Laura Loomer? Seriously this is the nut job you want to quote. She is such a right wing nut job that even another nut job Marjorie Taylor Greene calls her out. LMAOQuote:
Originally Posted by Tyde
Printable View
Laura Loomer? Seriously this is the nut job you want to quote. She is such a right wing nut job that even another nut job Marjorie Taylor Greene calls her out. LMAOQuote:
Originally Posted by Tyde
:lol4Quote:
Originally Posted by hutmaster
yea you’re right hut…
they’re all ‘nut jobs’
anyone and everyone in the country to dares align themselves with conservatism, and sides with arguably the most popular, and effective president in American history
the same guy who happens to be the odds on favorite to win back the White House in 2024…leaps and bounds ahead of the field
according to your TDS dumb ass, basically 1/2 the population who support Trump…over 80 million voters are all…
‘nut jobs’
DEAL WITH IT ^^
I don't agree with Loomer that Haley is ineligible for the presidency. But Loomer broke the story. There was no one else to quote at the time.Quote:
Originally Posted by hutmasterLaura Loomer? Seriously this is the nut job you want to quote. She is such a right wing nut job that even another nut job Marjorie Taylor Greene calls her out. LMAOQuote:
Originally Posted by Tyde
Loomer reported that she discovered that Nikki Haley was an anchor baby. Forget the messenger and concentrate on the message. Is the message true or not?
PS: You are a nut job for thinking MTG is a nut job.
I'm taking a look back at the predictions made by our liberal friends on election night 2016 when it became apparent Trump was going to win. It should give us a clue as to the value of their predictions if Trump wins the 2024 election.Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatine
Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmI'm taking a look back at the predictions made by our liberal friends on election night 2016 when it became apparent Trump was going to win. It should give us a clue as to the value of their predictions if Trump wins the 2024 election.Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatine
I found the menu at Trump National to be reasonably priced
The Trump Burger is a bargain
Man of the People
And right on cue, your response is to simply lie or make deflections and not actually address the issue. Do you actually read and believe the crap that you spew? Trump the most effective president in history? You want to call someone deranged then just look in the mirror.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tydeyea you’re right hut…
they’re all ‘nut jobs’
anyone and everyone in the country to dares align themselves with conservatism, and sides with arguably the most popular, and effective president in American history
the same guy who happens to be the odds on favorite to win back the White House in 2024…leaps and bounds ahead of the field
according to your TDS dumb ass, basically 1/2 the population who support Trump…over 80 million voters are all…
‘nut jobs’
DEAL WITH IT ^^
This take on the 14th amendment is parroted everywhere by people who have never looked into the facts.Quote:
Originally Posted by hutmaster
This is from over 5 years ago:
Quote:
Originally Posted by VaughnP
Only posting the tweet screenshot because even a widely respected progressive historian/law professor went public with admitting it's a bullshit take that actually needs challenged.
https://youtu.be/89gbIYJLS0A?si=W7zcF6R8AIfQ6XOj
:lol4
keep swinging for the fences libtards
I wonder if Hillary’s testosterone levels have declined with ageQuote:
Originally Posted by TydeQuote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
and you trumppanzees have done nothing but lose sinceQuote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmI'm taking a look back at the predictions made by our liberal friends on election night 2016 when it became apparent Trump was going to win. It should give us a clue as to the value of their predictions if Trump wins the 2024 election.Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatine
MAGA will get rocked again in 2024 in local state and national elections
since 2016 MAGA has done noting but lose and its a fact and it isnt debatable . You losers still know what a fact is right?
As we head into 2024, the conventional wisdom is that Democrats are on the back foot for next year’s elections. But there are three reasons I am optimistic that 2024 is going to be a good year for Democrats:
First, President Joe Biden has kept his central promise in the 2020 election: that he would lead the nation to the other side of Covid, successfully. The pandemic has receded. Our economic recovery has been better than any other G7 nation. GDP grew at an annual rate of 4.9% last quarter, and more than 3% for the Biden presidency. We have the best job market since the 1960s and the lowest uninsured rate in U.S. history. The Dow Jones broke 37,000 this month for the first time. Wage growth, new business formation and prime-age labor participation rates are all at historically elevated levels. Prices fell — yes, fell — last month. Rents are softening, and gas prices and crime rates are falling. Domestic oil and renewable production are at record levels. The annual deficit, which exploded under Trump, is trillions less today.
