It will cost me 56 cents

I've nothing against ole split arse. But I know jealous ho behaviour when I see it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by splitthis

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tellafriend

So where are we at with your nude pics?

---

You werent born then Son.

---

Try me, I'm in my mid 40s.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Lord of the Fraud

I've nothing against ole split arse. But I know jealous ho behaviour when I see it.

---

FFS quit being soooo retarded.

Split goes back and has never had an issue with another woman because of her sex. Anyone that's been around knows this, that avenue is a dead end.

FYI, she got the the custom title "hairy tit racist" on Boris when I was drunk giving out custom titles, so hairy tit is unconfirmed.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jsearles22

You realize Druff has personally driven to a members apartment right?

---

Yes, after that "member" posted my brother's personal info on his site, and also posted my personal phone number, and threatened to harass my brother at work.

I would do this exact thing again under the same circumstances.

---

Small detail, Jewdonk had already moved out, so Druff's visit turned out to be not much of anything. Not sure why people always leave out that detail 8 years later.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ToasterOven

Split goes back and has never had an issue with another woman because of her sex. Anyone that's been around knows this, that avenue is a dead end.

FYI, she got the the custom title "hairy tit racist" on Boris when I was drunk giving out custom titles, so hairy tit is unconfirmed.

---

I made a post that my areola was growing long straight hairs, which they were at the time. It was during hormonal midlife crisis shit which apparently made Druff squeamish with my online hookups. It lasted a year or so, and was managed by wrapping around my index finger and pulling. I can say am glad that sex charged time is behind me and just enjoy my pups and fresh frozen vodka and lime juice cocktails daily. Life is much easier and freeing nowadays.

Who's Aimee?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pooh

Who's Aimee?

---

An old chick from Boris who dated and lived with Ryland.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by splitthis

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Lord of the Fraud

I've nothing against ole split arse. But I know jealous ho behaviour when I see it.

---

FFS quit being soooo retarded.

---

I don't listen to radio so didn't know or hear her calling you a whore.

But was there any previous before that, or did you only decide to go after KT after that very public verbal assault?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Lord of the Fraud

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by splitthis

FFS quit being soooo retarded.

---

I don't listen to radio so didn't know or hear her calling you a whore.

But was there any previous before that, or did you only decide to go after KT after that very public verbal assault?

---

I handled KT ATM when she was spewing shit, before radio. Dont give a fuck she was calling me a whore, just set her straight on the matter, yes I was a whore, but not for charging my current husband for a BJ, but what I was doing before our divorce. Ex and I are still friends. I feel more remorse for a man I had a long term relationship online and in person that I fucked over, after the fact realize he was the best thing that ever happened to me. Such is life. I am firm in my belief she was a scammer to be. Please do return KT if I am wrong and post all you want. Alas she wont though, nothing to gain. I do hope she keeps her shit together for her kids sake.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by splitthis

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Lord of the Fraud

I don't listen to radio so didn't know or hear her calling you a whore.

But was there any previous before that, or did you only decide to go after KT after that very public verbal assault?

---

I handled KT ATM when she was spewing shit, before radio. Dont give a fuck she was calling me a whore, just set her straight on the matter, yes I was a whore, but not for charging my current husband for a BJ, but what I was doing before our divorce. Ex and I are still friends. I feel more remorse for a man I had a long term relationship online and in person that I fucked over, after the fact realize he was the best thing that ever happened to me. Such is life. I am firm in my belief she was a scammer to be. Please do return KT if I am wrong and post all you want. Alas she wont though, nothing to gain. I do hope she keeps her shit together for her kids sake.

---

Oh my fucking word. I need to start reading your posts I take it. You were a literal whore? (not that there is anything wrong with that)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by blake

I’d be surprised if most people here agree with either of these statements.

I think it was nuts to preemptively out her arrest record without any reason.

And surely you know that the people posting her info were not doing so for any other reason than trolling. To suggest otherwise is laughable

---

:wrong

Crowe Diddly, for example, is not a troll.

Others who did it have been known to troll at times, but seemed to approach it from a, "I know something about you which contradicts what you claim about yourself" sort of way, which is different than gratuitous info posting to piss someone off.

