Please just stfu already.Originally Posted by delaware
Please just stfu already.
Ive got a pretty successful system (59-60% rates last two years) on NBA games and would love to provide some insight. I was approved on the first list but do not seem to have access to the forum. Druff, Drexel, C$ - can anyone resolve this please?
It's hilarious that we as a society think everyone can be a dr, a lawyer, an engineer. Some people are just fucking stupid. Why can't we just accept that?
Searles still peeking out the window of the airport. They get off on that. Why give them the satisfaction?
Searles real talk here, why would you want to be part of this?
Druff told me that there is no scam and that no one will ask for anyones money and I trust him, however my scam alarm bells just will not stop ringing. Why on Earth would CMoney just give away a golden algorithm that the world of sports betting has never seen? What part of that makes sense to anyone?
Searles, it's also hard to take you seriously when you claim to be beating the NBA the way you are. Why would you need or want anything from anyone if you are hitting at a higher clip than Haralabob?
Gambling is low class, but can someone post the results of this backyard science experiment in this thread, you know, for the "lulz" (ugh).
You see some people bet sports because its fun and entertaining. I dont try to make a living from it. I also dont try to lose a shit ton of money. Im probably break even or so NFL, win a little bit with college football, and win in NBA. But in NBA I only bet very specific lines or spots. Days will go by without any bets. Some days are 2 or 3 bets. Like Ive espoused directly to you on more than one occasion, betting volume is the downfall of nearly every sports bettor. And again I dont bet high amounts. So for example who cares if I go 60-40 betting $50/game, and am up $800 over a small sample size?
I dont NEED anything from anyone, but it interests me. Understand? And maybe I can provide a little insight that will help someone else out. Or maybe not. But it sounds interesting nonetheless.
It's hilarious that we as a society think everyone can be a dr, a lawyer, an engineer. Some people are just fucking stupid. Why can't we just accept that?
You see some people bet sports because its fun and entertaining. I dont try to make a living from it. I also dont try to lose a shit ton of money. Im probably break even or so NFL, win a little bit with college football, and win in NBA. But in NBA I only bet very specific lines or spots. Days will go by without any bets. Some days are 2 or 3 bets. Like Ive espoused directly to you on more than one occasion, betting volume is the downfall of nearly every sports bettor. And again I dont bet high amounts. So for example who cares if I go 60-40 betting $50/game, and am up $800 over a small sample size?
I dont NEED anything from anyone, but it interests me. Understand? And maybe I can provide a little insight that will help someone else out. Or maybe not. But it sounds interesting nonetheless.
Your "system" only finds it appropriate to bet on 100ish games a year? Like less than one play a night? Or did you have lapses where you didn't bet for other reasons? Haralabob even though there is no way to really tell other than clues seems to bet a ton of games every night following his system or whatever. The word system is gay.
oh by the way I will pay you that 50 I let you freeroll on. Sorry to leave you by window. My PayPal is finally in order.
Notice how I said "for example" and then used 60-40 because even a retard like Garrett or Sparten would understand thats a 60% win rate. Did you really think I was saying I went exactly 60-40, all at -110 lines? C'mon man
Your "system" only finds it appropriate to bet on 100ish games a year? Like less than one play a night? Or did you have lapses where you didn't bet for other reasons? Haralabob even though there is no way to really tell other than clues seems to bet a ton of games every night following his system or whatever. The word system is gay.
It's hilarious that we as a society think everyone can be a dr, a lawyer, an engineer. Some people are just fucking stupid. Why can't we just accept that?
There is no golden algorithm just some that look promising which is why they need to be vetted a. At the end of the day, we could come up with nothing but worth a shot given the access to the tools we have.
:freelewfather
Hey Man, can you txt Drexel. I gave up control on it and let him do all of it. I have let no one in myself.
:freelewfather
There is no golden algorithm just some that look promising which is why they need to be vetted a. At the end of the day, we could come up with nothing but worth a shot given the access to the tools we have.
Well yeah well I could see that. I swear I read golden algorithm somewhere. And Hedge Fund. I thought this was like a wormhole lock for gtd. profits
Notice how I said "for example" and then used 60-40 because even a retard like Garrett or Sparten would understand thats a 60% win rate. Did you really think I was saying I went exactly 60-40, all at -110 lines? C'mon man
No put the 14 units up made it reasonably close to landing there. Notice I said 100ish.
I will stay out of your thread now good luck.
Well yeah well I could see that. I swear I read golden algorithm somewhere. And Hedge Fund. I thought this was like a wormhole lock for gtd. profits
I wish. I do really think these tools have promise though. I swear there is no catch. Once you are in the forum everyone has access to the same system.
:freelewfather
Just added a few more people.
Let me in to this backyard science experiment. i am a self proclaimed expert at all things internet. regards
Great idea. I'd like to have access to the forum, also.
I only bet thoroughbreds seriously and am a sports fan but not a sports bettor. I was just curious if your investigation of a late season Rockies over system was based on the idea that their staff would wear down more seriously than other staffs because of runs scored and pitches thrown in the early part of the season due to the thin air? In terms of temperature, the September/October part of the late season over system is counterintuitive to a casual sports fan like myself. Best of luck with your endeavor.
quite a bit i think. Already came across some interesting theories. ie,
Record 154-90, 63.1%
the game is played during the Regular season
the home team is Colorado Rockies
betting on the Over
the o/u is between 0 and 10.5
the game was played in August or October or September
141-95, 59.7%
the game is played during the Regular season
the game was played in March or April
the temperature is between 30 and 50
betting on the Under
the game was played between 12 and 16
Don't forget the Rockies have the worst pitching staff in MLB the past couple of years and the oldest closer for a while (Hawkins) Were lopsided with hitters and one dimensional. Needed to shed some bats for legitimate arms and have started too. Rid of Tulowitzki havent really replaced any of the arms to bring down the 10.5 so whatever you find in this is probably irrelevant to next MLB season, considering they may have a few more lively arms by then, and less bats, even tho it is a mile high. Have fun nerds.I only bet thoroughbreds seriously and am a sports fan but not a sports bettor. I was just curious if your investigation of a late season Rockies over system was based on the idea that their staff would wear down more seriously than other staffs because of runs scored and pitches thrown in the early part of the season due to the thin air? In terms of temperature, the September/October part of the late season over system is counterintuitive to a casual sports fan like myself. Best of luck with your endeavor.
johnnycommode yeah ofc 'crappy staff' is factored. Everything has a relationship one onto the next in theory. My point was, especially with the rockies currently trying to run numbers of the previous last yr and a half from the looks of the # cmoney gave, doubt this team is essentially the sum of all of that moving forward. They already got rid of Tulo altho iirc he was hurt a good bit of that sample as were others like Dickerson. Rockies bats (Carlos Gonzalez/Tulo/Areando/Blackmon) especially with big bats in thin air moved alot of runs but they also being lopsided compensated by having a dud by major league baseball standard pitching staff. So they scored many runs, but the opponents often did also so high scores in Rockies games was expected. Also why batters going to Colorado which is also a hitters park usually see an uptick in performance as well over a big sample. Thats probably why hes isolating them but I dont know.
lol double post druff remove this pls not hijacking thread promise
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Reply With Quote