Say that it's 2001, and you just met a girl at a party named Jenny Smith. You and Jenny immediately hit it off, quickly resulting in one of the best sexual encounters of your life. You see Jenny a few more times, but she tells you that she just got a job offer in Portland. Jenny moves off to Oregon, and you lose touch shortly after that.
Now it's 2012.
Out of curiosity, you think about Jenny and try to find her on Facebook. Though you and she don't have any common friends or acquaintances, you track her down by searching her name combined with her hometown, and you arrive at the right profile. You're impressed to see that she looks very similar to how she did 11 years ago, and also notice that she's single. Even better, she has returned from Portland, and now lives very close to you again.
You shoot Jenny a short message, telling her that you thought about her recently and remembered how you really enjoyed her company. In the coming days, you excitedly check your inbox to see her reply, but you get nothing. After about a week passes, you realize that Jenny wants nothing to do with you anymore -- not even a polite-but-terse "Nice to hear from you" reply.
Ouch.
I guess it wasn't as good for her as it was for you.
But wait -- that's not necessarily what happened.
It's very possible that Jenny never saw your message to her, even if she actively uses Facebook.
This is because, in an attempt to thwart spam, Facebook decides whether messages sent to you should land in your "Inbox" (the normal repository of private messages) or the little-known "Other" folder. The "Other" folder is where "less relevant" messages (in Facebook's opinion) go to die. Up until recently, very few people knew that this folder even existed, myself included.
You can find this "Other" folder by going to your normal Inbox, and clicking on "Other" near the top-left of the screen, as shown below:
So how does a message end up in the "Other" folder?
When you send someone a message on Facebook, the system immediately decides if that person is part of your "extended network". Your extended network is defined as the pool of people who Facebook feels might actually know you in real life. For example, if you have your former high school listed as West Albuquerque High, then everyone who went to that school will be part of your extended network. So will all friends of your Facebook friends, and by extension, friends of friends of friends. When you browse someone else's Facebook profile, they also are deemed part of your extended network (that is, if they contact you -- not if you contact them). This is because Facebook figures that if you browse someone, and later they contact you (not realizing you ever browsed them), it's highly unlikely to be spam. There are several other ways that people are considered to be in your extended network, including Facebook group membership, common hometown or existing residence, and many others. It all goes into a secret algorithm that Facebook never reveals.
In our example above, if Jenny had browsed you on Facebook in the past, then your message to her would have gotten through -- even if she never contacted you there.
However, if Jenny had never browsed you, and if you had zero Facebook friends in common, there's a good chance your message went to her "Other" box -- likely never to be seen.
I just found my Other box, and I had about 20 messages there, dating back to October, 2010.
Among them:
A former TA I had in college from a class I took 20 years ago contacted me in February, 2012. I don't have my college listed on my Facebook page, so it did not establish a connection to her, and her message got filtered into the Other box.
I ran a chat room in the '90s, and an old friend from there contacted me in June, 2012. She and I had no mutual friends on Facebook, nor anyone else in common in our lives, so her message got filtered.
Various poker-related people sent me messages that landed in "Other". This surprises me a bit because you would think we'd have at least a few common friends or friends-of-friends, but the truth is that I have very few poker-related people on my Facebook, as I like to keep Facebook separate from poker/forum drama.
A guy who was in a Facebook group sent me a message, actually praising some things I wrote there. This filtering was surprising, as you would think it would have allowed the messages because we were in the same group. Many others from that group got their messages through to me at the time.
I also had various spam messages in the Other folder.
Now here is something disturbing:
Facebook has changed their privacy settings to where you can filter your Inbox in two different ways:
Basic lets "extended network" messages go through, and still filters the "less relevant" or suspected spam messages into Other.
Strict actually prevents most non-Facebook-friends from getting their messages into your Inbox, with everything else going into Other.
So where is an option to allow ALL messages into your Inbox?
There isn't one!
Why?
Because Facebook is testing a program to start charging people $1 to send messages to those outside their extended network, to appear in their Inbox!
This program is already in place for select users. If you are one of them, you can pay Facebook $1 to put your message in a person's Inbox when it would have otherwise ended up in Other.
So in the example at the beginning of this post, you would have been prompted to either pay $1 to get your feeler message through to Jenny's Inbox, or otherwise deal with the fact that it would end up in her Other folder, likely never to be seen.
I don't begrudge Facebook for trying to find new ways to make money, but I find it obnoxious that they filter out certain messages and then charge people to circumvent that filter and contact you.
They claim that this will cut down on spam (because spammers won't want to pay $1 per message), but it's also destroying the spirit of Facebook, which is a tool to connect to all kinds of people from your past. Facebook rose to prominence with this model, and now they're going to charge long, lost friends to contact you, blaming it on spam prevention.
http://www.cnn.com/2012/12/20/tech/s...ges/index.html