Twitter just banned Milo Yiannopoulos

[FPS_Russia]

Milo's twitter ban and the ugly black chick are related, geez. It's embarrassing how the left and the MSM will not tolerate any criticism of black people what so ever.

Or how Huffpo, MSM and other left leaning websites skew coverage of racial issues involving blacks getting shot by whites. Like using a photo of Trayvon from years ago to drum up sympathy. Then ZERO coverage of the rampant (often brutal) black on white crime that occurs every single day.

This is the only guy I know who catalogs any black on white crime at all and it's just a YT channel.
Here's his uploads within the last 24 hours and there's constant uploads. There's no way he's covering over 20% of what's actually happening. Off the charts brutal shit happening everyday and totally unreported by the MSM. IN THE OFF CHANCE THEY DO COVER IT THE RACIAL ASPECT WILL NOT BE MENTIONED

[LarryLaffer]

BUMP

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/...b0f077b3ed221c

[Lord of the Fraud]

So this British nonce spends his life trolling America.......... and gets paid for the pleasure?



Child rapist or no child rapist. He should be fucking Knighted.

[LarryLaffer]

So this British nonce spends his life trolling America.......... and gets paid for the pleasure?



Child rapist or no child rapist. He should be fucking Knighted.

wow, you british cock suckers will do anything, even condone pedophiles.

[PLOL]

Ship Milo the bag after the week he's had.

Somebody please check on OSA to make sure he's coping okay

[DJ_Chaps]

You fairies are calling Milo a pedo now? Hilarious.

Sent from my LG-D852 using Tapatalk

[LarryLaffer]

Ship Milo the bag after the week he's had.

Somebody please check on OSA to make sure he's coping okay

lets ship milo one of these



and he can hang himself in a public square.


You see him on Bill Maher acting like he was on the top end of the autism spectrum? after watching that, I phoned up the nearest charity and donated. We need to help find a cure.

I mean he just wouldn't shut the fuck up. It's like he has SUPER ASBERGERS SYNDROME.

[PLOL]

You fairies are calling Milo a pedo now? Hilarious.

Sent from my LG-D852 using Tapatalk

Do you not read the news?

Sent from my compewter

[Dan Druff]

Honestly, Milo wasn't going to be around long term. It was just a matter of time before his envelope-pushing was too far for even the alt-right's taste. (Strangely enough, it seems that his pederast comments were sincere, and not trolling!)

But you've gotta give the guy credit for his hustle. I first encountered him way before most others did, when he thrust himself into the Gamergate controversy.

Basically, he recognized that Gamergate was all bullshit, and was being exploited by career scammers (look up Anita Sarkeesian) who took advantage of guilt-ridden SJWs. The SJW left thought they were fighting the gaming patriarchy, all while being duped by a few charlatans out for publicity and money. Milo saw this, started speaking up loudly about it, appeared on various YouTube shows and webcasts, and an alt-right star was born!

You can also see his evolution by watching those earlier Gamergate videos. At the time, he came off much less flamboyant and trollish, and much more refined and well-spoken. Only later did he turn up the flames in order to get noticed by the mainstream.

He then rode this wave of rapidly increasing fame, all while being curiously embraced by the GOP. Honestly, the sight of Milo receiving standing ovations from a crowd of hard-right Republicans is a pretty good indication of how much things have changed in the past 6 years or so.

He had his last hurrah during the Berkeley riots, where he was (accurately) championed as a victim of censorship, even garnering some sympathy from those on the left who had become disgusted by the fascist SJW movement.

But something like this was inevitable. Unless your name is Donald Trump, you can't constantly be riding a wave of controversy and endlessly avoid an eventual drowning.

[chinamaniac]

Who the fuck is milo yianacopowhatevr?

[Mintjewlips]

After Bannon left milos days were numbered, he went out in milo fashion. The chief editor of Breitbart hates milo FYI, he's had a hard on for milo ever since Bannon left. Milo is still a gay Republican that likes black cock, im sure he will bounce back in true Trump fashion, he is a winner after all.

And lol at thinking his comments were genuine, jfc you can't call him a troll then decide which comments are genuine.

[ftpjesus]

Honestly, Milo wasn't going to be around long term. It was just a matter of time before his envelope-pushing was too far for even the alt-right's taste. (Strangely enough, it seems that his pederast comments were sincere, and not trolling!)

But you've gotta give the guy credit for his hustle. I first encountered him way before most others did, when he thrust himself into the Gamergate controversy.

