I get the attempt at humor, but his mother has been dead for 40 years. Not even remotely clever, obviously not funny either. Try harder.Quote:
Originally Posted by BetCheckBet
Printable View
I get the attempt at humor, but his mother has been dead for 40 years. Not even remotely clever, obviously not funny either. Try harder.Quote:
Originally Posted by BetCheckBet
Friday, March 1
General Election: Trump vs. Biden
Forbes/HarrisX
Trump 52, Biden 48
Trump +4
General Election: Trump vs. Biden vs. Kennedy vs. West vs. Stein
Forbes/HarrisX
Trump 43, Biden 38, Kennedy 14, West 3, Stein 2
Trump +5
40 years eh?Quote:
Originally Posted by tgullI get the attempt at humor, but his mother has been dead for 40 years. Not even remotely clever, obviously not funny either. Try harder.Quote:
Originally Posted by BetCheckBet
Very pleased to see. Good life.
Donald Trump trial is close to where I live and not in West Palm Beach
https://twitter.com/SteveLovesAmmo/s...77206188499214
(My Sister in Law went yesterday)
Biden has a problem with racial demographics.
But not what you think. I'm not talking about white people.
Read this article: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/02/u...iena-poll.html
Here's one of the most problematic passages regarding Biden:
Quote:
One of the more ominous findings for Mr. Biden in the new poll is that the historical edge Democrats have held with working-class voters of color who did not attend college continues to erode.
Mr. Biden won 72 percent of those voters in 2020, according to exit polling, providing him with a nearly 50-point edge over Mr. Trump. Today, the Times/Siena poll showed Mr. Biden only narrowly leading among nonwhite voters who did not graduate from college: 47 percent to 41 percent.
That's a huge change. Biden went from almost 50 points up on Trump in 2020 with non-college-educated minority voters, to a 6 point edge.
According to the same article, Biden actually trails Trump with Latino voters. That used to be a reliable voting bloc for Democrats.
So it seems that Biden's erosion of support isn't due to an increase in white supremacists in this country. It's the minority voters who are tired of him and the Democratic Party.
This doesn't surprise me. Minority voters are not on board with all of the gender ideology nonsense, nor are they particularly happy with the way Democrats are letting criminals overrun their neighborhoods. Many minority voters have older-school, traditional values, and simply do not relate to a lot of the modern far-left nonsense. There's also an incorrect belief that Latinos support a lighter border policy (they don't), or that black voters support lesser policing and incarceration for criminals (they don't).
Say what you want about Trump, but he's the one who dislodged a lot of minority voters from the Democratic Party, especially Hispanic men. Prior to 2020, it was assumed that Texas would be turning blue sometime in the next decade, due to the increasing Hispanic population. That's no longer a target for Democrats, thanks to Trump's appeal to Hispanics. This effect might last even once Trump is out of office, and it might have saved the Republican Party on a national level.
Trump did something no other national Republican candidate could do in the modern era. He made a lot of minority voters come to the conclusion that the Democratic Party did not understand then, did not care about them, and were taking them for granted.
Trump has damaged the Republican Party in some ways, but this was one way he has tremendously helped.
Another right wing poll out:
General Election: Trump vs. Biden
NY Times/Siena
Trump 48, Biden 44
Trump +4
flies to shit
Communist Colorado Cunts LOSE
Biden campaign's strategy is basically to sit and do nothing, and hope America "wakes up" and realizes this is a "vote for democracy".
Yeah, good luck with that. January 6, 2021 isn't going to change people's minds at this point. Anyone voting against Trump because of that has already decided to do so.
How is Biden going to make up his huge erosion in support from minorities? They don't have answers.
There's also a belief in the Biden camp that people will decide the economy is great, and reelect Biden. But that's bullshit. The "great" economic numbers are a bunch of smoke and mirrors.
Is inflation down? Yes. But that doesn't mean that prices have retreated back to where they were a few years ago. It just means that the rapid increase in prices everywhere has slowed. People still look at grocery and restaurant prices, and remember how much cheaper things were just a few years ago. This is despite many people's salaries remaining relatively flat. So that impression isn't going away by November.
And the low unemployment numbers? Also misleading. There was a huge worker shortage brought on by COVID. Many people chose gig work during that time, and a lot of those people decided not to go back to traditional employment. As a result, jobs are plentiful, and have been ever since COVID. That doesn't mean the economy is strong -- just that there's not presently an issue where people seeking work can't find it.
The bottom line is that the public (correctly) perceives that everything is expensive now, from groceries to restaurants to housing to gasoline. They remember things were much better in all of these areas when Trump was President. That will be remembered in November.