I'm very surprised that you are advocating keeping her recent MULTIPLE arrests for fraud related crimes quiet. She is relatively new here AND was clearly forming personal relationships with people in the community. Had I known and said nothing, and she ended up rolling these people, I would (legitimately) be receiving massive criticism for keeping this a secret.

I'm not saying that each member needs to have their past investigated, but when something recent comes to light which paints a relatively new (and very active/popular) member as someone who has no problem committing fraud-related crimes, I think it's responsible to let people know.

---

you're setting a precedent for preemptively doxing someone and blasting their arrest record without a shred of evidence that the person was trying to roll someone. that's problematic.

also, we still have no idea when you will permit your site to be used to disclose private info and when you will not.

"fraud related crimes"? what does that mean specifically? theft? just one arrest? multiple? how recent does it/they have to be? just one incident or multiple?

how about if someone declared bankruptcy? knowing that the person is flat broke, would you want that person handling money of pfa users? how about someone with a drug habit?

do you need to know the specifics of the arrest or is the name of the charge itself sufficient?

the person being "popular" is also a factor? how is that determined? so fps_russia is safe?

for the record, i 100% agree that you would have taken major criticism if you stayed silent and she ended up rolling someone, but still think it sets a dangerous precedent.

you need a profile pic with some smashed together titties or something.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by blake

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

:wrong

Crowe Diddly, for example, is not a troll.

Others who did it have been known to troll at times, but seemed to approach it from a, "I know something about you which contradicts what you claim about yourself" sort of way, which is different than gratuitous info posting to piss someone off.

I'm very surprised that you are advocating keeping her recent MULTIPLE arrests for fraud related crimes quiet. She is relatively new here AND was clearly forming personal relationships with people in the community. Had I known and said nothing, and she ended up rolling these people, I would (legitimately) be receiving massive criticism for keeping this a secret.

I'm not saying that each member needs to have their past investigated, but when something recent comes to light which paints a relatively new (and very active/popular) member as someone who has no problem committing fraud-related crimes, I think it's responsible to let people know.

---

you're setting a precedent for preemptively doxing someone and blasting their arrest record without a shred of evidence that the person was trying to roll someone. that's problematic.

also, we still have no idea when you will permit your site to be used to disclose private info and when you will not.

"fraud related crimes"? what does that mean specifically? theft? just one arrest? multiple? how recent does it/they have to be? just one incident or multiple?

how about if someone declared bankruptcy? knowing that the person is flat broke, would you want that person handling money of pfa users? how about someone with a drug habit?

do you need to know the specifics of the arrest or is the name of the charge itself sufficient?

the person being "popular" is also a factor? how is that determined? so fps_russia is safe?

for the record, i 100% agree that you would have taken major criticism if you stayed silent and she ended up rolling someone, but still think it sets a dangerous precedent.

---

What doesn't set a dangerous precedent nowadays?

I have to take these as they come, and decide what is best.

In future situations such as these, I would like users to contact me with concerns and we will see how to handle it, rather than outing people on your own.

I think that's the best solution.

I still believe that, at the very least, outing Kilgore's recent past was correct here (but not the personal info part).

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by blake

you're setting a precedent for preemptively doxing someone and blasting their arrest record without a shred of evidence that the person was trying to roll someone. that's problematic.

also, we still have no idea when you will permit your site to be used to disclose private info and when you will not.

"fraud related crimes"? what does that mean specifically? theft? just one arrest? multiple? how recent does it/they have to be? just one incident or multiple?

how about if someone declared bankruptcy? knowing that the person is flat broke, would you want that person handling money of pfa users? how about someone with a drug habit?

do you need to know the specifics of the arrest or is the name of the charge itself sufficient?

the person being "popular" is also a factor? how is that determined? so fps_russia is safe?

for the record, i 100% agree that you would have taken major criticism if you stayed silent and she ended up rolling someone, but still think it sets a dangerous precedent.

---

What doesn't set a dangerous precedent nowadays?

I have to take these as they come, and decide what is best.

In future situations such as these, I would like users to contact me with concerns and we will see how to handle it, rather than outing people on your own.

