A newspaper that hasn't endorsed a Democrat for president in 7 decades shreds Trump as 'not qualified'
This is a Texas newspaper. lolzzzz
Printable View
A newspaper that hasn't endorsed a Democrat for president in 7 decades shreds Trump as 'not qualified'
This is a Texas newspaper. lolzzzz
I advise everyone to follow the Bill Mitchell that sad dish posted on twitter. It's a window into the thinking of trumpkins. Dude is classic.
If you want the real "odds" just go to the gambling sites. They have a better sense of the odds than any polls you will find
https://electionbettingodds.com/
https://www.betfair.com/exchange/plu...et/1.107373419
Quote:
Originally Posted by cmoney
This just isn't true. Betting markets lag behind polls.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ToasterOvenQuote:
Originally Posted by cmoney
This just isn't true. Betting markets lag behind polls.
People are stating there is no chance Trump can win and are using the polls to back this up. So if the polls are accurate, and he has no chance, then why not take advantage of the free money all these betting sites are offering?
Trump is a long shot but he definitely has a chance. All it takes it Hillary to be Hillary and completely bomb the debates or more scandals to come out.
I think both candidates are a disaster and it is embarrassing that out of 300 million people this is what we came up with.
Quote:
Originally Posted by cmoneyQuote:
Originally Posted by ToasterOven
People are stating there is no chance Trump can win and are using the polls to back this up. So if the polls are accurate, and he has no chance, then why not take advantage of the free money all these betting sites are offering?
Trump is a long shot but he definitely has a chance. All it takes it Hillary to be Hillary and completely bomb the debates or more scandals to come out.
I think both candidates are a disaster and it is embarrassing that out of 300 million people this is what we came up with.
Which "people are saying"? Trump is behind in the polls, but polls are a snapshot of the race. If the election was today, Trump would lose the electoral college. But that doesn't mean polls in late October are going to be the same as they are today.
But where do the betting markets get their line if not from the polls? If they are using polls, their line will lag. If they aren't using polls, what exactly are they using to set the line?
Quote:
Originally Posted by big dick
I feel good about all these states except for VA but bet em all
edit: also where is WI NV & NH, they will succumb to the :train as well
Reddit's really loaded with Hillary shills.
There's like a hundred Dirty B's over there talking about Hillary's plan to get money out of politics, her plan to stop the TPP. The blatant bullshit is getting upvoted and they'll down vote the shit out of you if you're critical of Hillary.
Deep breath, I'm done for the day. I will be back over there with a airtight case for Trump. A Trump presidency is what they deserve and that's what they're going to get. See ya guys around.
Quote:
Originally Posted by FPS_Russia
lol @ thinking reddit is anything but a liberal democratic leaning website.
apparently Trump is ahead on some polls this morning but what Im realizing is those pro Trump polls are never, ever electoral vote based.
We'll see. The state polls supposedly lag behind the national polls.Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatine
For people really interested in presidential campaign nut and bolt stuff, Trump is a fascinating case study. Apparently, Clinton has 30 offices in NC and Trump has zero. Trump is hardly advertising, although a bit more this month. So, do "get out the vote" operations mean nothing, does advertising mean nothing? We'll see, I guess.
hills down to -230.
honestly i think the coughing is starting to get to people.
lulz if she goes tits up before election day because of whatever is bothering her.Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatine
Hillary's health problems are really Trump's only chance at this point
He has beaten himself in this election, which is pretty impressive considering that this was an election where Hillary would have beaten herself against any reasonable Republican candidate.
I will say that there is often a weird "jump" in the polls for the underdog candidate around this time of year, but it always fades.
I remember first noticing it with Bush Sr. against Bill Clinton in 1992. I was dumb enough then to believe that Bush was going to somehow come back and win.
I saw it with Dole against Clinton.
I didn't see it with Gore/GW Bush because that one was so close the whole way, nor did I see it with Kerry/GW Bush, because again that one was already very close in September.
I didn't see it with McCain/Obama, but probably would have if not for the banking/housing crisis of 2008.
I did see it with Romney versus Obama.