I remember GHW Bush was living under a similar delusion in 1992. He really believed that the recession wasn't going to beat him. He assumed economic numbers would get better before election day, and that people would notice. The did get better, but people didn't notice because it hadn't been long enough, and he lost fairly decisively.
It is very hard to win reelection when people are unhappy with the economy.
And what about Trump's legal troubles and his other negative issues? Those are basically cancelled out (or more than cancelled out) by Biden's senility. Also, the Hunter stuff, while not likely to go anywhere legally, prevents Biden from posturing as the moral candidate. The public impression is that both guys are shady.
Trump is going to be the next President. Book it.
Well let’s put a little money on it. Say $500?Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
head to head, trump will beat biden. i will bet you $500 on that.Quote:
Originally Posted by JayjamiWell let’s put a little money on it. Say $500?Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
it means the choices must be trump and biden. if not, bet is void.
About two months ago I told you guys that SCOTUS would cite Section 5 of the 14th Amendment in overturning Colorado. That's exactly what they did. Section 5 is clearly written and easy to interpret. So why did so many legals minds miss it? I don't think the Colorado SC missed it. I think they ignored it and hoped everyone else would miss it. That's what libtards do. Ignore the law to to get their way. It's why liberals can never be trusted.
Trump v. Anderson, 601 U.S. ___ (2024) :
This case raises the question whether the States, in addition to Congress, may also enforce Section 3. We conclude that States may disqualify persons holding or attempting to hold state office. But States have no power under the Constitution to enforce Section 3 with respect to federal offices, especially the Presidency.Instead, it is Congress that has long given effect to Section 3 with respect to would-be or existing federal office-holders.
Moreover, permitting state enforcement of Section 3 against federal officeholders and candidates would raise se-rious questions about the scope of that power.
ANY STATE ENFORCEMENT OF SECTION 3 AGAINST FEDERAL OFFICE-HOLDERS AND CANDIDATES, THOUGH, WOULD NOT DERIVE FROM SECTION 5, WHICH CONFERS POWER ONLY ON CONGRESS.
For the reasons given, responsibility for enforcing Section3 against federal officeholders and candidates rests with Congress and not the States.
Jayjami is getting value that is not present with the Trump v Biden proposition. I’d pass on that too as Jayjami did.Quote:
Originally Posted by JayjamiWell let’s put a little money on it. Say $500?Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
Jay’s praying on Druff’s overly simply analysis.
The election in one chart.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
For you simps: Red is republican (angry working class populism). Blue is elites. (Democrat money)
The chart serves to explain California. Daly doesn’t offer an explanation but perhaps the working class poor in the California hills are in his thoughts and prayers
Last 10 days we added $100b to national debt.
$3t more debt is expected and will ring the register at $37t end of year.
Not a peep from the candidates.
Limitles’ cherished Beatles wrote a song in the late 60’s “Taxman”. British taxes were 90% for the wealthy. The rock stars of that era became tax exiles.
This is the golden age of taxation.
The national debt is simply unsustainable and is our nation’s most serious issue… yet not a peep. Men in dresses is the problem from what i hear.
Druff thinks he’s knows what other groups are thinking. Just because his Mexican maid and gardener humored him and told him they are voting for Trump doesn’t mean they will actually do so.Quote:
Originally Posted by SanlmarJayjami is getting value that is not present with the Trump v Biden proposition. I’d pass on that too as Jayjami did.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jayjami
Jay’s praying on Druff’s overly simply analysis.
Wonder which border crossing the maid and gardner chose?Quote:
Originally Posted by JayjamiDruff thinks he’s knows what other groups are thinking. Just because his Mexican maid and gardener humored him and told him they are voting for Trump doesn’t mean they will actually do so.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sanlmar
I heard NPR break out the Laffer curve this morning.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sanlmar
How much can you tax the population before the incentive to work is extinguished?
Tax increases are coming. The only question is how much.
Moore endorses Trump:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=suJu...9uYWxkIHRydW1w
funny how these idiots are reversing course on Trump, it was idiots like Moore that independents and young people voted for Biden.... but i will go ahead and say it again that the 2020 election was stolen/rigged from Trump, just enough for Biden to "win".... and my spidey senses are telling me that the same thing is gonna happen in 2024....
Dems are vehemently opposed to voter ID to insure that voter fraud will occurQuote:
Originally Posted by 1dollarboxcar
Voter fraud.. LMAO. You mean the 473 verified cases that were found from the 155 million ballots cast in 2020? And more of those coming from the GOP side than the dem side? https://thehill.com/homenews/preside...-fraud-in-six/Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmDems are vehemently opposed to voter ID to insure that voter fraud will occurQuote:
Originally Posted by 1dollarboxcar
I can't believe that Druff hasn't called this bullshit claim out more vehemently. Instead I've heard him say that "the dems are wrong for saying that there is "no" fraud. There is always some fraud." -- Yeah some fraud .0003% of ballots cast.