I think that's the best solution.

I still believe that, at the very least, outing Kilgore's recent past was correct here (but not the personal info part).

---

putting in a rule that prohibits people from disclosing any personal info publicly, and requiring that they go to you directly actually sounds like a really good idea.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by blake

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

What doesn't set a dangerous precedent nowadays?

I have to take these as they come, and decide what is best.

In future situations such as these, I would like users to contact me with concerns and we will see how to handle it, rather than outing people on your own.

I think that's the best solution.

I still believe that, at the very least, outing Kilgore's recent past was correct here (but not the personal info part).

---

putting in a rule that prohibits people from disclosing any personal info publicly, and requiring that they go to you directly actually sounds like a really good idea.

---

That was done, but even the biggest dummy could find out for themselves what was up with her by the posts SHE made.

Blake is a white male from the USA.

But there is a chance he's part Asian.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by splitthis

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by blake

putting in a rule that prohibits people from disclosing any personal info publicly, and requiring that they go to you directly actually sounds like a really good idea.

---

That was done, but even the biggest dummy could find out for themselves what was up with her by the posts SHE made.

---

in hindsight, that was an idiotic move on her part.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by splitthis

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Lord of the Fraud

I don't listen to radio so didn't know or hear her calling you a whore.

But was there any previous before that, or did you only decide to go after KT after that very public verbal assault?

---

I feel more remorse for a man I had a long term relationship online and in person that I fucked over, after the fact realize he was the best thing that ever happened to me. Such is life.

---

That sounds really sad and I can somewhat relate.

I read another post of yours which said you were done with men and life was easier on the bottle (loose paraphrasing)

You should try fix that. If no longer possible with him, then somebody else.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Brittney Griner's Clit

I could watch Kilgore Trout get James Byrded around a track behind the number 97 Weight Watchers car lap after lap and not see her as the victim and wonder what she's up to.

---

https://pokerfraudalert.com/forum/sh...333#post711333

i also don't get why KT (or anyone whose mugshot is online) doesn't pay that website's ransom and get the pic taken down.

those websites are 100% extortion, but if you want to be employed, i don't know what other option you have. (i suppose if she is a broke scammer who has no intention of being employed, then she doesn't need to worry about that.)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by blake

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

:wrong

Crowe Diddly, for example, is not a troll.

Others who did it have been known to troll at times, but seemed to approach it from a, "I know something about you which contradicts what you claim about yourself" sort of way, which is different than gratuitous info posting to piss someone off.

I'm very surprised that you are advocating keeping her recent MULTIPLE arrests for fraud related crimes quiet. She is relatively new here AND was clearly forming personal relationships with people in the community. Had I known and said nothing, and she ended up rolling these people, I would (legitimately) be receiving massive criticism for keeping this a secret.

I'm not saying that each member needs to have their past investigated, but when something recent comes to light which paints a relatively new (and very active/popular) member as someone who has no problem committing fraud-related crimes, I think it's responsible to let people know.

---

you're setting a precedent for preemptively doxing someone and blasting their arrest record without a shred of evidence that the person was trying to roll someone. that's problematic.

also, we still have no idea when you will permit your site to be used to disclose private info and when you will not.

"fraud related crimes"? what does that mean specifically? theft? just one arrest? multiple? how recent does it/they have to be? just one incident or multiple?

how about if someone declared bankruptcy? knowing that the person is flat broke, would you want that person handling money of pfa users? how about someone with a drug habit?

do you need to know the specifics of the arrest or is the name of the charge itself sufficient?

the person being "popular" is also a factor? how is that determined? so fps_russia is safe?

for the record, i 100% agree that you would have taken major criticism if you stayed silent and she ended up rolling someone, but still think it sets a dangerous precedent.

---

Get your act together. Druff knows the last time each of us took a fucking dump. And we're okay with that.

Blaaaaaaake thinks Druff works from precedents.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by splitthis

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by blake

putting in a rule that prohibits people from disclosing any personal info publicly, and requiring that they go to you directly actually sounds like a really good idea.

---

That was done, but even the biggest dummy could find out for themselves what was up with her by the posts SHE made.