We might be seeing the same now with Trump.
Something does seem to be wrong with Hillary. At first I felt the "Hillary is sick" stuff was just a manufactured anti-Hillary issue, but now we're starting to see some real evidence that she's not completely well.
Hillary has wanted to be President her whole life. That's been her dream. She stayed in a sham marriage just to achieve that dream.
Now she's inches away from the goal line, and there's no way a go-getter like Hillary is going to back off for the good of the country, even if she knows she's very sick and will die in office.
Hillary will continue running for President unless she's actually dead and buried -- and even then will be running for it.
Let's say Hillary knows she has less than a year to live. I'm not saying it's true, but let's just say hypothetically that she knows this. Zero point zero chance she would drop out of the race. She would conceal it, win, achieve her dream of being President, and rule for as long as she physically could. Hillary doesn't give a shit about the good of the country. Hillary cares about Hillary. (Trump is actually the same way.)
Maybe Hillary is just running bad with catching colds or whatever, and isn't actually that sick. After all, I just had to cancel my 200th radio show last week, and I'm not on death's door.
But you'd think Hillary would just cancel a campaign appearance (especially given these persistent health rumors) if she had a temporary illness like a cold, rather than look and sound like death on stage and give the right the evidence they're looking for.
I think Hillary has some long-running health issues, and she wasn't necessarily expecting to have the coughing fit occur during that campaign rally.
I don't find it far-fetched at all to believe at this point that we will have President Kaine before the end of 2020.
I'm surprised the country hasn't learned from what happened with Reagan and the Alzheimer's. I loved Reagan, but there's no denying that something was wrong with him in the final 2 years of office. It's not his fault, but that's the risk you take when you elect an old person to such an important position.
In general it's not a good decision to elect a 70-year-old as President, especially given the high stress of the job. Look how much of a toll it takes on the appearance of younger Presidents, such as Obama.
It's pretty funny watching Trump fail at imploding his campaign over and over. Don't let him scare you guys off, let's see how desperate he gets for the lulz.
I just wanna see Chris Hayes's smug face implode while Trump's being swore in, fingers crossed.
yeah the coughing videos are not a good look for her. also, the fact that she would be the oldest president ever elected and hasn't released her medical records is kind of ridiculous. same goes for trump but at least he's not having 4 minute coughing fits and suggesting to the fbi that a brain injury is causing memory loss.Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatine
hillary needs to wake up from whatever it is she's been doing the last few weeks. her only pitch to voters seems to be that she's not trump, which is fine, but not exactly an inspiring message. even if you disagree with him, trump actually has a message (change, trade, crime, war on terror, etc). i'm not sure what hillary's running on except for not being trump (which may be good enough but still).
i think any other major candidate would have crushed these two.
These people know about privatization and neo liberalism. Good luck folks.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NsVThykmdb0
We may have to do this ourselves. Here's Chris Hedges on the Alex Jones show a few years back.
Alex knows he's talking to someone special and they put their political difs aside for this interview.
2012 good watch
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qgR6IMsmGRE
Quote:
Originally Posted by FPS_Russia
In the first 45 seconds of the young turks video it said "thousands of STATE run banks, goverment offices, and factories were closed". So how much did privatization play in this event? Jw
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
This simply isnt true on literally any level.
At the very least, she recognizes that there may be 3 supreme court noms in the next 8 years, possibly 4 years. And I cant think of a single republican candidate in my lifetime who wouldnt use those seats to push a right-wing pro-life Christian theocratic agenda. Forget Roe vs Wade, forget Planned Parenthood, forget any sort of welfare system, forget insurance/financial oversight, forget national parks, so on, so forth.
Hillary recognizes that this is fundamentally unacceptable, and thats why people are willing to vote for her despite her being a literal lizard in baggy human skin.
The good news here being that there IS actually one republican candidate who would nominate centerists and that of course is Trump.
And if Hillary so much as clears her throat during the debates, we are probably going to find out whether Im right or wrong.