Consumer sentiment has risen sharply in recent weeks, and measures of life, job and income satisfaction are remarkably high. There is no doubt that recent years have been hard — Covid, an insurrection at the Capitol, the Russian invasion of Ukraine, repeated OPEC price hikes, global and domestic inflation — but it is increasingly clear that America is getting to the other side of this challenging period, and are in a far better place than when President Biden took office.
Second, the strength of the president’s record is only matched by the strength of his party. I don’t think it is widely understood how strong the Democratic Party is right now. The party has won more votes in seven of the past eight presidential elections, something no party has done in modern American history. Over the last four presidential elections, Democrats have averaged 51% of the popular vote, their best showing over four national elections since the 1930s.
In both 2022 and 2023, Democrats prevented the historical down ballot struggle of the party in power and had two remarkably successful elections. In the 2022 midterms, Democrats’ statewide margins were greater than the 2020 presidential margins in Arizona, Colorado, Georgia, Michigan, Minnesota, New Hampshire and Pennsylvania — all recent battleground states. That showing led the party to pick up a Senate seat, four state legislative chambers and two governorships, and helped keep the House of Representatives close, making it far more likely Republicans lose it in 2024.
This year, Democrats flipped a Supreme Court seat in Wisconsin; defeated a six-week abortion ban in Ohio; kept the Virginia state house, debunking the idea that Republicans could hide behind a 15-week abortion ban; and took state legislative seats, municipalities and school board seats across the country. Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear, a Democrat, grew his margin of victory from 2019, and Republicans lost mayoral elections in Colorado Springs, Colorado, and Jacksonville, Florida, two of the largest GOP-controlled cities in the country. And in over three dozen state legislative special elections around the country, Democrats outperformed 2020 – an election we won by 4.5 percentage points — by an average of 5 percentage points.
While in 2022, Republicans could point to gains in New York and California to offset their losses in the battleground states, there were no places in 2023 where they outperformed expectations. A blue wave washed across the U.S. in 2023, and this ongoing strong performance of the Democratic Party in election after election, in all parts of the country, should fill Biden’s supporters with confidence.
Finally, while Democrats keep winning, conventional wisdom continues to overly discount Trump’s historic baggage and MAGA’s repeated electoral failures. Despite these repeated failures, Republicans are on the cusp of nominating Trump again, who this time is an even more degraded and dangerous version of MAGA than he was in 2020.
Two things have happened to Trump since 2020 that are going to make it very hard for him to win in 2024 — the stripping away of women’s reproductive rights, and his attempt to overturn the 2020 election and end American democracy for all time. Additionally, this year courts have already determined that he sexually abused journalist E. Jean Carroll in a department store; oversaw a yearslong financial fraud; and led a party-wide effort, involving hundreds of Republican leaders and thousands of willing allies, to overturn the last election, culminating in a violent attack on Congress.
Democrats will be able to argue that no one is more responsible for overturning Roe v. Wade than Trump; that his mishandling of classified documents is to blame for the most serious security breach in American history; that in concert with Russian President Vladimir Putin he will end the global liberal order that has brought America and the world unprecedented prosperity and peace; that he supports more dead kids in schools, a faster warming planet, lost health insurance for tens of millions of Americans and the end of American democracy for all time. Trump represents an unprecedented threat to the country, is even more extreme than 2020, and has, in political parlance, the highest “negatives” of any candidate perhaps in our history. It is going to be very hard for him to win next year.
For all these reasons, as we head into 2024, I am optimistic that Joe Biden and the Democrats will once again beat Donald Trump, and hopefully, this time, send MAGA into the dustbin of history where it belongs.
the daily mail released a poll conducted j.l. partners of likely us voters. Use one word to describe what biden n trump wants in their 2nd term. convert answers into a word cloud and release. trump posts his word cloud on truth social. why?
biden's cloud results are nothing, economy, peace.
yet another swing and a miss for unhinged libtards
Appeals court denies case delay over Trump immunity claim in E. Jean Carroll suit
A federal appeals court on Thursday denied a request by former President Trump to pause author E. Jean Carroll’s defamation case against him while the Supreme Court considers his claim of immunity.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in New York issued a single-page denial of the appeal, two weeks after ruling that Trump cannot assert presidential immunity in the Carroll case.