---

I think posting the picture of her license was the single dumbest move made in the history of PFA. Anyone disagree?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AhoosierA

I think that what makes her arrest record interesting and worth discussion is that it was a financial crime. If it were something drug related or petty theft or something it wouldn’t even be worth mentioning.

---

Even petty theft would be a little bit concerning, because again that is financially-related.

But a single arrest for something small wouldn't be a big deal.

If it were something totally unrelated to any financial danger to members of the community -- such as drug possession, domestic violence, assault, etc., then I agree that it's none of anyone's business here, unless it were a major crime of some sort.

Here it was MULTIPLE, RECENT arrests for fraud-related stuff, and she's posting on a site called pokerfraudalert. If that's not newsworthy, I don't know what is.

---

Yeah that's pretty much what I was getting at. If she is willing to go to jail for passing bad checks and defrauding banks. She isn't afraid of ruining her rep on an 8th tier poker forum!

tellafriend, post in this thread so i can red rep you please

Shout out Toaster Oven for selecting page 20's music!!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nt0C7yVhkaY

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pooh

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by splitthis

That was done, but even the biggest dummy could find out for themselves what was up with her by the posts SHE made.

---

I think posting the picture of her license was the single dumbest move made in the history of PFA. Anyone disagree?

---

I think it was a pretty dumb move, however you could find out her she was prior to her posting the license by information that she had already given (willingly) previously.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AhoosierA

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pooh

I think posting the picture of her license was the single dumbest move made in the history of PFA. Anyone disagree?

---

I think it was a pretty dumb move, however you could find out her she was prior to her posting the license by information that she had already given (willingly) previously.

---

You are one creepy cunt.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AhoosierA

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pooh

I think posting the picture of her license was the single dumbest move made in the history of PFA. Anyone disagree?

---

I think it was a pretty dumb move, however you could find out her she was prior to her posting the license by information that she had already given (willingly) previously.

---

It's like when the govt figures out you fuck boys but they still set u up at the playground so there is official evidence. ahh in a simple world yes that explains it AhoosierA... nothin simple in these streets when the Boon Gang rides through.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AhoosierA

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pooh

I think posting the picture of her license was the single dumbest move made in the history of PFA. Anyone disagree?

---

I think it was a pretty dumb move, however you could find out her she was prior to her posting the license by information that she had already given (willingly) previously.

---

You could say the same about me.
You could say the same about anybody who posts here regularly.

Does that mean everybody should be investigated to make sure their stories check out?

This hoosier cat playing detective and digging up personal info because he can is some seriously sick shit.

The fucker probably knows the real names of half the people on this forum.


Get rid

He just observes too, like a peeping tom waiting to pounce.

Fuck that

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Lord of the Fraud

He just observes too, like a peeping tom waiting to pounce.

Fuck that

---

He gets some privileges for developing early stages of most interesting man in the world syndrome. Review his posts.

Hoosier is old school good people, no need to slander his good insights, am sure he doesnt give a fuck who you are.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hockey Guy

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AhoosierA

I think it was a pretty dumb move, however you could find out her she was prior to her posting the license by information that she had already given (willingly) previously.

---

You could say the same about me.
You could say the same about anybody who posts here regularly.

Does that mean everybody should be investigated to make sure their stories check out?

---

True.

Of course not everyone should be investigated. But when you're such a polarizing figure, you're going to peak people's interest.

The fact of the matter is, there is really only enough space here at PFA for one woman. We have seen this before. Unless Matriarch Splithis approves the next female poster in advance I am afraid we will go through this again and again.

Anyone remember the move The Warriors? There was only ever one woman in that gang and that is just the way it is here, right or wrong.

https://media.giphy.com/media/VGJWaVKGh5XH2/giphy.gif

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Lord of the Fraud

This hoosier cat playing detective and digging up personal info because he can is some seriously sick shit.

The fucker probably knows the real names of half the people on this forum.


Get rid

---

Actually the only people I know from this forum is people I've interacted with on FB who I ran into on The RealGrinders facebook group. LarryLaffer, SDouble, Kilgore Trout...and of course I know Druff & Drexel.