Originally Posted by
Daredevil
It really does seem that the chances of raw/slim's story being bullshit is about 99.9%. So many holes, so many things that don't make sense.
Also the fact that he now seems willing to just go away quietly into the night is the biggest red flag for me. If someone had really cheated me in the fashion that he is claiming, I would never let it go until I had proved my side. He could get a friend to take a picture of the texts on his phone and upload them if he can't screen capture, he could take his argument to another radio show/forum if he feels that the owner of this one is suppressing the truth, he could call witnesses from the Rio to back up his story. Yet all these things somehow cannot be done and so he's just going to leave, yeah, right.
But all that being said, it is still not right for Druff to say that he will not let slim/raw have any kind of voice on the radio unless certain pre-requirements are met. Bukowski72 made a great post about this that no one seemed to address, but I must say I agree. The problem is that it has always been said that anyone could come on PFA (or the old site), and air a grievance if they feel they had somehow been cheated or scammed. It was never said that anything more than a persons word would be necessary to have a voice on radio.
To have a higher standard for someone who is accusing a host, has the appearance of impropriety. Not to say that any impropriety is going on, but I think it is in this site's best interest to have this debate on air. The reason is, that if it does not, then it can always be brought up as some sort of injustice and damage the reputation of a site that is built on the reputation of it's owner. So it's better to just let someone with no hard proof (slim at this point) go up against someone who does (Druff has heard the vm from Drexel) and just let him look a fool and a liar than to censor it and have the appearance of shady inter-host collusion to suppress this story.