5. Overturn Citizens United.

6. Remove the Federal Reserve, it's the biggest Jewish swindle in the history of mankind.

Until these happen American voters will remain powerless.

Factoid: Israel has no extradition treaty w the United States, Sonatine isn't that strange?

---

can you explain what you mean about the federal reserve? what is citizens united?

---

Citizens united lets anyone donate as much as they want to whoever they want and not have to disclose it... It’s how the Koch brothers control the majority of republicans. You no longer need $10 from a million people, you can get $100,000,000 from one donor. It goes against the main purpose of a democracy

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by El Gallo

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by blake

can you explain what you mean about the federal reserve? what is citizens united?

---

Citizens united let’s anyone donate as much as they want to whoever they want and not have to disclose it... It’s how the Koch brothers control the majority of republicans. You no longer need $10 from a million people, you can get $100,000,000 from one donor. It goes against the main purpose of a democracy

---

yeah i know what citizens united is. fps is far and away the worst poster in the history of these forums and i hope that by engaging him, i can completely fuck up this thread even more, thereby making enough people complain that even druff would ban him.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by blake

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by El Gallo

Citizens united let’s anyone donate as much as they want to whoever they want and not have to disclose it... It’s how the Koch brothers control the majority of republicans. You no longer need $10 from a million people, you can get $100,000,000 from one donor. It goes against the main purpose of a democracy

---

yeah i know what citizens united is. fps is far and away the worst poster in the history of these forums and i hope that by engaging him, i can completely fuck up this thread even more, thereby making enough people complain that even druff would ban him.

---

i actually assumed you just encouraged him to troll me.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SrslySirius

As a former rabid NFL fan, I can attest that just one season off really breaks the spell. I now give zero shits about football, and it seems that an increasing number of people around my age feel similarly. This ratings slump is nothing new, it has been stagnating for a few years now.

If Trump does manage to encourage boycotts, the league may have a hard time winning those fans back. This could hasten the decline that was already underway.

Meanwhile, live sports is the sole reason many consumers continue giving shitty cable companies their business. A hit to NFL viewership could seriously damage subscriber numbers as well. Americans are already cord-cutting by the millions each year.

I think protesting the national anthem is childish and counterproductive to the goals of social justice, but I'm fascinated to see how this all plays out.

---

you do realize that like 5 players were kneeling, the most prominent being kaepernick, who is now unemployed, right?

these protests (currently) have ZERO to do with social justice, racism or police brutality. the second trump opened his fat mouth to his redneck base, saying he would fire the NFL "sons of bitches" who knelt during the anthem, i knew that every team would protest cause it has now become a symbol of protesting trump, himself, and the fact that he is such an embarrassment

warriors head coach steve kerr:

Quote:

---

How about the irony of, ‘Free speech is fine if you’re a neo-Nazi chanting hate slogans, but free speech is not allowed to kneel in protest?'” Well, you know what else is disrespectful to our flag? Racism."

---

https://www.mediaite.com/trump/steve...r-flag-racism/

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by blake

warriors head coach steve kerr:

Quote:

---

How about the irony of, ‘Free speech is fine if you’re a neo-Nazi chanting hate slogans, but free speech is not allowed to kneel in protest?'” Well, you know what else is disrespectful to our flag? Racism."

---

https://www.mediaite.com/trump/steve...r-flag-racism/

---

https://media.giphy.com/media/3ov9jV...bTj2/giphy.gif

"The Venn Diagram of Facebook friends bitching about kneeling NFL players and Facebook friends who peaked in high school is a single overlapping circle."

Such a stupid distraction. If I was an NFL coach I'd run all my players back into the locker room during the national anthem. There is no way in hell I'd be out there like a faggot with some players kneeling and some players standing. The only other option would be forcing every player to stand which would fuck up your team in every conceivable way.

So, what's happening with the Taliban these days? They are no longer the nightly story.

