*** Official Flying Stupidity Wagering thread ***

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jsearles22

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TheXFactor

They still have to catch the ball.

The speed that the 49ers are playing will also be a factor.

They are play very fast. I doubt the Chiefs will be able to adjust.

49ers have a clear advantage.

https://d.newsweek.com/en/full/15612...f1c6f0753e3d15

---

You must be drunk. SF got torched by Atlanta. KC’s offense is better. SF gave up 46 to NO. KC is better. To think anyone can shut down this healthy KC juggernaut when Reid has two weeks to prepare is asinine at best. The Chiefs o27 and game o54 are the prudent bets. Those could both happen and SF win, don’t get me wrong.

---

Sf has a better defense than both of those squads so comparisons don’t work. Not saying result is wrong. My fear is sf not being able to keep up but that will only be necessary if their defense fails them. TBD.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tellafriend

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jsearles22

You must be drunk. SF got torched by Atlanta. KC’s offense is better. SF gave up 46 to NO. KC is better. To think anyone can shut down this healthy KC juggernaut when Reid has two weeks to prepare is asinine at best. The Chiefs o27 and game o54 are the prudent bets. Those could both happen and SF win, don’t get me wrong.

---

Sf has a better defense than both of those squads so comparisons don’t work. Not saying result is wrong. My fear is sf not being able to keep up but that will only be necessary if their defense fails them. TBD.

---

So I say SF DEFENSE gave up 46 to Saints and Chiefs offense is better. Your rebuttable is that SF has a better defense than NO?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jsearles22

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tellafriend

Sf has a better defense than both of those squads so comparisons don’t work. Not saying result is wrong. My fear is sf not being able to keep up but that will only be necessary if their defense fails them. TBD.

---

So I say SF DEFENSE gave up 46 to Saints and Chiefs offense is better. Your rebuttable is that SF has a better defense than NO?

---

They weren’t as healthy then. Surely you would agree.

Starting at 5:35 PT

Clippers at Dallas - Over 232

Porzingis is coming back after an absence. You might want to consider this, as sometimes this wreaks havoc upon handicapping.

This is also the "public" side.

Boy I run bad.

I pick this over, and there's 3 points in the first 4 minutes, on 1-for-17 shooting.

Amazing.

I don't think I've ever given up on a total 4 minutes into the game, but this might be it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

Boy I run bad.

I pick this over, and there's 3 points in the first 4 minutes, on 1-for-17 shooting.

Amazing.

I don't think I've ever given up on a total 4 minutes into the game, but this might be it.

---

I tailed.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tellafriend

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

Boy I run bad.

I pick this over, and there's 3 points in the first 4 minutes, on 1-for-17 shooting.

Amazing.

I don't think I've ever given up on a total 4 minutes into the game, but this might be it.

---

I tailed.

---

I was about to ask. I'm assuming you didn't tail the last 3, all of which won.

Actually it's picked up a bit. 17 points in the past 2.5 minutes, so while it's behind pace by a lot, it's no longer shut out of winning.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tellafriend

I tailed.

---

I was about to ask. I'm assuming you didn't tail the last 3, all of which won.

---

Precisely.

Well they scored 45 points in the final 8 minutes of the quarter. That would've been great if they didn't score 3 in the first 4 minutes.

Anyway, it's no longer the fiasco it appeared to be. Live betting has it at 220, which isn't good for us, but not unwinnable.

My Monday morning:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

Well they scored 45 points in the final 8 minutes of the quarter. That would've been great if they didn't score 3 in the first 4 minutes.

Anyway, it's no longer the fiasco it appeared to be. Live betting has it at 220, which isn't good for us, but not unwinnable.

---

Still have a chance over 232, I just fired on over 113 2nd half

what a first set comeback by wozniacki…think she was down 2 breaks in the first set and rallied to win 7-5...

if I know my man, san, he got some of that sweet sweet +320 action live...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 4BET

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

Well they scored 45 points in the final 8 minutes of the quarter. That would've been great if they didn't score 3 in the first 4 minutes.

Anyway, it's no longer the fiasco it appeared to be. Live betting has it at 220, which isn't good for us, but not unwinnable.

---

Still have a chance over 232, I just fired on over 113 2nd half

---

Dallas has to get back into the game or this is fucked. If the Clips turn it into a blowout, it will kill the possible 4th quarter fouling and frantic scoring in the final minutes.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by GambleBotsChafedPenis

what a first set comeback by wozniacki…think she was down 2 breaks in the first set and rallied to win 7-5...

if I know my man, san, he got some of that sweet sweet +320 action live...

---

I’m about the swings and locking in guaranteed $.



So I parlayed Ash Barty & Woz preflop for +170. Little extra .30 bump

I pocket
+.70 Woz wins
or
+1.70 Yaz wins

My life as a nit. Homeruns are for baseball

never underestimate the 'give a shit' factor or the '5 cent head' factor...

atta boy san!!! thanks for the eventual risk free profit...

:to

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by GambleBotsChafedPenis

never underestimate the 'give a shit' factor or the '5 cent head' factor...

atta boy san!!! thanks for the eventual risk free profit...

---

That’s about as good as sports gets. Down 1-5

I had no idea who would prevail.

Nice preflop pick it was

cirstea was like +140 in the late 2nd set....dont know jack shit about womens tennis so didn't feel comfortable firing on it...

was gonna go on the theory that betting against a child (even as talented of a one as coco is) can't be that bad of a bet...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by GambleBotsChafedPenis

cirstea was like +140 in the late 2nd set....dont know jack shit about womens tennis so didn't feel comfortable firing on it...

was gonna go on the theory that betting against a child (even as talented of a one as coco is) can't be that bad of a bet...

---

Too late for me to jump in

No feel

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sanlmar

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by GambleBotsChafedPenis

cirstea was like +140 in the late 2nd set....dont know jack shit about womens tennis so didn't feel comfortable firing on it...

was gonna go on the theory that betting against a child (even as talented of a one as coco is) can't be that bad of a bet...

---

Too late for me to jump in

No feel

---

coco is gonna be interesting to watch in the next 5 years...she hits one helluva hard ball for a chick who's only 15...