Basically, he recognized that Gamergate was all bullshit, and was being exploited by career scammers (look up Anita Sarkeesian) who took advantage of guilt-ridden SJWs. The SJW left thought they were fighting the gaming patriarchy, all while being duped by a few charlatans out for publicity and money. Milo saw this, started speaking up loudly about it, appeared on various YouTube shows and webcasts, and an alt-right star was born!

You can also see his evolution by watching those earlier Gamergate videos. At the time, he came off much less flamboyant and trollish, and much more refined and well-spoken. Only later did he turn up the flames in order to get noticed by the mainstream.

He then rode this wave of rapidly increasing fame, all while being curiously embraced by the GOP. Honestly, the sight of Milo receiving standing ovations from a crowd of hard-right Republicans is a pretty good indication of how much things have changed in the past 6 years or so.

He had his last hurrah during the Berkeley riots, where he was (accurately) championed as a victim of censorship, even garnering some sympathy from those on the left who had become disgusted by the fascist SJW movement.

But something like this was inevitable. Unless your name is Donald Trump, you can't constantly be riding a wave of controversy and endlessly avoid an eventual drowning.

The GOP is going to have to admit their log cabin republicans (the gay wing of the GOP) are no longer remaining silent and such.. The horse left the barn when Gawker went after Billionaire Conservative Peter Thiel. We saw how that ended.. Thiel singlehanded funded legal actions by Hulk Hogan that bankrupted the organization.. Thiel is not an exception to the rule truth is there are a lot more homosexual conservatives then people realize but the GOP used to try and keep them under wraps per their pro nuclear family agenda.. Honestly I hope it causes some homosexuals to wake up that conservatism is not the bane of homosexuals and that it can benefit many cause liberal/socialism isn't helping them much considering the continued pandering to the death to gays Islamic nutcases by the left..

[gimmick]

Honestly, Milo wasn't going to be around long term. It was just a matter of time before his envelope-pushing was too far for even the alt-right's taste. (Strangely enough, it seems that his pederast comments were sincere, and not trolling!)

But you've gotta give the guy credit for his hustle. I first encountered him way before most others did, when he thrust himself into the Gamergate controversy.

Basically, he recognized that Gamergate was all bullshit, and was being exploited by career scammers (look up Anita Sarkeesian) who took advantage of guilt-ridden SJWs. The SJW left thought they were fighting the gaming patriarchy, all while being duped by a few charlatans out for publicity and money. Milo saw this, started speaking up loudly about it, appeared on various YouTube shows and webcasts, and an alt-right star was born!

You can also see his evolution by watching those earlier Gamergate videos. At the time, he came off much less flamboyant and trollish, and much more refined and well-spoken. Only later did he turn up the flames in order to get noticed by the mainstream.

He then rode this wave of rapidly increasing fame, all while being curiously embraced by the GOP. Honestly, the sight of Milo receiving standing ovations from a crowd of hard-right Republicans is a pretty good indication of how much things have changed in the past 6 years or so.

He had his last hurrah during the Berkeley riots, where he was (accurately) championed as a victim of censorship, even garnering some sympathy from those on the left who had become disgusted by the fascist SJW movement.

But something like this was inevitable. Unless your name is Donald Trump, you can't constantly be riding a wave of controversy and endlessly avoid an eventual drowning.

The GOP is going to have to admit their log cabin republicans (the gay wing of the GOP) are no longer remaining silent and such.. The horse left the barn when Gawker went after Billionaire Conservative Peter Thiel. We saw how that ended.. Thiel singlehanded funded legal actions by Hulk Hogan that bankrupted the organization.. Thiel is not an exception to the rule truth is there are a lot more homosexual conservatives then people realize but the GOP used to try and keep them under wraps per their pro nuclear family agenda.. Honestly I hope it causes some homosexuals to wake up that conservatism is not the bane of homosexuals and that it can benefit many cause liberal/socialism isn't helping them much considering the continued pandering to the death to gays Islamic nutcases by the left..

Yea we all know continued pandering to the death to gays Cristian nutcases by the right is much better. It's not really a sentence, but i assume you get the gist of what i was going for. Maybe this alternate way of linking words together to express thoughts becomes the new norm.

[Dan Druff]

The GOP is going to have to admit their log cabin republicans (the gay wing of the GOP) are no longer remaining silent and such.. The horse left the barn when Gawker went after Billionaire Conservative Peter Thiel. We saw how that ended.. Thiel singlehanded funded legal actions by Hulk Hogan that bankrupted the organization.. Thiel is not an exception to the rule truth is there are a lot more homosexual conservatives then people realize but the GOP used to try and keep them under wraps per their pro nuclear family agenda.. Honestly I hope it causes some homosexuals to wake up that conservatism is not the bane of homosexuals and that it can benefit many cause liberal/socialism isn't helping them much considering the continued pandering to the death to gays Islamic nutcases by the left..