LOL! The Hill? Why don't you just quote the communist manifesto. You used a false premise to beget a false premise that .0003% of ballots were involved. 99% of voter fraud has gone undetected or ignored.Quote:
Originally Posted by BartHansonVoter fraud.. LMAO. You mean the 473 verified cases that were found from the 155 million ballots cast in 2020? And more of those coming from the GOP side than the dem side? https://thehill.com/homenews/preside...-fraud-in-six/Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
I can't believe that Druff hasn't called this bullshit claim out more vehemently. Instead I've heard him say that "the dems are wrong for saying that there is "no" fraud. There is always some fraud." -- Yeah some fraud .0003% of ballots cast.
First there is not another country in the world that doesn't require ID to vote. Countries more liberal than the US. Why are liberals in those countries not crying out to end voter ID?
You are not stupid enough to believe dems when they say they are against voter ID because it discriminates against blacks, are you? Well, if you are then you and the dems should be working towards ending ID requirements for.
Buying:
A gun
alcohol
cigarettes
bar or casino
hunting/fishing license
hotel rooms
get married
get on an airplane
rent a car
unemployment
medicaid or social security
welfare/food stamps
bank account
Oh! And get this one, check a book out from the library.
It's not racist that you have to show ID for all the above but it is racist if you require ID'ing voters?
It's not only a myth that some blacks don't have ID-do you really think they would forgo everything on the above list by not having ID?-it's also racist as hell to think they are stupid enough not to have ID.
So minorities not having ID is not the true reason dems are against voter ID. The true reason they are against it is they benefit from voter fraud.
Want to see dems flip flop on voter ID? When conservatives commit voter fraud in larger numbers than dems....then you will see dems support voter ID.
Trump is awful, fuck him, fuck Biden too this is a lose lose scenario for the greatest country on earth
Trump can win this election rather easily if he picks the right VP. Almost certainly neither Biden or Trump will make it through 2028. People know that. Kamala Harris is universally despised by just about everyone. If Trump picks say a Tim Scott or Marco Rubio, someone the establishment can get behind he will win going away. If he picks another MAGA candidate, he will likely lose. All he really needs to do is win the suburbs in MI and he has got it, because Georgia, Arizona and Nevada are done for Biden. The lead for Trump is simply too large to overcome at this point in those states. But he needs MI or PA and the only way to get one of those is to have the Republican establishment getting excited about the VP, knowing they could be president for 10+ years.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tgull
GA will go red this time around. And yes, i am willing to bet on it.
I am at a loss why the Dems aren’t takiing this opportunity to establish a National Digital ID. Keep track of your vaccines and get that CBDC Fed account number establishedQuote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmLOL! The Hill? Why don't you just quote the communist manifesto. You used a false premise to beget a false premise that .0003% of ballots were involved. 99% of voter fraud has gone undetected or ignored.Quote:
Originally Posted by BartHanson
First there is not another country in the world that doesn't require ID to vote. Countries more liberal than the US. Why are liberals in those countries not crying out to end voter ID?
You are not stupid enough to believe dems when they say they are against voter ID because it discriminates against blacks, are you? Well, if you are then you and the dems should be working towards ending ID requirements for.
Buying:
A gun
alcohol
cigarettes
bar or casino
hunting/fishing license
hotel rooms
get married
get on an airplane
rent a car
unemployment
medicaid or social security
welfare/food stamps
bank account
Oh! And get this one, check a book out from the library.
It's not racist that you have to show ID for all the above but it is racist if you require ID'ing voters?
It's not only a myth that some blacks don't have ID-do you really think they would forgo everything on the above list by not having ID?-it's also racist as hell to think they are stupid enough not to have ID.
So minorities not having ID is not the true reason dems are against voter ID. The true reason they are against it is they benefit from voter fraud.
Want to see dems flip flop on voter ID? When conservatives commit voter fraud in larger numbers than dems....then you will see dems support voter ID.
Druff would approve
Talk about a way to get exactly 0% of evangelicals, even the black ones. They’ve been screaming mark of the beast at literally everything since I was 5.Quote:
Originally Posted by SanlmarI am at a loss why the Dems aren’t takiing this opportunity to establish a National Digital ID. Keep track of your vaccines and get that CBDC Fed account number establishedQuote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
Druff would approve
Why not just eliminate ID entirely, then?Quote:
Originally Posted by BartHansonVoter fraud.. LMAO. You mean the 473 verified cases that were found from the 155 million ballots cast in 2020? And more of those coming from the GOP side than the dem side? https://thehill.com/homenews/preside...-fraud-in-six/Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
I can't believe that Druff hasn't called this bullshit claim out more vehemently. Instead I've heard him say that "the dems are wrong for saying that there is "no" fraud. There is always some fraud." -- Yeah some fraud .0003% of ballots cast.