I'm gonna try to stay out of this thread after this. It somehow just hit me after all this time. I really do not spend as much time on this as you think. It does drive me crazy but I have no self control at all. Whether you believe shit happens naturally or if its orchestrated it will take you to the same place of in a year basically everyone saying either
"If Phil Hellmuth gets in of course there is a pretty huge chance of something disastrous happening to our country."
"If Annie Duke gets in of course there is a pretty huge chance of something disastrous happening to our country."
I was watching CNN this morning when their own poll came out T+2. Their political analysts were absolutely melting down. Their own analysts were shocked that independents were favoring Trump by 20 points, whereas Romney only won independents by 5.
I do believe the logic however, you cannot cherry pick polls. You have to look at the averages, which says Clinton up around 3 points. That feels about right. I think the first debate will be the difference maker. If Wikileaks does a huge dump the eve of the debate, and Clinton goes on a coughing attack, she is going to be behind a week later. To be honest, if Trump comes out looking unprepared, its probably over.
It's cool that you think about me all the time.Quote:
Originally Posted by FPS_Russia
So you've gone from slobbering on Bernie Sanders's dick, to Jill Stein being the best thing ever, to an "airtight case for Trump", in like 6 weeks?
That is certainly a progression made by lots of sane, sensible people.
Quote:
Originally Posted by FPS_Russia
:laterfag
http://www.thedailybeast.com/article...lind-spot.html
Great article about how its all the media's fault.
and contains a hof line about why to vote for Trump: "for the taxes I pay, I deserve some comic relief"
My girl Rachel Maddow reporting polls released today showing Hillary up +1 in Texas
He has a 99% chance of winning Texas. I also saw a poll Trump plus 1 in Virginia. You start cherry picking polls with left/right wing slants you are going to make a fool out of yourself.Quote:
Originally Posted by big dick
Trump is up 2 on the CNN National Poll by the way. He is also up 3 points in Reuters nationally, and up 1 points on the LA Times poll which nailed the Clinton/Sanders race in CA. See anyone can cherry pick polls, stick with the averages. Clinton has a lead nationwide at the moment, but listening to Rachel Maddow, come on.
Rachel Maddow? You really watch her?
Are you really talking about someone's health? Aren't you constantly battling some sort of illness? Either you are a hypochondriac, or you are in worse shape than Hillary.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
Hillary is far more likely to be a "ruler" than TrumpQuote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
Right....
You remember Bernie Sanders, right? The guy who was your personal Lord and Savior for most of the past year? Let's see who he says to vote for.Quote:
FPS_Russia: Thank goodness you're ok I was worried sick about you. Come on B don't beat around the Bush. Tell us who we should vote for.
http://www.complex.com/life/2016/09/...halogical-liarQuote:
"It is trying to divide this country up. It is telling us that we are supposed to hate Muslims, we are supposed to hate Mexicans, if we are men we are supposed to hate women, we are supposed to hate anyone who is different than we are.
The truth is, if you look at Donald Trump’s record, what you find is this guy is a pathological liar," Sanders said. "I’m not talking about a little lie there, or stretching the truth there. I am talking about him coming up with things in his head that do not exist. There are psychological definitions there.
"No candidate is perfect," Sanders said. "We have to ask ourselves a very simple question: What are the issues and what are the positions of the candidates on those issues?" Sanders also stated, "I intend as a United States Senator, between now and Election Day, to do everything I can to make sure Donald Trump does not become the next President of the United States."
Lol at barry
Barry is proof hitler didn't kill all the retarded jews
You were looking in the mirror when you typed this right?Quote:
Originally Posted by DraymondHe has a 99% chance of winning Texas. I also saw a poll Trump plus 1 in Virginia. You start cherry picking polls with left/right wing slants you are going to make a fool out of yourself.Quote:
Originally Posted by big dick
Trump is up 2 on the CNN National Poll by the way. He is also up 3 points in Reuters nationally, and up 1 points on the LA Times poll which nailed the Clinton/Sanders race in CA. See anyone can cherry pick polls, stick with the averages. Clinton has a lead nationwide at the moment, but listening to Rachel Maddow, come on.
Rachel Maddow? You really watch her?