Yea we all know continued pandering to the death to gays Cristian nutcases by the right is much better. It's not really a sentence, but i assume you get the gist of what i was going for. Maybe this alternate way of linking words together to express thoughts becomes the new norm.

The truth is that many gay men are economically conservative (partly due to the fact that they are more affluent than average), and there are even some who are socially conservative.

Gay men are mostly Democrats because that party has historically been the one in their corner, but times are changing. I personally know a few gay men who changed their party allegiance after the Orlando shootings, seeing prominent Democrats do all they could to avoid linking it to radical Islam.

I actually hope the Dems continue their peculiar love affair with Islam, as that very well might be the catalyst necessary to push the gay male population over to the GOP. Many of the ingredients are already there.

Milo actually could have been influential in helping convert fellow gay men over to the GOP, but he was more interested in attention whoring than accomplishing anything real for the right.

But it's just a mater of time until other less controversial gay men rise to the forefront of today's GOP. One result of the modern political divisiveness is that it actually has fostered some degree of racial/religious/sexual tolerance in place of ideological tolerance.

Suddenly a flamboyant gay guy with jungle fever got standing ovations at GOP events, simply because he agreed with their politics, spoke well, and had charisma. This would have been unheard of 5 years ago, let alone 10 or 20.

The new normal in American politics is to embrace any potential ally who will help you beat the other side.

Interestingly, another rising conservative YouTube star is Blaire White, a transsexual.

It's becoming less and less about the person, and more about the message they are projecting.

Sadly, this still hasn't resulted in a less divisive country, because this party-versus-party bickering has also brought us into a new era of race baiting and identity politics. Overall, we are more divided than ever.

Sad!

[LarryLaffer]

Yea we all know continued pandering to the death to gays Cristian nutcases by the right is much better. It's not really a sentence, but i assume you get the gist of what i was going for. Maybe this alternate way of linking words together to express thoughts becomes the new norm.

The truth is that many gay men are economically conservative (partly due to the fact that they are more affluent than average), and there are even some who are socially conservative.

Gay men are mostly Democrats because that party has historically been the one in their corner, but times are changing. I personally know a few gay men who changed their party allegiance after the Orlando shootings, seeing prominent Democrats do all they could to avoid linking it to radical Islam.

I actually hope the Dems continue their peculiar love affair with Islam, as that very well might be the catalyst necessary to push the gay male population over to the GOP. Many of the ingredients are already there.

Milo actually could have been influential in helping convert fellow gay men over to the GOP, but he was more interested in attention whoring than accomplishing anything real for the right.

But it's just a mater of time until other less controversial gay men rise to the forefront of today's GOP. One result of the modern political divisiveness is that it actually has fostered some degree of racial/religious/sexual tolerance in place of ideological tolerance.

Suddenly a flamboyant gay guy with jungle fever got standing ovations at GOP events, simply because he agreed with their politics, spoke well, and had charisma. This would have been unheard of 5 years ago, let alone 10 or 20.

The new normal in American politics is to embrace any potential ally who will help you beat the other side.

Interestingly, another rising conservative YouTube star is Blaire White, a transsexual.

It's becoming less and less about the person, and more about the message they are projecting.

Sadly, this still hasn't resulted in a less divisive country, because this party-versus-party bickering has also brought us into a new era of race baiting and identity politics. Overall, we are more divided than ever.

Sad!

explain this please

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.the...rticle/284570/

[Dan Druff]

The truth is that many gay men are economically conservative (partly due to the fact that they are more affluent than average), and there are even some who are socially conservative.

Gay men are mostly Democrats because that party has historically been the one in their corner, but times are changing. I personally know a few gay men who changed their party allegiance after the Orlando shootings, seeing prominent Democrats do all they could to avoid linking it to radical Islam.

I actually hope the Dems continue their peculiar love affair with Islam, as that very well might be the catalyst necessary to push the gay male population over to the GOP. Many of the ingredients are already there.

Milo actually could have been influential in helping convert fellow gay men over to the GOP, but he was more interested in attention whoring than accomplishing anything real for the right.

But it's just a mater of time until other less controversial gay men rise to the forefront of today's GOP. One result of the modern political divisiveness is that it actually has fostered some degree of racial/religious/sexual tolerance in place of ideological tolerance.