We can just trust the population to always be who they say they are, and never to cheat, scam, or steal.
If an "acceptable" percentage of the population does it, no problem, right?
The "verified cases" of this type of voter fraud are way way way undercounted. I could register at 10 different precincts under fake names, around where I live, vote at each one of them, and the chance of getting caught would be just about zero point zero. Because how would they catch me? As long as you know the info you put down, they have no reason to suspect anything is wrong.
If you have no ID, you have much bigger problems with day-to-day life than being unable to vote. Republicans have, in the past, proposed ways for people to get ID easier, such as making it simpler to get a birth certificate copy. Democrats weren't interested. It's not really about giving the right to vote to people who can't get ID. It's getting votes for people who don't WANT ID, and almost all of them vote Dem.
Pennsylvania: Trump vs. Biden
FOX News
Trump 49, Biden 47
Trump
+2
Pennsylvania: Trump vs. Biden vs. Kennedy vs. West vs. Stein
FOX News
Trump 42, Biden 42, Kennedy 9, Stein 2, West 2
Tie
Arizona: Trump vs. Biden
FOX News
Trump 49, Biden 45
Trump
+4
Arizona: Trump vs. Biden vs. Kennedy vs. West vs. Stein
FOX News
Trump 43, Biden 39, Kennedy 10, West 2, Stein 1
Trump
+4
YEAH!
Ohio: Trump vs. Biden
The Hill/Emerson
Trump 55, Biden 45
Trump +10:yes2
Word has it Trump is already beginning to round out his cabinet. Outside a Trump medical issue, given inflation and the state of the world, this thing is about over. Biden is not going to flip every battleground state at this point. By the way, these polls are after the State of the Union address which MSNBC and CNN deemed so great they were almost orgasmic. Yeah, not so much.
Michigan: Trump vs. Biden
Quinnipiac
Trump 48, Biden 45
Trump
+3
Michigan: Trump vs. Biden vs. Kennedy vs. West vs. Stein
Quinnipiac
Trump 41, Biden 36, Kennedy 10, Stein 4, West 3
Trump
+5
Pennsylvania: Trump vs. Biden
The Hill/Emerson
Trump 52, Biden 48
Trump
+4
Pennsylvania: Trump vs. Biden
FOX News
Trump 49, Biden 47
Trump
+2
Arizona: Trump vs. Biden
FOX News
Trump 49, Biden 45
Trump
+4
Pennsylvania: Trump vs. Biden vs. Kennedy vs. West vs. Stein
FOX News
Trump 42, Biden 42, Kennedy 9, Stein 2, West 2
Tie
Pennsylvania: Trump vs. Biden vs. Kennedy vs. West vs. Stein
The Hill/Emerson
Trump 44, Biden 40, Kennedy 5, Stein 1, West 1
Trump
+4
Arizona: Trump vs. Biden vs. Kennedy vs. West vs. Stein
FOX News
Trump 43, Biden 39, Kennedy 10, West 2, Stein 1
Trump
+4
Nevada: Trump vs. Biden
Noble Predictive Insights
Trump 45, Biden 40
Trump
+5
Nevada: Trump vs. Biden vs. Kennedy vs. West vs. Stein
Noble Predictive Insights
Trump 40, Biden 33, Kennedy 11, West 4, Stein 2
Trump
+7
Ohio: Trump vs. Biden
ONU/SurveyUSA
Trump 50, Biden 38
Trump
+12
Ohio: Trump vs. Biden vs. Kennedy
ONU/SurveyUSA
Trump 44, Biden 32, Kennedy 13
Trump
+12
Trump supporters put together some pretty good pro Trump propaganda.
I thought this one was good.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/dDFqzhaM7cBp/
https://twitter.com/RpsAgainstTrump/...42883006308689
This is not the unbiased, same party criticism it appears to be.
Trump’s 2016 campaign repeatedly bashed the Bush years and the Cheney-advised Iraq War.
Even if you agree with Cheney, know that this isn’t just a concerned Republican voicing objections.
This is personal.
All the libs are running around saying, "OMG LOOK EVEN DICK CHENEY THINKS TRUMP IS DANGEROUS, SEE GUYZZZ!!"
As if they ever listened to Dick Cheney. And as if this was an unbiased statement.
So dumb.
LOL Team Retard