Originally Posted by
sonatine
i was discussing this with a gov friend this morning and all he had to say was "when the majority of an entities userbase is in eastern europe, you dont want to be involved."
at this point id put the odds at 80% that eastern euro crimesphere is arbitrarily manipulating this market. it simply has all the hallmarks. its sophisticated, its relentless, and its working.
If this is true, and eastern europeans are both holding 80%, and also the ones behind the denial of service/and or hacking attacks, then logically wouldn't it be likely they dumped a ton the other day at $250- $260, and are now tanking the market to acquire more in order to run them up again?
There is nothing illegal is simply holding bitcoins, is there? I understand they are used in practical terms for many illegal things, but I am trying to understand if the logical move should these bitches go way down to some absurd $29 number, the only value to those manipulating the markets is to acquire more, and manipulate them back up again, correct?
It would seem a calculated, but smart risk to buy a 1000 if they hit a number like $29, and just gamble that they will run them up again, wouldn't it? They are doing all the work. You could lose $30k obviously, but it seems a better chance they manipulate it back up to $250 than they go to a penny if they have this capability?
I am not trying to get in the middle of this argument whether this is actually what is going on, both you and dddonedied are far better versed in technology, and I have no clue who is right.
I am just hearing two arguments, his that they are inherently valuable, have useful application, and won't likely be shut down easily. You're arguing that the market is being manipulated by the criminal element in a successful manner, but both those arguments would suggest that taking a winger on an amount you can afford to lose isn't necessarily a bad idea, at least in the short term.
In the time since I started writing this, they have went from $75 back to $120. lulz
I mean, at what number do even the skeptics pounce to buy? There has to be a number where it's simply worth the risk even if you have no firm belief in their long term viability. Rarely does one get a chance to get in low on something like this once you've missed the boat after the initial run up.