Trump’s lawyers had asked for a 90-day pause in Carroll’s motion, writing “the denial of this right would upend the longstanding rule that lower courts are divested of jurisdiction for the pendency of an immunity-related appeal.”
In the earlier ruling, the Second Circuit ruled Trump had already waived immunity by failing to assert it in 2019.
Carroll alleged the former president raped her in a New York department store in the mid-1990s, a claim Trump has repeatedly denied, and sued him in 2019. A jury found the former president liable for sexual assault, battery and defamation in May and awarded her $5 million but found she had not proven rape. Carroll has since sued Trump a second time for defamation, with a federal judge already finding him liable. A trial to determine damages is set to begin Jan. 16 to determine the amount the former president owes.
Trump countersued Carroll in June for continuing to assert he raped her after the first verdict, but Judge Lewis Kaplan, the judge in both cases, dismissed the counterclaim in August.
Maine’s top election official removes Trump from 2024 ballot
Maine’s top election official has removed former President Donald Trump from the state’s 2024 ballot, in a surprising decision based on the 14th Amendment’s “insurrectionist ban.”
The decision makes Maine the second state to disqualify Trump from office, after the Colorado Supreme Court handed down its own stunning ruling that removed him from the ballot earlier this month. The development is a significant victory for Trump’s critics, who say they’re trying to enforce a constitutional provision that was designed to protect the country from anti-democratic insurrectionists.
Maine Secretary of State Shenna Bellows, a Democrat, issued the decision Thursday after presiding over an administrative hearing earlier this month about Trump’s eligibility for office. A bipartisan group of former state lawmakers filed the challenge against Trump.
Bellows’ decision can be appealed in state court, and it’s all but assured that Trump’s side will challenge this outcome.
“I do not reach this conclusion lightly,” Bellows wrote. “Democracy is sacred … I am mindful that no Secretary of State has ever deprived a presidential candidate of ballot access based on Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment. I am also mindful, however, that no presidential candidate has ever before engaged in insurrection.”
Most legal experts believe the US Supreme Court will settle the issue for the entire country.
Still, the Maine decision builds on the momentum that Trump’s critics have claimed after the Colorado ruling. Before Colorado, several other states, like Michigan and Minnesota, rejected similar efforts.
Ratified after the Civil War, the 14th Amendment says American officials who “engage in” insurrection can’t hold future office. But the provision is vague and doesn’t say how the ban should be enforced.
Trump denies wrongdoing regarding January 6, 2021, and says the legal challenges are meritless.
https://www.cnn.com/2023/12/28/polit...lot/index.html
What a profoundly ignorant tweet. The impeccable legal logic for invoking the 14th Amendment is detailed in a law review article by two prominent conservative legal scholars who are eminently more qualified to opine on this matter than Mark Levin, who reveals his colors as a partisan hack. If Levin has any issues with the logic outlined by Professors William Baude and Michael Stokes he should state them. Otherwise, it's just another example of flooding the zone with shit to sway the uninformed. That is unconscionable.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tellafriend
Home run.
following the law is now "fascist" LOLQuote:
Originally Posted by Tellafriend
What a great strategy!!Quote:
Originally Posted by cleatusHome run.
WE WONT VOTE AT ALL LOL
So much winning
Pretty sure Judge Wallace has some "leagl training in her backround"Quote:
Originally Posted by Tellafriend
A Colorado court makes it official: Trump is an insurrectionist
For the first time, a judge, having heard evidence and conducted a hearing under section 3 of the 14th Amendment, has stated unequivocally that Donald Trump committed an “insurrection against the Constitution.” Section 3 provides:
“No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office . . . under the United States . . .who, having previously taken an oath, . . . as an officer of the United States . . . to support the Constitution . . . shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same . . . .”
