Rand Paul
Christie
Trump
Hilary
Bernie
Carson
Cruz
Rubio
Bush
Kasich
Bernie's popularity here is surprising given the average age of posters. Dudes in their 30's and above usually out grow the far left crazy shit.
Win or lose, Cruz is done after Iowa. He's the Santorum of this election cycle.
Going with Clinton, unless she's indicted, then who knows.
That's not really true, he has a totally different funding and organizational source than Santorum.
That said he only has one path to the White House, and that involves the establishment not picking a candidate and splitting the vote. If they all circle around Rubio coming out of Iowa then Rubio will win.
Voted Hilary
She will send the american economy down the shitter while also starting fewer illegal wars.
Ideal that really.
Can't see the Rothschilds agreeing to that though unfortunately.
Weather forecast for Iowa this Tuesday looks good for candidates with committed political followers, not wind-swingers. This will probably benefit the candidates with the stronger ground games (Cruz for sure, but don't know if better for Bernie or Hillary).
Compared to most of the GOPers, but not Sanders. Hillary is a hawk who will send the US military all over the world to try to change societies that don't treat women like in the West. She was a key backer of Obama's Afghanistan Surge-Lite in 2009 for this reason. Idiots who promote such a policy don't understand that you can't change another society's culture at the point of a gun.
Rubio and Cruz are by far the worst .
Pooh How could you ever in a million years consider voting for that sellout pedo looking bought and paid for scumbag?
Lof why would you root for the demise of the u.s economy? I get it that you hate fat lazy stupid hicks( I do to) but idk why you want to see the u.s economy take a shit
lol a brown big lolz
pretty good read
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/day-i...ry?id=36617227
Any value of Cruz stealing Iowa tomorrow?
I see Trump is -400 but just spent 45 minutes on a treadmill where MSNBC, CNN and especially FOX were trashing Trump and implying that Cruz or even Rubio could win.
Just media spinning wheels or is an upset coming?
PokerFraudAlert...will never censor your claims, even if they're against one of our sponsors. In addition to providing you an open forum report fraud within the poker community, we will also analyze your claims with a clear head an unbiased point of view. And, of course, the accused will always have the floor to defend themselves.-Dan Druff
Nate Silver had Cruz the winner until 2 days ago, so a Cruz win wouldn't be much of an upset.
I locked in Trump to win Iowa at +150 and Field to win at +120 last week and I booked it with a bias of field winning.... Starting to look like I should have weighted differently...,
I will gladly take even money up to 20k that the underdog Donald Trump wins Iowa. Both sides escrow with Todd Druff.
Its been interesting watching Nate Silver waffle around with his math and working traditional metrics. Always an interesting read nonetheless.
You keep reiterating the 120k historic (traditional) turnout, as an example. Their is nothing traditional about Trumps run. The greatest read has been people trying to explain and quantify his candidacy. I think hate is more motivating than ward captains.
Sanders success on the other side speaks to the same success Trump is experiencing.
I can't remember a candidate that has personified "NONE OF THE ABOVE" like these two.
I really don't think this election is about issues so much as process. Monday night will be more interesting than the Super Bowl. At least there is an argument as to who will win tomorrow.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)