LOL @ Todd wanting $1100 BACK

[TMMLK]

Wow,

Wants $1100 back from 10+ years ago. Tight site. Let's create a fund to help out Todd.

Regards,
TMMLK

[MumblesBadly]

I, too, thought this was hilarious. Druff loves property rights when it benefits himself, but fuck it if the other guy gets a legal claim on it first!

Also, Druff never gave EP the $1100 to pursue the arbitration claim. He should instead sue the attorney he used to prepare and file that arbitration claim, as that guy screwed up not knowing about the need for a sound ex ante trademark claim. That’s why the $1100 was wasted.

[TMMLK]

I, too, thought this was hilarious. Druff loves property rights when it benefits himself, but fuck it if the other guy gets a legal claim on it first!

Also, Druff never gave EP the $1100 to pursue the arbitration claim. He should instead sue the attorney he used to prepare and file that arbitration claim, as that guy screwed up not knowing about the need for a sound ex ante trademark claim. That’s why the $1100 was wasted.

He also noted that he didn't care for the money back than (bragging about how much he was up online,etc) In addition there is no chance Todd would use that as a site name anyways. Todd being Todd thought he could beat the system and ended up losing and wants a refund, lolz.

He's close to being busto now. Ship beggar immediately. 2 times in last 3 months complaining about money - this topic and how the site loses money (both on radio)

[Crowe Diddly]

just out of curiosity, wtf are you guys talking about?

[Dan Druff]

The domain squatter who cost me $1100 in 2006 by stealing toddwitteles.com.

He is a regular PFA Radio listener now. I said that I would only forgive him if he paid me back the $1100 he cost me.

As usual, TMMLK is just trolling, and Mumbles has a terrible take on the situation, trying to politicize something which isn't political.

[HoodedN]

The domain squatter who cost me $1100 in 2006 by stealing toddwitteles.com.

He is a regular PFA Radio listener now. I said that I would only forgive him if he paid me back the $1100 he cost me.

As usual, TMMLK is just trolling, and Mumbles has a terrible take on the situation, trying to politicize something which isn't political.

Mumbles’ take is particularly bad because you clearly stated on radio that you didn’t use an attorney and did all the leg work yourself. Yet mumbles’ opinion is that you should sue the attorney. Thank god he found a career that requires absolutely zero brain power.

[MumblesBadly]

The domain squatter who cost me $1100 in 2006 by stealing toddwitteles.com.

He is a regular PFA Radio listener now. I said that I would only forgive him if he paid me back the $1100 he cost me.

As usual, TMMLK is just trolling, and Mumbles has a terrible take on the situation, trying to politicize something which isn't political.

How am I trying to politicize this matter? Based on the prevailing laws at that time, he did *not* steal that domain name from you. He was just smarter than you about its potential value and legally staked a claim to it before you did. Such business ingenuity and hustle has been a key component to the success of the American economy for generations.



You simply don’t like that he got the jump on you on the matter, and have rationalized that he shouldn’t have had a claim to it despite the IP laws at that time.

So, instead of being bitter about it, man up and congratulate him for legitimately besting you on the matter back then, and ponder how much you might have forsaken by not buying the domain from him back then for only $400 more that what you wasted on the arbitration process, and then monetizing your fame at that time using that domain name during the height of the poker boom.