As Judge Sarah Wallace puts it in her 102-page decision: “The court finds that . . .Trump engaged in an insurrection on January 6, 2021 through incitement, and that the First Amendment does not protect Trump’s speech.”
Thus, the Colorado court has both affirmed the commitment to truth that animates the justice system under the rule of law and set another marker of Trump’s deviation from constitutional governance. The court’s decision makes a record for history.
The plaintiffs in the case built on the work of scholars and commentators who concluded that Trump was a federal “officer” during his term as president and that his involvement in the run-up to Jan. 6, 2021, and the events of that day were acts of insurrection.
https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciar...surrectionist/
Quote:
Originally Posted by vpbobWhat a profoundly ignorant tweet. The impeccable legal logic for invoking the 14th Amendment is detailed in a law review article by two prominent conservative legal scholars who are eminently more qualified to opine on this matter than Mark Levin, who reveals his colors as a partisan hack. If Levin has any issues with the logic outlined by Professors William Baude and Michael Stokes he should state them. Otherwise, it's just another example of flooding the zone with shit to sway the uninformed. That is unconscionable.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tellafriend
i am eager to hear all about her legal training and knowledge in constitutional law. jesus you people.
Honorable Shenna Bellows
Maine's 50th Secretary of StateShenna Bellows image
Secretary of State Shenna Bellows is Maine’s 50th Secretary of State, sworn into her first two-year term in the position on Jan. 4, 2021. Secretary Bellows is Maine’s first female Secretary of State.
Secretary Bellows previously served two terms in the Maine Senate from 2016-2020, representing 11 towns in southern Kennebec County. In the Maine Senate, she served as Senate Chair of the Labor and Housing Committee and served on the Judiciary Committee. She was a 2020 presidential elector in the Electoral College.
Secretary Bellows led the Holocaust and Human Rights Center of Maine as executive director from 2018 to 2020. Previously, she owned Bellows & Company, a non-profit consulting business, where she worked with organizations such as the Sierra Club’s Maine Chapter, Consumers for Affordable Healthcare and the Maine Women’s Lobby. She also served as interim executive director of LearningWorks. In 2014, Secretary Bellows was the Democratic nominee for United States Senate in Maine.
From 2005 to 2013, Secretary Bellows was executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Maine. She was a member of the first Right to Know Advisory Committee and the Maine Freedom of Information Coalition. She served on the Executive Committee of the 2009 and 2012 ballot campaigns to pass marriage equality in Maine, and co-chaired a successful 2011 statewide ballot campaign to restore same-day voter registration. She was an original member of the Committee for Ranked Choice Voting.
Currently, Secretary Bellows is serving on the National Association of Secretaries of State (NASS) Elections, Cybersecurity, State Records and Archives, Business Services, and International Relations Committees. She was a member of the bipartisan 2021 NASS Task Force on Vote Verification. She serves as Secretary on the Elections Infrastructure Information Sharing & Analysis Center (EI-ISAC) Executive Committee. She is also a member of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency’s Election Infrastructure Subsector Government Coordinating Council. She previously served as co-chair of The Council of State Governments (CSG) 2021-2022 Healthy States National Task Force Civic Health Subcommittee. Additionally, she is a member of the University of Maine at Augusta Board of Visitors.
Secretary Bellows grew up in Hancock and is a graduate of Ellsworth High School. She holds a B.A. in International Politics and Economics from Middlebury College. She volunteered with the Peace Corps in Panama and AmeriCorps VISTA in Nashville, Tennessee.
Secretary Bellows lives with her husband, Brandon, in Manchester.
And here i was thinking "telly" must despise the Maine SOS
Nice of you to post her resume to prove that she is extremely qualified for her position
I'm a little stunned .You gonna turn over a new leaf and actually advocate for the constitution and actually defend the rule of law in The United States?
Pretty sure Judge Wallace has some "leagl training in her backround"Quote:
Originally Posted by TellafriendQuote:
Originally Posted by vpbob
i am eager to hear all about her legal training and knowledge in constitutional law. jesus you people.
