Favorite Apple

[splitthis]

As they say, one a day keeps the doctor away. My favorite is a honeycrisp. This weekend at the market they had a new variety I havent heard of before called Envy, supposedly a cross between a honeycrisp and a pink lady. I bought alot of them since they were .99 a pound. Not bad, would say meat is more mealy than a honeycrisp. For tart I like a grannysmith. I share my apples with the pups.

[blake]

gala or fuji

/thread

[Dan Druff]

Tim Apple

[MumblesBadly]

Macintosh. We had a Mac apple tree in the backyard growing up. So delish fresh off the tree and in apple pies. But they are impossible to find out of season because they bruise very easily with its relatively soft pulp.

[lol wow]

Gwyneths daughter

[Zap_the_Fractions_Giraffe]

i vape my apples, Yami juusu 3mg nicotine.

[Tellafriend]

Fuji

[FRANKRIZZO]

granny apples

[big dick]

honeycrisp

[OSA]

My favorite Apple is the one where it goes back to 230 bucks a share.

[Mintjewlips]

Crabapple...

[theSMARTESTLIBERALalive]

The only edible apple is an apple produced by the workers of the world. They produce their apples to such a high standard because they know their children will be eating those same apples. Apples produced by capitalists have worms in them & are rotting because they do not care about the children. Then capitalist controlled government agencies lie to the people telling them the apples are nutritious while all along they are poising the children.


We see then: the means of production and of exchange, on whose foundation the conservatives built themselves up, were generated in feudal society. At a certain stage in the development of these means of production and of exchange, the conditions under which feudal society produced and exchanged, the feudal organisation of agriculture and manufacturing industry, in one word, the feudal relations of property became no longer compatible with the already developed productive forces; they became so many fetters. They had to be burst asunder; they were burst asunder.



Communism today, Communism tomorrow, Communism forever!!!!!!

[Mintjewlips]

Can you be a liberal and a communist?

[MrTickle]

Can you be a liberal and a communist?

no

[theSMARTESTLIBERALalive]

Can you be a liberal and a communist?

Hello my good friend Mintjewlips. Of course you can. Unfortunately the american capitalist media has so much world power that so called liberals are nothing but white washed conservatives. Both would be well to the right in any world political survey. American liberals, just like their american conservative cousins are owned by the american capitalist infrastructure. If they do not parrot what they are told to parrot, they will quickly lose access to their million $ checks. There is an abomination of the language at work here, leading to an abomination of facts.


The significance of Communism bears an inverse relation to historical development. In proportion as the modern class struggle develops and takes definite shape, this fantastic standing apart from the contest, these fantastic attacks on it, lose all practical value and all theoretical justification. Therefore, although the originators of these systems were, in many respects, revolutionary, their disciples have, in every case, formed mere reactionary sects. They hold fast by the original views of their masters, in opposition to the progressive historical development of the workers of the world. They, therefore, endeavor, and that consistently, to deaden the class struggle and to reconcile the class antagonisms. They still dream of experimental realization of their social Utopias, of founding isolated “phalansteres”, of establishing “Home Colonies”, or setting up a “Little Icaria”(4) — duodecimo editions of the New Jerusalem — and to realize all these castles in the air, they are compelled to appeal to the feelings and purses of the bourgeois. By degrees, they sink into the category of the reactionary [or] conservative Socialists, differing from these only by more systematic pedantry, and by their fanatical and superstitious belief in the miraculous effects of their social science.

[Kuntmissioner]

Honeycrisp is my top choice when the apple selection is diverse.

In a pinch I'll also most likely enjoy any of the four letter variety. Jazz, gala, pink lady, Fuji. All reds of course

Ill also pucker up on a granny smith when offered.

[GrenadaRoger]

Can you be a liberal and a communist?

Hello my good friend Mintjewlips. Of course you can. Unfortunately the american capitalist media has so much world power that so called liberals are nothing but white washed conservatives. Both would be well to the right in any world political survey. American liberals, just like their american conservative cousins are owned by the american capitalist infrastructure. If they do not parrot what they are told to parrot, they will quickly lose access to their million $ checks. There is an abomination of the language at work here, leading to an abomination of facts.


The significance of Communism bears an inverse relation to historical development. In proportion as the modern class struggle develops and takes definite shape, this fantastic standing apart from the contest, these fantastic attacks on it, lose all practical value and all theoretical justification. Therefore, although the originators of these systems were, in many respects, revolutionary, their disciples have, in every case, formed mere reactionary sects. They hold fast by the original views of their masters, in opposition to the progressive historical development of the workers of the world. They, therefore, endeavor, and that consistently, to deaden the class struggle and to reconcile the class antagonisms. They still dream of experimental realization of their social Utopias, of founding isolated “phalansteres”, of establishing “Home Colonies”, or setting up a “Little Icaria”(4) — duodecimo editions of the New Jerusalem — and to realize all these castles in the air, they are compelled to appeal to the feelings and purses of the bourgeois. By degrees, they sink into the category of the reactionary [or] conservative Socialists, differing from these only by more systematic pedantry, and by their fanatical and superstitious belief in the miraculous effects of their social science.

nice level

but if you are serious, write like Ernest Hemingway not like William F Buckley Jr -- no one is fooled anymore by big words and long sentences

[theSMARTESTLIBERALalive]

Hello my good friend Mintjewlips. Of course you can. Unfortunately the american capitalist media has so much world power that so called liberals are nothing but white washed conservatives. Both would be well to the right in any world political survey. American liberals, just like their american conservative cousins are owned by the american capitalist infrastructure. If they do not parrot what they are told to parrot, they will quickly lose access to their million $ checks. There is an abomination of the language at work here, leading to an abomination of facts.


The significance of Communism bears an inverse relation to historical development. In proportion as the modern class struggle develops and takes definite shape, this fantastic standing apart from the contest, these fantastic attacks on it, lose all practical value and all theoretical justification. Therefore, although the originators of these systems were, in many respects, revolutionary, their disciples have, in every case, formed mere reactionary sects. They hold fast by the original views of their masters, in opposition to the progressive historical development of the workers of the world. They, therefore, endeavor, and that consistently, to deaden the class struggle and to reconcile the class antagonisms. They still dream of experimental realization of their social Utopias, of founding isolated “phalansteres”, of establishing “Home Colonies”, or setting up a “Little Icaria”(4) — duodecimo editions of the New Jerusalem — and to realize all these castles in the air, they are compelled to appeal to the feelings and purses of the bourgeois. By degrees, they sink into the category of the reactionary [or] conservative Socialists, differing from these only by more systematic pedantry, and by their fanatical and superstitious belief in the miraculous effects of their social science.

nice level

but if you are serious, write like Ernest Hemingway not like William F Buckley Jr -- no one is fooled anymore by big words and long sentences

Thank you GrenadaRoger, but alas many of the big words and long sentences are not mine but were the thoughts of the greatest man that ever lived, the wonderful Karl Marx.

I appreciate your input but please do not compare me to radical capitalist like William F Buckley Jr. For Ernest Hemingway's sake, it is muddy where he stood.

[limitles]

First of all thanks to the theSMARTESTlLIBERAalive for not letting up on population of feral Americans

You have to be tough.

With that in mind here is a quiz for y'all south of the border

What to these four people have in common? Being in the same picture nor how alive they may be counts.
Correct spelling may determine the ultimate winner

[splitthis]

You gotta try Pazazz apples, they are the best in the world way better than honeycrisp