Or you were too busy listening to President Romney's speech?
Maddow sold out for Hillary. She better keep her ass in the studio if she doesn't want to hear some booing.Quote:
Originally Posted by DraymondHe has a 99% chance of winning Texas. I also saw a poll Trump plus 1 in Virginia. You start cherry picking polls with left/right wing slants you are going to make a fool out of yourself.Quote:
Originally Posted by big dick
Trump is up 2 on the CNN National Poll by the way. He is also up 3 points in Reuters nationally, and up 1 points on the LA Times poll which nailed the Clinton/Sanders race in CA. See anyone can cherry pick polls, stick with the averages. Clinton has a lead nationwide at the moment, but listening to Rachel Maddow, come on.
Rachel Maddow? You really watch her?
Found it, this one is hard to find. It shows that Hillary not only supports the TPP Hillary worked on the TPP. You might as well call it HPP: (Hillary's Pacific Partnership) It's pure corporate domination and it shows what a brazen liar she is on the subject. This is why we can't trust corporate media, they will fuck us in the case that there's a conflict of interest. If they mention the TPP it's to tell us Hillary against it.
Orwell 1984
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MrPW3RgiLbk
It's not 2010 anymore. Reddit is the largest English language message board ever, by a big margin. /r/The_Donald has 200,000 subscribers. /r/uncensorednews, which is overtly white supremacist, has 89,000. All of those people get to vote in other subs too.Quote:
Originally Posted by LarryLaffer
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mintjewlips
Was going to rep but didn't know which to choose. Fucking brutal/awful/wow
You can tell the election is nearing, half the field here have lost hold of reality
You're lucky to be Canadian.Quote:
Originally Posted by limitlesQuote:
Originally Posted by Mintjewlips
Was going to rep but didn't know which to choose. Fucking brutal/awful/wow
You can tell the election is nearing, half the field here have lost hold of reality
Limitles, the only person on the forum less coherent then a dead DelawareQuote:
Originally Posted by limitlesQuote:
Originally Posted by Mintjewlips
Was going to rep but didn't know which to choose. Fucking brutal/awful/wow
You can tell the election is nearing, half the field here have lost hold of reality
Now you see you've done it again. A fine line exists between getting a laugh or making someone hurt you.Quote:
Originally Posted by MintjewlipsLimitles, the only person on the forum less coherent then a dead DelawareQuote:
Originally Posted by limitles
Your first post was obv sick, but if you were simply aiming for a gut reaction laugh, you got one.
(something you didn't grasp)
Second post. Because I'm mentioned I'm biased but do not fuck with the memory of the recently departed.
Not funny. You aren't near his level.
And would ya'll inform your local school boards that teachers have been receiving, for decades it seems, "incentives" in a plot to eliminate the once proud word than from the elementary school curriculum.
https://theintercept.com/2016/09/06/...-surveillance/
The intercept's solid AF, HD photos galore. Check out the Orwellian name of this facility, that's a hell of a coincidence.
You will not believe the name of
"The NSA’s British Base at the Heart of U.S. Targeted Killing".
I'm going to listen to Bernie.
Sorry about trolling Reddit.
I've seen the light.
Hillary 2016
Imagine the war in the Middle East ended in our lifetime. It's a huge stretch, I know. Do you think the US would close down this operation?Quote:
Originally Posted by FPS_Russia
But of course this facility is not exclusively used for that war. Covert unsanctuined political assassination is a growing part of our game. Maybe the US targets are unsavory but it is all unilateral, arbitrary and immoral.
It is such a god damned shame the lazy people behind the Bourne franchise did not harness the beautiful raw material Snowden and others provided. Car chases in Vegas. Fuck you Matt Damon.
But I get that the "thank you for your service" simpletons and the Druff-style "I got nothing to hide" crowd would not abide the direction such a movie would be forced to take. Simply too political and commercially not viable in this era. USA, USA, USA!
Hillary is gonna have so much fun with these toys uninhibited by anything but a strictly political compass. The best way to neuter the damage Snowden did is to take the next big leap. She's up to the task.