Where would PFA be without climate change?
It comes up regularly and I usually pass. However, its winter and I'm paying some bills.
Discussion always starts with the quest for a singular villain. The orange gimp, Gore or some CEO. Right away it's veering into the land of simpletons.
We could all live in cabins with dirt floors and subsistence farm. That's a good sustainable model. Infant mortality and tuberculosis. I am glad I am not hunting on the Savannah.
There are too many people on this planet. Everyone wants a better life. India and China are approaching western consumption fast. You can't deny them. Everyone wants air conditioning. Neither the chemistry involved, the raw materials necessary (mining) nor the energy necessary can be justified.
There is global warming but the water crisis always seemed under publicized but it's the same thing in my mind.
It takes an estimated 39,090 gallons of water to make a car. It's unclear if that includes the more 2,000 gallons used to make its tires--each tire takes 518 gallons to make. [1]
Pair of Jeans
It takes around 1,800 gallons of water to grow enough cotton to produce just one pair of regular ol' blue jeans.
These kind of figures got me to muck my cards. A cotton shirt takes 1800 gallons. The population keeps exploding. Druff lives in the desert. Makes no sense. He was supposed to die by this choice.
There is no Social Darwinism and our natural enemies have been removed.
The only hope is some kind of cataclysmic event. It's a self correcting feature that has been disabled.
...