Suddenly a flamboyant gay guy with jungle fever got standing ovations at GOP events, simply because he agreed with their politics, spoke well, and had charisma. This would have been unheard of 5 years ago, let alone 10 or 20.

The new normal in American politics is to embrace any potential ally who will help you beat the other side.

Interestingly, another rising conservative YouTube star is Blaire White, a transsexual.

It's becoming less and less about the person, and more about the message they are projecting.

Sadly, this still hasn't resulted in a less divisive country, because this party-versus-party bickering has also brought us into a new era of race baiting and identity politics. Overall, we are more divided than ever.

Sad!

explain this please

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.the...rticle/284570/

Okay, I'll explain it.

Even that left-biased Atlantic article posted above conceded that the AVERAGE gay male household income was higher.

However, it made the case that poverty was more common among gay men (20%) versus straight men (15%), thus meaning there is greater variance in gay male incomes than their straight counterparts.

I have no idea if their figures are true, but even if we assume they are, the average income for gay men is still higher, which makes my statement correct.

Furthermore, gay male couples have children with much less frequency than straight couples, so gay males also have more disposable income. In short, children are expensive.

My point still stands, though overall you cherry-picked a relatively minor point out of my general statement regarding the politics of gay males, so I'm not sure why we are even debating this.

[LarryLaffer]

explain this please

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.the...rticle/284570/

Okay, I'll explain it.

Even that left-biased Atlantic article posted above conceded that the AVERAGE gay male household income was higher.

However, it made the case that poverty was more common among gay men (20%) versus straight men (15%), thus meaning there is greater variance in gay male incomes than their straight counterparts.

I have no idea if their figures are true, but even if we assume they are, the average income for gay men is still higher, which makes my statement correct.

Furthermore, gay male couples have children with much less frequency than straight couples, so gay males also have more disposable income. In short, children are expensive.

My point still stands, though overall you cherry-picked a relatively minor point out of my general statement regarding the politics of gay males, so I'm not sure why we are even debating this.

I think my point is that you never seem to provide any evidence to support your wild claims.

I'm just supposed to take your word when a simple Google search turns up proof otherwise (you say it isn't, but it's more than you provided)

it's just low hanging fruit.

you understand confirmation bias and how guilty you are of it?

[Daly]

explain this please

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.the...rticle/284570/

Okay, I'll explain it.

Even that left-biased Atlantic article posted above conceded that the AVERAGE gay male household income was higher.

However, it made the case that poverty was more common among gay men (20%) versus straight men (15%), thus meaning there is greater variance in gay male incomes than their straight counterparts.

I have no idea if their figures are true, but even if we assume they are, the average income for gay men is still higher, which makes my statement correct.

Furthermore, gay male couples have children with much less frequency than straight couples, so gay males also have more disposable income. In short, children are expensive.

My point still stands, though overall you cherry-picked a relatively minor point out of my general statement regarding the politics of gay males, so I'm not sure why we are even debating this.

The gay mafia is real.

[handicapme]

Okay, I'll explain it.

Even that left-biased Atlantic article posted above conceded that the AVERAGE gay male household income was higher.

However, it made the case that poverty was more common among gay men (20%) versus straight men (15%), thus meaning there is greater variance in gay male incomes than their straight counterparts.

I have no idea if their figures are true, but even if we assume they are, the average income for gay men is still higher, which makes my statement correct.

Furthermore, gay male couples have children with much less frequency than straight couples, so gay males also have more disposable income. In short, children are expensive.

My point still stands, though overall you cherry-picked a relatively minor point out of my general statement regarding the politics of gay males, so I'm not sure why we are even debating this.

I think my point is that you never seem to provide any evidence to support your wild claims.

I'm just supposed to take your word when a simple Google search turns up proof otherwise (you say it isn't, but it's more than you provided)

it's just low hanging fruit.

you understand confirmation bias and how guilty you are of it?

Huh? That article basically verifies his statement. He also didn't say "most" but instead said "more than average"

Go play on your tricycle in wickerpark screaming about how trump is the devil. Your mother should have swallowed you.

[LarryLaffer]

I think my point is that you never seem to provide any evidence to support your wild claims.

I'm just supposed to take your word when a simple Google search turns up proof otherwise (you say it isn't, but it's more than you provided)

it's just low hanging fruit.

you understand confirmation bias and how guilty you are of it?

Huh? That article basically verifies his statement. He also didn't say "most" but instead said "more than average"

Go play on your tricycle in wickerpark screaming about how trump is the devil. Your mother should have swallowed you.

hAve fun at your day job Handijobme.

I'll have fun playing poker and enjoying my day.