Originally Posted by
JUSTIFIEDhomicide
I think the mortgage company handles it because the guy who owns the house is not local. I talked to both tenants upstairs. I am using one of their internet connections ATM. Clearly not a long term solution. This is day three now. I called yesterday at 830am and they told me they needed to speak with the owner of the home and get back to me. They failed to get back to me. I am not that worried about it since I am using one of the people upstairs connection. This saves me from having to make a quick decision about what to do, and hopefully play it out where I can get a minnimum of 80$ taken from the rent. This isn't about the money. We can pay the rent. It's 1300$ between my girlfriend and I. That's not the issue. The issue is this company just turning off the internet and cable without even letting me know.
I have found out cable and internet included are not on the guys upstairs lease, but it is on ours...
Whatever they do matters zero to me. That is their decision. I wll be calling today and offering them a 80$ reduction. If they don't take it I will just be taking the advice of this thread and sending them a check at the end of the month for 1220$ and saying if you want the rest, we will see you in court.
Isn't all of this bullshit btw? If indeed I said yes to the 45$ wouldn't we also have to go there and sign a brand new lease? I know they are out of bounds with what they're doing. Annoying, but luckily we don't really ever watch cable since we have Netflix, Amazon Prime, HBO GO and comcast online.
This is all about principle.
No, if you accepted the $45, you wouldn't have to sign a brand new lease, though you would want something in writing stating that they were allowing you to underpay by $45.
But you shouldn't accept $45 if the replacement internet/cable costs more than $45. You should not be out a penny for any of this.
I am guessing that they did away with the "free" internet/cable because you were the only one who had it in your lease, so they were tired of giving it away to the other tenants who weren't legally entitled to it. They figured you were too stupid or passive to question it.
Pooh, you are wrong. You don't want to roll the dice with evictions unless you're sure you will win, because they will screw up your credit big time. If you withhold ALL of the rent, and then lose the subsequent eviction case, then an eviction will be on your credit, and you'll also be abruptly out of your place to live.
Judges, in general, look unfavorably upon people who find flimsy excuses not to pay the entire rent. They will see you more as a deadbeat/scammer than someone with a valid point. You should always determine how "livable" the property is, and then deduct the correct percentage from there. For example, let's say there is an electrical problem in one of the two bedrooms, and the landlord drags his feet on fixing it for a month, leaving that bedroom with no electricity. You have the right to subtract half the rent, but not the entire rent, as you still had a very usable single bedroom during that time.
In this case, the entire apartment is livable, but they are refusing to pay for a utility that is guaranteed included in the lease. It's very straightforward here. Your damages per month are the cost of replacement services, and that's what should be subtracted. No judge would ever rule in their favor here, so you can safely subtract this and not be scared if they try to evict you.