Weather Channel Founder: Man Made Climate Change a FRAUD

[Seth]

I told you people for YEARS, this Global Warming bullshit is the biggest gimmick ever perpetrated on the general public. It's almost as bad as Karl Marx lecturing the Russians on the benefits of communism.

So now you have the founder of the Weather Channel ruining this myth. We are seeing an end of an industry where "scientists" who fleeced grant money for years now being exposed (and soon to be unemployed).

There was a recent survey of the 20 most pressing issues for Americans, and guess which finished LAST? You got it, Global Warming. LOL. I am proud to say, I am carbon abuser. I personally disregard any attempts to conserve energy. We need 100 more coal plants and 10 more refineries to get fuel prices down to historic levels.

You people need to start listening to me otherwise you will lose a lot of money.

http://www.express.co.uk/news/nature...hannel-founder

[Sloppy Joe]

Yawn. Enjoy Australia. Please 'come back' with a better persona.

[Seth]

Yawn. Enjoy Australia. Please 'come back' with a better persona.

What does me going to Perth in 10 days matter to the biggest scam since underground nuclear bunkers? I'll tell you what it means, you are a fucking dipshit. Go away.

[Hurdleking]

Please just go back to work cleaning toilets, the only person who will be happy you are venturing into this subject matter is Tyde because it will keep you from your tiresome trolling of his posts. You are simply too stupid to know how ignorant you sound with a post like this. The founder of the weather channel as a source for this? It would be a waste of energy to engage you on this----we can agree to disagree and everyone is glad you have no impact on making policy in this area......you can unclog plumbing, no reading comprehension required....

[tyde]

[DirtyB]

John Coleman has a degree in Journalism and absolutely zero scientific background.

"The polar ice is increasing, not melting away."

That's factually not true. The total mass of polar ice is decreasing at an accelerating rate. The guy has no idea what he's talking about.

[Seth]

John Coleman has a degree in Journalism and absolutely zero scientific background.

"The polar ice is increasing, not melting away."

That's factually not true. The total mass of polar ice is decreasing at an accelerating rate. The guy has no idea what he's talking about.

Curious, since your sole source of information is Huffington Post on just about every issue, can you enlighten us on what your degree is, and how you are so much smarter than the founder of the Weather Channel on man made global warming?

[DirtyB]

John Coleman has a degree in Journalism and absolutely zero scientific background.

"The polar ice is increasing, not melting away."

That's factually not true. The total mass of polar ice is decreasing at an accelerating rate. The guy has no idea what he's talking about.

Curious, since your sole source of information is Huffington Post on just about every issue, can you enlighten us on what your degree is, and how you are so much smarter than the founder of the Weather Channel on man made global warming?

How about citing one instance where I reference the Huffington Post.

This has nothing to do with being smart. It's about understanding how basic science and scientific data work.

And why is the founder of Weather Channel considered smart or knowledgeable on climate science?

[tyde]

[Seth]

Curious, since your sole source of information is Huffington Post on just about every issue, can you enlighten us on what your degree is, and how you are so much smarter than the founder of the Weather Channel on man made global warming?

How about citing one instance where I reference the Huffington Post.

This has nothing to do with being smart. It's about understanding how basic science and scientific data work.

And why is the founder of Weather Channel considered smart or knowledgeable on climate science?

Ok, degree in Political Science or History. Got it.

[tyde]

How about citing one instance where I reference the Huffington Post.

This has nothing to do with being smart. It's about understanding how basic science and scientific data work.

And why is the founder of Weather Channel considered smart or knowledgeable on climate science?

Ok, degree in Political Science or History. Got it.

as opposed to your mysterious degree from a 'top northeastern university'

[matos]

Here's something to read when you have time between unclogging toilets. It's on a site called wikipedia. There are lots of good sources on the bottom of the page. Not sure if you've heard of this site before but its great for finding information on many things important to humans. You can read more about what this site is here.

[Krypt]

I told you people for YEARS, this Global Warming bullshit is the biggest gimmick ever perpetrated on the general public. It's almost as bad as Karl Marx lecturing the Russians on the benefits of communism.

So now you have the founder of the Weather Channel ruining this myth. We are seeing an end of an industry where "scientists" who fleeced grant money for years now being exposed (and soon to be unemployed).

There was a recent survey of the 20 most pressing issues for Americans, and guess which finished LAST? You got it, Global Warming. LOL. I am proud to say, I am carbon abuser. I personally disregard any attempts to conserve energy. We need 100 more coal plants and 10 more refineries to get fuel prices down to historic levels.

You people need to start listening to me otherwise you will lose a lot of money.

http://www.express.co.uk/news/nature...hannel-founder

founder of the weather channel? nigga put down that miller light.

[YUUP]

I was thinking the Jews must have some control over the weather by now and then read this....

Dan Druff:
This Orthodox home had its air conditioner on a timer. Indeed, after the sun went down, the thing kicked on by itself, and the apartment was relatively comfortable.

Now, you might ask, "Why does an ice cold AC unit need a timer in order to run by itself? Can't it just be set at a certain temperature, and click on and off according to that?"

Yes. But you're forgetting -- this was a Jewish household. They found it to be wasteful to have AC running at night while people were sleeping, so they didn't want it simply to cool the house to a certain temperature. They only wanted the house cooled while people were awake.



And this was 2002.

[Dan Druff]

The issue isn't whether the climate has changed recently (it has), but more whether or not man was the cause of it.

This is actually a very hard question to answer, as weather patterns have a lot of variance, and there have been massive changes to global weather in the past, long before man had the capabilities to do anything to possibly affect the environment.

[ToasterOven]

The issue isn't whether the climate has changed recently (it has), but more whether or not man was the cause of it.

This is actually a very hard question to answer, as weather patterns have a lot of variance, and there have been massive changes to global weather in the past, long before man had the capabilities to do anything to possibly affect the environment.

For a bright guy, you've got a blind spot on this issue. Whenever it comes up, you always site the "weather". Weather does have a lot of variance.

The issue is global temperature and sea levels, which change the climate. Scientists aren't unsure if man caused this. Politicians and pundits are unsure. Big difference.

[repoman]

global warming debates are boring, but the most interesting thing about this thread is that John Coleman is a degenerate gambler... I've played poker with him many times in San Diego. Dude loves to gamb00l.

[WillieMcFML]

don't think the sample size will ever be large enough to really determine if we are causing climate change

[sonatine]

don't think the sample size will ever be large enough to really determine if we are causing climate change

the only people at this point who question the validity of man made climate change are those who lack the education or aptitude to understand the hard data at bar.



lol @ sample size.


wow billiam. wow.

[sonatine]

The issue isn't whether the climate has changed recently (it has), but more whether or not man was the cause of it.

This is actually a very hard question to answer, as weather patterns have a lot of variance, and there have been massive changes to global weather in the past, long before man had the capabilities to do anything to possibly affect the environment.

For a bright guy, you've got a blind spot on this issue. Whenever it comes up, you always site the "weather". Weather does have a lot of variance.

The issue is global temperature and sea levels, which change the climate. Scientists aren't unsure if man caused this. Politicians and pundits are unsure. Big difference.

cite.


aaaaaand im done, good luck with this thread yall.