A Colorado court makes it official: Trump is an insurrectionist
For the first time, a judge, having heard evidence and conducted a hearing under section 3 of the 14th Amendment, has stated unequivocally that Donald Trump committed an “insurrection against the Constitution.” Section 3 provides:
“No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office . . . under the United States . . .who, having previously taken an oath, . . . as an officer of the United States . . . to support the Constitution . . . shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same . . . .”
As Judge Sarah Wallace puts it in her 102-page decision: “The court finds that . . .Trump engaged in an insurrection on January 6, 2021 through incitement, and that the First Amendment does not protect Trump’s speech.”
Thus, the Colorado court has both affirmed the commitment to truth that animates the justice system under the rule of law and set another marker of Trump’s deviation from constitutional governance. The court’s decision makes a record for history.
The plaintiffs in the case built on the work of scholars and commentators who concluded that Trump was a federal “officer” during his term as president and that his involvement in the run-up to Jan. 6, 2021, and the events of that day were acts of insurrection.
https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciar...surrectionist/
All 7 judges on the Colorado SC AGREED TRUMP IS AN INSURRECTIONSIST
3 republicans and 4 dems
Quote:
Originally Posted by big dick
that you are impressed with the "resume" from this political hack says all one needs to know about your understanding of the world.
You're a lawyer and you're losing an argument about LAW to a guy who isnt a lawyer.Quote:
Originally Posted by TellafriendQuote:
Originally Posted by big dick
that you are impressed with the "resume" from this political hack says all one needs to know about your understanding of the world.
It obviously isn't because I know more about law than you, ofc I don't.
It's because you are defending the indefensible.
Pointless going back n forth with you. No benefit to me or you. Waste of time and energy that I could be using in more productive ways.
I dont intend on spending my 2024 trying to convince you and other MAGA people that what you're supporting is beyond wrong and on top of that very dangerous to our country
I hope you and your family have a good 2024 (besides politically)
Section 5 of the 14th amendment gives Congress sole authority to enforce Section 3. No rights were given to the states. The Colorado decision was not just wrong, it was unlawful.Quote:
Originally Posted by big dickPretty sure Judge Wallace has some "leagl training in her backround"Quote:
Originally Posted by Tellafriend
A Colorado court makes it official: Trump is an insurrectionist
For the first time, a judge, having heard evidence and conducted a hearing under section 3 of the 14th Amendment, has stated unequivocally that Donald Trump committed an “insurrection against the Constitution.” Section 3 provides:
“No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office . . . under the United States . . .who, having previously taken an oath, . . . as an officer of the United States . . . to support the Constitution . . . shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same . . . .”
As Judge Sarah Wallace puts it in her 102-page decision: “The court finds that . . .Trump engaged in an insurrection on January 6, 2021 through incitement, and that the First Amendment does not protect Trump’s speech.”
Thus, the Colorado court has both affirmed the commitment to truth that animates the justice system under the rule of law and set another marker of Trump’s deviation from constitutional governance. The court’s decision makes a record for history.
The plaintiffs in the case built on the work of scholars and commentators who concluded that Trump was a federal “officer” during his term as president and that his involvement in the run-up to Jan. 6, 2021, and the events of that day were acts of insurrection.
https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciar...surrectionist/
All 7 judges on the Colorado SC AGREED TRUMP IS AN INSURRECTIONSIST
3 republicans and 4 dems
SCOTUS is going to tell you that per Section 5 they are overturning the Colorado decision. You heard it here first.
Yeah they will probably overrule the CO SC decision but they wont do it because they are following the text written in the constitutionQuote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmSection 5 of the 14th amendment gives Congress sole authority to enforce Section 3. No rights were given to the states. The Colorado decision was not just wrong, it was unlawful.Quote:
Originally Posted by big dick
SCOTUS is going to tell you that per Section 5 they are overturning the Colorado decision. You heard it here first.
You need not worry about this tho mickey
You need to worry about the trials because once he is found guilty and he will be found guilty trump loses 1/4 of republican supporters who currently support him. You heard it here first
Do you think trump commited any crimes at all? Or is all just one big witch hunt? Do you think he has commited even single crime?