Never in doubt that such a tweet would rise from the ashes

Embedded Tweet

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by blake

warriors head coach steve kerr:

Quote:

---

How about the irony of, ‘Free speech is fine if you’re a neo-Nazi chanting hate slogans, but free speech is not allowed to kneel in protest?'” Well, you know what else is disrespectful to our flag? Racism."

---

https://www.mediaite.com/trump/steve...r-flag-racism/

---

He's right, listen to this shit on YT, viewers discretion advised. I'm going to bill YT for counseling.
Excuse me while I throw up, this is really evil, not as evil as lying another country into war or what's going on in Palestine, you know what I mean.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KX3uCmbFUFg
Bernie gave a speech yesterday and he vowed zero tolerance for white supremists and neo nazis. I couldn't agree more.

what are you 2p2 names fps russia?

a reminder of something............Impeachment is coming......



18 U.S. Code § 227 stipulates that any federal employee, member of Congress, or member of the executive branch is forbidden from using their position within the federal government to influence the employment decisions of a private business, solely on the basis of partisan political affiliation. The penalty for doing so could result in fines and incarceration of up to 15 years, and anyone who is found guilty of violating that law could even be disqualified from holding office:

(a)Whoever, being a covered government person, with the intent to influence, solely on the basis of partisan political affiliation, an employment decision or employment practice of any private entity—

(1) takes or withholds, or offers or threatens to take or withhold, an official act, or

(2) influences or offers or threatens to influence, the official act of another shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than 15 years, or both, and may be disqualified from holding any office of honour, trust, or profit under the United States.

It’s worth noting that U.S. Code specifies that no federal employee is exempt from the law, including the President of the United States.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by LarryLaffer

a reminder of something............Impeachment is coming......



18 U.S. Code § 227 stipulates that any federal employee, member of Congress, or member of the executive branch is forbidden from using their position within the federal government to influence the employment decisions of a private business, solely on the basis of partisan political affiliation. The penalty for doing so could result in fines and incarceration of up to 15 years, and anyone who is found guilty of violating that law could even be disqualified from holding office:

(a)Whoever, being a covered government person, with the intent to influence, solely on the basis of partisan political affiliation, an employment decision or employment practice of any private entity—

(1) takes or withholds, or offers or threatens to take or withhold, an official act, or

(2) influences or offers or threatens to influence, the official act of another shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than 15 years, or both, and may be disqualified from holding any office of honour, trust, or profit under the United States.

It’s worth noting that U.S. Code specifies that no federal employee is exempt from the law, including the President of the United States.

---

youre a simpleton.

and you left out (deliberately?) the most important part:

"Solely on the basis of partisan political affiliation"

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by LarryLaffer

a reminder of something............Impeachment is coming......



18 U.S. Code § 227 stipulates that any federal employee, member of Congress, or member of the executive branch is forbidden from using their position within the federal government to influence the employment decisions of a private business, solely on the basis of partisan political affiliation. The penalty for doing so could result in fines and incarceration of up to 15 years, and anyone who is found guilty of violating that law could even be disqualified from holding office:

(a)Whoever, being a covered government person, with the intent to influence, solely on the basis of partisan political affiliation, an employment decision or employment practice of any private entity—

(1) takes or withholds, or offers or threatens to take or withhold, an official act, or

(2) influences or offers or threatens to influence, the official act of another shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than 15 years, or both, and may be disqualified from holding any office of honour, trust, or profit under the United States.

It’s worth noting that U.S. Code specifies that no federal employee is exempt from the law, including the President of the United States.

---

One doesn't need this section of the U.S. Code to impeach a president. In fact, during the Watergate scandal, the special prosecutor investigating whether Nixon should be criminally prosecuted agreed to turn over evidence to the team for Congress members who were working to bring impeachment charges against Nixon versus holding onto to it to use in criminal proceedings. Meaning, impeaching the president is completely separate from criminal prosecution. Hence, the details of the U.S. Code are essentially irrelevant to impeachment proceedings.