No, Trump won't lose conservative support if convicted by kangaroo courts. Thats just a delusion you lefty fascists have. You idiots are so afraid of Trump you are throwing everything but the kitchen sink at him in hopes of stopping him.Quote:
Originally Posted by big dickYeah they will probably overrule the CO SC decision but they wont do it because they are following the text written in the constitutionQuote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
You need not worry about this tho mickey
You need to worry about the trials because once he is found guilty and he will be found guilty trump loses 1/4 of republican supporters who currently support him. You heard it here first
Do you think trump commited any crimes at all? Or is all just one big witch hunt? Do you think he has commited even single crime?
LOL at this Cassidy Hutchinson grifter. She was a low level White House aide for a few months, obscure, and now is running around the country saying Trump is a threat to Democracy. Hilarious people are paying attention to her, she was 24 years at the time and was around for like 8 months.
What she leaves out is she had a job in Mara Lago set up after Trump left office, and the day before she was to start the offer was pulled. Yep, all of a sudden she now hates Trump and he is a threat to democracy and going to destroy the world. TDS is real people, but I think most are just using it to make money off of Trumps name.
I get a guy like Michael Cohen going after Trump, they knew each other for 25 years and probably spoke almost every day and Trump kicked him to the curb because he outlived his usefulness. I get that one, but Cassidy Hutchinson? People actually bought her book, if you did you are not smart. Now she says she is going to do everything she can to stop him from being elected, like she has one scintilla of power and influence.
:lol4
Kangaroo courts?Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmNo, Trump won't lose conservative support if convicted by kangaroo courts. Thats just a delusion you lefty fascists have. You idiots are so afraid of Trump you are throwing everything but the kitchen sink at him in hopes of stopping him.Quote:
Originally Posted by big dick
You are brainwashed dude and most likely have systematically been since the 90s by Limbaugh and the other lying sacks of shit
Almost a quarter of Trump supporters oppose having him on ticket if convicted: Survey
BY LAUREN IRWIN - 12/20/23 7:52 AM ET
Nearly a quarter of former President Trump’s supporters say he should not be the Republican nominee for president in 2024 if he is convicted of a crime, according to a survey released Tuesday.
The New York Times/Siena College poll found 24 percent of respondents who said they would vote for Trump in the upcoming election also say he should not be the nominee if found guilty in one of his legal trials, “even if he has won the most votes.”
https://thehill.com/homenews/campaig...victed-survey/
Now go ahead and move the goalposts like you and the other MAGAS do
"the poll is fake"
" its a democratic pollster"
You'll think of something.
Don't have to move the goalposts when those, ahem, "polls" were conducted by left wing propagandists. With every charge against him Trump continues to go up in the real polls.Quote:
Originally Posted by big dickKangaroo courts?Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
You are brainwashed dude and most likely have systematically been since the 90s by Limbaugh and the other lying sacks of shit
Almost a quarter of Trump supporters oppose having him on ticket if convicted: Survey
BY LAUREN IRWIN - 12/20/23 7:52 AM ET
Nearly a quarter of former President Trump’s supporters say he should not be the Republican nominee for president in 2024 if he is convicted of a crime, according to a survey released Tuesday.
The New York Times/Siena College poll found 24 percent of respondents who said they would vote for Trump in the upcoming election also say he should not be the nominee if found guilty in one of his legal trials, “even if he has won the most votes.”
https://thehill.com/homenews/campaig...victed-survey/
Now go ahead and move the goalposts like you and the other MAGAS do
"the poll is fake"
" its a democratic pollster"
You'll think of something.
I’m not sure you can be found guilty for trying to subvert democracy when we don’t live in a democracy. That’s like getting arrested for vehicular manslaughter after hitting a mannequin.
The world is so unfair to peacemakers.
Rappers for Trump:
https://x.com/dom_lucre/status/17419...z2Z7235_7wPd_w
lol CNN nixed RAM from the Iowa republican debate saying only Trump, DeSantis and Haley qualified.
But Trump pulled a fast one on all of them. Instead of going to the Iowa debate Trump will be doing an Iowa Town Hall to be broadcast by FNC at the same time as the CNN debate.
CNN, DeSantis and Haley are all pissed. Because guess which show will get all the views. Lol
Nice post, but this belongs in the “na[i]ggers doing dumb things” thread.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm